Playtech plcAnnual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Sustainable Success pillars
Our strategic roadmap
Our purpose
To create technology that changes the way
people experience gambling entertainment
Our strategy
B2B:B2C:
Be the partner
of choice for
newly regulating
markets
Capitalise on
Live and SaaS
opportunities
Realign
resources to
reflect B2B
growth areas
Read more about our strategy on pages 12 to 15
Leverage retail
presence to
grow Snaitech’s
online business
Optimise
HAPPYBET for
online
Targeted M&A
to expand
Snaitech
123456
Read more about our sustainability strategy on page 46 to 77
Pioneering safer
gambling solutions
Promoting integrity and
an inclusive work culture
Partnering on shared
societal challenges
Powering action for positive
environmental impact
You will find the icon above throughout this report
to highlight Sustainable Success content
Our critical success factors
Scale and
distribution
Data
Sustainable
Success
Innovation
Read more about our strengths on page 32
HEX: 058e46 - RGB: 5.142.70 - CMYK: 87.19.100.6
HEX: 058e46 - RGB: 5.142.70 - CMYK: 87.19.100.6
HEX: 058e46 - RGB: 5.142.70 - CMYK: 87.19.100.6
HEX: 058e46 - RGB: 5.142.70 - CMYK: 87.19.100.6
Playtech is the leading platform, content and
services provider in the online gambling industry,
with a clear strategy to benefit our shareholders,
customers, colleagues and the environment.
Founded in 1999, the Company has a premium
listing on the Main Market of the London Stock
Exchange and is focused on regulated and regulating
markets across its B2B and B2C businesses.
Both divisions leverage Playtech’s proprietary
technology to deliver innovative products
and services to ensure a safe, engaging and
entertaining betting and gaming experience.
Contents
Strategic Report
2 Financial highlights
3 Operational highlights
4 Company overview
6 Chairman’s statement
8 United with Ukraine
10 Our investment case
12 Our strategy
16 Key performance indicators
18 Chief Executive Officer’s review
24 Market trends
30 Business model
34 Product and innovation
43 Stakeholder engagement
46 Responsible business and sustainability
78 Chief Financial Officer’s review
85 Risk management, principal risks and
uncertainties
91 Viability statement
Governance Report
94 Chairman’s introduction to governance
96 Board of Directors
98 Directors’ governance report
106 Audit Committee report
Remuneration Report
111 Statement by the Committee Chairman
115 Summary of Directors’
RemunerationPolicy
119 Annual report on remuneration
129 Directors’ report
Financial Statements
136 Independent auditor’s report
144 Consolidated statement of
comprehensiveincome
145 Consolidated statement of changes
inequity
146 Consolidated balance sheet
148 Consolidated statement of cash flows
150 Notes to the financial statements
216 Company statement of changes in
equity
217 Company balance sheet
218 Notes to the Company financial
statements
226 Five-year summary
Company information
227 Company information
View the Digital Summary Report at
www.ar22.playtech.com
1
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Financial highlights
Strong financial
performance in 2022
1 From continuing operations.
2 B2B and B2C only.
3 Continuing operations but includes Finalto in FY20.
Adjusted for Snaitech’s PREU tax payment of €90
million relating to 2020, which was paid in 2021 due to
circumstances around COVID-19. Definition has changed
from FY21 to adjust for changes in jackpot balances,
client deposits and client equity, professional expenses
onacquisitions and ADM security deposit.
4 Net debt/Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as gross debt
less Adjusted gross cash including cash held for sale
and excluding cash held on behalf of clients, progressive
jackpots and security deposits divided by Adjusted
EBITDA from continuing and discontinued operations.
Revenue
1
€’m
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
1,602
1,205
1,079
1,441
1,225
Revenue from regulatedmarkets
2
%
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
89
85
84
87
78
Adjusted EBITDA
1
€’m
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
406
317
254
375
345
Diluted adjusted EPS
1
c
2022
2021
2019
2018
51.5
40.9
8.8
44.6
73.9
Net debt to EBITDA
4
x
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
0.6
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.5
Adjusted operating cash flow
3
€’m
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
397
318
276
303
342
“ Encouraging progress
across both the B2B and
B2C divisions in 2022,
culminating in good
EBITDA growth and a
strong balance sheet.“
Chris McGinnis
Chief Financial Officer
2020
2
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Group revenue growth
1
33%
Group adjusted EBITDA
1
€406m
B2C adjusted EBITDA growth
1
38%
Net debt to EBITDA
4
0.6x
1 Retail and online combined, measured by GGR.
Operational highlights
Significant progress
across the Company
B2B – executing on our strategy
Extending lead
in LatAm
2022 saw a strong performance in the
LatAm region, illustrating the value of the
structured agreement model. Caliente in
Mexico performed strongly once again.
Wplay in Colombia also performed well, and
is poised to continue its growth. Galerabet
positions us well in the potentially lucrative
Brazilian market.
Key deals signed
in the US
Excellent progress was made in the US, with
several new deals signed in the year. Golden
Nugget, Rush Street and WynnBET have
signed multi-state deals, while Resorts and
888 have signed multi-product agreements
in New Jersey. Playtech expanded its
footprint with Parx, launching its IMS platform
in Pennsylvania.
Live performing
well
Live delivered a strong performance,
with Playtech taking full advantage of the
structural growth drivers in this product
vertical. Playtech opened a new Live facility
in Peru in 2022, and is now well positioned
toserve its existing clients in Latin America.
B2C – outperforming and transformed
Snaitech continues
to lead in Italy
Snai maintained its number one market
share position
1
across Italian sports betting
brands in 2022, demonstrating its consistent
operational and brand strength, whilst also
being a fast growing player in Italy in the
online sector when measured by Gross
Gaming Revenue (GGR).
Snaitech transformed
post pandemic
Snaitech is fundamentally a superior
business post pandemic. With the online
segment making up a greater proportion of
revenues, Snaitech is a higher margin and
less capital intensive business.
Read more about Snaitech on page 15
A successful 2022
football World Cup
Wagers during the football World Cup in
Qatar were up 27% compared to Russia
in 2018 despite Italy’s absence from the
tournament, demonstrating the strength of
Snaitech’s brand and technology offering.
Building a better business
Ukraine –
supporting the
Playtech family
With over 700 employees in Ukraine, the war
had a big impact on the Playtech family, and
the Company responded with support for
our employees and their families as well as
contributing to humanitarian relief efforts.
Reducing our
environmental
footprint
Playtech has set a target to reduce
operational emissions by 40% by 2025.
We have made progress on meeting this
target, with 56% of Playtech’s total energy
consumption derived from renewable
energysources, up from 11% in 2021.
Leading research
into responsible
gambling
Playtech is collaborating with Holland
Casino, the University of Amsterdam and
Erasmus University to initiate a new four-year
research project to examine how best to
tailor tools to customers’ individual needs,
risk levels and behaviour patterns.
Read more about our Ukraine response on
pages 8 and 9
Read more on pages 64 to 73 Read more on page 53
Strategic Report
3
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Company overview
The leading platform,
content and services
gambling technology
company
>40
Regulated jurisdictions
>180
Licensees
20
Countries
with offices
c.7,000
Employees
Country
A global company
Playtech was established at the inception of
the online gambling industry and possesses
unparalleled knowledge and expertise in
the sector, with over 20 years of experience
and investment in technology. Playtech’s
global scale and distribution capabilities,
with over 180 licensees operating in over
40 regulated markets and with offices in
20co20 countries, mean we are ideally positioned
to capture opportunities in newly regulating
markets and high-growth markets with low
onlinepeneonline penetration.
Core competencies
Scale and distribution
Playtech’s scale and distribution network
across more than 180 licensees in over 40
regulated jurisdictions in retail and online
allows it to power its leading suite of platform,
content and services.
Data
Playtech’s scale enhances its data-driven
analytics, allowing it to developintelligent
platform features toimprove customer
experience.
Sustainable Success
Growing our business in a sustainable and
responsible way, and in line with our values,
isa key factor in delivering long-term value
for all of our stakeholders.
Read more on page 46 to 77
Innovation
We invest heavily to deliver innovative ways
for end customers to experience content
and services, such as pioneering omni-
channel gaming.
Read more on page 34 to 42
Supporting the Playtech
family in Ukraine
An unprecedented humanitarian
effort to help our >700 employees in
Ukraine, led by Playtech staff.
Read more on pages 8 and 9
4
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Our operations
B2B
Providing technology to gambling
operators globally through a revenue
share model and, in certain agreements,
taking a higher share in exchange for
additional services.
Read more on page 30
B2C
Acting directly as an operator in select
markets and generating revenues from
online gambling, gaming machines and
retail betting.
Read more on page 31
A fundamentally higher quality
division post pandemic
€632m
Revenue
€160m
EBITDA
25%
EBITDA margin
An increasingly more
sustainable division
44%
% of regulated B2B
revenues (2017)
73%
% of regulated B2B
revenues (2022)
€983m
Revenue
€245m
EBITDA
25%
EBITDA margin
2017
2022
Regulated B2B revenues Unregulated B2B revenues
2019
2022
Snaitech % of online revenues Snaitech % of retail revenues
18%
B2C EBITDA margin
(2019)
25%
B2C EBITDA margin
(2022)
Strategic Report
5
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Chairman’s statement
Strategy execution
underpinned by strong
corporate governance
I am delighted to report another highly successful year
for Playtech, albeit one in which we had to contend with a
challenging economic backdrop and significant disruption
from the war in Ukraine.
Despite these circumstances, we delivered strong growth and made
significant progress against our strategy. This underlines both the
resilience of our business model as well as the ability, commitment
and dedication shown across all levels of the business.
I would like to thank my Board colleagues, the Executive Management
and the wider team, together with our advisers, who have worked
tirelessly to deliver these excellent financial, operational and strategic
results against a challenging backdrop. Their efforts have been the
foundation of our success this year.
Strong progress from all corners of the business
Playtech made significant progress throughout 2022 across
both the B2B and B2C businesses, further diversifying its
portfolio and positioning the Group to capitalise on the
excitingopportunities ahead:
• In the US, Playtech expanded its footprint with Parx, launching its
IMS platform in Pennsylvania. In early 2023, Playtech also signed
a landmark agreement with Hard Rock Digital that accelerates our
US strategy and provides significant growth opportunities globally.
• Good progress was made in Canada, with Playtech signing an
agreement with NorthStar to launch a broad suite of products in
this newly regulated market, along with taking an equity investment
in NorthStar in early 2023, incorporating elements of the strategic
agreement model employed successfully in other markets.
• In Latin America, Playtech’s presence continues to go from strength
to strength, with existing agreements in Mexico and Colombia
seeing excellent growth in the period. Playtech is ideally positioned
to benefit from growth in the soon to be regulated Brazil market.
Playtech opened a new Live Casino facility in Peru as it continues
toexpand its presence across the region.
• Snaitech has continued to exceed expectations with the online
segment proving resilient despite the reopening of retail sites, while
it also maintained its number one position by brand across retail
and online sports betting in Italy. Fabio Schiavolin, CEO of Snaitech,
discussed the opportunity for the business at an investor event
hosted in September 2022.
More details can be found on pages 19 and 22 for B2B and B2C
businesses, respectively.
Corporate activity
The impressive performance delivered in 2022 is all the more notable
given the intensity of the corporate activity that Playtech has been
involved in. Taken together, this activity shone a spotlight on the
quality of Playtech’s strategy, operations, technology and people,
whose commitment and expertise continue to drive Playtech from
strength to strength.
Offer and further approach for Playtech
In October 2021, the Board recommended an all-cash offer from
Aristocrat at a 58% premium to the prevailing share price. Ultimately,
atthe Court and General Meetings held on 2 February 2022,
Aristocrat’s proposal did not achieve the requisite 75% level of
shareholder approval needed for its offer to progress.
Shortly after Aristocrat’s proposal lapsed, Playtech received an approach
by an investor group formed and advised by TTB Partners Limited. On
14 July 2022, TTB Partners advised that it did not intend to make an
offer for the Company due to challenging underlying market conditions.
6
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Brian Mattingley
Chairman
Finalto sale completed
We were delighted to complete the sale of Finalto in July 2022.
This represented a significant step in our stated strategy to simplify
the Group and focus our efforts on the high-growth B2B and B2C
gambling markets.
Board changes
As our Company evolves, so too does its Board. After five years as Chief
Financial Officer (CFO), Andrew Smith stepped down from the Board
in November 2022. Andrew contributed significantly to Playtech’s
strategy and helped guide the business through a period of substantial
transformation. We wish him all the best in his future endeavours.
It’s a testament to the succession planning work of the Nominations
Committee and the Board that we’ve had such a seamless transition
with Chris McGinnis becoming our new CFO. Chris has done a superb
job as Deputy CFO and Director of Investor Relations, and I believe that
his deep knowledge of Playtech will be invaluable in the years ahead.
Since the start of the new year, we have also welcomed Samy Reeb
to the Board as a Non-executive Director. We are already reaping the
benefits of his broad skillset and extensive experience of working with
global businesses.
One of my highest priorities when joining Playtech was to address the
balance of the Board. While we have made good progress towards
improving the Board’s gender diversity, there is still work to be done
and we are actively focused on taking further steps towards meeting
our ambition of having a more diverse Board.
Sustainability
Following an intense period of corporate activity last year, we enter
2023 with a renewed focus on issues around the environment,
sustainability, and our wider contribution to communities and
society. Our Sustainable Success strategy is central to this and sets
out an ambitious plan for how we intend to bring the principles of
sustainability and responsible business into everything we do.
Despite the competing priorities of a busy year, our newly formed
Sustainability and Public Policy Board Committee met regularly to
review, monitor and advise on Playtech’s sustainability, responsible
business and public policy matters. The Committee also ensures the
continued effectiveness of Playtech’s ESG strategy, ensuring that
weremain truly forward looking and progressive in our plans.
Ukraine/people
The backdrop of the war in Ukraine has put a significant strain on our
people and on the communities in which we operate. While we took quick
and decisive action to minimise disruption to our business, we are mindful
that our colleagues and their families who remain in Ukraine continue to
face very real and dangerous challenges every day as the war continues.
I’m proud of the response from our people who have maintained contact
with those colleagues in Ukraine, assisted with relocation efforts and
provided emergency supplies. We remain committed to doing everything
we can to ensure their safety during these difficult times.
Our people are our greatest asset and I want to thank everyone for
their hard work in helping us to navigate the challenges of the past
year and deliver such a strong set of results.
Looking forward
Whilst we anticipate many of the challenges faced last year to continue
into 2023, I am confident that Playtech’s clear and proven strategy across
both the B2B and B2C divisions positions us well to build on our progress
and deliver another outstanding performance in the year ahead.
Brian Mattingley
Chairman
23 March 2023
Remembering Alan Jackson
It is with great sadness that we lost a dear friend and a
member of the Playtech family – Alan Jackson. Alan was
appointed to Playtech’s Board as a Non-executive Director
during Playtech’s IPO in 2006 and became Chairman in
October 2013, serving a total of 14 years on the Playtech
Board. Alan built an extraordinary and distinguished career
in business and Playtech was fortunate to have benefited
from his leadership, dedication, support, kindness and
enthusiasm. We are grateful for Alan’s contributions, which
were instrumental in making Playtech the company it is today.
We will all miss Alan dearly – may he rest in peace.
“ I am delighted to report another
highly successful year for Playtech
where we delivered strong growth
and made significant progress
against our strategy despite
a challenging economic and
geopolitical backdrop.”
7
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
United with Ukraine
Supporting the
Playtech family
in Ukraine
“ We express our gratitude for your
significant contribution and assistance
in collecting donations and organising
medical humanitarian assistance
to Ukraine.”
Alyona Novgorodskay
VP Business Development at the
Embassy of Ukraine in the State of Israel
Scale of the
undertaking
>700
Employees in Ukraine
c.300
Employees volunteered
tocontacttheir colleagues
toensure their safety
>250
Playtech employees and
theirfamiliesrelocated
With over 700 team members in Ukraine – over 10% of
our workforce – the war in Ukraine continues to have a
major impact on Playtech. However, an unprecedented
situation also drove a unique response, a response of
whicheveryone at Playtech can be proud, and which put
thesafety and wellbeing of our colleagues ahead of all else.
On 24 February, teams from Playtech’s Kyiv office were
planning an annual winter trip for 250 colleagues. Hours
later, a completely new plan was underway – one which
involved establishing a crisis team, based in our office
in Sofia, Bulgaria, and a process to ensure the safety
ofour staff.
By the evening of 25 February, more than 150 of our
colleagues had volunteered to join what would become
a c.300-strong team. Immediate action included the
establishment of a 24/7 hotline chat group to maintain
contact with every team member based in Ukraine. By
28 February, Playtech had delivered essential supplies
including food, water and eight tonnes of medical
equipment. The most ambitious part of the plan involved
Playtech organising and financing large-scale bus
transportation to help approximately 250 colleagues
andfamily members leave Ukraine, the majority of
whomwere relocated to Sofia.
As the war continues, we’re monitoring current
developments and supporting our employees, ensuring
their safety where possible, providing additional financial
support and offering a range of equipment such as new
laptops with long life batteries and access to satellite
phones, to support them during the current and potential
future energy blackouts.
An incredible
achievement
>€350k
Donations to support the
humanitarian effort in Ukraine
>8 tonnes
Life-saving medical
equipmentdelivered
8
Charities donated to facilitating
humanitarian support
Strategic Report
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
8
A monumental effort
Built a brand new organisational structure
to deliver:
• medical equipment and mental
health support;
• 24/7 hotline providing employees with
access to our dedicated control centre;
• transportation within and outside Ukraine;
• alternative payment methods while
parts of the banking system were
shut down; and
• food, water and basic supplies within
andoutside Ukraine.
“ The strength and character shown by
everyone in Ukraine was truly humbling
and inspiring. We were fortunate enough to
provide essential supplies to those in need,
and our aim remains to continue to support
our people and assist them in confronting
the challenges they are facing in whatever
way we can.”
Mor Weizer
CEO of Playtech
Behind the numbers and logistics, the story of
Playtech’s response to the Ukrainian war is ultimately
a human one. Every one of the 714 employees based
in Kyiv has been affected in their own way and has
faced individual challenges.
In March, one of our colleagues contacted us in
dire need of help for her family who, displaced by
the invasion, were living in a hotel in Poland. With
no access to food or money, they ate only thanks
to the hotel breakfast for several days. Our team
acted quickly to organise a money transfer to the
hotel, paying for several months’ worth of food and
accommodation in advance. Everyone in the crisis
team was proud that our colleague felt comfortable
in turning to us for help at this most difficult time. As
a result, her 85-year-old grandfather (pictured) was
able to enjoy a hot dinner for the first time in days.
Strategic Report
9
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
10
Attractive structural growth drivers in B2B Gambling
The gambling market is in the midst of a super-cycle (see page24),
driven by the expansion of regulated and regulating markets, with
the Americas and Europe leading theway.
At the same time, rapidly shifting consumer and technology
trends have grown the appeal of the Live segment.
Playtech is well placed to capture this considerable opportunity.
Through its investments in innovation, Playtech possesses a
strong technology offering and its sheer scale means it has
access to vast amounts of data, allowing it to generate data
network effects (see page 28), while the variety of its business
model offering from structured agreements to SaaS allows it
toserve almost any operator.
Our investment case
Structural growth drivers
with margin expansion
With an increasingly diversified global offering, Playtech is
primedto accelerate organic sales growth across both the
B2Band B2C divisions.
Global regulated gambling markets, led by the Americas and
Europe, are expected to grow materially. Playtech is well
positioned to participate given its broad, high-quality product
offering, while structured agreements and SaaS allow Playtech to
serve almost any operator across the globe. In our B2B business,
high operating leverage within the attractive Live and SaaS
segments should provide a further tailwind to margins.
Snaitech, our B2C business in Italy, has become a fundamentally
higher quality business post pandemic due to the structural shift
towards the underpenetrated, higher margin online business
andthis is expected to continue to deliver strong growth.
Playtech has the potential to deliver a powerful combination of
top-line growth and margin expansion, which is expected to drive
earnings momentum and high cash flow generation for the Group.
As a result, further investments can be made to position ourselves
advantageously in other newly regulating markets as well as
delivering shareholder returns.
1
Technology
• Innovation
• Data network effects
See pages 34 to 42
Multiple
organic
growth
drivers...
...and the
means to
capture
value
Product
• Live Casino
See page 29
Business model
• Structured agreements
• SaaS
See pages 30 and 31
Region
• Americas
• Europe
See pages 24 to 27
Strategic Report
11
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Underpenetrated online
segment set to drive B2C
growth
Underpenetrated Italian
online market
Italy is one of the top two gambling markets in Europe,
along with the UK. Unlike the UK, the online market is still
underpenetrated at 26% versus 58% in the UK and thus we
see scope for the addressable market to grow in Italy. With
average revenue per online customer acquired from retail
sites more than three times higher than those acquired
directly through online channels. Snaitech’s strong brand,
retail presence and cross-selling approach means it is
ideally positioned tobenefit from this growth opportunity.
Potential for margin
expansion is significant
High operating leverage in Live
and SaaS…
Within the Live Casino business, Playtech has already made
significant investments in studio infrastructure. Within SaaS,
Playtech has also invested heavily in data centres to be able
to serve its customer base, while it has already signed up
over 350 customers with scope to increase wallet share.
Investment to date lays the groundwork for higher operating
leverage going forward.
…coupled with the shift to the
B2C online channel…
The Snaitech online business has a significantly higher
margin than retail. As Snaitech looks to continue to migrate
retail customers to online in addition to acquiring native
online customers, we should continue to see the share of
the online segment increase.
…to drive margin expansion
across the Group
With both the B2B and B2C segments exposed to margin
accretive factors, we expect Playtech to be able to deliver
margin expansion in the years ahead. This, combined with
accelerating top-line growth, will deliver earnings growth
forPlaytech’s shareholders.
23
Further upside from
European expansion
Outside of Italy, there is the potential to acquire
retail-focused assets in neighbouring European countries
with low online penetration at attractive multiples, with a
view to growing the online business given the track record
of existing Snaitech management.
26%
Italy online
penetration
1
58%
UK online
penetration
1
1 Source: H2GC (includes betting and gaming and excludeslotteries).
Our strategy
Delivering consistent growth
in a sustainable way
B2B: well positioned in markets set for growth
Be the partner
of choice for
newly regulating
markets
Capitalise on
Live and SaaS
opportunities
Growth in the gambling industry is primarily
driven by regulation – growth comes from
markets that are early in the journey of
regulating, which then moderates as markets
progressively mature. We aim to be the
partner of choice for operators in newly
regulating markets, with a particular focus
onthe Americas and Europe.
The US represents a huge revenue
opportunity of $3 billion for Playtech on a per
annum basis across iGaming, online sports
and platform (see page 25).
The LatAm region has strong structural
drivers (see page 26). With Caliente providing
the blueprint for success in this region,
Playtech is ideally positioned to deliver
strong growth via its structured agreements
in multiple countries, including Brazil.
Finally, there continues to be strong potential
in European markets that are either regulating
or underpenetrated online where Playtech
can bring the strength of its offerings to bear
such as the Netherlands and Spain.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
1234567
Live represents an enormous opportunity
(see page 29), in which Playtech has invested
heavily. Ten studios are currently operational
with a further one in Pennsylvania under
construction. We have more than doubled
the number of tables over the past four years
and invested in both the latest cutting-edge
technology and branded gaming rights
such as Jumanji™. With significant operating
leverage in the business, growth in Live is
margin accretive.
The SaaS business model (see page 31)
allows Playtech to serve those operators
looking for Playtech’s content without the
platform, thus increasing the Company’s
total addressable market. With investments
already made in building out infrastructure,
such as data centres, SaaS is a high-margin
segment. Although SaaS revenues have
been growing strongly, revenue from each
operator represents a small proportion
of their wallet. Thus, we see ample scope
to increase wallet share amongst these
existingcustomers.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
1234567
With exciting areas of growth in regulated
markets and several technology trends (see
technology trends on page 28) maturing at
the same time, there is a need to continue to
invest in the B2B Gambling division to ensure
Playtech maintains and grows its market
share lead. We see opportunities across
the B2B business where we can improve
efficiencies and eliminate duplication, the
savings of which can be used to fund any
required investments.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
1234567
Realign resources
to reflect B2B
growth areas
Playtech has a clear plan to continue to drive growth in a responsible and
sustainable way. Here we outline the medium-term strategic priorities for both
theB2B and B2C divisions, which will enable us to deliver revenue growth,
expand margins and generate shareholder andstakeholder value.
123
12
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Holland Casino: very strong start
During 2021, Playtech signed a new, expanded long-term strategic
software and services agreement with Holland Casino, the
state-owned land-based casino operator in the Netherlands – a
top ten market in Europe that opened its regulated online gambling
market in October 2021. Playtech now supplies Holland Casino
with a full turnkey, multi-channel technology package, as well as
certain ancillary services.
Holland Casino is off to an impressive start given its first mover
advantage and was the biggest driver of revenue growth in Europe
in 2022, illustrating the significant growth opportunities of newly
regulated markets. Combined with the launch of Casino and Poker
with Bet365 in the Netherlands in early 2022, Playtech is well
positioned to capitalise on the Netherlands market.
Case studies of executing in newly regulated markets
Strategy in action
Caliente: successful blueprint
Caliente in Mexico provides the blueprint for executing on structured
agreements (see business model section on page 30) in other markets.
The idea is to select a “local hero” in a country with favourable market
dynamics, and look to grow with that partner as the market grows. Playtech
contributes its market-leading technology as well as expertise and
experience in launching onlinebusinesses in newly regulating markets,
while the partner typically has a strong brand and deep knowledge of
local markets. The results, with aligned incentives, can be impressive.
Revenues within Mexico, the majority of which originate from
Caliente, have grown at a CAGR of 66% between 2015 and
2022 and Caliente now represents our largest customer when
measured by revenue. The attractive economics of a structured
agreement, which typically includes a higher revenue share for
Playtech, means that the profit margins are high.
With structured agreements signed in several other LatAm
countries including Colombia with Wplay and Brazil with Galerabet,
Playtech is in a strong position to build upon the Mexicansuccess
story across the LatAm region.
66%
CAGR
Mexico revenues
$m (FY15–FY22)
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
“ Alongside Playtech’s unrivalled
multi-channel technology, its strong
track record in delivering industry-
leading software to newly regulated
markets makes it a trusted and
experienced supplier.”
Erwin van Lambaart
CEO, Holland Casino
Strategic Report
13
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Our strategy continued
B2C: build a pan-European B2C presence
Leverage retail
presence to
grow Snaitech’s
online business
Optimise
HAPPYBET
for online
Italy is one of the top two gambling markets in
Europe, along with the UK. Unlike the UK, the
online market in Italy is still underpenetrated
– 26% currently versus 58% in the UK. As a
result, we see significant scope for the higher
margin online business to grow.
Snaitech’s strong retail brand is critical to
its success and a competitive advantage
compared to online operators, particularly
in light of the advertising ban in Italy. With
average revenue per online customer
acquired via retail sites more than three times
higher than those acquired directly through
online channels, Snaitech’s cross-selling
approach means it is ideally positioned to
benefit from this growthopportunity.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
1234567
HAPPYBET now sits under the management
of the Snaitech team which has initiated a
process to optimise HAPPYBET’s online
business. This involves rationalising its retail
footprint with significant investment in the
online business, mirroring the successful
Snaitech strategy.
With Germany moving towards legalising
gambling, HAPPYBET is in a strong
position, having been awarded one of the
few available online sports betting licences
in Germany.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
The Snaitech management team
transitioned the business to take advantage
of the shift to online. With this high-quality
management team in place, there is scope
to utilise this skill set and experience outside
of Italy, within neighbouring European
countries. Consolidation of HAPPYBET’s
position in Germany and Austria through
M&A looks attractive, while acquiring assets
in other neighbouring European countries
provides further opportunity.
Link to KPIs
1234567
Link to risks
1234567
Targeted
M&A to expand
Snaitech
456
1234567
See risk section on pages 85 to 90
See KPI section on pages 16 and 17
14
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Embedding sustainability
into our culture
In 2021, Snaitech became a member of two leading Italian
associations for DEI: Parks – Liberi e Uguali and Valore D.
Parks – Liberi e Uguali works with companies to understand
and realise the full business potential of developing strategies
and best practices that respect diversity and inclusion.
Valore D is the first association of companies in Italy that has
been committed to gender balance and an inclusive culture in
organisations in Italy for more than ten years.
In 2022, Snaitech continued its collaboration with the two
associations to raise awareness of inclusion in the workplace
and generate a corporate culture that is better able to channel,
orient and welcome all diversity.
The goal of the campaign, “La consapevolezza prende forma”,
was to further grow and strengthen our commitment in this
direction. Snaitech held training sessions on diversity and
inclusion issues, which included three webinars in 2022.
Strategy in action
The transformation of Snaitech:
a fundamentally higher quality business post pandemic
Larger addressable
market
Since Playtech acquired Snaitech in 2018,
it has transformed into a higher margin,
less capital intensive business with a larger
addressable market.
Snaitech’s efforts to leverage its leading
retail network and brand have created a
larger online business. As the pandemic
accelerated the shift to online, Snaitech
capitalised on the opportunity by launching
dedicated promotions to migrate customers
to online from retail.
With online revenues in 2022 remaining
stable despite retail having reopened, it’s
evident that some of these onboarded
customers continue to spend at least part of
their wallet online. New customers were also
onboarded directly via the online channel,
further increasing the addressable market.
Snaitech revenues by channel
€’m
666
2022
2021
2020
2019
234
364158
355230
729
Retail Online
100
Higher margin
The pandemic accelerated the shift to
theonline segment.
Snaitech revenue mix
(retail v online)
%
2022
20198812
7426
Retail Online
Given the lower overheads and greater share
of Net Gaming Revenue (NGR), the online
segment is a higher margin business. This
has resulted in Snaitech becoming a higher
margin business overall.
2022 Snaitech EBITDA margin
%
18Retail
Online56
Snaitech EBITDA margin
%
202019
202228
Less capital intensive
The retail business requires more capital
expenditure to grow, given the licence
renewal fee is higher for retail compared
to online, in addition to Snaitech owning
a proportion of the gaming machines. As
a result, online is a less capital intensive
segment and thus benefits from a higher
return on assets.
Snaitech 2018–2022 average
capex tosales ratio
%
Note: HQ Snaitech capex apportioned between
retail and online by revenues.
6Retail
Online2
Strategic Report
15
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Key performance indicators
Financial
Group revenue growth
1
33%
%
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
33
12
(25)
18
52
Definition
Increase in revenue from continuing operations divided by
prioryear revenue.
Why are we focused on it?
Revenue is a key driver of the business and is reported in detail
across geography and business unit. The measure enables us
to track our overall success and our progress in increasing our
market share.
2022 performance
Group revenues grew 33% in 2022 driven by continued strength
inregulated B2B markets and Snaitech.
Link to strategy
123456
Adjusted EBITDA margin
1
25%
%
2021
2020
2019
2018
202225
26
24
26
28
Definition
Adjusted EBITDA shown as a percentage of revenue from
continuing operations. We use adjusted EBITDA to aid comparison
year to year.
Why are we focused on it?
Adjusted EBITDA margin is a measure of improving profitability in
our business and helps to evaluate the leveraging of our operating
assets. It also determines the quality of revenue growth.
2022 performance
Adjusted EBITDA margin declined 90bps in 2022 due to the
reopening of sites in the lower margin retail segment in Snaitech.
Link to strategy
123456
Diluted adjusted EPS
1
51.5c
c
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
51.5
40.9
8.8
44.6
73.9
Definition
Profit before exceptional items attributable to equity shareholders
of the Group from continuing operations, divided by the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding after adjustment
forthe effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares.
Why are we focused on it?
Earnings per share reflects the profitability of the business and how
effectively we finance our balance sheet. It is a key measure for
ourshareholders.
2022 performance
The increase is mainly driven by revenue and EBITDA growth in
2022 versus 2021, flowing through to earnings per share. The
adjusted measure is used to ensure comparability between years.
Link to strategy
123456
Adjusted operating cash flow
1,2
€397m
€’m
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
397
318
276
303
342
Definition
Operating cash flow after adjusting for changes in jackpot balances,
client deposits and client equity, professional expenses on
acquisitions and ADM security deposit.
Why are we focused on it?
Delivery of increased cash generated from operations allows us
toinvest in further growth opportunities across our business as
wellas delivering shareholder returns.
2022 performance
The increase is mainly driven by growth in earnings in 2022
versus 2021.
Link to strategy
123456
1 From continuing operations.
2 Includes Finalto up to and including FY20. Adjusted for Snaitech’s PREU tax payment of
€90 million relating to 2020, which was paid in 2021 due to circumstances around COVID-19.
16
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Non-financial
Powering licensees
with safer gambling
solutions
13 brands
Integrated with
BetBuddy
2022
2020
2021
2019
2018
83
72
22
136
72
Brands Jurisdictions
Definition
Number of brands in jurisdictions that
were integrated throughout each year
withPlaytech Protect solution, BetBuddy.
Why are we focused on it?
As a business, the most impactful
contribution that Playtech can make to
the industry and in society is through the
provision of technology to advance safer
gambling and player protection.
2022 performance
BetBuddy has expanded into three
new jurisdictions, having been adopted
by clients in Germany, Portugal and
Switzerland. To cope with the growth of
its customer base, the platform has been
migrated to cloud architecture.
Link to Sustainability Success pillars
Pioneering safer gambling solutions
Scope 1 and 2
greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions
39.6%
Reduction since
baseline year, 2018
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
6,970
7,892
9,316
10,914
11,543
Definition
Amount of carbon dioxide equivalent
(CO
2
e) emitted through the energy used
within all our assets, including office
buildings, racetracks, live studios and data
centres. More details on the methodology
can be found in the Responsible Business
and Sustainability Addendum to the
Annual Report 2022.
Why are we focused on it?
The environment, and particularly climate
change, is a growing area of concern
for Playtech, its investors and its other
stakeholders. In 2019 Playtech introduced
a GHG emissions target to guide its
energy reduction efforts. The Company’s
ambition is to reduce its absolute Scope
1 and 2 GHG emissions (location based)
by 40% by 2025, using 2018 as the
baseline year.
2022 performance
Playtech’s total Scope 1 and 2 (location-
based) emissions decreased by 11.7% in
2022. Since 2018, they have decreased by
39.6%, meaning that Playtech is very close
to achieving its 40% reduction target. One
of the major areas of focus was to switch
our material operations to renewable
energy, where possible, with 56.4% of
Playtech’s total energy consumption
derived from renewable energy sources,
up from 10.8% in 2021. Another notable
area of progress is the Company’s formal
commitment to set near-term and net
zero targets through the Science Based
Targets initiative (SBTi).
Link to Sustainability Success pillars
Powering action for positive
environmental impact
Gender diversity
at senior leadership
level
26%/74%
Female/male ratio
%
2022
20212377
2674
Female Male
Definition
Percentage of male and female
employees in senior leadership positions.
Why are we focused on it?
Playtech aims to foster a respectful and
supportive workplace that enables every
colleague to have the same opportunity
regardless of regardless of background,
gender, ethnicity, cultures, beliefs and
other attributes that represent our
customers and community. The Company
has set out a specific diversity target to
increase the representation of people
who identify as female amongst its
leadership population by 35% by 2025
against the 2021 baseline year, with an
ultimate ambition to achieve equality in
theworkplace.
2022 performance
Playtech conducted a systematic review
to strengthen our measurement and
reporting methodologies and processes.
This data has been instrumental
in implementing a programme of
improvements as we enhance diversity
as part of recruitment and selection,
development and succession planning,
with a particular focus on leader and
manager recruitment processes.
Link to Sustainability Success pillars
Promoting integrity and an
inclusive culture
17
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Chief Executive Officer’s review
Strong momentum
positions us well to deliver
on 2023 strategic priorities
Overview
Playtech made excellent progress on its strategic priorities
throughout 2022, with growth in both the B2B and B2C businesses.
As a result, the Group enters 2023 well-positioned to execute on
compelling market opportunities across both B2B and B2C.
Playtech’s B2B Gambling business remains focused on opportunities
in regulated or soon to be regulated markets. The Group continues
to target high-growth markets including the US, Latin America
and certain parts of Europe. In addition to growing in the attractive
Live market, Playtech continues to expand its portfolio of strategic
agreements. These helped the B2B segment to deliver revenue
growth of 14% (+11% on a constant currency basis) in 2022. At the
profit level, B2B Adjusted EBITDA grew a healthy 15% to €160.2 million
in 2022 compared to €139.2 million in 2021.
In the US and Canada, Playtech made great strides to establish itself
as one of the key players in this market. The long-term opportunity
across Playtech’s full product suite remains significant. In early
2023, a landmark agreement was signed with Hard Rock Digital to
provide Casino and Live, amongst other content, in North America,
accelerating our US strategy. In addition, having signed with Parx
Casino in 2021 in the US, Playtech grew its footprint with Parx by
launching its IMS platform in Pennsylvania and entered Ohio and
Maryland in 2023.
Playtech also signed several new deals in the period, including Golden
Nugget (Casino and Live in New Jersey and Michigan), and WynnBET
(multi-state deal to launch Live and Casino), while 888 and Resorts
Digital Gaming both signed up for Casino and Live in New Jersey.
Good progress was also made in Canada where Ontario became
the first province in Canada to regulate online gambling. This has
continued into 2023 with Playtech announcing in February that it has
taken an equity investment in NorthStar and extended the scope of
itsrelationship.
Playtech’s presence in Latin America continues to go from strength to
strength as existing agreements with Caliente in Mexico and Wplay in
Colombia continue to perform well. Playtech also opened a new Live
Casino facility in Peru as it continues to extend its presence across the
region. Looking ahead, the Company is looking forward to growing its
presence in the exciting, soon to be regulated Brazil market.
Playtech remains committed to diversifying its B2B division by
bringing on new brands and licensees. As well as making progress
with new strategic agreements and joint ventures, Playtech also
maintained its track record of attracting new brands to its SaaS
offering. Playtech launched over 100 brands in the period, with more
than 350 new brands now live since launching the SaaS offering
back in 2019.
18
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Mor Weizer
Chief Executive Officer
Playtech’s B2C Gambling business, Snaitech, recorded another
remarkable performance as revenue grew 54% compared to 2022.
Adjusted EBITDA, meanwhile, was 39% higher than the previous
year, benefiting from retail sites in Italy remaining open throughout the
year as well as the strength of online. The online segment continues
to see impressive growth, indicating that the addressable market has
expanded post-pandemic. Snai maintained its number one market
share position (retail and online combined measured by GGR) across
Italian sports betting brands in 2022, cementing its reputation for
consistent operational and brand strength, whilst also being a fast-
growing player in Italy in the online sector when measured by GGR.
The sale of Finalto was completed in July 2022 for cash proceeds
of $228.1 million resulting in a profit on disposal of €15.1 million
and represents a significant step forward in the Group’s strategy
to simplify the Group, allowing it to focus on the high-growth B2B
gambling and B2C gambling markets.
Playtech’s strong performance in 2022 was underpinned by
the energy, enthusiasm and professionalism of the Company’s
employees. They are the lifeblood of the business and do an
outstanding job supporting the Group’s customers.
Supporting the Playtech family in Ukraine
It has been more than a year since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
and unfortunately the conflict continues to have a devastating
impact. While the Group’s continuity plans mean that Playtech
has experienced minimal disruption to its business activities, the
c.700 employees based in Ukraine remain front of mind. Playtech
is committed to doing everything it can to ensure the safety of them
andtheir families.
The Board and management team continue to be moved by
the generosity and support that the Group’s colleagues have
demonstrated in maintaining contact with those who remain in
Ukraine. Despite the other pressures facing the business last year –
including significant corporate activity – they have constantly sought
to do whatever they can to provide assistance in the form of ongoing
communications, logistics and financial support.
“ Playtech’s strong performance
in 2022 was underpinned
by the energy, enthusiasm
and professionalism of the
Company’s employees.”
B2B Gambling
Core B2B Gambling
Regulated markets
Playtech’s B2B Gambling business remains focused on opportunities
in regulated or soon to be regulated markets. The Group continues
to target high-growth markets, including the US, Latin America and
certain parts of Europe.
Regulated markets delivered revenue growth of 22% (+18% on
constant currency basis) compared to FY 2021, driven by strong
revenue growth from the Group’s partners in Latin America, Holland
Casino in the Netherlands, as well as strong growth in other regulated
markets such as Poland, Spain and Ireland.
The Americas
The Americas is at the centre of our strategy for Core B2B Gambling.
The region maintained its impressive record of growth, with FY
2022 revenue up 43% (+27% at constant currency) compared to
FY 2021. This was powered by strong growth from Caliente as well
as increasing contributions from other customers, including Parx
in the US.
Accelerating the Group’s presence in the US remains a key strategic
priority for Playtech, as proven by the strides taken last year to
capitalise on the favourable regulatory environment. Having signed
a strategic agreement with Parx Casino in 2021, Playtech has been
increasing its footprint with Parx and this is starting to translate into
greater revenue contribution. In 2022, Parx launched its IMS platform
in Pennsylvania, which involved a complex migration, and will serve
as a useful blueprint for future deals. In addition, Playtech launched its
IMS, Casino and POP products in New Jersey, while in 2023, the IMS
was rolled out in Ohio and Maryland. Playtech now has a presence
with Parx in Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Ohio and Maryland.
Further product launches in additional states with Parx are expected
going forward. Pokerstars also launched the Casino product in New
Jersey, while 888 launched Live Casino in Michigan in 2023.
Several new deals were also signed in the US, including Golden
Nugget (Casino and Live in New Jersey and Michigan), Rush Street
Interactive (multi-state deal for Casino), and WynnBET (multi-state
deal tolaunch Casino and Live), while 888 and Resorts Digital Gaming
both signed up for Casino and Live in New Jersey.
In March 2023, Playtech signed a landmark agreement with Hard
Rock Digital, the exclusive, global vehicle for online for Hard Rock
International, to provide Casino and Live amongst other content, in
North America. These products will also be supplied outside of North
America in addition to the IMS and services including marketing and
operations. As part of the agreement, Playtech has also invested
€80million in exchange for a low single digit % minority equity
ownership stake, the proceeds of which will be used to help fund
HardRock Digital’s continued global expansion.
19
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
B2B Gambling continued
Core B2B Gambling continued
Regulated markets continued
The Americas continued
Meanwhile, Playtech delivered several significant product launches
across core markets. In the newly regulated Canadian province of
Ontario, NorthStar launched multiple products. In addition, Bet365
and 888 both went live in Ontario with Casino and Live on the first day
the market became regulated. Towards the end of 2022, FanDuel,
Mansion and Casumo all launched the Casino and Live products.
In February 2023, Playtech announced an expansion of its
partnership with NorthStar. Playtech has taken an equity investment
in NorthStar. The proceeds of this investment will be used to
accelerate the growth of NorthStar’s footprint across Ontario and
future regulated markets across Canada. The agreement also
expands the scope of Playtech’s offering to NorthStar to include
operational and marketing services, in addition to the IMS platform,
Casino, Live, Poker and Bingo solutions already launched.
Playtech delivered against its commitment to further expand its
infrastructure in high-growth markets, such as the US. Having
already opened Live studios in New Jersey and Michigan, another
Live facility is under construction in Pennsylvania and is expected to
open in 2023. Behind the Company’s growing physical presence are
an increasing number of employees focused on sales, operations
and back-office functions, taking head count to more than 130 at
theend of 2022.
Following the repeal of PASPA in 2018, each year that passes has
seen a growing number of states approve legislation to legalise
sports betting. While 2022 saw further progress, California was
notable in voting to reject the legalisation of online sports betting and
in-person sports betting at tribal casinos and private horse tracks.
Chief Executive Officer’s review continued
This may delay legislation in states that have yet to approve sports
betting, but the expectation remains that these states will eventually
look to approve legislation. In 2022, Playtech received licences
for Pennsylvania, Colorado and Ohio with Maryland received in
2023, taking the total number of US states where Playtech has a
licence to nine.
Online casino is allowed at the discretion of individual states. No new
states have authorised Online casino in 2022, although there are
several states where iGaming legislation is being considered.
Playtech’s presence in Latin America continues to go from strength
to strength, with existing agreements with Caliente in Mexico and
Wplay in Colombia continuing to perform well. Looking further ahead,
Playtech is well-positioned to continue its growth and capitalise on
other strategic agreements in Latin America in the years ahead.
Playtech also opened a new Live Casino facility in Peru, giving
the Company a strong base from which to serve both its existing
clients in Latin America and prospective clients in newly regulated
markets in the region. Several customers, such as Wplay, Bet365 and
BetVictor, have launched tables in the new Live facility with demand
proving strong so far. Given the success of legislation in markets like
Colombia, Playtech anticipates continued favourable regulation and
strong growth in the region in the years to come.
One example of this is in Brazil, where sports betting legislation
has been passed and is expected to be implemented in the near
future. Brazil is anticipated to be a significant market given the large
population and love of sports. The Company has an exciting strategic
agreement in place with Galerabet, with economics similar to its
other arrangements in Latin America, in anticipation of regulation in
this market.
Europe ex-UK
2022 B2B revenue growth in Europe ex-UK of 31% (+31% at constant
currency) was driven by strong growth across several countries,
including Netherlands, Spain, Poland and Ireland.
The move towards greater regulation in Europe continues to
represent significant growth opportunities. The first full year of
Playtech’s new, expanded long-term strategic software and services
agreement with Holland Casino has seen an impressive start.
Playtech now supplies Holland Casino with a full turnkey multi-
channel technology package, as well as certain ancillary services.
The agreement includes the IMS platform, Sports betting, Online
Casino, Live Casino, Poker and Bingo products, plus selected
operational and marketing services. While growth rates moderated
as the year went on, the partnership is continuing to see the benefits
of its first mover advantage. It was a key driver of revenue growth in
Europe in 2022, illustrating the significant growth opportunities of
newly regulated markets. This agreement, as well as the launch of
Casino and Poker with Bet365 and Unibet in the Netherlands in 2022,
means Playtech is well positioned to capitalise on the newly regulated
Netherlands market.
Elsewhere in Europe, the Company invested in its physical
infrastructure by expanding its Live facility in Romania. The facility
now also includes Blackjack and Poker studios, enabling Playtech
to serve its customers with an even wider and more diverse suite of
products. In terms of new customers, the Live business launched with,
among others, Betsson in Italy and Pokerstars in Greece.
Playtech’s Casino business made great progress opening up new
territories with its existing customer base, such as Pokerstars and
Betsson in Greece, Leo Vegas in Spain, Betway and 888 in Italy,
Stoiximan in The Czech Republic, Betano in Bulgaria and Fortuna
in Slovakia. This clearly demonstrates the scalability of Playtech’s
business model.
20
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
UK
The UK saw revenue decline 4% (-5% on a constant currency basis)
compared to FY 2021, where the positive impact of the reopening of
retail stores from mid-April 2021 was more than offset by a decline in
revenue from Entain in addition to a slowdown in the online business
caused by the uncertain regulatory climate.
The UK Government is currently undertaking a review into existing
gambling laws in the UK. In response, several operators are taking
pre-emptive measures such as stake limits and affordability checks in
an attempt to show regulators that the industry is able to self-regulate.
In December 2020, the UK Government announced a call for
evidence to review the existing gambling laws in the UK. Since the
initial 16-week call for evidence, which ended on 31 March 2021, the
Government has been assessing the evidence presented, alongside
other data, with the aim of setting out conclusions and any proposals
for reform in a White Paper. Playtech submitted data and evidence
relating to the call and will support this wherever possible going
forward. The White Paper was due to be published in 2022, but
this has been delayed with media reports suggesting it is due to be
published imminently.
Playtech remains committed to the UK market and will actively
support its customers in implementing any necessary changes
following the White Paper’s expected publication. Playtech has been
actively involved in discussions around safer game design and online
advertising for some time. By using its technology and data to support
its licensees in safer gambling, the Company is confident that it will
remain the go-to platform for regulated markets including the UK.
Other unregulated (excl. Asia)
The Group’s strategy to focus on both regulated and regulating
markets includes unregulated markets which are expected to
regulate in the near future. These are classified in the “Unregulated
excl. Asia” line within B2B Gambling. These unregulated markets
(excluding Asia) were up 11% year on year (+10% at constant currency)
versus 2021, primarily driven by very strong growth in Brazil, offset
in part by adecline in Germany, which saw regulatory changes, and
Netherlands moving to a regulated market in 2021.
In Canada, recent legislation means that single-game sports betting
is now allowed at the discretion of individual provinces. Seven
provinces, including the country’s largest province, Ontario, began
allowing bets to be placed on single-game sporting events. Since
then, as of 4 April 2022, Ontario has become the first fully regulated
online gambling market in Canada, with iGaming launched as well.
As other provinces across Canada introduce sports betting and
iGaming, the market opportunity in North America will continue to
grow. In line with the Company’s strategy to target newly regulating
markets, Playtech signed a strategic agreement with NorthStar
Gaming in January 2022.
The Company also took steps to establish its presence in South
Africa, a nascent but fast-growing market, which permits sports
betting and Live casino. Towards the end of 2022, Playtech
launchedCasino and Live products with TsogoSun.
Unregulated Asia
Revenue from the Unregulated Asia business declined 18% (-21%
on a constant currency basis) compared to 2021. The decline was
largely the result of further lockdowns in China during the year. As it
stands today, the Asia business is much more diversified in terms of
both distributors as well as geographies compared to recent years.
The Company incurred a bad debt provision of €15.4 million in H1 22
following continued collection delays in the region.
B2B – Product Developments
Playtech remains committed to diversifying its B2B Gambling
division by bringing on new brands and licensees. As well as making
progress with new strategic agreements and joint ventures, Playtech
also maintained its track record of attracting new customers in both
regulated and regulating markets to its SaaS offering. Playtech
launched over 100 brands in the period, with more than 350 now live
since the launch of its SaaS model in 2019.
In August 2022, Playtech launched The Walking Dead™ 2, taking
advantage of the exclusive rights it acquired for Online Casino in
2021. A second title is planned to launch in 2023, with both expected
to engage and retain a large audience. Alongside partnerships
with major licensed brands, Playtech’s Casino content strategy
continues to focus on the development of original brand suites,
known as Playtech power suites, with the likes of Age of the Gods™
and Fire Blaze™ producing some of Playtech’s most popular slots.
Leprechaun’s Luck became Playtech’s top-performing new game
of 2022 and was shortlisted for Game of the Year in the 2022
EGR awards.
In terms of other notable product developments, the Live team
launched Safari Riches Live, a live casino slot game created
exclusively for 888. This marks a major milestone as it represents the
first time a slot brand developed by 888 has been transformed into
a bespoke live casino game. Elsewhere, the Live team also signed
up the exclusive global rights to Jumanji, including for the US, and
plans to launch a game in 2023. Other highlights include Everybody’s
Jackpot and The Greatest Cards Show, which have both broken new
ground technologically. Everybody’s Jackpot features first of its kind
“Unreal engine” metaverse technology, while The Greatest Cards
Show’s augmented reality and horizontal wheel – a Live sector first –
makes it one of Playtech’s most sophisticated games yet.
21
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
B2C Gambling
Playtech’s B2C business consists of Snaitech (including HAPPYBET)
and the White Label operations, which is primarily Sun Bingo. Overall,
B2C revenues grew 48% compared to FY 2021 at constant currency,
while Adjusted EBITDA grew 38%.
Snaitech
Italy
Snaitech delivered another year of significant growth in FY 2022, with
revenue up 54% compared to the prior year, while Adjusted EBITDA
grew 39% versus FY 2021. This exceptional performance was
primarily driven by the reopening of retail sites in Italy, which occurred
at the end of June 2021 and have since remained open.
As a result, retail sales grew significantly in the period and are within
10% of pre-pandemic levels. This is a good performance given a
small proportion of franchise retail shops closed permanently, some
customers permanently transitioned to the online channel and new
legislation – introduced in January 2020 – that requires customers
to present ID card to enter retail shops. At the EBITDA level, the
retail segment has now surpassed 2019 pre-pandemic levels on an
absolute basis, while EBITDA margins are also higher than 2019 levels
driven by an increasing proportion of revenue generated from the
higher margin sports betting segment and a lower retail sports pay out
in 2022 compared to 2019.
The online business grew 2% in 2022 versus 2021 despite retail
shops being reopened in June 2021, suggesting a combination of a
proportion of existing retail customers permanently shifting to online
in conjunction with new customers being onboarded via the online
channel. Adjusted EBITDA margins remained high at 56% in 2022
versus 59% in 2021.
As disclosed at the FY 2021 results, Snaitech has begun the formal
sale process of La Maura Racetrack in Italy. €1 million was received
on signing in July 2021, with the remaining €19 million expected
to be received in instalments in 2024. We have now received
€56million from the sale of “non-core” land since the acquisition of
Snaitech in 2018.
Snai maintained its number one market share position (retail and
online combined measured by GGR) across Italian sports betting
brands in 2022, cementing its reputation for consistent operational
and brand strength, whilst also being a fast growing player in Italy in
the online sector when measured by GGR.
Chief Executive Officer’s review continued
Finally, the 2023 budget law postponed the expiration of all
concessions such that all licenses in Italy, including online and retail,
have been extended until December 2024 at a total cost of €24 million
in 2023 and €34 million in 2024. Beyond 2024, talks are continuing
to find an agreement with local authorities on a common and
homogeneous set of rules.
Germany and Austria
HAPPYBET (now reported as part of Snaitech) saw revenue growth
of 10% in 2022 compared to 2021. This was primarily driven by
the reopening of retail sites and early progress after the Snaitech
management team took control of HAPPYBET’s operations. The
business remains loss making with EBITDA of €-10.8 million in 2022
(2021: €-11.4 million), but strategic and operational measures have
been taken.
In 2022, the team at Snaitech has already made good progress
upgrading HAPPYBET’s technology infrastructure, enhancing the
product and services offering, deploying new marketing strategies
and activities to increase brand awareness and realising costs
synergies between HAPPYBET and Snaitech. This will in time drive
the performance of both retail and online. Germany’s Interstate Treaty
regulated online slots, online poker and sports betting. Playtech has
been awarded one of the few available online sports betting licenses
in Germany through HAPPYBET and has already launched an online
offering. With structural growth drivers and a turnaround strategy
being implemented by a strong management team, the Group is
confident of its prospects going forward.
Sun Bingo White Label
Sun Bingo White Label saw 5% revenue growth to €65.3 million
(2021:€61.9 million) while Adjusted EBITDA was €2.0 million, down
from €6.7 million in 2021. As disclosed at H1 2022 results, reported
EBITDA includes a €10.4 million payment to terminate an onerous
contract with a former service provider. The termination of the
agreement has positively impacted the profitability of the business.
“ We are committed to
growing our business in
a sustainable way, that
builds long-term value
for our stakeholders.”
22
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Safer gambling and sustainability
As a technology leader in the gambling sector, we are committed to
growing our business sustainably and in a way that builds long-term
value for our stakeholders. To meet this ambition we have set out a
five-year strategy that sets out a roadmap that moves us towards fully
integrating sustainability and responsible business into our culture,
strategy and operations.
As I reflect on our sustainability journey over this past year, I am
most proud of our efforts to safeguard and support our Ukrainian
colleagues and their families. The strength and character shown
by our people is truly humbling and inspiring. As the war continues,
we remain steadfast in our support to our affected colleagues and
their families – continuing to assist them in confronting the ongoing
challenges they face in whatever way we can, as well as providing
ongoing humanitarian aid across the country.
I am also pleased that we have continued to make progress in all
areas relating to sustainability including safer gambling, diversity
and climate change. We have taken significant steps to strengthen
sustainability governance and accountability, as well as further
enhancing our commitments on climate change and gender diversity.
Highlights include:
• Strengthening governance with frequent engagement with the
Board Sustainability and Public Policy Committee in addition to
engagement with our external stakeholder advisory panel.
• Enhancing accountability by extending the application of
sustainability-linked remuneration to executive management and
selected leaders, focusing on delivery around safer gambling,
reducing our environmental impact and diversity and inclusion.
• Expanding our engagement and partnership with our licensees
and other partners on safer gambling technology solutions through
Playtech Protect whilst also advocating for strong safer gambling
policy and standards across regulated and emerging markets.
• Progressing towards our aspiration for workplace equality
with female representation within our leadership population
increasing to 26%.
• Reinforcing our commitment to contribute to a low carbon
future with a significant shift to renewable energy and a formal
commitment to the Science Based Target Initiative (SBTi) to set
both near-term and net zero targets.
As we look to 2023, we will focus on further embedding sustainability
into our culture and key decision-making processes.
Corporate activity
Completion of Finalto sale
Having completed the sale of Finalto to Gopher Investments in July
2022, Playtech has taken a significant step towards simplifying the
Group and to focus on its technology-led offering as a pureplay
business in the high-growth B2B and B2C gambling markets. The
sale was agreed for an enterprise value of $250 million, although this
amount was reduced to $228.1 million based on the performance
of Finalto from 1 January 2021 to completion. Completion of the
transaction also triggered payment of a break fee of $8.8 million which
Playtech is required to pay to the Consortium that had previously
agreed to acquire Finalto, while profit on disposal of Finalto amounted
to €15.1 million. The sale proceeds were partly used to repay the
outstanding balance on Playtech’s revolving credit facility with the
remainder of proceeds used for general corporate purposes.
Mor Weizer
Chief Executive Officer
23 March 2023
23
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Market trends
Regulation, technology
and online: where the
market is heading
Playtech operates in a dynamic, fast changing environment and is well placed to take
advantage of marketplace trends. This section examines our operating environment
across four trends around regulation, sustainability, technology and the shift to online.
1) A super-cycle driven by a trend towards regulation
Regulation is the key driver of growth in the gambling industry
Regulation is the key driver of growth in the gambling industry. Those countries that become newly regulated tend to see strong growth early on,
which is why it is crucial for operators and technology partners to build a presence in a country that is about to be regulated or is newly regulated.
However, growth typically slows down after a certain period. This tends to be driven by three main factors. Firstly, there is increased competition
as new players enter the market, causing pricing pressure. Secondly, as markets mature, they become saturated due to limited demographic
growth. Thirdly, regulation typically becomes more stringent over time. For example, in the mature UK market, we have seen a tightening of
ruleson age and identity checks and a ban on gambling using credit cards.
Deviations from the broad shape of the curve are mainly attributable to the stringency of regulations in a country. For example, Spain has
implemented strict restrictions on advertising for the gambling sector.
At this point in time, we are in an advantageous position in multiple countries across the world which are moving towards regulating gambling
orhave newly regulated the sector. In the next section, we assess each of the major regions in the world and how Playtech has positioned itself.
Online growth rates moderate as regulation matures
Evolution of online gambling market growth rates following online regulation
Source: H2GC and Playtech estimates. Market growth based on 2022–2024e average online GGR; maturity of regulation is based on years since regulation of online adjusted for
specifics of country.
Maturity of regulation
Point of online legalisation
Market growth
Unregulated
Regulated
Germany
Canada
Peru
Brazil
Chile
Sweden
United States
Netherlands
Argentina
Colombia
Greece
Spain
France
Mexico
Italy
Australia
United Kingdom
24
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
US
State-by-state legislation in the US
The regulatory landscape in the US is subject to constant change and
development. In the four years since the repeal of the Professional and
Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA) in 2018, regulation of
sports betting has progressed with more than 30 states now offering
or introducing legislation to allow sports betting. However, California
recently voted to reject the legalisation of online sports betting and in-
person sports betting at tribal casinos and private horse tracks. This
may delay legislation in states that have yet to approve sports betting,
but we expect these states to ultimately acquiesce.
iGaming, which was not subject to PASPA, is allowed at the
discretion of individual states. In 2021, the Mohegan Tribe and the
Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut received federal approval
to operate online casino games, while Michigan launched in 2021,
joining New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and West Virginia, with
Nevada allowing online poker only. No new states have authorised
online casino in 2022, although legislation to regulate online
casinoisworking its way through New York’slegislature.
iGaming has not opened up at the same rate as
sports betting…
In the US, iGaming has not expanded at the same rapid pace as sports
betting since the PASPA ruling in 2018 with just six states permitting
iGaming compared to more than 30 states regulating sports betting.
…but this could change
As per VIXIO
1
, the tax revenue generated from iGaming in these six
states is nearly double that of the tax revenue generated from sports
betting in 30 states, which could encourage state legislatures to
consider regulating iGaming as these six states have already done.
Playtech is well placed to benefit from the trend
towards regulating iGaming
This development bodes well for Playtech. We are very strong in
this vertical and have been building the necessary foundations to
ensure we can benefit when states begin to regulate iGaming. We
have signed multi-state deals for iGaming with multiple key operators,
while we see sports betting as strategically important for key partners
in the US.
Current US state-by-state regulatory landscape
Regulation is the biggest market driver in the short term
States that offer only sports betting
States that have approved but not yet offered sports betting
States that offer both sports betting and iGaming
Source: VIXIO.
US B2B revenue opportunity
Total long-term B2B addressable market of c.$3 billion
Market
size
1
Third-
party
shareRoyalty share
Revenue
opp.
iGaming$18bnx75%x10%–15%=c.$1.7bn
Sports betting
(online)
$23bnx33%x10%–15%=c.$950m
Platform (PAM)$41bnx25%x3%–5%=c.$410m
Total B2B opportunity (excl. structured agreements)c.$3bn
1 Market sizes are GGR based on forecasts for online sports betting/iGaming.
Source: FanDuel CMD (2022) and Jefferies research (2021).
$3bn
Revenue opportunity for Playtech
1 VIXIO is an independent source on fast-moving regulatory developments in the
gamblingsector.
25
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Market trends continued
Latin America
A region trending towardsregulation
The region is shifting towards regulating the gambling industry. In the
past few years, Mexico and Colombia have both seen the regulation
of the online segment, while Peru has recently enacted legislation that
regulates sports betting and online gambling. Brazil and Chile have
gambling regulation underway with expectations of enactment in the
near future.
Mexico
Panama
Uruguay
Colombia
Brazil
Several countries in LatAm with large
populations and GDP
Significant opportunity in LatAm
CountryPopulationGDP (million)
Brazil213,000,0001,600,000
Mexico129,000,0001,300,000
Colombia51,000,000314,000
Argentina45,000,000492,000
Peru33,000,000223,000
Chile19,000,000317,000
Guatemala18,000,00086,000
Costa Rica5,000,00064,000
Panama4,000,00064,000
Source: Worldometer, World Bank.
Several structured agreements in place in LatAm
Executing on our other structured agreements
Well placed with our structuredagreements
Playtech has structured agreements in place where we expect to see
growth. Our success with Caliente in Mexico is well known (see page
13 in the “Our strategy” section), while Wplay in Colombia continues to
perform well. To take advantage of the huge potential in the Brazilian
market, we have signed a structured agreement with Galerabet in
2021. As with other partnerships, the Galerabet agreement includes
the customer software licence agreement in addition to an option
overa significant non-controlling equity stake in theoperation.
Our structured agreement with Tenlot and the Red Cross brings
exclusivity in Costa Rica, where Playtech operates under the only
licence available. During 2021, we launched in Costa Rica and also
launched our structured agreement in Panama with Onjoc, under the
brand betcha, where we had the first to market advantage. Looking
ahead, we are focused on executing these opportunities to drive
growth in the region.
Caliente
betcha.pa
Ten lot
Wplay
Galerabet
26
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Europe
Europe – a mix of newly regulating and mature markets
The market in Europe is more nuanced than the Americas region.
Some countries are opening up their online gambling market such as
the Netherlands and Germany while others are mature but still have an
underpenetrated online market, such as Italy, Spain and France. And
finally, there is the UK, which is the most mature market of all with high
online penetration rates.
Well positioned in the Netherlands and Germany
During 2021, Playtech signed a new, expanded long-term strategic
software and services agreement with Holland Casino, the state-
owned land-based casino operator in the Netherlands. This
agreement, as well as the launch of Casino and Poker with Bet365 in
the Netherlands in early 2022, means Playtech is well positioned to
capitalise on the newly regulated Dutch market.
Playtech has significant exposure to the underpenetrated online
Italian market, via Snaitech, and the German market, through our B2C
HAPPYBET business. Although HAPPYBET has underperformed as
a business, a turnaround plan is underway to focus the business on
capturing the online opportunity.
The UK is reducing in importance
Although the UK has historically contributed a significant proportion
of revenue to the B2B division, its importance is declining. In 2019, it
made up 37% of B2B revenues, which has reduced to 20% in 2022
due to a maturing UK market and the faster growing Americas and
European regions.
Asia
Asia remains broadly unregulated
Gambling is a very popular pastime in Asia, which possesses
structural growth drivers such as a passion for sport, large
populations and above average GDP growth, not dissimilar to the
LatAm region. However, the majority of markets remain unregulated.
Over the long term, we see Asia following a similar path as the
Americas towards regulating the sector, but the visibility of this path
remains unclear at the present time.
Asia is increasingly a smaller part of B2B
While there have been issues in Asia with currency controls and
volatile government attitudes towards the gambling sector, it is
becoming an increasingly smaller part of the business – 44% of B2B
revenues in 2017 compared to 11% in 2022 driven by a combination of
declining Asia revenues and accelerated growth in other regions.
UK and Asia becoming a smaller proportion of B2B
Asia and UK as % of B2B revenues
2) Growing importance of sustainability to build long-term value
ESG performance has moved from something that was of interest
to a small number of investors to a subject that commands the
attention of both the wider investment community and stakeholders
more generally.The gambling sector is no exception and, alongside
issues such as safer gambling, climate change and DEI, there
is a particular focus on how companies are demonstrating their
commitment to ethical and responsible behaviour across their
business. Having comprehensive and effective policies and
practices in place is therefore essential if the industry is to gain
and retain the trust of customers and society at large.
Safer gambling is a material ESG topic for the gambling industry.
Both regulators and the gambling industry recognise the
importance of developing safer gambling solutions, evaluating
their effectiveness and helping support research that leads
to the development of evidence-based regulation. Playtech
has been at the forefront of this process to ensure gambling
customers are able to enjoy the benefits of a safe and secure
playingenvironment.
BetBuddy is becoming an increasingly important tool
As player protection tools become an increasingly important
factor in a customer’s decision in choosing where to play,
Playtech’s analytics-driven BetBuddy tool (see page 36)
isanintegral tool within the IMS platform.
112022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2069
442729
173053
2017
152461
203743
323137
Asia UK RoW
27
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Market trends continued
3) Technology – multiple technologies about to hit mainstream adoption
Data and AI
Overview
The digitisation of the world is creating
unimaginable amounts of data from all kinds
of sources. More data is being generated
every two years than in all of time before
that point. However, the key to obtaining a
competitive advantage is getting access
to the right data sets and drawing insights
from them. Those companies that are able
toattract a large number of users gain
access to the most data, which allows
them to train their algorithms to give more
accurate results. This in turn attracts more
users, triggering data network effects that
becomedifficult to compete against.
Impact on the industry/Playtech
The use of data to gain actionable insights
into customers is a cornerstone of the online
gaming industry. It facilitates:
• the delivery of a personalised experience
for each user, thus increasing revenue
percustomer;
• new customers being acquired through
intelligent marketing;
• players being verified and the detection
offraud; and
• tackling gambling addiction, encouraging
a more responsible industry.
Given Playtech’s sheer scale, it has access
to vast amounts of data. Playtech is investing
heavily in its analytics, business intelligence
(BI) and safer gambling tools to ensure
that it makes use of this data to retain
itscompetitive advantage and ensures
asustainable future for theindustry.
Link to strategy
123456
Virtual reality/
augmented reality
Overview
Augmented reality (AR) is focused on
enhancing the real-world experience, with
real-time, virtual information overlaying
physical objects delivered through a device
such as a headset or mobile phone. Virtual
reality (VR) provides a completely immersive,
computer-generated 3D environment that
replaces the real world. With tech titans such
as Apple and Meta releasing next generation
headsets, we can expect to see significant,
as yet unknown, new use cases arise within
the gambling sector.
Impact on the industry/Playtech
• Should AR and VR gain broad adoption,
they could be used to vastly improve the
player experience.
• With VR, players will be able to engage
with other players and experience walking
the halls of a physical casino in the comfort
of their own home.
• With AR, there is the ability to customise a
player’s experience in a physical casino, or
within Live, to overlay real-time information
on the video stream.
• Playtech has begun to incorporate
someof these technologies in its offering.
The Greatest Cards Show within Live
has augmented reality features, while the
Poker vertical has released customisable
digital avatars.
Link to strategy
123456
5G roll-out
Overview
5G is the latest new global wireless standard
and enables a new kind of network that
is designed to connect everyone and
everything together including machines,
objects and devices. It is predicted to deliver
much higher data speeds, ultra-low latency,
more reliability, a big increase in network
capacity and a more uniform experience to
more users. These benefits can usher in new
immersive experiences such as VR and AR.
Impact on the industry/Playtech
• 5G is an enabler of VR and AR
technologies and thus helps to create
games that are richer and more immersive
than before.
• Video streaming of Live dealer games can
be of a much greater quality with higher
speeds and a more reliable network.
• In-game sports betting will benefit,
particularly on mobile. Inside stadiums,
more devices can be connected at once
with reduced latency, thus enabling fans
to place bets as they watch the game.
Outside stadiums, 5G enables fans to
simultaneously make bets and stream
thegame on their mobile phones.
• The low latency of 5G could help to
facilitate more social iCasino games,
asplayers will be able to enjoy real-time
interactions with other players.
Link to strategy
123456
Data network
eects
Better end
consumer
experience
Better brand
for Playtech
customers
More end
consumers
More data
Better
algorithms
More
targeted/
relevant recom-
mendations
28
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Live
Overview
Live is an extremely attractive vertical that is
expected to grow significantly over the coming
years. This is driven by two major trends:
• Firstly, there is a shift to online from
retail as the world digitises and this
hasaccelerated due to the pandemic.
• Secondly, within online, there is a growing
trend away from random number generation
(RNG) towards Live, as players want more
of an interactive, immersive experience.
With the imminent launch of VR by tech
companies such as Apple, weexpect this
shift to accelerate.
The combination of these drivers means
industry analysts predict the Live market
toreach $18 billion based on GGR by 2025,
upfrom $6.9 billion in 2021, a CAGR of 28%.
Impact on industry/Playtech
Playtech has already made significant
investments to capitalise on this attractive
product vertical:
• Ten studios are currently operational
with a further one in Pennsylvania under
construction. The latest one to open is in
Peru which was launched earlier this year
and will help us to support growth within the
attractive LatAm region, particularly Brazil.
• The number of tables has more than
doubled over the past four years.
• Significant investment has been made
to ensure we have the latest cutting-edge
technology and access to branded
gaming rights such as Jumanji™.
These investments have already been
made, and the nature of the Live business
model is such that additional players can be
added to tables at minimal cost. This creates
significant operating leverage and leads to
Live being margin accretive to the overall
B2B division.
Link to strategy
123456
Underpenetrated online
markets in Europe
Overview
The pandemic accelerated the shift towards
online gambling as retail shops were closed
during lockdown and customers, with plenty
of time to pass, played online. We await to see
how structural this shift is over the coming year.
However, early indications suggest the migration
to online has remained sticky post pandemic, with
all major countries in the EU seeing at least a seven
percentage point rise in online penetration from
prior to the pandemic in 2019 compared to 2022.
There is ample scope for the migration to online
to continue. Looking to the UK as an example
of a mature market, online penetration in 2022
was just under 60%, far in excess of Spain, Italy
and Germany.
Impact on industry/Playtech
Within the B2C division, Playtech is very
well placed to continue to benefit from an
underpenetrated online market in Europe. In
Italy, Snaitech gives Playtech exposure to a
large market where online penetration remains
at 26%, far below the UK at 58%. In addition,
the online business is higher margin and less
capital intensive, meaning it generates higher
returns. Aside from Italy, Playtech is also well
placed in Germany with HAPPYBET, which
possesses one of the few available online
sports betting licences in Germany.
Within the B2B division, Playtech has a
strong presence in Spain across Live, Casino
and Sports, and is well positioned to take
advantage of the continued shift to online.
Several large European countries
have an underpenetrated
online market
Online penetration as % of GGR
2019 2022
Source: H2GC (includes betting and gaming and
excludeslotteries).
58
UK
France
Spain
30
28
55
41
23
Italy
26
15
Germany
25
15
Link to strategy
123456
Sports
Overview
As the market shifts to online, the Sports
segment is impacted by multiple trends:
• convergence of sports betting, media
streaming and social;
• emerging markets shifting
towards embedded betting within
streaming services;
• shift to in-play betting with the types
ofbets becoming more granular; and
• more and more data sources being used
tocome up with sports betting odds such
as fitness of players.
Impact on industry/Playtech
• Our Sports offering is targeted at those
areas where we see strategic benefits.
One such region is LatAm, where many of
the countries enjoy a rich sporting culture
and we have made good progress in
Mexico, Colombia and Panama.
• Our Betbuilder product, now available for
football with other sports to follow, will be a
focus of our Sports offering given the trend
of shifting towards offering more granular
types of bets.
Link to strategy
123456
4) Shift to online continues, accelerated by the pandemic
29
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Business model
Flexibility to capture
every opportunity
B2B
Conventional model
Platform + content
The conventional model involves us providing the operator
with a platform-based solution, underpinned by Playtech’s
leading Information Management Solution (IMS) offering. The
operator can then choose from a wide range of product verticals
and content, including Live, Casino, Sports, Bingo, Poker
andVirtual Sports.
The operator, which holds the gambling licence, is typically
responsible for building and maintaining its brand in addition
to customer services and marketing. In exchange for providing
the technology, Playtech employs a revenue share model with
the operator.
Structured agreements
Platform + content + services
We also partner with “local heroes” with a strong retail brand
andpresence but without the necessary technological expertise
to succeed online. Under a structured agreement, we provide a
platform-based solution as per a conventional model, in addition
toa range of marketing and operational services, some of which
aresubcontracted out to a third party.
This model also involves a revenue share framework with
the operator, with Playtech’s share typically higher than in a
conventional model to compensate for the provision of these
additional services. Playtech also typically injects capital into these
operators to help facilitate growth and in return receives an equity
call option which can be exercised should the operator be acquired.
How we work
ConventionalStructured agreementSaaS
Services
Content
Platform
Clients
Value accrued
to Playtech
Standard B2B
royalty income
for technology
End customers
Licence held by operator
MarketingOperations
Portal/ChannelsContentBI/Analytics
IMS platform
Engagement Centre
Payments
Player ManagementWallet
Risk/KYC/AMLSafer Gambling
Value accrued
to Playtech
Standard B2B
royalty income
for technology
+
Additional
revenue to
compensate
for extra
services
+
Call option on
equity
End customers
Licence held by operator
IMS platform
Engagement Centre
Payments
Player ManagementWallet
Risk/KYC/AMLSafer Gambling
Playtech provides/subcontracted Operator provides
MarketingOperations
Portal/ChannelsContentBI/Analytics
• Entain
• Bet365
• Parx
• Flutter
• WynnBET
• BetMGM
• Caliente
• Wplay
• Galerabet
• NorthStar
• Tipico
• Lowen Play
• Betway
• Novibet
• RET
• Leader-bet
Strategic Report
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
30
B2B
B2C
Snaitech
Our B2C division is comprised primarily of Snaitech in Italy and HAPPYBET, the retail
and online Sports B2C business in Austria and Germany. Both businesses are led
andoperated by the Snaitech management team.
Snaitech is a leading operator in the Italian betting and gaming market, and generates
revenues from gaming machines, retail betting and online gambling. The business
was acquired by Playtech in 2018, bringing together Playtech’s leading technology
stack with Snaitech’s powerful brand and local expertise in one of Europe’s largest
gambling markets.
Retail
The retail betting business predominantly operates a franchise model with franchisees
responsible for staff costs, rent and facilities, while Snaitech itself provides the licence,
content, technology and brand.
The franchise model generates growth with relatively low capital intensity, generating
high return on capital. Meanwhile, the value sharing agreement with franchisees is at
the revenue level, meaning Snaitech is less affected by rising cost pressures.
The Gaming Machine segment predominantly consists of Video Lottery Terminals
(VLTs) and Amusement with Prizes (AWPs). Snaitech has a higher revenue share
from VLTs but incurs the cost for content from operators, while for AWPs, the machine
owner takes a higher revenue share but incurs the cost of hardware and content.
Further detail is provided in the table below.
RetailPlayers in value chainShare of NGRResponsibilities
Sports
betting
Franchisee45%–50%Sta, rent and facilities
Licence holder
1
55%–50%
1
Licence, brand, content, technology, trading and risk
1
Gaming
machines
VLTPlatform owner10%–12%Hardware, software and content
Location owner55%–50%Security, location costs and sta
Licence holder
1
35%–38%
1
Licence
1
AWPMachine owner
2
37%–40%
2
Machine installation and maintenance
2
Location owner55%–50%Security, location costs and sta
Licence holder
1
8%–10%
1
Licence
1
Online
The online business operates a direct-to-consumer model, with Snaitech paying a
share of revenue to the retail franchisee owners should they sign up customers at their
retail site or to affiliates which direct customers to Snaitech’s online site. Platform and
content costs, part of which are supplied by Playtech, are incurred bySnaitech.
OnlinePlayers in value chainShare of NGRResponsibilities
Sports
betting
and
casino
Platform and
content owner
2
10%–15%
2
Platform and content
2
Aliates/retail
sites
20%–25%Customer acquisition
Licence holder
1
70%–60%
1
Licence, tech, trading, risk and customer services
1
SaaS
Content
For those operators that have their own
platform, we also offer customers the
ability to access our content, in a plug-
and-play SaaS model. Operators benefit
from low implementation costs and quick
time to market, while Playtech is able
to expand its addressable market and
generates a recurring, monthly revenue
stream at a higher margin.
How we work
1 Snaitech accrues all value.
2 Snaitech accrues a portion
of value.
Strategic Report
31
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Our strengths
Unparalleled scale in the
gambling industry
Playtech’s global scale and distribution capabilities, with over
180 licensees operating in over 40 regulated markets and with
offices in 20 countries, mean it is ideally positioned to provide its
technology to operators in new regulated and regulating markets.
Given its scale, the data that Playtech leverages enables it to
players to enjoy the same seamless experience across any
platform and on any device, including retail, all through a
single wallet and a single account.
Playtech’s platform acts as an aggregator for both content and wallet
systems, allowing content suppliers to integrate seamlessly with it.
Our UK Bingo network consists of more than 20 brands and manages
more than 60,000 daily players and 20,000 daily concurrent players.
2022 highlights
In a major milestone for Playtech’s long-term partnership with Buzz
Bingo, Playtech’s single wallet solution went live across Buzz’s entire
digital and retail estate in July 2022. This gives players the flexibility to
deposit funds online and use them in a physical club (and vice versa)
or withdraw winnings in any location. The launch of Buzz Live Bingo in
September is already driving a strong incremental NGR uplift, with no
cannibalisation of existing rooms.
Elsewhere, Playtech welcomed EPlay24 – the fastest growing
operator in the history of the Italian Bingo market – to its network,
whilst the relaunch of Britain’s Got Talent Bingo for Mecca Bingo
and the launch of Loyalty Rooms for Sky Bingo are among the major
developments for Playtech’s long-term partners.
Analytics
Business intelligence technology (BIT), built using artificial
intelligence (AI), provides new and existing licensees with
superior innovation for their next stage of growth.
Playtech’s exclusive data-driven business intelligence marketing
technology significantly enhances licensee revenues by improving
player experience and increasing lifetime value. Added AI functionality
gives licensees the tools to analyse big data and leverage real-time
automated insights into players’ behavioural patterns to create a
personalised gaming experience.
We offer the ability to segment players and personalise
communication based on their behaviours, improving player
experience. At the same time, AI functionality enables personalised
safer gambling interaction, powered by BetBuddy. AI functionality
is now embedded across Playtech’s IMS platform and is used by
Playtech’s leading tier one customers.
2022 highlights
• The deployment of a new BI model helps operators predict which
players are likely to leave the game, giving them the option to offer
bonuses to encourage them to stay.
• Significant improvements to player segmentation enable targeting
at a more granular level, for example based on which product
verticals players prefer and how often they play.
40
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Services
Making the most of Playtech’s technology
Through partnering with over 180 licensees globally, Playtech has amassed a huge amount of knowledge on the gambling industry including
customer acquisition and retention, how to manage risk and operational know-how. For those operators that are looking to launch online in newly
regulating markets, this know-how can prove invaluable in ensuring that they make the most of the opportunities of an expanding addressable
market. For those that are already established, our services can offer a way to get the most out of Playtech’s technology to help deliver further
growth. We break down our services offering into three segments: marketing services, operational services and consultancy and training.
Consulting and training:
Our consulting and training services ensure an easily accessible source of industry
andoperational knowledge togetthemost out of Playtech’s technology.
Marketing services:
Our marketing services are typically targeted at those operators where
wehaveadeeprelationship such asstrategicagreements.
Customer acquisition
Executing best practices and strategies in external marketing
to execute and promote marketing campaigns in line with
an agreed marketing plan and budget. We are experienced
across all customer acquisition channels and look to build
relationships with partners to ensure maximum value.
Customer retention
Developing and executing marketing strategies to retain,
grow and maximise player value while achieving high levels
of engagement and in line with regulatory and compliance
frameworks and procedures. We have experience across
all communication channels including social media and
gamification and can deliver valuable bonus strategies
across all product verticals.
Operational services:
Our operational services are typically available for those customers
whichuseourtechnology under aconventionalbusiness model.
Customer
onboarding
Assisting the operator
in configuring
their customers’
onboarding journey/
flow. We configure the
technical set-up for the
system and oversee
ongoing results to
ensure business
performance.
Risk
management
Delivering fraud
prevention services
for the operator to
minimise reputational
and financial losses.
We also offer AML
services to ensure
operators adhere
to regulatory
requirements.
Customer
experience services
By combining our
expertise in regulatory
frameworks, customer
protection and leading
delivery, we provide
high-quality customer
experience services
using AI-driven
solutions at scale.
Payments processing
Overseeing the
processing of cash
out requests by
customers from the
point of the request to
the moment they leave
our platform as an
“approved” outgoing
transaction in line with
risk management/
fraud prevention/AML
controls.
Technical
delivery services
Delivering the
necessary back-office
configurations in IMS
to ensure operators
optimise Playtech’s
technology.
Playtech Academy and training
playtechacademy.com is the award-winning website that
acts as a portal where operators and Playtech employees
alike can self-serve a wide range of content including
videos, presentations, podcasts, thought leadership and live
webinars, to enhance their knowledge of Playtechproducts.
Consulting
Our experienced consultants, across a wide range of
locations and covering multiple verticals, help support
operators in implementing industry best practice to get the
most out of Playtech’s technology. Activities are linked to
clearly defined and measurable KPIs.
41
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Product and innovation continued
A flexible offering
A plethora of options to fit our licensees’ needs
SaaS
For those operators that have their own platform, we also offer the ability to access our content, in a plug-and-play SaaS model.
Operators benefit from the ability to access Playtech content without having to license the IMS platform with low implementation
costsand quick time to market, while Playtech expands its addressable market.
The SaaS model can also be used to provide a low friction method of exposing as many operators as possible to Playtech’s technology.
Once operators see the quality of Playtech’s content and technology, the path to offering additional Playtech products becomes easier.
Playtech has been building out the infrastructure for its SaaS business since 2017 including data centres in local markets. As a result,
Playtech is ready to accommodate a large number of operators across its infrastructure and has added over 350 brands since launching
the SaaS offering.
>350
Brands added since launch of the SaaS offering
Modular
Our IMS platform capabilities can also be broken down into a
set of easily identifiable services with distinct integrations. This
componentisation of our software allows the delivery of a more
agile distribution of our technology – ultimately making the
data-driven capabilities in IMS more modular and allowing more
operators to access the capabilities they need. By delivering
a more agile solution we are extending our reach to additional
operators and allowing them to deploy our technology in a quicker
and more cost-effective way. This increases our cross-sell
capabilities with our licensees.
Componentising the IMS platform
IMS
Engagement
Centre
Payments
Player
Management
Risk/AML
/KYC
Wallet
Safer
Gambling
Playtech Open Platform and Games Marketplace
Playtech Open Platform (POP) allows licensees to access more
than 10,000 of the industry’s most popular online and mobile in-
house and third-party games at any time, across any channel and
on any device, ensuring licensees can offer their players a broad
range of content. The Games Marketplace allows operators to
discover and configure Playtech and third-party content, and
monitor their performance, regardless of the technology that
the game was built in. This also increases the amount of data
that Playtech can access, improving our analytics offering and
increasing network effects.
42
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Marketplace business
model unleashes
powerful network
effects
Network
eects from
third-party
content/Games
Marketplace
Better brand
for Playtech
customers
More end
consumers
Better
customer
experience
More choice
for end
consumers
Attracts more
third-party
content
Stakeholder engagement
Engaging constructively
with all stakeholders
Playtech’s success is reliant on maintaining strong relationships with stakeholders.
As a technology leader and trusted service provider in the gambling industry, Playtech’s success is built upon maintaining strong relationships
and trust with its stakeholders. As an Isle of Man registered company, we are not bound by the UK Companies Act 2006. However, we seek to
adhere to best practices and, as such, the following section outlines how the Directors take into account their obligations under section 172(1)
(a)to(f) of the Companies Act 2006.
Employees
Why we value them
We recognise our employees are fundamental to our success and,
as such, we put our colleagues at the heart of everything that we
do as a company. We strive to recognise and reward everyone’s
contributions appropriately and support our employees to ensure
motivation and give people the opportunity to develop both personally
and professionally. Playtech, therefore, needs to attract and retain
top talent and a strategic and professional approach to recruitment
isessential to achieve this.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Impact of the war in Ukraine on our colleagues and the community
• Flexibility, autonomy and being able to work from home
• Employee wellbeing, work-life balance and career progression
• Diverse and inclusive workplace
• Competitive remuneration and benefits
• Communications about strategy and priorities
• Rising cost of living
How the Board and management engage and respond
In 2022, the Board and executive team took steps to strengthen the
quality and frequency of colleague engagement which will continue
into 2023. Specific methods of engagement include:
• Employee engagement surveys
• Town halls and office visits – structured and informal format to:
• Understand and listen to ideas, issues and concerns
• Increase awareness and understanding of the corporate strategy
and priorities
• Establish meaningful, two-way engagement with colleagues
• Foster a culture of listening, openness and consultation
• Ensure employees are aware of actions as a result of engagement
• Independent Speak Up mechanism allowing employees to raise issues
• Qualitative and quantitative data and recommendations frequently
presented to the Board, Sustainability and Remuneration
Committees on employee turnover, engagement, reward
andbenefits, talent development, and diversity and inclusion
Read more on pages 56 to 63
Shareholders
Why we value them
Continued access to capital is vital to the long-term success of our
business. Furthermore, Company Directors can better understand
shareholder concerns and the driving forces behind their voting
decisions. Engagement with experienced investors can be valuable
for the Company in providing feedback on key strategic decisions,
whilst also helping to anticipate any issues that may arise in areas
such as governance and sustainability.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Strategic priorities following unsuccessful acquisition of
Playtech plc
• Simplification of the Group including disposal of Finalto
• US and Latin America strategy
• Capturing the market opportunity in Italy
• Corporate governance
• ESG strategy and progress on safer gambling, climate and diversity
and inclusion
How the Board and managementengage and respond
• Annual Report and AGM
• Structured programme of communications between Board
members and Investor Relations and existing and prospective
investors and analysts
• Results presentations and post-results engagement with major
shareholders
• Capital Markets Days
• Board receives regular updates on investor relations
• Engagement with ESG indices
• Chair of the Remuneration Committee engages with shareholders
on Remuneration Policy and practice
43
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Licensees and customers
Why we value them
We seek to understand our licensees’ and customers’ needs and
challenges so that we can develop products and services and enter
strategic partnerships that will add value. Regularly engaging with
licensees and customers also highlights opportunities for innovation
to ensure we can stay ahead of the competition, and respond
tochallenges.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Innovation across content, products and platform
• Data protection
• Compliance
• Business and operational continuity during the Ukraine war
• Competitive pricing
• Service reliability and scalability
• Solutions and support to meet and anticipate regulatory
developments and sustainability topics – including safer gambling
How the Board and management engage and respond
• Face-to-face engagement at trade shows
• Executive Management team regularly meets with our customers
to ascertain how Playtech is delivering as a partner and how we
can improve
• The Board regularly receives updates on licences signed
andprogress on implementations
• Management teams use account management structures and
CRM tools across our business to ensure we are delivering to
ourlicensees’ and customers’ expectations
• We aim to apply best practices, develop skills and capabilities,
anddeliver continuous improvement in execution to enhance
theoverall customer experience
Suppliers and technology partners
Why we value them
Playtech’s Procurement function identifies key suppliers and
maintains partnership relationships to ensure its supply chain is
aligned with the Company’s core values and supports business
continuity. Our suppliers and technology partners play a crucial role
in supporting our operational excellence as well as the success of our
commercial teams, product units and, ultimately, our licensees. Our
customers benefit from high-quality provision of technical services
as well as the suppliers’ and partners’ geographic reach, industry-
specific and functional domain expertise and implementation support.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Complexity and speed of onboarding process for new suppliers
• Impact of the pandemic on supply chain continuity and
timely delivery
• Consistent and regular communication and engagement
withkey suppliers
• On-time payments
• Fair terms
• Ensure suppliers (including small suppliers) have access
tonewbusiness opportunities
• Ethical behaviour and supplier compliance with sustainability
criteria on climate and human rights
• Innovation partnerships
How the Board and management engage and respond
• Presentations to the Board Sustainability Committee on
sustainable procurement risk assessment and sustainable
supplychain strategy
• The Procurement function undertakes actions to ensure open
communication with vendors and suppliers
• Playtech initiates supplier briefings and brainstorming sessions
tohelp create new solutions aligned with Playtech requirements
• Playtech ensures its suppliers comply with regulatory
requirements, through due diligence checks, GDPR reviews and
information security checks
• Playtech works with suppliers to ensure compliance with human
rights and climate requirements
• Despite disruption due to the Ukraine crisis, Playtech managed
todeliver hardware on time and meet project deadlines
• The Board has directed Playtech to partner selectively with those
that are leaders in their own field and share Playtech’s standards
and values
Stakeholder engagement continued
44
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Regulators and policymakers
Why we value them
Engagement with regulators plays an important role in, and can be
valuable to, facilitating a fairer, safer and more sustainable sector.
The Company continues to actively advocate for regulation in existing,
future and evolving markets and recognises that one-on-one
engagements with regulators and policymakers are vital to raise
industry standards and better understand regulator concerns and
decision making. Through increased engagement with regulators
andpolicymakers, the Company is well positioned to achieve one of
its key commitments to share knowledge and have an even greater
influence on the regulatory environment and drive greater levels of
industry collaboration.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Developing effective regulations for new jurisdictions
• Improving existing regulations and compliance with a greater focus
on safer gambling and AML
• New regulatory and legislative developments to promote player
and consumer protections
• Monitoring AML compliance failings
• Industry-wide changes to legislation to restrict advertising in new
and established jurisdictions
• Implementing industry-wide safer game design
• Adequate industry contributions to charities providing research,
education and treatment
• Use of technology and data analytics to enable player protection
How the Board and management engage and respond
• Board member participation in trade body and one-to-one
meetings with regulators and policymakers
• Chief Compliance Officer provides the Board with regular updates
on developments
• The Board is engaged with the licensing processes in several
newjurisdictions to better understand regulatory requirements
• The Board continues to actively promote further regulation in the
US via meetings with state regulators
• The Board receives ongoing updates including the review of the
UK Gambling Act and regulatory developments in the US and
Latin America
• Playtech delivers training to the Board every 12–18 months,
including legal requirements related to anti-money laundering
andanti-corruption, as well as regulatory developments
Society and communities
Why we value them
We are committed to operating and growing our business in a way
that has a positive impact on the communities and environment where
we operate. We also recognise that the challenges facing the sector
and communities cannot be solved by one organisation alone. Driving
positive social change requires collaboration and partnership.
Most pertinent issues in 2022
• Societal concerns about the impact of gambling on digital wellbeing
and mental health
• Financial and in-kind investments in safer gambling research,
education and treatment
• Action to reduce the risks and impacts on climate change and nature
• Action to tackle modern slavery and human and labour rights issues
• Equality, diversity and inclusion
• The impacts of the war in Ukraine
• Partnership, engagement and support for local community
organisations and causes
How the Board and management engage and respond
• Engagement of the Sustainability and Public Policy Board
Committee along with the CEO with Playtech’s external
Stakeholder Advisory Panel to challenge and inform the
Company’s sustainability strategy
• The Board is provided with updates from the Chair of the
Sustainability Committee on a wide range of societal and
environmental topics including:
• The Company’s safer gambling strategy with a specific focus
on Playtech Protect, Playtech’s safer gambling technology
solutions offering
• Climate change
• Human rights
• The Board is provided with regular updates on community-related
efforts led by Playtech employees, such as the response to the
Ukraine war
• The Board participated in climate change training and endorsed
theCompany’s climate change strategy
• The Board Sustainability and Public Policy Committee reviewed
and approved targets for increasing female representation in
leadership roles
See our response to Ukraine on pages 8 and 9
See KPI section on page 17
45
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Responsible business and sustainability
Sustainable Success
Sustainability framework, commitments and targets
The war in Ukraine, rising cost of living, economic downturn, continued impacts of climate change and lasting impacts of the pandemic on employee
working life and wellbeing, coupled with increased regulatory and disclosure requirements, have all had a profound influence on how a business responds
and manages societal and environmental impacts and opportunities. For the online gambling sector, there is a continued focus on the role that technology
can play in understanding and reducing risk as well as supporting a safer gambling experience. However, the growth of online gambling and increasing
regulatory developments continue to prompt debate and concerns about the impact of online gambling on the health and wellbeing of consumers.
Allofthese developments have influenced the Company’s decisions about its commitments and actions to grow in a responsible and sustainable way.
Commitments
• Expand the portfolio of safer gambling technology, tools
and solutions
• Harness investment in R&D to advance the next generation
of safer solutions
• Strengthen operational safer gambling standards and
technology across our operations
Performance measures
• Engagement and collaboration with licensees
• Research and partnerships
• Safer gambling certification
Pioneering
safer gambling
solutions
Commitments
• Promote integrity, uphold human rights and reduce
compliance risk across our operations and supply chain
• Ensure equal opportunity and equality for all employees
1 Snaitech employees also completed training relating to Italian Legislative Decrees 231/01 and 231/07, in light of regulatory changes.
Risk assessment
Policies and
procedures
External
engagement
and monitoring
Assurance,
evaluation and
reporting
Training
Reducing
compliance risk
Communications
and engagement
Governance
and oversight
Application to
products, services
and operations
57
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Reducing compliance risk continued
Speaking up
An important aspect of Playtech’s commitment to conducting its
business with integrity and promoting a culture of openness and
accountability is providing a channel for employees to voice concerns
about anything they find unsafe, unethical or unlawful. The Company’s
Speak Up line is instrumental in ensuring that employees have
access to an independent channel to raise concerns confidentially
and without fear of criticism or retaliation. Since 2017, Playtech has
offered an independent Speak Up hotline to enable employees to
raise their concerns confidentially and anonymously. During 2022,
Playtech had two incident reports, anonymously submitted in writing
via the Speak Up platform. These incidents triggered the internal
review and escalation process to the Chief Compliance Officer
andGeneralCounsel for review and have now been resolved.
Data protection
Playtech is committed to protecting and respecting the personal data
it holds, in accordance with the laws and regulations of the gaming
markets in which it operates. The Company’s systems, software,
technologies, controls, policies and processes have been adjusted
to ensure appropriate management of privacy risk. Personal data
processing is crucial to Playtech’s business model, with customers
and clients trusting the Company with their personal data every day.
Ultimately, they only trust Playtech as a business partner and supplier
when they have confidence that their personal data is safe and
understand how and why it is used by the Company.
Playtech’s Group-wide security and privacy policies support the
management of data privacy risk and are accessible to and applied
by all its global businesses units. Playtech provides transparency to
its players, employees and stakeholders on how it collects, uses and
manages their personal data and their associated rights.
Following the implementation of the EU General Data Protection
Regulation (GDPR) in May 2018, and numerous regulatory
requirements for the gambling industry, Playtech has embedded
a tested and verified as well as robust and consistent approach to
data protection and security across all of its jurisdictions. Playtech
takes all possible steps to safeguard personal data by adhering to
the principles contained within the GDPR and other relevant data
protection legislation.
Playtech has established a dedicated Data Protection team that
reports monthly to the Board on data privacy risks and issues. The
Data Protection team’s work focuses on driving privacy by design and
monitoring of policies as well as conducting reviews and data privacy
impact assessments. The Group implemented procedures set out
clearly the actions required when dealing with a data privacy incident.
These include notifying regulators, clients or data subjects as required
under applicable privacy laws and regulations. Over the past year,
Playtech has matured the depth and frequency of data protection
and cybersecurity reporting to maintain high visibility for its senior
management team and the Board.
Playtech is proactive in refining its approach to data privacy.
Acknowledging the evolving regulatory and technological landscape
and changing customer habits and trends, the Company seeks
continuous improvement both in its policy and its application. All
Playtech employees and partners are required to comply with
confidentiality requirements, and legal and regulatory obligations,
with contractual terms such as data processing agreements and
EU model clause agreements governing the use, disclosure and
protection of information. Each year, employees and contractors are
also required to complete test-based data protection and security
awareness training.
Responsible business and sustainability continued
Training overview
The following outlines participation and completion rate in data protection and security training offered to employees and contractors in the organisation.
Training type
Total number of eligibleTotal number completing the trainingCompletion rate
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Cyber and physical security
The Playtech Security team’s mission is providing business
enablement for the gaming platform, licensees and players in a
secure, non-intrusive and scalable manner. The global technological
environment is ever evolving, and so are cyber and physical security
threats. The gaming and betting industry is a highly lucrative target for
malicious parties, ranging from individuals operating by themselves to
highly sophisticated organised crime groups, which drives Playtech
Security to constantly strive for improved technologies, processes
and skills to address these challenges.
The Playtech Security team oversees the operational, technical and
organisational measures taken to protect the organisation from both
cyber and physical security risks. Domains such as infrastructure,
application, compliance and physical facilities are covered by a
comprehensive security programme, which assures the safe and
secure operation of Playtech’s business. The global Security team
has a strong customer-centric approach manifested by:
• emphasis on securing customer data at rest and in transit;
• educating licensees on the security capabilities of the
Playtech platform;
• monitoring activities around production applications and infrastructure;
• assuring suppliers and third parties undergo due diligence process
before integration with the Company’s infrastructure; and
• performing ongoing security audits and tests to verify the security
controls in place.
Furthermore, the Playtech Security team feeds into the corporate risk
register and provides monthly updates to the Board about the security
programme, which includes:
• annual audit activities, in house and by licensees (ISO 27001, ISAE
3402, PCI-DSS, global regulations, etc.);
• network security architecture, automation and governance; and
• state-of-the-art protection of the Company’s devices from
malware, in-depth scanning of application code across
development teams to find security bugs and a 24/7 SOC team
which monitors the security incidents across the Company.
Compliance and responsible supply chain management
In 2022, Playtech initiated the review of its procurement policy to
strengthen oversight and mitigate compliance, ethical and climate-related
risks, to ensure minimum standards are adhered to when entering
joint ventures. Compliance continues to work closely with the
Procurement function to review risks in the supply chain. Supply chain
issues, including human rights and climate related, were specifically
examined as part of the compliance health check process and
riskassessment.
Human rights
Playtech is committed to upholding the principles embodied in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as well as the International
Labour Organization’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and
Rights at Work. Playtech’s most salient human and labour rights
issues relate to employment, data protection, procurement of goods
and services, and AML, specifically ensuring that individuals involved
in human trafficking and slavery are not laundering their money
through Playtech’s operations.
In 2022, Playtech published its sixth Modern Slavery Act statement,
outlining the initiatives the Company is undertaking to understand
and assess potential risks of modern slavery and human trafficking,
available at www.playtech.com.
Key areas of focus for 2022 included the reinforcement of processes
and procedures for managing third parties used in employment
practices, reviewing and strengthening audit procedures, and
strengthening supplier human rights assessments. In 2022, Playtech
enhanced its supplier risk profile to identify sectoral risks as well
as risks from their geographical location. A risk assessment matrix
was used, looking at sectoral risk, country risk and spend data to
prioritise next steps. The Company has reviewed 133 supplier sectoral
categories and has given a human rights and modern slavery risk
rating from “low” to “high” to each category. The Group has identified
57 “high” and “medium” categories as priority categories. To identify
country-specific risks, the Company took account of a number of
external indices in its process, including the UN Human Development
Index, Freedom House’s Freedom in the World Civil Liberties, the US
State Department’s Trafficking in Persons Report, the Global Slavery
Vulnerability Index and the World Bank Worldwide Governance
Indicators – Regulatory Quality, with the addition of the UNICEF
Child Rights Atlas – Workplace Index. In 2023, Playtech will engage
with its suppliers identified as being in a high-risk sector and located
in a high-risk country through a self-assessment questionnaire to
confirm that they continue to uphold the same standard as Playtech.
The Company will also continue an in-depth review of its internal
processes to ensure any gaps are identified and corrected.
In addition, Playtech’s Compliance team continues to monitor human
rights flags as part of its risk monitoring of third parties, including
suppliers, partners and licensees. The Company reviews any cases
involving human rights flags on a case-by-case basis to assess risk
and actions required.
59
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Responsible business and sustainability continued
Equality in the workplace
Playtech aims to foster a respectful and supportive workplace that
enables every colleague to have the same opportunity regardless of
backgrounds, cultures, beliefs, genders and ethnicities, or any other
attributes. The Company has set out specific diversity commitments
and a target to increase female representation amongst its leadership
population, including Executive Management and senior management,
to 35% by 2025 against a 2021 baseline year, with an ultimate ambition
to achieve equality in the workplace.
At the core of Playtech’s diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging
strategy, the Company made the following commitments:
1. promote an inclusive culture across the organisation;
2. build a more gender diverse workforce, increasing representation
of gender at all levels of the organisation and across all functions;
3. increase leadership representation of underrepresented
groups; and
4. adopt a data-driven approach to increase workforce diversity at
all levels of the organisation and across all functions.
Playtech’s strategy is formed to foster inclusion, improve gender
diversity and reduce the gender pay gap across our workforce.
The Board Sustainability and Public Policy Committee played and
will continue to play a key role in engaging with business leaders
on inclusion, challenging management to deliver against these
commitments and monitoring progress against the stated targets.
Playtech recognises that a diverse mixture of skills, professional
and industry backgrounds, geographical experience and expertise,
gender, tenure, demographics, disability, ethnicity and diversity of
thought is instrumental for the long-term success of the Company.
In 2022, the Board approved a Board Diversity Policy, setting out
its approach to ensure that diversity and inclusion is a core part
of recruitment and succession planning at the Board. To support
the implementation of the strategy, the Group has also deployed
a refreshed global recruitment policy as well as a new wellbeing,
bullying and harassment policy. The policies confirm Playtech’s
commitment to recruit from a diverse, qualified group of candidates,
thus increasing our diverse talent pool and broadening the Company’s
diversity of thought. In 2022, the FCA finalised new rules on board and
executive committee diversity disclosures. In 2023, we will be setting
targets on this and will report on the relevant ethnicity data.
In 2022, the Group also launched its first online unconscious bias
training, which had an 80% completion rate. This training remains
open for all employees, which can be accessed and completed in their
own time. Playtech also launched bullying and harassment training for
managers, which had a 75% completion rate.
Workforce engagement and development
It is important for the Group that its employees feel fulfilled, are
satisfied with their working environment and feel like they have
been given the right tools and guidance to develop their skills,
experience and career. During the year, Playtech launched its first
global mentorship programme, which aimed at matching mentors
and mentees based on the needs of each mentee. The programme
is designed to run for 12 months with a plan to continue a second
phase in 2023. The Company has set out its future focus to enhance
leadership development and embed diversity and inclusion as a core
part of the development programme for current and future leaders
and managers. To support this aspiration, in 2023 Playtech will also
launch a new Learning and Development policy and programme.
Championing diversity, equity
and inclusion in Estonia
In 2022, Playtech Estonia engaged its employees across
different initiatives to raise awareness around diversity,
equity and inclusion (DEI) and to foster an organisational
culture where every employee feels welcome and valued.
In May, Playtech Estonia celebrated Diversity Day in
collaboration with other local companies. All activities
were planned and organised by the local diversity
champions with the aim to make employees think more
about the value of having diverse teams and encouraging
openness. Employees participated in a gamified session
about nationalities and raised donations for the Estonian
Human Rights Center. Playtech Estonia also put together
an action plan for DEI-related activities for the next two
years, which was positively received by the Estonian
Human Rights Center. The plan includes the following
focus areas:
1. raise awareness about the values of a
diverse workplace among our managers
andemployees;
2. assure that the recruitment process is open for
all candidates and free from discrimination;
3. continue to support the career development of
youth in IT;
4. empower women in IT; and
5. maintain a family-friendly Company culture.
The Diversity Label for Playtech Estonia was extended
for an additional two years, and Playtech Estonia publicly
announced this inSeptember.
Strategic Report
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
60
In 2022, the Company utilised a new element of the performance
management tool to measure employee engagement and satisfaction
across its global workforce. With this tool, Playtech is able to assess
its performance using a Net Promoter Score (NPS) approach, an
established metric for measuring satisfaction. In this first baseline
exercise, the Company received a 70% response rate on overall
engagement, with a score of 8.2 out of 10. Playtech had an NPS of
54% (“I would recommend Playtech as a great place to work”).
In the first survey, the highest rated categories were crisis handling
(i.e. the war in Ukraine), teamwork and manager support. Results from
the survey also highlighted opportunities for enhancement around
learning, development and professional growth and support for
employee wellbeing, as well as increased frequency and improved
quality of communications about strategy and priorities. This exercise
also enabled Playtech to understand employees’ position and views
on how the Company can champion and enhance diversity across the
Group. On the question of diversity, equity and inclusion, employees
felt that people from all backgrounds have equal opportunity to
succeed at Playtech with a score of 8.6 out of 10. Additionally,
employees felt that “Playtech does a good job at fostering a diverse
and inclusive environment” rating the Company with 8.3 out of 10.
However, Playtech recognises that there is more to be done to foster
equality across the business.
As a result of the survey, the Company is implementing a number of
workstreams to review the ideas and areas for improvement from the
survey, including establishing a Global Engagement Working Group
to identify wins that will have an immediate impact, the development
of business unit and country action plans to address concerns in the
medium to longer term and strengthening two-way communications
with its workforce.
Measuring progress on gender diversity
Playtech has conducted a systematic review to ensure it strengthens
its measurement and reporting methodologies and processes.
Playtech has implemented a new “business intelligence” (BI) tool
to monitor global human resources data, such as recruitment,
promotion, mobility, etc. This provides us greater flexibility to identify
opportunities for improvement and plan targeted actions to continue
to foster an inclusive culture with equal opportunities.
This data has been instrumental in implementing a programme of
improvements as we enhance diversity as part of recruitment and
selection, development and succession planning, with particular
focus on leader and manager recruitment processes. This led to
Playtech’s progress against our global target to reach 35% female
representation in leadership positions by 2025 reaching 26%,
compared to 23% in 2021. In 2023, Playtech will continue to use data
analytics to refine its understanding of gaps in female talent across
the Group and take action to increase female retention.
The FTSE Women Leaders Review, launched in 2016 as a follow up to
the Davies Review, is an independent review body which followed the
work of the Davies Review to increase the number of women on FTSE
350 boards. Although it started off as a voluntary independent review,
Playtech continued its participation in 2022, with the appointment
of one additional female on the Executive Committee. The metrics
reflect Playtech’s efforts to encourage the leadership to enhance our
processes and procedures within recruitment and internal mobility.
We continue to strengthen the rigour in performance management
processes, including efforts to ensure that remuneration and
promotion processes are fair and consistent. The key focus in 2023 is
to continue to collect and monitor our data in the UK and beyond, gain
local business unit and country accountability globally and enhance
the right behaviours in our leaders which in turn will promote a more
inclusive culture and workforce.
Global gender splits: The following charts illustrate the global
diversity data and trends from 2020 to 2022.
Employees (%)
1
2022 60.639.3
2021 62.737. 3
2020 60.739.3
Senior managers (%)
2
2022 73.826.2
2021 80.819.2
2020 80.619.4
Leadership population (%)
4
Female (target: 35% by 2025)
2022 74.125.9
2021 77.422.6
Directors (%)
5
2022 71.428.6
2021 71.428.6
2020 71.428.6
Male
Female
1 Employees are defined as the total number of employees on the payroll on 31 December.
Outof 7,160 employees, 7 preferred not to disclose their gender.
2 From 2021 onwards, senior managers are defined as the leadership population excluding any
Board members (e.g.CEO, CFO). In 2022, there are 195 senior managers in total.
3 In 2020, senior managers were defined as the top 500 highest earning employees at Playtech.
4 Leadership population is defined as Executive Management and senior management,
whichincludes managers with multiple departments or departments with complex and
morehighly technical responsibilities.
5 Directors are defined as Board Directors on 31 December.
Direct reports to the Executive Committee (%)
1, 2
2022 50.649.4
2021 58.741.3
2020 74.225.8
Executive Committee (%)
2
2022 63.636.4
2021 70.030.0
2020 100.0
Male
Female
1 Excludes administrative support staff.
2 Data as at 31 October of the reporting year.
61
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Measuring progress on gender diversity continued
UK gender pay gap data
One of the Group’s priorities is to review and reduce the gender pay
gap (GPG) with a focus on reducing the median gender pay gap,
which is the middle pay point for males and females. The Company
currently reports on the gender pay gap in the UK and will be looking
to conduct this exercise in other markets starting in 2023.
This year is the fifth anniversary of publishing UK GPG data for
Playtech. The data analysis and graphical representations indicate
a significant reduction of the median pay gap from 60.4% in 2018
to 26.5% in 2022. However, compared to last year, there has been
an increase from 18.9% in 2021 to 26.5% in 2022. When reviewing
the data for the relevant period, it is clear this is due to the number
of male leavers in lower paid positions. This is also reflected in the
bonus median pay gap figure. In addition, the Company continues
to see higher representation of men in the higher salaried roles, with
81% males and only 19% females in the upper quartile, although
this year there is a slight improvement compared to 2021 where the
split was 83% males and 17% females. The proportion of males and
females receiving a bonus has improved compared to the previous
year (65% males and 57% females in 2022 vs 81% males and 69%
females in 2021) following improvements to our internal processes
and policies to reduce any possible bias and discrimination. Playtech
acknowledges the gap remains and is committed to the necessary
focus on gender pay gap and continuing to promote a culture of
diversity and inclusion.
Gender pay gap
1
Median gender pay gap (%)
2
2022 26.5
2021 18.9
2020 21.0
Mean gender pay gap (%)
2
2022 27.4
2021 27.5
2020 25.5
Median gender bonus gap (%)
3
2022 36.5
2021
11.4
2020 31.1
Mean gender bonus gap (%)
3
2022 41.4
2021 44.7
2020 49.6
Male
Female
1 Based on UK employees only. The numbers were calculated in line with the UK Government’s
requirements for reporting gender pay figures and cover payroll andbonuses paid up to
5April2020, 5 April 2021 and 5 April 2022 respectively.
2 Based on hourly rate of pay. In line with the UK Government’s guidance for gender pay
gapreporting, furloughed employees are excluded from the calculation.
3 Based on total bonuses received. In line with the UK Government’s guidance for gender pay
gap reporting, furloughed employees are included in the calculation.
Human capital metrics
In 2022, Playtech is reporting for the first time its global retention and
turnover rates as well as the total number of new hires, split by gender
and age groups.
Playtech has reported for the first time this year its global employee
retention rate and turnover figures. The Group’s retention rate has
remained over 65% over the last three years with 2020 having the
highest figure mainly due to the pandemic and the stability of the
employment market at that time (68% in 2022, 65% in 2021 and 77%
in 2020). The Company’s global turnover rate has increased slightly
from 28% in 2021 to 38% in 2022, which has been partly driven by
divestments in the year and an increase in the number of employees in
its Live studios. The table below shows the global retention and turnover
figures by gender and age groups, both of which were slightly higher
for women than men. In 2023, we will do a deep dive on those numbers
to understand how to improve them and strengthen the Group’s talent
retention strategy. Playtech’s continuing investment in human capital
and attractiveness of our employment proposition is evidenced by the
recruitment of 3,155 new hires (43% women and 57% men) in 2022.
2022
Global employee retention rate68%
Male employees67%
Female employees70%
Under 30 years old66%
30–50 years old88%
Above 50 years old93%
Global employee turnover rate38%
Male employees34%
Female employees45%
Under 30 years old63%
30–50 years old23%
Above 50 years old15%
Total number of new hires3,155
Male employees57%
Female employees43%
Responsible business and sustainability continued
62
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Health, safety and wellbeing
The wellbeing of Playtech’s workforce and their families and
communities continues to be a key priority as they all continue to
deal with the ongoing impacts of the pandemic. During the year,
Playtech continued to prioritise workplace wellbeing and continued to
implement a flexible working model to support work/life balance and
flexibility for its employees, particularly those caring for friends and
family in these challenging times.
In 2022, Playtech continued to implement and scale its global
wellbeing framework with a focus on physical, mental, financial
and social wellbeing. We continued to cultivate a culture of support
for its employees, ensuring they have access to a suite of support,
advice and networking opportunities to help them be resilient, grow
and succeed at work. In 2022, Playtech rolled out more than 100
wellbeing initiatives with a focus on physical, mental, financial and
social wellbeing. Over 3,400 employees participated in one or more of
these sessions.
Line managers have played an instrumental role in supporting the
Group’s commitments to employee wellbeing. They have led efforts
to initiate and support team and individual wellbeing discussions
and build awareness to break down stigmas about mental health,
including discussions on gambling-related harm.
Snaitech operational health and safety
Snaitech’s business operations are unique within Playtech’s
operations. The Italian operations comprise retail shops and
racetracks, meaning the physical health and safety challenges are
different and more material as compared with an office environment.
Snaitech is committed to developing and promoting a culture of
worker health and safety and implementing a management system
toensure full compliance with local Italian legislation.
The below table outlines occupational health and safety data for
Snaitech operations over the past three years.
Occupational health and safety data
1
202220212020
Total number of accidents8104
Accident ratio
Total number of accidents/working
hours x 200,000
2
1.11.60.7
Number of days lost to accidents22426688
Severity of accident index
Total days lost for accidents/
working hours x 200,000
2
31.941.314.8
Number of days of absence
3
10,7476,83640,131
1 Covers Snaitech operations only.
2 200,000 is a fixed coefficient (50 working weeks x 40 hours x 100).
3 Number of days of absence in 2020 is defined as total hours of absence/8 (hours of work per
day); 31,942 days of absence are due to furloughed absences. Number of days of absence in
2021 is defined as hours lost due to illness, which includes COVID-19.
Economic footprint
Playtech is head quartered in the UK, where the Parent Company,
Playtech plc, is tax resident. Playtech engages in tax planning that
supports its business and reflects commercial and economic activity.
Playtech selects the location of its operations based on commercial
and operational factors that extend well beyond tax, including: the
prevailing regulatory environment available, a widely available pool
of technical talent, the linguistic capabilities in these jurisdictions, the
location of the Group’s licensees, and labour and operational cost
factors. The Group is committed to complying with all tax regulations
in jurisdictions in which it operates and seeks to minimise the risk
of uncertainty and disputes through proactive dialogue with the
tax authorities and by obtaining third party expert advice, where
appropriate.
Playtech has offices in 20 countries, with offices and commercial
activities in multiple jurisdictions, with the majority of its development
and technical operations in Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Bulgaria and
Gibraltar. These locations are well known as technology hubs with
a large population of highly skilled experts. The Group’s presence
in some markets, such as Austria, Australia and Italy, is a result of
acquisitions.
Given the dynamic nature of tax rules, guidance and tax authority
practice, the business is exposed to continuously evolving rules and
practices governing the taxation of e-commerce and betting and
gaming activities in countries in which the Group has a presence.
Such taxes may include corporate income tax, withholding taxes
and indirect taxes. The Head of Tax keeps the Board and Executive
Management fully informed of developments in domestic and
international tax laws within jurisdictions where the Group has a
presence. The Group has an appropriately qualified Tax team to
manage its tax affairs.
During the year, the Board reviewed and adopted the Group’s
UK Tax Strategy Statement (available at www.playtech.com/
responsibility-regulation/tax-strategy). The total adjusted tax charge
for 2022 is €54.9 million (2021: tax credit of €7.1million) and the
effective tax rate for the current period is 25.5%.
63
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Powering action for
positive environmental
impact
In 2022, Playtech evolved its sustainability framework to include a new pillar that outlines its commitment to climate change. The Board and
leadership recognise that urgent action is required to substantially reduce the risks and impacts of climate change, that climate change is a material
issue and that the Company has an important role to play in the sector and the countries and communities where it operates. Additionally, the
Company is impacted by existing and potential future regulations to limit GHG emissions from the corporate sector and exposed to the impacts
that climate change can have on its operations, employees and customers. As a large company with significant B2B operations, Playtech has an
opportunity to scale action on climate through partnership and engagement with its value chain – from its customers to its suppliers.
Commitments
• Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions within own
operations and supply chain
• Build capability and climate resilience through decisive
actions in both own operations and supply chain
• Align to global climate efforts to transition into a low carbon
economy, in accordance with the latest climate science,
and prioritise climate innovation
Targets and
performance measures
Policy and commitments
Playtech’s Group environmental policy outlines the Company’s
commitment to reducing its environmental footprint as well as to
buying renewable energy and engaging suppliers to reduce its supply
chain emissions. In 2022, the Company circulated an environmental
procedure document to support the implementation of the policy
within its existing and new operations.
In 2022, one of the major areas of focus was to switch its material
operations to renewable energy, where possible. Another notable
area of progress is the Company’s formal commitment to set near-term
and net zero targets through the Science Based Targets initiative
(SBTi). Finally, the Company continued to improve its understanding
of its Scope 3 GHG emissions and its climate-related risks and
opportunities and started considering the levers it has to influence
those areas. The Board and members of the Executive Management
have also participated in climate change training during 2022.
Environment metrics
As per the UK SECR requirements for 2022, Playtech has reported
its Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions and energy consumption
figures for the UK.
In 2019 Playtech introduced a GHG emissions target to guide its
energy reduction efforts. The Company’s ambition is to reduce its
absolute Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 40% by 2025, using 2018
as the baseline year. To make this happen, Playtech is working with
key site operations, supported by environmental specialists, to reduce
energy usage and address other environmental impacts. In addition,
Playtech has a central fund to support energy reduction projects.
Playtech’s total Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) emissions decreased
by 11.7% in 2022. Since 2018, they have decreased by 39.6%, meaning
that Playtech is very close to achieving its 40% reduction target. The
decrease in emissions is explained mainly by the decreasing emission
intensity of the electricity grids in the countries where the Company
operates, which averaged -14.1% (weighted by total electricity
consumption per country) in 2022. Normalised per full-time equivalent
(FTE) employees, emissions decreased by 12.5%. Total energy
consumption increased by 3.2% in 2022, explained by the continued
rebounding of activities following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Responsible business and sustainability continued
6,970 tCO
2
Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) emissions
39.6%
Reduction since 2018 (baseline)
64
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Reduce Scope
1 and 2 carbon
footprint by
40% by 2025
against a 2018
baseline
Secure approval
of near-term
and net zero
targets by
Science
Based Targets
initiative (SBTi)
Switch all
offices,
wherever
possible, to
renewable
energy
Environment metrics
Greenhouse gas emissions
Key performance indicator
Independent limited
assuranceUnit2022 20212020
Energy use
Global total energy consumption—kWh27,243,173
1, 2
26,404,60927,677,113
UK total energy consumption—kWh1,733,605
1, 2
1,672,3501,556,362
GHG emissions
Global Scope 13tonnes COe1,237
1, 2
1,1711,155
UK Scope 1—tonnes COe67
1, 2
6948
Global Scope 2 (location-based)3tonnes COe5,733
1, 2
6,7208,161
UK Scope 2 (location-based)tonnes COe274
1, 2
281302
Global Scope 2 (market-based)3tonnes COe1,631
1, 2
7,078—
UK Scope 2 (market-based)—tonnes COe77
1, 2
212—
Global Scope 3—tonnes COe109,10080,420—
Category 1: Purchased goods and services3tonnes COe32,13841,031—
Category 2: Capital goods3tonnes COe22,36414,842—
Category 3: Fuel and energy-related activities3tonnes COe2,5522,610—
Category 14: Franchises3tonnes COe45,95717,972—
Global total Scope 1 and 2
(location-based)—tonnes COe6,970 7,8929,316
UK total Scope 1 and 2 (location-based)—tonnes COe341 350350
Global total Scope 1 and 2 (market-based)—tonnes COe2,869 8,249—
UK total Scope 1 and 2 (market-based)—tonnes COe144 281—
Global Scope 1, 2 (location-based) and 3—tonnes COe116,07088,312—
Global Scope 1, 2 (market-based) and 3—tonnes COe111,96988,669—
Carbon intensity
Scope 1 and 2 (location-based) GHG intensity3tonnes COe/employee1.001.141.37
Scope 1 and 2 (market-based) GHG intensity—tonnes COe/employee0.411.19—
1 2022 absolute data is an estimate based on 99.7% actual data coverage by headcount. Coverage has been above 99% for all three years.
2 Due to reporting timelines, data for November and December 2022 has been estimated using November and December 2021 actual data, except for sites where actual 2022 data was already
available. Thisisthe same methodology that was applied for all three years.
3 Indicates data subject to independent limited assurance by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). The full assurance statement over 2022 data can be found at www.investors.playtech.com/
shareholder-information/sustainability-strategy-and-esg-reporting.aspx. The data for previous years, where assured, is detailed in the respective Annual Reports.
4 Detailed breakdown on the Scope 3 categories can be found in the Responsible Business and Sustainability Addendum to the Annual Report 2022.
During 2022, Playtech drove forward its transition to renewable
electricity in the key markets where the Company operates. This
has resulted in 56.4% of the Company’s total energy consumption
now coming from renewable sources, backed up by energy
attribute certificates, up from 10.8% in 2021. This has led to a
decrease of Playtech’s Scope 2 (market-based) emissions of
77.0%compared to 2021.
Playtech recognises the environmental impact across its global
value chain. The Company therefore conducts an annual Scope 3
footprint. In the process, the Group has followed the GHG protocol
guidance to calculate those emissions, based on a combination of
financial and actual supplier data. The Company is committed to
increasing engagement with key suppliers on their emissions and
gathering more actual data to continuously improve the accuracy of
Scope 3 figures in future years. Playtech determined which of the 15
categories listed by the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope
3) Standard are relevant to the Company and therefore should be
included in its Scope 3 footprint. 13 out of the 15 categories were
identified as being relevant to the Company and two were not relevant
for Playtech. All relevant categories have been calculated, although
“employee commuting” has only been calculated for Snaitech, which
represents around half of the Group’s total employees, due to data
availability. The Company aims to collect sufficient data to include a
full Group footprint on employee commuting in future reporting.
Playtech’s Scope 3 GHG emissions are over 90% of its total
carbon footprint and out of the 15 Scope 3 categories, the
Company’s top three material categories are “products and
services”, “capital goods” and “franchises”. Further details on the
methodology behind the environment metrics, such as emission
factors used, and the breakdown of Scope 3 GHG emissions
can be found in the Sustainability Reporting and Data section
atwww.playtech.com/sustainable-success.
65
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Responsible business and sustainability continuedResponsible business and sustainability continued
Environment metrics continued
The consumption of water across the Playtech Group decreased
by 16.1% in 2022. The racetracks saw a 22.7% increase in water
consumption because of the continued rebounding of activities
postpandemic.
Playtech continues to manage and report on a wider set of
environmental KPIs for Playtech’s Italian operations, Snaitech.
Snaitech runs a retail operation and three racetracks, which means
the environmental impact profile is different from the rest of the
Company’s markets. In 2022, Snaitech’s total non-hazardous waste
production decreased by 25.1%. The volume sent to landfill has
decreased to 5.69 tonnes compared to 7.44 tonnes in 2021. Even
though the volume that is reused or recycled also decreased by
25.1%, this is proportionate with the overall decrease. The volume of
hazardous waste also decreased by 30.3%. Of Snaitech’s total waste
production, 96.0% was produced by the racetracks. 99.9% of total
waste was reused or recycled.
Water consumption
1
2022
2
2021
3
2020
4
Total water consumption (m
3
)578,150688,707611,629
Water consumption for watering
racetracks (m
3
)230,871188,150167,831
Water consumption for watering
racetracks (% of total)39.9%27.3%27.4%
1 Data covering all of Playtech’s operations.
2 2022 estimate based on 78% actual data coverage by headcount.
3 2021 estimate based on 73% actual data coverage by headcount.
4 2020 estimate based on 84% actual data coverage by headcount.
Waste and effluent
5
202220212020
Total non-hazardous waste
production (tonnes)5,2887,0567,665
Of which:
– Sent to landfill (tonnes)675
– Reused or recycled (tonnes)5,282
6
7,048
7
7,660
Hazardous waste (tonnes)344966
5 Data covering Snaitech operations only.
6 This figure is split between racetracks (manure/by-product of animal origin – 4,292),
racetracks (other – 779),andoffices (212).
7 This figure is split between racetracks (manure/by-product of animal origin – 6,946),
racetracks (other – 358) and offices (195).
External assurance and benchmarking
To increase transparency around its climate change performance
and strategy, Playtech completed the CDP Climate Change 2022
Questionnaire and received a “B” rating, maintaining the rating
achieved in 2021 under strengthened scoring criteria. The Company
intends to continue improving its rating in future years. Playtech has
embraced the recommendations of the TCFD, a framework that
allows it to report consistently on the opportunities and challenges
presented by climate change and provide information on how these
might impact strategy and financial performance. Our approach in
this area is evolving in line with developing best practice. Playtech’s
Greening the Financial System, Climate Scenarios Phase 2; World Bank, Climate Knowledge Portal; World Resources Institute,
Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas.
Table A: Climate scenarios and sources.
Climate-related risks are regularly monitored by the executive cross-functional Environment Forum, the Sustainability and Public Policy
Committee of the Board, as well as the Risk & Compliance Committee of the Board. They are also considered as part of the Risk & Compliance
Committee’s biannual review of risks across the Group. Playtech routinely monitors the status of climate regulation in its key markets to ensure
that its GHG reduction targets keep pace with regulatory changes.
The risks and opportunities that were identified as part of the climate scenario analysis are summarised in the below table. The Company
defines short term as less than one year; medium term as one to five years; and long term as more than five years. The Group defines the impact
as material when it is larger than the Group materiality as set out in the Independent Auditor’s Report on pages 136-137. The Company attempted
to calculate the financial impact of each risk and opportunity. For some, however, this was not yet possible due to a lack of data. Playtech will aim
to increase the number of risks and opportunities for which impacts are quantified, year on year as more data becomes available. For the risks
and opportunities where the financial impact was determined and quantified, it was calculated based on a combination of projections on the
physical impacts of climate on specific locations, projections on the societal responses to certain future climate states, both from reputable data
sources described in the table Table A: Climate scenarios and sources and information gathered from within the business.
Responsible business and sustainability continuedResponsible business and sustainability continued
70
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Physical risks
CategoryTypeDescription
Applicable
scenario(s)MaterialityManagement approach
AcuteRiskCancellation of sports events due to high
temperatures or extreme weather events.
Likelihood: very likely.
Timeframe: medium and long term.
Impact: loss of revenue and/or higher
operating costs.
1.5°CImmaterial.Move to night time events, which would
result in higher operating costs due to
the necessary lighting. Invest in the most
energy-ecient lighting available and/or
on-site renewables. Renew racetracks
with more resilient all-weather surfaces.
2°CImmaterial.
3°CImmaterial.
AcuteRiskWater stress causing disruption to horse racetracks
and third-party data centres.
Likelihood: very likely.
Timeframe: medium and long term.
Impact: higher operating costs, temporary
disruption to operations.
2°CNot yet
quantified.
IT risk assess and stress test data
centres, based on age, location and in-
person visits.
Invest in water-ecient equipment;
rainwater treatment and storage facilities;
and water-saving measures. Discussing
changes in calendar to not plan any races
from June.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
ChronicRiskHigher energy costs to cool buildings, including
third-party data centres, Live studios and offices
due to higher temperatures.
Likelihood: very likely.
Timeframe: short, medium and long term.
Impact: higher operating costs.
1.5°CImmaterial.Invest in energy-saving measures and
on-site renewables.
2°CImmaterial.
3°CImmaterial.
AcuteRiskReduced employee productivity and ability to
commute during heatwaves.
Likelihood: unlikely.
Timeframe: medium and long term.
Impact: disruption to operations and higher
operating costs.
1.5°CNot yet
quantified.
Playtech already has a strong hybrid
working culture and demonstrated an
ability to perform while large parts of
the business were fully working from
home during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Emergency air-conditioned transport
could also be oered to employees where
working from home is not an option
(forexample dealers in Live studios).
Increase budgets to support employee
benefits, if necessary.
2°CNot yet
quantified.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
AcuteRiskDisruption to supply chains of key IT equipment
due to extreme weather events. Force majeure
clauses being used more, making it more difficult to
be nimble.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: medium and long term.
Impact: disruption to operations.
1.5°CNot yet
quantified.
Key business units are already stocking
up on hardware and components to
ensure business continuity and building
price premiums for priority delivery
into budgets. Additional investments to
quickly relocate stocks, where needed.
2°CNot yet
quantified.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
ChronicRiskTemporary or permanent closure, or investment in
adaptation, of owned assets and third-party data
centres due to unsuitability for climate impacts.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: higher capital investment or write-off of
assets; higher operating costs.
2°CImmaterial.When expanding into new markets or
planning new assets, the resilience of
those locations to the impacts of climate
change will need to be taken into account.
Feasibility studies on the adaptability of
current buildings for projected climate
impacts. Maintenance and periodic
update of business continuity plans.
Risk assess and stress test data centres,
based on age, location and in-person
visits.
3°CImmaterial.
3°CImmaterial.
ChronicRiskHigher employee-related costs due to inflationary
pressures from climate change and health impacts.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: higher operating costs.
2°CNot yet
quantified.
Monitor the business and political
climate in key markets on an
ongoing basis.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
71
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
CategoryTypeDescription
Applicable
scenario(s)MaterialityManagement approach
ChronicRiskGlobal economic, political and societal instability,
for example due to migration, unavailability of key
life goods, culture change.
Likelihood: unlikely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: disruption of operations and higher taxation.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
Monitor and adapt employee-related
budgets as necessary.
ChronicRiskExtreme weather events and sea level rise would
lead to high investment required to keep vulnerable
assets operational, including the Italian retail
network and Live studios in North and South
America, including in New Jersey.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: higher capital investment; write-off of
assets; disruption to operations.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
Factor future investment into financial
planning; consider future suitability
of locations when expanding; invest
in flood defences where possible or
absorb costs of relocation where not.
Transitional risks
CategoryTypeDescription
Applicable
scenario(s)MaterialityManagement approach
Policy and
Legal
RiskCarbon taxes could pose an additional cost to the
business and limit high-emission activities such
as flying, which would lead to a need to recruit
expertise locally.
Likelihood: very likely.
Timeframe: medium term.
Impact: higher operating costs.
1.5°CImmaterial.Set and review emission
reduction targets. Expand
localrecruitment networks
and invest in local talent pools.
Relocate employees.
2°CImmaterial.
MarketRiskAs the impacts of climate change disrupt key
commodity supply chains and agricultural
production, the cost of living is expected to rise. This
would lead to consumers having less disposable
income and would lead to lower revenue for the
consumer-facing business.
Likelihood: about as likely as not.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: loss of revenue.
2°CMaterial.Monitor the situation and
maintain capacity to supply
increases in demand.
3°CMaterial.
MarketOpportunity/
Risk
1
As heatwaves, extreme weather events and wildfires
force consumers to stay home for periods of the
year, there may be growth in online gambling.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: increase in revenue.
2°CNot yet
quantified.
Monitor the situation and
maintain capacity to supply
increases in demand. Shift
business units which mainly
relyon physical gambling
activities to offer online products.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
Products
and
Services
OpportunityIf casinos are forced to relocate due to the physical
effects of climate change, this could lead to
increased demand for products used by casinos
produced by IGS.
Likelihood: unlikely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: increase in revenue.
3°CImmaterial.Monitor the situation and
maintain capacity to supply
increases in demand.
Responsible business and sustainability continued
Physical risks continued
72
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
CategoryTypeDescription
Applicable
scenario(s)MaterialityManagement approach
MarketsOpportunityIf large parts of the tropics and Southern Europe
become less desirable to live in due to the effects
of climate change in these regions, it could lead to
increased attractiveness of key cities in the Northern
Hemisphere where Playtech has large operational
footprints, such as Riga and London.
Likelihood: likely.
Timeframe: long term.
Impact: increase in attractiveness to
prospectiveemployees.
3°CNot yet
quantified.
Monitor the situation; maintain and
expand, if necessary, operations
in more attractive locations.
Table B: Climate-related risks and opportunities
1 Depending on the business unit: it’s a risk for business units dependent on physical gambling activities and an opportunity for business units dependent on online gambling activities.
The outcomes of the climate scenario analysis are reflected in the risk management, principal risks and uncertainties section (pages 85-90). The
management approaches identified for likely risks and opportunities are being explored, such as investment in renewable energy generation at
key assets. Going forward, Playtech will update its scenario analysis on an annual basis as more information becomes available on the possible
climate futures that humanity faces and their impacts on business. The results of these exercises will be reported to the Board at least annually
through the Sustainability and Public Policy Committee.
Live Casino championing
environmental action
In 2022, the Live team in Latvia implemented several initiatives
to reduce the environmental footprint of the operation. The
operation in Latvia is unique, as it serves as both an office
and Live Casino studio, which operates 24/7. During the
summertime, the electricity consumed by the central cooling
system is one of the high-emitting sources of the office’s
carbon footprint. To address this challenge, the team installed
a sun-reflective film on the main facade of the building. This
helped to reduce the temperature of the premises, thereby
reducing the amount of energy needed to cool the building.
The team also expanded its waste recycling efforts through
the implementation of a waste disposal system for employees
to recycle plastic bottles and cans.
The most significant initiative in 2022 was switching to
renewable energy. The Live facility switched its electricity to
renewable power sources, including hydro energy. The shift to
renewable energy was a significant step towards reducing the
site’s and Group’s carbon emissions.
73
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Partnering on shared
societal challenges
Playtech recognises that the challenges facing the sector and
our communities cannot be solved by one organisation alone.
Drivingpositive social change requires collaboration and partnership.
Our approach
A guiding principle for Playtech’s philanthropic and volunteering
activities is collaboration and partnership. Playtech employees
around the world dedicate their time, skills, money and, most
importantly, passion to support the communities and causes that are
important in their local markets. Playtech established a formal global
programme in 2017 to align its activities around common themes
and outcomes including mental health, digital wellbeing and safer
gambling as well as humanitarian causes, material to the communities
where Playtech operates.
Additionally, we established a Global Community Investment
Committee to oversee and monitor the strategy and governance
of the charity and volunteering activities across the world. In 2022,
Playtech worked with more than 100 local charities in ten markets.
Through the programmes supported, Playtech engaged with more
than 46,000 people in 2022
1
. This is more than a 3.5x increase from
>12,600 people reached in 2021. Community investment includes
gifts in kind, monetary donations and employee volunteering. The
total value of monetary donations totalled over €650,000. Of the ten
countries that took part in the community investment programme,
there was an average of 5% uptake of employees contributing their
time, money or skills in their community.
Building strong and enduring partnerships is central to our approach
in addressing shared societal challenges and making an impact.
The Company is continuously investing in a range of partnerships
with charities, research organisations and social enterprises to
explore how to positively contribute to societal challenges in its
local communities. The following case studies sections provide an
overview of flagship programmes and partnerships designed to make
a difference in the communities where we operate.
1 Engaged is defined as an individual that has directly benefited and/or has interacted with the
programme, supported from financial and/or in-kind support. Community programmes include
all remaining causes except mental health and digital wellbeing, e.g. health and hardship.
Playtech is working with a
diverse range of partners to:
• Help people live healthier online lives and adopt digital
resilience and safer gambling behaviours;
• Contribute to and support research, education and training
to prevent, reduce and address gambling-related harm; and
• Increase employee participation in and contribution
tovolunteering.
Targets and performance
measures
Responsible business and sustainability continued
Reach 415,000
people with
digital wellbeing
programmes
by2025
5% year-on-
year increase
in employees’
contributions
(skills, time or
money) to the
community,
reaching a
global average
of 10% by 2025
Engage 30,000
people in
community and
mental health
programmes
to improve
livelihoods
by2025
>370,000
People reached
>70,000
People engaged through community investment
andmentalhealth programmes
74
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Supporting our colleagues and communities in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine had an unprecedented impact on the lives of our
employees and country. During the year, Playtech provided a wide range
of support to its employees as well as charities delivering humanitarian aid
to communities across the country. From the inception of the war in early
2022, the Company rapidly mobilised its skills, community budgets, assets
and technology to support employees, their families and local communities.
Across the Group, Playtech donated over €250,000 to eight different
humanitarian organisations, which delivered lifesaving medical equipment
and supplies, essential items and psychological support to people across
the country. Over 300 employees from 14 different countries volunteered
to support their Ukrainian colleagues. Support included establishing
a 24/7 hotline group chat, maintaining daily contact with designated
employees and co-ordinating the transportation and accommodation
outside of Ukraine. In addition, local “essential items” drives were
organised by employees across five Playtech offices, with over 100 boxes
including food, clothing, portable chargers and hygiene products shipped
to Ukraine. ACompany-wide fundraising initiative raised over €10,000
and was donated to an additional three humanitarian charities.
In the autumn, colleagues in Ukraine initiated a special initiative called
the “cold winter project”. This initiative is supporting Ukraine-based
charities which are delivering a combination of medical emergency
support, housing, five ambulances and hot meals, supporting thousands
of vulnerable children and families this winter. Playtech continues to
support this initiative and has deployed an additional €100,000 at the
beginning of 2023.
Further information on Playtech’s charitable and humanitarian efforts
arelocated on pages 8-9.
Delivering positive impact
through Playtech’s Recovery
and Resilience Fund
In 2020, Playtech partnered with Charities Aid Foundation
(CAF) to launch the £3 million COVID-19 Recovery and
Resilience Fund. The fund provided both immediate and
long-term support to charities, social enterprises and
not-for-profit organisations that were dedicated to
deliveringmental health services.
The fund has awarded 56 grants to organisations in 10
different locations including: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia,
Gibraltar, IOM, Italy, Latvia, Philippines, UK and US. These
grants supported 18 different causes, with the top 4 causes
being frontline workers (23%), mental health patients (23%),
domestic violence (10%) and at-risk youth (10%). So far, the
fund has collectively reached over 24,000 people directly
andover 1.4 million people indirectly.
One project example is Crisis Text Line, Inc., a US non-profit
organisation dedicated to providing support to people in crisis
through text conversations. In 2020, it saw a 19% increase in
volume compared to 2019, and 19% of its US texters
self-identified as frontline workers. This project helped
cover the costs associated with supporting these texters in
crisis and a total of 4,226 people directly benefited from this
funding. A quote from a beneficiary highlights the positive
impact this service has on so many people: “I really appreciate
what you all are doing. It was very nice to talk to someone who
gave me validation in the way I feel and actually took the time
to listen. It means a lot. Keep doing what you’re doing – you’re
an amazing individual.”
Strategic Report
75
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Responsible business and sustainability continued
Investing in safer gambling
research, education and treatment
Healthy online lives and digital wellbeing
The impacts of gambling-related harm, particularly mental
health impacts, have been rising up the agenda and informing
actions amongst health agencies, politicians, regulators,
activists and charities. Scrutiny and pressure on the sector
to act have added urgency, visibility and relevance for
addressing the intersection of these issues. The enormity
of the current situation also serves as an opportunity and
platform for bringing together interested organisations to
make a difference across the issues.
The intersection of gambling, online life and
mental health
Safer gamblingMental health
Healthy lives and
digital wellbeing
In 2020, Playtech announced a commitment to supporting
programmes and partnerships designed to reduce gambling-
related harm and promote positive digital wellbeing and health
outcomes. In doing so, Playtech formally announced and
committed £5 million over five years in five areas of focus, to
support partnerships and initiatives that can make a positive
difference at the intersection of gambling, online life and mental
health. Playtech has established strategic partnerships with a
growing number of organisations including Betknowmore, Epic
restart foundation, Kindbridge, RG+, the National Centre for
Suicide Prevention, YGAM and more. To date, over 470,000
beneficiaries were reached, both directly and indirectly.
Asummary of each of these partnerships is available on
thePlaytech website.
Playtech has continued its investment in research,
educationand treatment programmes designed to reduce
gambling-related harm. In 2022, Playtech invested over
£1,010,000 in such programmes and initiatives. Below are
afewexamples of programmes supported during the year.
Partnering for change: Playtech
Cyprus and Generation for
Change CY collaboration for
inclusion and equality
In 2022, Playtech Cyprus continued its partnership with
Generation for Change CY, an organisation committed
to supporting vulnerable and marginalised communities,
including refugees, migrants and asylum seekers. Individuals
from these communities experience significant societal
challenges including cultural differences and understanding
new traditions. The initiatives delivered included the Let’s
Play Together Intercultural 3x3 Basketball Tournament,
a Humanitarian Aid Programme and IT donations. The
organisation Generation for Change CY and 22 Playtech
employees worked together throughout the year to deliver
events and initiatives, all focusing on different aspects
ofinclusion.
The basketball tournament helped people from all walks of life
come together to compete in good spirit and with the utmost
respect for one another. The aim of the initiative was to bring
people from different backgrounds together, allowing them to
interact with each other on equal grounds, fostering familiarity,
exchange and appreciation and forming friendships. This initiative
brought together more than 76 players from 21 different countries.
The Humanitarian Aid Programme resulted in the collection of
a large range of products including food, hygiene essentials,
clothes, bedding and kitchen utensils. These collections
directly helped approximately 240 households around Cyprus.
This initiative highlighted the importance of equality and
inclusion for all, as no one should be without thenecessities.
Playtech donated five laptops in support of Generation
for Change CY’s educational and skills development
programmes. The laptops helped provide IT skills courses
to 13 participants to develop their digital literacy. In addition,
the laptops allowed the organisation to deliver employability
activities, which included CV writing, job search sessions and
IT skills courses and were delivered to more than 130 job-
seeking individuals from vulnerable communities. Due to the
overall success of the Playtech and Generation for Change
CY partnership, there will be plans for future collaborations.
76
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Collaborating to reduce
gambling-related financial harm
Since 2019, Playtech has partnered and participated in GamCare’s
Gambling Related Financial Harm (GRFH) programme. Launched
in 2019, the aim of this programme is to develop a best practice
framework for the identification and support of players experiencing
financial difficulty due to gambling-related harm. This multi-
stakeholder initiative brings together lived experience as well as
representatives from the financial sector, the gambling industry,
money and debt advice organisations, gambling treatment and
support services, and research bodies to share best practices, set
new standards, innovate and connect.
The initiative helps organisations better understand the links
between gambling-related financial harm, in particular debt,
and enables them to better help the individuals affected. It has
launched a comprehensive toolkit for financial institutions, gambling
businesses and debt advice agencies across the UK to help them
recognise, support and refer people experiencing GRFH. This
ensures that common language is used and GRFH interventions
are built into processes and cascaded to frontline staff. Various
virtual and in-person workshops and networking events were
organised for frontline workers who might encounter debt and other
gambling-related financial harms. In total, 338 professionals were
reached directly in 2022, with 222 of those receiving wider learning or
engagement under the programme.
Worksafe
Playtech is funding the development of Worksafe by Betknowmore
UK and GamCare. Worksafe is a workplace wellbeing programme
focused on the prevention and reduction of harms linked to gambling
and related digital behaviours. The programme aims to fill the gap
in relation to gambling, in the training, resources and care provided
to employees to maintain positive mental health through enhanced
resilience in the workplace.
The programme accelerated in 2022, after being delayed due tothe
COVID-19 pandemic. The programme’s strategy focuses on three
priority areas: awareness raising, capability building andresearch. A
workshop was created to improve people’s abilityto recognise and
respond to gambling in the workplace. Theworkshop is flexible so
that it can apply to SMEs and multinationals in every conceivable
sector. Content includes lived experience of people with gambling
harms and others who have been affected in the most sensitive
but impactful way possible. It has been piloted with 34 different
organisations, which have in turn provided feedback on the content
and structure of the programme. There are four bespoke packages
offered and the resources will be City & Guilds quality assured. In
the meantime, the Worksafe team has developed partnerships with
umbrella organisations for the sectors it intends to prioritise. These
include gambling operators, local and central government, housing
associations, finance and retail. Worksafe will be formally launched
into the marketplace in early 2023, with a view to becoming
self-sustaining in the future.
77
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Chief Financial Officer’s review
Record performance
with continued
strength in B2B and B2C
Overview
Group performance
Overall, Playtech had an excellent 2022, with Adjusted EBITDA
of€405.6 million (2021: €317.1 million), an increase of 28%
(22%ona constant currency basis) compared to 2021. Similarly,
reported EBITDA increased by €91.2 million to €372.5 million
(2021:€281.3million). Total reported revenue from continuing
operations was €1,601.8 million (2021: €1,205.4 million), representing
a 33% increase (31% on a constant currency basis) compared to
2021. The excellent overall results in 2022 were driven by continued
strength in the Group’s online businesses as well as retail reopening
following pandemic-related closures in parts of 2021 in many of the
Group’s markets.
The strong performance was driven by both the B2C and B2B
divisions. In B2C, Snaitech had an excellent 2022 performance as
the strong results in its online business continued and its retail shops
were open for the entirety of 2022, following the pandemic-related
closures for most of H1 2021. This led to B2C Adjusted EBITDA of
€245.4million, an increase of 38% compared to 2021.
In B2B, the results were driven by strong growth in regulated markets,
with revenues growing by 22% from €378.7 million to €461.6 million
(18% on a constant currency basis), led by Caliente in the Americas
and Holland Casino in Europe, validating the strategy of focusing on
opportunities in regulated and soon to be regulated markets.
Reported and adjusted profit
Adjusted profit before tax from continuing operations increased
by 79% to €215.4 million (2021: €120.4 million), driven by the rise
in Adjusted EBITDA, decrease in depreciation and amortisation
and increase in finance income due to favourable EUR/USD
FXmovements.
Reported profit before tax from continuing operations decreased to
€95.6 million (2021: €605.0 million), mainly due to the €583.2 million
of unrealised fair value gains on derivative financial assets recognised
in the prior year with the current year fair value gain being only
€6.0 million.
This led to a total post-tax reported profit from continuing operations
of €40.6 million (2021: €686.7 million).
Balance sheet, liquidity and financing
The Group continues to maintain a strong balance sheet with
Adjusted gross cash, which excludes the cash held on behalf of
clients, progressive jackpots and security deposits, of €272.4 million
as at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: €434.3 million). The
decrease is a result of fully paying down the outstanding Revolving
Credit Facility (RCF) balance of €166.1 million in July 2022, as well
as the €330.0 million part repayment of the 2018 Bond, offset by
the €223.9 million cash consideration received on the disposal of
Finalto and the positive cash generation due to the performance of
the Group during the year. The Group now has a reduced leverage
position with net debt decreasing by €332.6 million to €275.2 million
as at 31 December 2022 (31 December 2021: €607.8 million). Net
debt/Adjusted EBITDA was 0.7x as at the year end, a significant
improvement to the ratio at 31 December 2021 of 1.9x.
Finalto sale
The sale of the Finalto division to Gopher Investments completed
in July 2022. The final cash proceeds from the disposal were
$228.1million (€223.9 million), which includes an enterprise value of
US$250 million offset by a completion accounts adjustment.
Playtech used part of these proceeds to repay its RCF in full in July
2022 with the remainder used for general corporate purposes.
78
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Chris McGinnis
Chief Financial Officer
28%
Growth in Group
Adjusted EBITDA
Group summary (continuing operations)
3
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
B2B Gambling632.4554.3
B2C Gambling983.1663.7
Intercompany(13.7)(12.6)
Total Group revenue from
continuingoperations1,601.81,205.4
Adjusted costs(1,196.2)(888.3)
Adjusted EBITDA from
continuingoperations405.6317.1
Reconciliation from EBITDA to
Adjusted EBITDA:
EBITDA372.5281.3
Employee stock option expenses8.013.1
Professional fees 15.714.4
Fair value change of redemption liability (4.3)1.3
Ukraine employee support costs3.3—
Onerous contract10.4—
Provision for other receivables—1.2
Charitable donation—3.5
Settlement of legal matter—2.3
Adjusted EBITDA405.6317.1
Adjusted EBITDA margin25%26%
Overall, the Group’s total revenue from continuing operations
increased by 33% to €1,601.8 million (2021: €1,205.4 million),
mostly driven by retail reopening following COVID-19 related
restrictions which impacted H1 2021 in many of the Company’s main
markets, including Italy, as well as its continued growth in regulated
B2B markets.
In B2B, revenue increased by 14% from €554.3 million in 2021 to
€632.4 million in 2022, driven by Mexico, where Caliente continued
its strong growth, as well as increases seen in other countries such as
the Netherlands, Poland and Brazil, partly offset by a decrease in the
UK and Asia.
The Group’s total reported revenues from its B2C operations
increased by 48% to €983.1 million (2021: €663.7 million). Snaitech
had an excellent performance as the strong results in its online
business continued and its retail shops were open for the entirety of
2022, following the pandemic-related closures for most of H1 2021.
The Group’s Adjusted EBITDA from continuing operations increased
to €405.6 million (2021: €317.1 million), representing a 28% and 22%
increase on an actual and constant currency basis, respectively.
Adjusted EBITDA margin decreased by only 90bps in 2022 versus
2021 due to a change in channel mix, with the return of the lower
margin retail segment for the full year 2022, versus closures during
the first half of 2021 due to COVID-19, as well as increased bad debt
provision in the B2B business in Asia, recognised in H1 2022.
The Group’s total reported EBITDA increased by 32% to
€372.5million (2021: €281.3 million). The adjusted items between
reported and Adjusted EBITDA are explained in Note 10 of the
financial statements.
Divisional performance
B2B Gambling
B2B Gambling revenue
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Change
%
Constant
currency
%
Regulated – Americas144.7101.343%27%
Regulated – Europe
(excludingUK)184.6141.431%31%
Regulated – UK126.7132.1(4)%(5)%
Regulated – Rest of the world5.63.944%44%
Total regulated B2B revenue461.6378.722%18%
Unregulated excluding Asia103.693.711%10%
Total core B2B revenue565.2472.420%16%
Asia 67.281.9(18)%(21)%
Total B2B Gambling revenue632.4554.314%11%
Overall, B2B Gambling revenues increased by 14% (11% on a
constant currency basis), largely due to an increase in the regulated
B2Bbusiness.
Core B2B Gambling revenues
2
increased by 20%, driven by an
increase in regulated markets in the Americas and Europe (excluding
the UK), as well as unregulated markets (excluding Asia) of 43%, 31%
and 11% respectively (27%, 31% and 10% respectively on a constant
currency basis). This was offset by a 4% decrease in revenues from
UK (5% on a constant currency basis), and an 18% (21% on constant
currency basis) decline in revenues from Asia.
The increase in the Americas was primarily driven by Mexico, due to
revenue growth from Caliente while in Europe (excluding the UK) the
growth was driven by the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and Ireland. The
increase in the Netherlands was driven by the expanded long-term
strategic software and services agreement with Holland Casino,
which successfully launched in October 2021. In unregulated markets
excluding Asia, the increase was driven by very strong growth in
Brazil, offset in part by a decline in Germany, which saw regulatory
changes in 2021, and the Netherlands moving to a regulated market.
Asia revenue decreased mainly due to the lockdowns in China and
other parts of Asia in the period, whereas in the UK our partnership
with Entain continues to reduce in scope.
B2B Gambling costs
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Change
%
Research and Development87.578.212%
General and Administrative82.667.223%
Sales and Marketing16.813.524%
Operations285.3256.211%
Total B2B Costs 472.2415.114%
Total B2B Revenue and Costs
B2B revenue632.4554.314%
B2B Costs(472.2)(415.1)14%
Total B2B Adjusted EBITDA160.2139.215%
Margin25%25%
79
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Divisional performance continued
B2B Gambling continued
B2B Gambling costs continued
Research and Development (R&D) costs include, among others,
employee-related costs and proportional office expenses. Expensed
R&D costs increased by 12% to €87.5 million (2021: €78.2 million),
driven by the increase in employee-related costs. Capitalised
development costs were 39% of total B2B R&D costs in 2022,
whichisin line with the prior year.
General and Administrative costs include employee-related costs,
proportion of office expenses, consulting and legal fees, and
corporate costs such as audit and tax fees and listing expenses.
These costs increased by 23% to €82.6 million (2021: €67.2 million),
due to a new bonus scheme provision for employee retention,
increase in consulting fees and post COVID-19 costs.
Sales and Marketing costs increased by 24% to €16.8 million (2021:
€13.5 million), mainly due to increased marketing activity following
theend of the COVID-19 crisis as well as higher bonus provisions.
Operations costs include costs relating to infrastructure and other
operational projects, IT and security and general day-to-day
operational costs, including employee and office-apportioned
costs and branded content fees. These costs increased by 11% to
€285.3million (2021: €256.2 million), driven mainly by an increase in
employee related costs relating to live operations and the provision
of additional B2B services, mainly under the Group’s structured
agreement arrangements, as well as sport hardware costs.
B2B Adjusted EBITDA
Total B2B Adjusted EBITDA increased by 15% to €160.2 million
(2021:€139.2 million), while EBITDA margin remained steady at 25%
(2021: 25%). The B2B Adjusted EBITDA in the period was impacted by
the €15.4 million doubtful debt provision in Asia recognised in H1 2022
(2021: €7.5 million), which was offset by the increase in performance
from Brazil and Mexico and more generally the sports product.
B2C Gambling
2022
€’m
2021
€’mChange
Snaitech
Gambling revenue
1
899.8584.754%
Gambling costs645.6402.161%
Adjusted EBITDA254.2182.639%
Margin28%31%
Sun Bingo White Label
Gambling revenue65.361.95%
Gambling costs63.355.215%
Adjusted EBITDA2.06.7(70)%
Margin3%11%
HAPPYBET
Gambling revenue20.118.210%
Gambling costs
2
30.929.64%
Adjusted EBITDA(10.8)(11.4)5%
MarginNANA
B2C Adjusted EBITDA245.4177.938%
Margin25%27%
1 Includes intercompany revenue from HAPPYBET of €2.1 million (2021: €1.1 million).
2 Includes intercompany costs from Snaitech of €2.1 million (2021: €1.1 million).
Snaitech
Snaitech revenues increased 54% from the prior year to €899.8million
(2021: €584.7 million), with operating costs seeing a similar increase
of 61% to €645.6 million (2021: €402.1 million). The retail network in
Italy was shut for almost the entirety of H1 2021 due to the COVID-19
pandemic. The relaxing of COVID-19 restrictions at the end of June
2021 enabled retail sites to reopen, which drove the increase in
revenues and costs in 2022. The online segment continues to see
impressive growth, indicating that the addressable market has
expanded post-pandemic.
Snaitech’s Adjusted EBITDA increased by 39%, while revenue
increased 54%. As a result, Snaitech’s Adjusted EBITDA margin
decreased 300 bps to 28% (2021: 31%), due to the return of the lower
margin retail business.
Sun Bingo White Label
Revenue from the Sun Bingo business increased by 5% to
€65.3million (2021: €61.9 million). However, operating costs within
Sun Bingo increased by 15% to €63.3 million (2021: €55.2 million). The
main reason for the increase is that, following the commencement
of the new contract with News UK, the cost structure of the business
changed. From July 2021, Playtech incurs the marketing costs
(previously they were recharged to News UK) and furthermore, there
is now a brand fee being charged by News UK (previously this was
covered by the minimum guarantee).
This led to Adjusted EBITDA of €2.0 million (2021: €6.7 million).
Adjusted EBITDA still includes the unwinding of the minimum
guarantee prepayment of €5.4 million in the current year (2021:
€11.9 million) over the new period of the contract which was
renegotiated in 2019.
On a reported basis Playtech incurred a one-off cost of €10.4 million
in H1 2022 to terminate an onerous contract with a service provider.
The termination of the agreement will improve the profitability of the
business going forward.
HAPPYBET
The Sport B2C business, saw year-on-year revenue growth of 10%
to €20.1 million (2021: €18.2 million), with costs increasing by 4%.
The business remains loss making, with Adjusted EBITDA loss in the
current period of €10.8 million (2021: loss of €11.4 million). The small
improvement is primarily driven by the reopening of retail sites and
early progress after the Snaitech management team took control of
HAPPYBET’s operations.
Chief Financial Officer’s review continued
80
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Below EBITDA items
Depreciation and amortisation
Reported and adjusted depreciation decreased by 3% to
€41.5million (2021: €42.9 million). After deducting amortisation of
acquired intangibles of €42.0 million (2021: €34.8 million), Adjusted
amortisation decreased by 9% to €67.8 million (2021: €74.5 million)
as the Italian gaming machine licences useful life has been extended
to June 2023 at no cost. The remainder of the balance under
depreciation and amortisation of €18.8 million (2021: €16.9 million)
relates to IFRS 16 Leases and the recognition of the right-of-use
assetamortisation.
Impairment of tangible and intangible assets
The reported impairment of tangible and intangible assets of
€38.5million (2021: €21.6 million) mostly relates to:
• the impairment of the Eyecon cash-generating unit (CGU) of
€13.6million, driven by the fact that its operations are highly
concentrated in the UK online market which has seen a slowdown
due to the uncertain regulatory climate;
• the impairment of the Quickspin CGU of €7.0 million, given the risk
the CGU bore from the proportion of revenues being generated
from the Group’s B2B customers choosing to operate in areas with
geopolitical tension, and the resulting 1% increase on the post-tax
discount rate of the CGU to mitigate that factor;
• the impairment of the Bingo VF CGU of €12.5 million (2021:
€6.4million) due to slower than expected growth in the business,
following plans to recover from the termination of a significant
licensee in the prior year; and
• the impairment of the IGS CGU of €5.6 million, which was severely
affected by COVID-19 and until recently had not managed to bring
revenue up to pre-COVID-19 levels with the business suffering from
cancelled or postponed projects.
The prior period impairment of €21.6 million mainly relates to:
• €12.3 million impairment resulting from the disposal of some real
estate in Milan. The recoverable amount (being net sales proceeds
as per the binding sale agreement) was compared to the property’s
net book value which led to the impairment;
• €6.4 million impairment in the Bingo VF cash-generating unit
mainly driven by the termination of one of the biggest customer
contracts; and
• €2.7 million of development workforce aborted projects.
Finance income and finance costs
Reported and adjusted finance income of €11.6 million (2021: €1.1
million) mainly relates to a €9.2 million foreign exchange gain, driven
primarily by the favourable movement in the USD to EUR rate during
2022. In the prior year, this was an overall loss of €0.5 million and
hence included in finance costs. The remainder of the finance income
is interest received.
Reported finance costs includes interest payable on the bonds and
other borrowings, bank facility fees, bank charges, interest expense
on lease liabilities, the movement in contingent consideration
and redemption liabilities, fair value loss of convertible loans and
expected credit losses on loan receivables. Reported finance costs
increased by 8% to €73.0 million (2021: €67.7 million), mainly due to
the €3.0million (2021: €Nil) fair value loss on the GameCo convertible
loan immediately before it was converted to equity and the first
time recognition of €1.6 million of expected credit losses on the
loans receivable. This was offset by a reduction in the movement in
contingent consideration and redemption liability to €0.1 million (2021:
€4.8 million). Adjusted finance costs increased by 11% to €69.9 million
(2021: €62.9 million). The difference between adjusted and reported
finance costs is the movement in contingent consideration and
redemption liability of €0.1 million (2021: €4.8 million) and fair value
loss of the GameCo convertible loan of €3.0 million.
Unrealised fair value changes of derivative financial assets
The unrealised fair value changes of derivative financial assets of
€6.0million (2021: €583.2 million) is due to the recognition of the fair
value of the various call options held by the Group in Latin America
which fall under the definition of derivatives within IFRS 9 Financial
Instruments. Further details on the fair value of the various call options
are disclosed in Note 20, which includes a significant judgement
made in relation to the valuation of the Playtech M&A Call Option.
Taxation
A reported tax expense from continuing operations of €55.0 million
(2021: tax credit of €81.7 million) arises on a profit before tax of
€95.6million (2021: €605.0 million) compared to an expected charge
of €18.2 million based on the UK statutory rate of 19%. The key items
for which the reported tax charge has been adjusted are the provision
of €8.4 million in respect of overseas tax audits and the reversal of
deferred tax liabilities of €8.3 million in respect of intangibles assets
acquired through business combinations.
The Group’s reported effective tax rate for the current period is 39.5%.
This rate is higher than the UK statutory rate of 19%. The key reasons
for the differences are profits of subsidiaries located in territories
where the tax rate is higher than the UK statutory tax rate (which
predominately relates to Snaitech based in Italy) and expenses not
deductible for tax purposes including professional fees, impairment of
intangible assets and loss on disposal of subsidiaries.
The total adjusted tax expense is €54.9 million (2021: tax credit
of €7.2million) which arises on an adjusted profit before tax of
€215.4million (2021: €120.4 million). The total adjusted tax expense
of €54.9million consists of an income tax expense of €20.4 million
(2021: tax charge of €14.6 million) and a deferred tax expense of
€34.5 million (2021: deferred tax credit of €21.8 million). The total
adjusted deferred tax expense mainly consists of a deferred tax
expense of €44.7 million relating to the Snaitech group including the
use of Snaitech tax losses and a credit of €16.7 million relating to UK
tax losses for which a tax benefit is recognised in the current year.
The Group’s effective adjusted tax rate for the current period is 25.5%.
This rate is higher than the UK statutory rate of 19% as there are
profits within subsidiaries located in territories where the tax rate is
higher than the UK statutory tax rate (which predominately relates to
Snaitech based in Italy).
81
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Strategic Report
Discontinued operations
Casual and Social Gaming segment
On 11 January 2021, the Group entered into an agreement for the
disposal of the remainder of the business, namely “YoYo”, for a
total consideration of $9.5 million resulting in a profit on disposal of
€7.6million. This business has now been fully disposed.
The Adjusted EBITDA relating to the Casual and Social Gaming
business was €Nil in both periods being presented as operations
were completely wound down in 2020.
Finalto (formerly TradeTech Group)
Finalto was disposed of in July 2022 with cash proceeds of
$228.1million (€223.9 million) and transaction costs of €1.6 million
resulting in a profit on disposal of €15.1 million.
In terms of performance, revenue up until the point of disposal was
€74.5 million (2021 full year revenue: €46.6 million). The improved
performance was due to higher market volatility during 2022, which in
turn increased both Reported and Adjusted EBITDA to €24.4million
for the period up to the point of disposal (2021 full year loss:
€30.9 million) and €33.8 million (2021 full year loss: €23.0 million),
respectively.
Adjusted profit
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Reported profit from continuing operations
attributable to the owners of the Company40.6686.7
Employee stock option expenses8.013.1
Professional fees 15.714.4
Fair value change and finance cost on redemption
liability and contingent consideration(4.2)6.1
Ukraine employee support costs3.3—
Onerous contract10.4—
Charitable donation —3.5
Settlement of legal matter—2.3
Provision for other receivables—1.2
Fair value change of equity instruments0.31.6
Fair value change of derivative financial assets(6.0)(583.2)
Fair value loss on convertible loans3.0—
Amortisation of intangibles on acquisitions42.034.8
Impairment of tangible and intangible assets38.521.6
Loss on disposal of subsidiary8.8—
Deferred tax on acquisitions(8.3) (9.1)
Deferred tax on reorganisation—(63.6)
Deferred tax on asset held for sale—(1.8)
Tax related to uncertain positions8.4—
Adjusted Profit from continuing operations
attributable to the owners of the Company160.5127.6
The reconciling items in the table above are further explained in
Note 10 of the financial statements. Reported profit before tax from
continuing operations was €95.6 million (2021: €605.0 million), mainly
due to the €583.2 million of unrealised fair value gains on derivative
financial assets recognised in the prior year with the current year gain
being only €6.0 million.
Adjusted EPS (in Euro cents)
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Adjusted basic EPS from continuing operations53.542.8
Adjusted diluted EPS from continuing operations51.540.9
Basic EPS from profit attributable to owners
oftheCompany 29.2226.3
Diluted EPS from profit attributable toowners
oftheCompany 28.1216.2
Basic EPS from profit attributable to the owners
oftheCompany from continuing operations 13.5230.3
Diluted EPS from profit attributable to the owners
ofthe Company from continuing operations 13.0220.1
Basic EPS is calculated using the weighted average number of equity
shares in issue during 2022 of 300.1 million (2021: 298.2 million).
Diluted EPS also includes the dilutive impact of share options and
is calculated using the weighted average number of shares in issue
during 2022 of 311.9 million (2021: 312.1 million).
• Fraud Maturity Review/Risk Management Maturity Health Check
• Playtech Sports Cybersecurity Audit
The results of these audits were reported to the Audit Committee on
a regular basis, with recommendations made by Internal Audit and
corresponding management actions being reviewed and challenged,
where appropriate. In addition to regular feedback of audit results, the
Internal Audit Team monitors completion of management actions and
provides updates of these to the Audit Committee twice a year orupon
request by the Committee on a quarterly basis.
A particular focus of the Audit Committee in 2022 was a complete
review and re-setting of the Group’s internal financial control regime
in light of expected SOX Compliance Requirements. The Audit
Committee worked in conjunction with the finance team, as well as
the Internal Audit Team and PwC, to assess requirements and scope
a project plan. An external consultant was appointed to lead the
review, working across all aspects of the Group, and develop revised
policies which will be implemented during 2023 and 2024 as part
ofanexpanded second line controls function.
The Committee confirms that any necessary action will be taken to
remedy any significant failings or weaknesses identified from any
Internal Audit reviews.
Each year, the Committee reviews the quality and effectiveness of the
Internal Audit Team through a number of methods, including a regular
review of ongoing work to ensure the Audit plan is being delivered,
discussions with key executives, and feedback from both BDO and
PwC. This review includes an assessment of Audit Plan delivery,
business understanding, impact of the Internal Audit Team on the
organisation, communication and performance. In addition, the Audit
Committee Chairman meets with the Director of Internal Audit & Risk
and his deputy at a minimum on a monthly basis to be updated on the
Team’s activities.
109
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Audit Committee report continued
Internal Audit and Risk Management continued
An Internal Audit Plan for 2023 was developed by the Internal Audit
Team, and challenged and approved by the Audit Committee at the
November 2022 Audit Committee meeting. Internal Audit will carry
out audits in accordance with this plan using a risk-based approach
and continue to maintain effective lines of communication with the
Audit Committee and key management. The Committee believes this
programme of continual assessment will ensure the Internal Audit
Plan for 2023 remains fit for purpose in light of any new or emerging
risks. The Internal Audit Team will also be utilised to provide assurance
over corporate governance matters and for ad hoc projects,
wherenecessary.
Committee Evaluation
The performance of the Audit Committee was assessed as part
of the Board Review which was facilitated by Independent Audit
Limited. The process sought views from Executives and Non-
executive Directors and included a review of the operations of the
Committee. Independent Audit Limited’s conclusion was that the
Audit Committee has been transformed under the current Chair
and demonstrably holds the finance leadership accountable for
performance and delivery. In addition, Independent Audit highlighted
that a new Standard covering the management of external oversight
is being developed as an enforceable requirement. During 2023, the
Committee will start developing its approach to this area of evaluation,
including obtaining the views of stakeholders from across the business.
Non-Financial Control Systems
In parallel to the review of the Group’s internal financial control regime,
the Audit Committee considered the Group’s broader control regime
and how best to assess overall governance given the evolving nature
of the Group’s strategic priorities, the regulatory environments in
which the Group operates and stakeholder interests.
In order to monitor and challenge key dimensions of the Group’s
governance model the Audit Committee formalised a review process
with each of the senior management responsible for compliance,
sustainability, tax and IT security. As part of the 2023 Audit Committee
programme, each team will present its strategy, together with
current and any proposed changes to their control regimes, and
this will provide the basis for subsequent formal evaluation over
thefollowing12 months.
Areas which will have their control regime reviewed in 2023 are:
• R&D and technology expenditure to ensure ongoing efficacy of
budgeting and execution occurs in light of the Group’s changing
business model and geographic emphasis
• Mergers & Acquisitions to ensure that appropriate project
evaluation and prioritisation takes place, and requisite integration
and management oversight occurs
• ESG and CSR management to ensure the Group delivers on all
environmental, regulatory and other stakeholder undertakings
Looking ahead the Committee is working on the assumption that
Playtech will be subject to further regulatory and compliance
requirements as it continues to expand geographically and the
complexity of its business model increases, while at the same
time regulators increase the levels of scrutiny across the sector.
Accordingly, the Committee has taken steps to both broaden and
deepen the control environment across the Group with particular
focus this year on enhanced financial controls, but also establishing
oversight of ESG, CSR, and broader security and audit regimes.
My thanks go to Andrew Smith for his service to the Board and as
CFO working with the Audit Committee, having stepped down in
November 2022.
I believe the skills and experience of the Committee members remain
strong and relevant, enabling the Audit Committee to continue to
perform effectively.
John Krumins
Chairman of the Audit Committee
23 March 2023
110
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Statement by the Committee Chairman
Dear Shareholder
On behalf of the Board, I welcome the opportunity to present the
Remuneration Committee’s report on Directors’ remuneration for
theyear to 31 December 2022.
This report describes how the Board has applied the principles of
the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the “Code”) to Directors’
remuneration. Although Playtech is an Isle of Man incorporated entity
and, as such, is not required to comply with the UK regulations on
Directors’ remuneration, we recognise the importance of shareholder
transparency. Accordingly, we can confirm that the Company adheres
to the UK regulations as they relate to Directors’ remuneration and the
report below is divided into: (i) this Annual Statement; (ii) a summary
of the Directors’ Remuneration Policy (the “Policy”) as approved
by shareholders at the 2021 AGM; and (iii) the Annual Report on
Remuneration that reports on the implementation of the Company’s
stated Remuneration Policy for the year to 31 December 2022. The
Annual Report on Remuneration and this Statement will be the subject
of an advisory shareholder resolution at the forthcoming AGM.
Business context
As shareholders will be aware, we made significant and wide-ranging
changes to the Remuneration Policy in 2021 as a result of an extensive
review and shareholder consultation process. In undertaking this
review the Committee sought to draw a line under the poor voting
record on remuneration over the past few years. Changes included
a 20% reduction in the base pay of the CEO, reduction in executive
pension contributions, increase in the bonus deferral into shares and
a material reduction in the fee for the Chairman. At the 2022 AGM
the total votes received in favour of resolution for the Remuneration
Report were 69.67%. Following the AGM and throughout the year
during the takeover period and discussions, the Group has continued
to engage extensively with shareholders. It was clear from these
discussions that the principal reason why certain shareholders were
unable to support the resolution related to the CEO’s payout under the
one-off equity incentive scheme approved by shareholders in 2019.
Shareholders were, however, supportive of the changes implemented
since 2021.
As a result of these significant changes, the balance of remuneration
shifted towards one driven by performance, which the Remuneration
Committee believes has contributed to the significant growth in Group
performance over the period.
Restructured
remuneration aligns
withperformance
“ The balance of remuneration
has shifted towards one driven
by performance, which the
Remuneration Committee believes
has contributed to the significant
growth in Group performance
over the period.”
Ian Penrose
Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee
111
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Statement by the Committee Chairman continued
Business context continued
Playtech has continued to operate strongly despite the significant
distractions that were presented in 2022 by:
• The takeover offer from Aristocrat, that was at a 62% premium to
the share price at the time of offer, being rejected by shareholders
atEGM in February 2022
• The takeover offer for the Financials business, Finalto, having
been rejected by shareholders at the GM in August 2021, finally
being sold to a new bidder in July 2022 having been approved by
shareholders at GM
• Ongoing takeover activity from two other bidders which were finally
terminated in the summer of 2022
• Extensive discussions on realising value in the US
• The associated demands on the Board to deal with the above,
together with the time commitments to materially improve the levels
of overall governance and impact of the Company’s Committees
• The humanitarian and business impact of the war in Ukraine where
over 10% (714 employees) of the Company’s workforce are based
Despite the above, the Remuneration Committee and Board is
pleased that the performance of the business has been very strong,
with adjusted EBITDA of €405.6 million (28% increase on 2021), which
is reflected in the remuneration outcomes for the year.
Implementation of Policy in 2022
The significant changes which formed the basis of the new Policy
were implemented for the first time in 2021, and we operated
remuneration in line with the Policy for 2022.
As stated in the Annual Report last year, no LTIP award was granted in
2021, due to the Company being in a closed period for the majority of
2021 and into 2022 as a result of the proposed acquisition of Playtech
by Aristocrat, subsequent takeover discussions/negotiations and
then the subsequent strategic options being evaluated. The Company
was only able to grant LTIP awards in August 2022, once the Group
came out of an unusually lengthy closed period of over 12 months,
which meant there was a gap of nearly two years between grants.
The 2022 LTIP awards are subject to relative TSR and adjusted EPS
performance. Further details on the 2022 LTIP awards are given
on page 122.
We confirm that as stated last year, the Committee did not grant
any form of catch-up LTIP award despite the Executive Directors
effectively missing their 2021 award. This resulted in a significant
reduction in the remuneration potential of the Executive Directors, and
indeed the wider Playtech management team, and we are delighted at
their continued focus on the business and delivery despite this.
The Committee remains cognisant of the need to continue to show
restraint with regards to executive remuneration, particularly in the
context of the current cost of living crisis (which has a more significant
impact on our employees). In this vein, the Committee reviewed
the salaries of the Executive Directors and senior management
team and approved increases of 2% and 3.5% for the CEO and
CFO (significantly below the 7% average increase awarded across
the UK workforce) with effect from 1 January 2022. Furthermore, it
remains the Committee’s intention that future salary increases for the
Executive Directors will not exceed the general level of increases for
the Group’s employees.
As a result of the intensive corporate activity that occurred during the
year, the Non-executive Directors undertook significant additional
responsibilities, and committed substantially more time to the business,
which extended far beyond their normal responsibilities. This was
a complex, lengthy and intense period of corporate activity, which
meant the Company was in a closed period for over 12 months.
Furthermore, the expansion into the United States necessitated extensive
licence applications in several States, one requiring physical attendance.
It is estimated that each of the Chairman and Non-executive Directors
spent at least an additional 32 days (2021: 20 days) over and above
their contracted hours working on Playtech matters over the course
of 2022. As a result, and in line with Policy, a pro rata additional
fee was paid to the Chairman and each Non-executive Director,
commensurate with the time spent and the fee level for the Senior
Independent Director, equating to £132,000 (2021: £120,000 or
lower if appointed part way through 2021), and then scaling back the
additional fees payable so the increase was no more than 10% of
the additional fees paid in 2021, despite the more than 50% increase
inadditional days.
It is not anticipated that any additional fees will be paid in respect of
2023, however if this does occur the fees and basis for determining
these will be disclosed in the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Report.
Executive Director changes during the year
As announced on 1 November 2022, the Company mutually agreed
with Andrew Smith that he would step down from the Board and his
role as CFO on 28 November 2022. Chris McGinnis was promoted
to CFO and Executive Director of the Company with effect from the
same date. Given the proximity to the financial year end, the Board
agreed with Andrew Smith that he would remain involved with the
business until the end of the financial year to facilitate an orderly
transition to the new CFO.
Further details regarding the leaving arrangements for Andrew Smith
are set out on pages 122 and 123.
The reward package for Chris McGinnis has been set in line with the
existing remuneration policy. Chris McGinnis was appointed as CFO
on a basic salary of £350,000 (which is lower than Andrew Smith,
whose salary on his stepping down from the Board was £445,567).
The Committee intends to increase his salary to £400,000 effective
from 1 July 2023 once he becomes established in his new role,
with a commitment to not undertake a further salary review until
1January 2025.
Performance and pay outcome for 2022
Annual bonus
The financial performance of Playtech was strong in 2022, despite
the enormous distractions and challenges faced due to the lengthy
takeover activity and corporate transactions.
At the beginning of the year, the Committee reviewed the approach to
calibrating challenging performance targets, and agreed to increase
the level of stretch within the targets such that the level of performance
required to achieve maximum payouts under the financial targets was
to exceed target by 10%. This was an increase on the level of stretch
within the 2021 targets, which required a 5% outperformance of target
to achieve maximum payout.
Cognisant of consensus forecasts for adjusted EBITDA (€331 million
at the beginning of the financial year), the Committee set on-target
adjusted EBITDA (equivalent to a 50% payout under the adjusted
EBITDA element) 10% above consensus at €365 million. The
maximum target adjusted EBITDA was set at a further 10% premium
to this at €401.5 million, or 21% above consensus. Similarly, with
consensus forecasts for cash generation being €284 million, the
target cash generation was set at €307 million, and maximum payout
at €338 million. Adjusted EBITDA and cash generation for 2022
were €405.6 million and €396.9 million respectively, which resulted
in a maximum payout under both the adjusted EBITDA and cash
generation elements of the bonus.
The Group made good progress against all of the key strategic and
operational objectives (comprising 20% of the annual bonus) set
at the beginning of the year. The CEO was tasked with completing
112
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
the disposal of the Finalto business, accelerating the performance
and market positioning of the LATAM business, continuing to drive
the digital growth/channel shift in Snaitech to improve the quality of
earnings and therefore value, and accelerating Playtech’s position
in the rapidly growing market in the United States. The former CFO
was tasked with improving the structure and efficiency of the balance
sheet, supporting the CEO on certain strategic initiatives, and to
commence the overview of the business integration and efficiency
plan to drive material cost efficiencies and additional cash generation
in 2023 and particularly 2024.
In addition, for both the CEO and former CFO, the remaining 10% of
the annual bonus was allocated towards ESG targets. This was a new
criteria introduced in 2022, and is being extended to all members of
the senior management team in 2023 in recognition of its strategic
importance. The specific ESG measures assessed in 2022 were:
• Safer gambling – innovation in and promotion of safer gambling
solutions and insights, including continued uptake and development
of Playtech Protect solutions
• Environment – continued progress towards our stated emissions
reduction target of 40% scope 1 and 2 emissions target by 2025
(on a 2018 baseline) and increased use of renewable energy
across the Group
• DEI targets – annual progress towards increasing female representation
across the leadership and senior management population to 35%
from a 2021 baseline
• Reputation, ethics and Compliance – no new material ESG, ethical
or compliance breaches resulting in significant reputational damage
for the Group
• Leadership qualities around crisis management, human compassion,
operational excellence and standard setting during the Ukraine war
where we have 10% of the global workforce
In particular, the Committee took account of the CEO’s exceptional
leadership and social responsibility in facing the ongoing Ukraine crisis.
Playtech has over 700 employees (10%+ of the global workforce)
in Ukraine, and, before and during the invasion, Playtech’s Crisis
Management Group has worked 24/7 to look after our workforce,
provide relocation opportunities to adjacent countries and provide
humanitarian support whilst ensuring the business continues to
operate. The Committee is proud of Playtech’s response to this awful
situation. Finally, it should be noted that the above has been achieved
against the backdrop of continued corporate activity and takeover
approaches which have understandably consumed large amounts of
management time, whilst continuing to deliver record financial results.
In this context and recognising the significant progress made in
respect of the key strategic, operational and ESG objectives of the
Company, the Committee determined to pay a maximum bonus in
respect of these objectives. When combined with the maximum
payout achieved under the financial targets, the overall bonus payout
for the CEO and former CFO was 100% of maximum.
This amounted to £1.6 million (2021: £1.6m) for the CEO and £613k
(2021: £549k) for the former CFO. As set out above, the Remuneration
Committee determined to not pro-rate the bonus for the former CFO
in recognition that he was actively employed during the whole financial
year, in reflection of the Board’s request for him to remain in the
business to support an orderly transition.
No bonus was payable to the new CFO under this plan in respect
ofthe one month of the year served as a Director.
In line with the remuneration policy, 33.3% of the annual bonus
payment to the CEO will be deferred into shares. In light of the
exceptional Company performance and Andrew Smith’s commitment
to the Company until the year end, the Committee determined that the
annual bonus would be paid in cash for the former CFO.
LTIPs
The LTIP granted in 2020 which will vest in October 2023 is subject
to Adjusted Diluted EPS (25%) and relative TSR (75%) performance.
Adjusted Diluted EPS for the financial year ending 31 December 2022
was 51.5 Euro cents, which will result in vesting of 93.4% of the EPS
element. As at 31 December 2022, the performance period for the
relative TSR component of the LTIP is not yet complete (26 October
2020 – 25 October 2023), and therefore an estimate of the vesting
under this element of 50% of maximum has been provided at year end.
Following the end of the performance period, the final vesting level
will be calculated and the corresponding LTIP amounts disclosed in
the single figure table for financial year ending 31 December 2022 will
be updated in the 2023 Directors’ Remuneration Report to reflect the
final outcome.
These awards are also subject to a two-year post vesting holding
period, in line with the Policy.
The Committee recognises that the CEO also has a one-off equity
incentive scheme that was approved by shareholders in 2019. This
partially lapsed during 2022 as a consequence of the share price not
reaching the £8 share price targets set in 2019. Full details are set out
in the Annual Report on Remuneration.
How we will operate the Policy in 2023
Base salary
The average salary increase for 2023 awarded to those employees
across the UK workforce who were eligible to receive a salary increase
was 8.1% as a consequence of the rising demand for suitably qualified
technology staff, together with the increased rate of inflation. The
Committee is very conscious that the effects of inflationary pressures
affect the lower paid employees the most, and so decided that all
Board members and senior staff (and therefore higher earners) would
be limited to an increase of 3.5%. As a consequence, the salary for the
CEO increased by 3.5% to £844,000 with effect from 1 January 2023.
As set out above, the new CFO commenced his role on a basic salary
of £350,000 (significantly lower than the previous CFO, whose base
salary on exit was £445,567), which will increase to £400,000 on 1 July
2023, and then not change until the next review on 1 January 2025.
The Committee has commissioned a market benchmarking exercise
for all of the roles within its remit, including those in the wider senior
management team, and will reflect on the results of this as well as pay
and conditions across the wider workforce when considering any
further amendments to salary levels next year.
Annual bonus
The annual bonus opportunity for 2023 will remain unchanged at
200% and 150% of salary for the CEO and CFO respectively. Financial
performance will continue to drive 70% of the bonus and will be split
50% EBITDA and 20% cash flow. We have set stretching targets for
both measures in an inflationary year facing a cost of living crisis,
material rises in energy costs and the ongoing war in Ukraine (where
we employ over 700 people), with target performance set above
market consensus on 25 January 2023 (the date of the meeting of
the Remuneration Committee when the targets were set) and with
maximum for achieving a material increase above consensus. The
remaining 30% of the bonus will be based on key strategic targets
which will again include ESG measures relating to safer gambling,
diversity and reduction of the Company’s Scope 1, Scope 2 and
supply chain emissions. The targets will have a graduated approach
to differentiating between good and excellent performance, with full
disclosure in next year’s Annual Report.
In line with the Directors’ Remuneration Policy, 33.3% of any annual
bonus payment will be deferred into shares for two years.
113
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Statement by the Committee Chairman continued
LTIP award
Following expiry of the previous scheme, shareholders approved
anew ten-year LTIP scheme at the 2022 Annual General Meeting.
It is the intention of the Company to grant LTIP awards to the Executive
Directors, senior management and staff in respect of 2023 as soon as
practicable following the publication of the 2022 Annual Results.
Pension
Following an initial reduction from 20% to 15% effective 1 July 2021,
the pension contributions to Executive Directors reduced from 15%
to 12.5% of salary effective from 1 July 2022 and to 10% effective
from 1 October 2022. They are now aligned with the wider workforce
contribution of 7.5% from 1 January 2023.
Concluding remarks
The Committee continues to work hard to improve corporate
governance and strengthen the pay for performance culture in
the business, whilst materially reducing the fixed pay and pension
contributions for the executives. We believe that this is having
a significant positive impact on the financial performance of
the business, and on delivering initiatives to materially improve
shareholder returns.
The Committee and I hope that you find the information in this report
helpful and informative, and we welcome any comments or questions
ahead of the 2023 AGM.
Ian Penrose
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee
23 March 2023
114
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Summary of Directors’ Remuneration Policy
Approved at 2021 AGM
The Directors’ Remuneration Policy was approved by shareholders
at the AGM on 26 May 2021 (75.47% of votes cast being in favour) and
became effective from that date. There are no proposals to amend the
Directors’ Remuneration Policy at the 2023 AGM.
A summary of the policy is set out below for reference to assist with
the understanding of the contents of this report. The full policy is
detailed in our 2020 Annual Report, which can be found in the “Investors”
section under “Annual Reports” on the Company’s corporate website
(www.playtech.com).
Remuneration philosophy
Our Remuneration Policy is designed to reward the contributions
of senior management as well as incentivise it to drive shareholder
returns, and to maintain and enhance Playtech’s position as the
software and services provider of choice to the gambling sector.
Remuneration is delivered via fixed remuneration and simple and
transparent incentive-based plans enabling the Executive Directors
to be rewarded for delivering strong financial performance and
sustainable returns to shareholders. In a fast-moving sector such as
ours we need to apply the Policy flexibly in order to deliver the right
level of overall pay to Directors.
Considerations when forming the Remuneration Policy
This Policy has been formed in accordance with the principles and
provisions in the Code. The table below sets out how the Committee
has addressed various aspects in the Code:
• Clarity – The Committee’s policy has been clearly set out in this
report, the individual elements of remuneration and their operation
• Simplicity – This proposed Policy is well understood by
both management and shareholders and aligns to typical
market practice
• Risk – The Committee believes that the incentive structure does not
encourage undue risk taking. There are a number of mechanisms
available to the Committee, including discretions and malus and
clawback provisions within incentive plans, that allow adjustment in
the case that the Committee believes the outcomes are excessive
• Predictability – The Policy table and the illustrations of remuneration
provide an illustration of potential levels of remuneration that may
result from the application of the Policy under different performance
scenarios. The Committee believes that the range of remuneration
scenarios is appropriate for the roles and responsibilities of the
Executive Directors, based on the performance required for
incentive awards to pay out
• Proportionality – The Policy has been designed to give appropriate
flexibility in operation, particularly in relation to incentive plan
metrics, which allows the Committee to implement the Policy from
year to year using the metrics that align with the Group’s strategy.
Furthermore, the Policy contains discretion to allow the Committee
to adjust remuneration outcomes to ensure that they are reflective
of overall performance in the short and long term
• Alignment to culture – As well as aligning with the strategy of the
business, the Policy has been formed to allow focus on broader
stakeholders. In particular, there is an increased focus on employee
and shareholder engagement through incentive metrics and
Committee discretion
Remuneration Policy for Executive Directors
The following table summarises each element of remuneration, how it supports the Company’s short and long-term strategic objectives
andchanges the Committee is proposing to the current Policy based on shareholder feedback.
Element of
remuneration
Short-term and long-term
strategic objectivesOperationOpportunity
Framework to
assess performance
Base salary
To attract, retain and
motivate high calibre
individuals for the role
and duties required
To provide a market
competitive salary
relative to the
external market
To reflect appropriate
skills, development and
experience over time
Normally reviewed annually by the
Remuneration Committee, with any
increases typically effective in January
Takes account of the external market
and other relevant factors including
internal relativities and individual
performance. In reviewing salary levels,
the Remuneration Committee may
also take into account the effect of any
exceptional exchange rate fluctuations
in the previous year
Executive Directors decide the
currency of payment once every three
years (which can be in Pound Sterling,
US Dollars or Euros) with the exchange
rate being fixed at that time
Other than when an
executive changes roles
or responsibilities, or when
there are changes to the
size and complexity of the
business, annual increases
will not exceed the general
level of increases for the
Group’s employees, taking
into account the country
where the executive
ordinarily works
If a significant adjustment is
required, this may be spread
over a period of time
n/a
115
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Summary of Directors’ Remuneration Policy continued
Approved at 2021 AGM
Element of
remuneration
Short-term and long-term
strategic objectivesOperationOpportunity
Framework to
assess performance
Benefits
To help attract and retain
high calibre individuals
Benefits may include private medical
insurance, permanent health
insurance, life insurance, rental
and accommodation expenses on
relocation and other benefits such
aslong service awards
Other additional benefits may be
offered that the Remuneration
Committee considers appropriate
based on the Executive Director’s
circumstances
Non-pensionable
n/an/a
Annual bonus
Clear and direct
incentive linked to annual
performance targets
Incentivise annual
delivery of financial
measures and personal
performance
Corporate measures
selected consistent
with and complement
the budget and
strategic plan
Paid in cash and shares
Clawback and malus provisions apply
whereby bonus payments may be
required to be repaid for financial
misstatement, misconduct, error,
serious reputational damage and
corporate failure
200% of salary for the CEO
and 150% of salary for other
Executive Directors
33.3% of any payment
is normally deferred into
shares for two years which
are subject to recovery
provisions
Performance
measured
over one year
Based on a
mixture of financial
performance
and performance
against strategic
objectives
Normally, at least
70% of the bonus
will be dependent
on financial
performance
Bonus is paid on
a sliding scale of
0% for threshold
increasing to 100%
for maximum
performance
Long Term
Incentive Plan
(LTIP)
Aligned to key strategic
objective of delivering
strong returns to
shareholders and
earnings performance
Grant of performance shares, restricted
shares or options
Two-year holding period will be applied
to vested shares (from 2019 awards),
subject to any sales required to satisfy
tax obligations on vesting
Clawback and malus provisions apply
whereby awards may be required to
be repaid for instances of financial
misstatement, misconduct, error,
serious reputational damage and
corporate failure
Maximum opportunity of
250% of salary with normal
grants of 200% and 150%
of salary in performance
shares for the CEO and
other Executive Directors
respectively
Performance
measured over
three years
Performance
targets aligned with
the Group’s strategy
of delivering
strong returns
to shareholders
and earnings
performance
25% of the awards
vest for threshold
performance
Remuneration Policy for Executive Directors continued
116
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Element of
remuneration
Short-term and long-term
strategic objectivesOperationOpportunity
Framework to
assess performance
Pension
Provide
retirement benefits
Provision of cash allowance Pension contributions for
existing Executive Directors
will be as follows:
• 20% until 30 June 2021
• 15% effective from
1 July 2021
• 12.5% effective from
1 July 2022
• 10% effective from
1October 2022
• From 1 January 2023,
alignment with the
wider workforce
Pension for new Executive
Directors will be in line with
the pension plan operated for
the majority of the workforce
in the jurisdiction where the
Director is based
n/a
Share
ownership
guidelines
The Company has a
policy of encouraging
Directors to build
a shareholding in
the Company
Executive Directors are expected
to accumulate a shareholding in the
Company’s shares to the value of at
least 200% of their base salary
Executive Directors are required to
retain at least 50% of the net of tax out-
turn from the vesting of awards under
the deferred bonus plan and LTIP until
the minimum shareholding guideline
has been achieved
Shares must be held for two years after
cessation of employment (at lower of
the 200% of salary guideline level, or
the actual shareholding on departure)
n/an/a
Non-executive
Directors
To provide a competitive
fee for the performance
of NED duties, sufficient
to attract high calibre
individuals to the role
Fees are set in conjunction with the
duties undertaken
Additional fees may be paid on a
pro-rata basis if there is a material
increase in time commitment and
the Board wishes to recognise this
additional workload
Any reasonable business-related
expenses (including tax thereon) which
are determined to be a taxable benefit
can be reimbursed
Other than when an individual
changes roles or where
benchmarking indicates fees
require realignment, annual
increases will not exceed the
general level of increases for
the Group’s employees
n/a
117
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Summary of Directors’ Remuneration Policy continued
Approved at 2021 AGM
Consideration of employment conditions elsewhere
inthe Company when setting Directors’ pay
The Remuneration Committee, when setting the Policy for Executive
Directors, takes into consideration the pay and employment
conditions through the Company as a whole.
In determining salary increases for Executive Directors, the
Committee considers the general level of salary increase across
the Company. Typically, salary increases will be aligned with those
received elsewhere in the Company unless the Remuneration
Committee considers that specific circumstances exist (as mentioned
in the Policy table) which require a different level of salary increase for
Executive Directors.
As part of the Committee’s wider remit under the Code, the
Committee will continue to monitor pay policies and practices within
the wider Group and to provide input and challenge in respect of
current policies and practices as well as any proposed future review
and changes to ensure that they are appropriate, fair and aligned to
the Company’s remuneration principles and support the culture and
growth of the business.
With respect to employee engagement, the Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee (and the wider Board) engages with the
CEO of Snaitech, the COO of our B2B activities together with the
Global Head of Human Resources on strategic and operational issues
affecting and of interest to the workforce, including remuneration,
talent pipeline and diversity and inclusion.
The Committee’s policy is that annual salary increases for Executive
Directors will not generally exceed the average annual salary increase
for the wider employee population determined with reference to the
country in which the Executive ordinarily works, unless there is a
particular reason for any increase, such as a change in the Executive’s
roles and responsibilities or a change in the size and complexity of
the business.
The Committee also considers external market benchmarking to
inform the Executive’s remuneration. External market benchmarking
is also considered in relation to remuneration decisions of the
widerworkforce.
Consideration of shareholders’ views
The Company is committed to engagement with shareholders and
has engaged extensively on remuneration and other issues since
the 2022 AGM, particularly as a consequence of the corporate
activity. Shareholders provided valuable input into the Company’s
Remuneration Policy.
118
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Annual report on remuneration
The sections of this report subject to audit have been highlighted. The figures are shown both in Pounds and Euros, for ease of reference.
Directors’ emoluments (in £) (audited)
Mor WeizerAndrew Smith (former CFO)Chris McGinnis
Executive Director202220212022202120222021
Salary
1
816,000800,000408,437430,50033,205—
Bonus
2
1,632,0001,600,000612,655548,888——
Annual long-term incentive
3,4
1,690,9791,440,661208,857452,710253,645—
One-o long-term incentive
5
—5,114,000————
Benefits
6
38,27134,63331,89833,637260—
Pension107,100156,66756,62482,6042,490—
Total emoluments 4,284,3519,145,9611,318,4711,548,339289,600—
Total fixed pay961,371991,300496,959546,74135,956—
Total variable pay3,322,9798,154,661821,5121,001,598253,645—
Directors’ emoluments (restated in €) (audited)
Mor WeizerAndrew Smith (former CFO)Chris McGinnis
Executive Director202220212022202120222021
Salary
1
957,443932,921478,802501,93637,703—
Bonus
2
1,914,8861,906,208713,094653,934——
Annual long-term incentive
3,4
1,906,9201,727,051243,097542,704286,036—
One-o long-term incentive
5
—6,013,000————
Benefits
6
44,79840,36737,46939,987294—
Pension125,895182,23066,43496,0912,816—
Total emoluments 4,949,94310,801,7771,538,8961,834,650326,849—
Total fixed pay1,128,1371,155,518582,705638,01440,814—
Total variable pay3,821,8069,646,259956,1911,196,638286,036—
1 Basic salary of the Executive Directors is determined in Pounds Sterling and then converted into Euros at the average exchange rate applicable during the relevant financial year for the purpose
of this report. The Committee reviewed the Executive Directors’ salaries with effect from 1 January 2022. It was decided that Mor Weizer and Andrew Smith’s salary would be increased by 2% and 3.5%
respectively. Chris McGinnis was appointed to the Board on 28 November 2022 on a base salary of £350,000 and therefore the amounts disclosed are in respect of the period he served as a Director.
2 The figures for bonuses represent payments as determined by the Remuneration Committee for the Executive Directors based on the Company’s performance during each financial year and
by reference to their actual salary earned during the respective period. The bonuses were determined in Pounds Sterling and then converted into Euros at the exchange rates applicable as at
31December 2021 and 31 December 2022 respectively. Details of (a) how the annual performance bonus for the Executive Directors was determined; and (b) the timing of bonus payments are
setout below. Chris McGinnis was appointed to the Board on 28 November 2022 but did not receive a bonus in respect of the period he served as a Director.
3 The LTIP awards granted in February 2019 vested subject to performance conditions measured over a three-year period from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. As a result of the performance
conditions being partially met, 46.16% of the award will vest. This performance outcome corresponds to a total of 217,787 and 68,437 nil cost options for Mor Weizer and Andrew Smith. The value
included in the table is therefore £1,440,661 (€1,727,051) and £452,710 (€542,704), based on the share price on vesting (1 March 2022) of £6.615 (€7.93), of which £520,729 (€653,361) and £163,632
(€205,310) relates to share price appreciation respectively.
4 The LTIP awards granted in October 2020 vest after three years subject to an EPS performance condition (measured over a three-year period from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022) and relative
TSR performance conditions (measured over a three-year period from 26 October 2020 to 25 October 2023). Based on performance to 31 December 2022, the final vesting outcome under the EPS
condition is 93.4%. However, as we are still partway through the performance period for the relative TSR performance condition, we have used an estimate of the vesting as at 31 December 2022 (equal
to 50% of the relative TSR element, 37.5% of the overall award). Considering both the EPS and estimated relative TSR outcomes, 60.9% of the award is estimated to vest. This performance outcome
corresponds to a total of 332,216 and 49,832 nil cost options for Mor Weizer and Chris McGinnis respectively. The value included in the table for Mor and Chris is therefore £1,690,979 (€1,906,920) and
£253,645 (€286,036), based on the share price on 31 December 2022 of £5.09 (€5.74), of which £474,072 (€564,767) and £71,110 (€84,714) relates to share price appreciation respectively. Further details
on the estimated LTIP outcomes for the 2022 awards are set out on pages 121 and 122. As part of the settlement agreement with Andrew Smith, the Committee determined to settle the in-flight 2022 LTIP
award via a payment of £208,857, based on the time pro-ration between the grant date and the end of his notice period.
5 No awards that were granted to Mor Weizer in December 2019 vested in 2022, compared to 700,000 options that vested in 2021 partially vested during the 2021 financial year, with 300,000 options
vesting on 26 November 2021 and 400,000 options vesting on 14 December 2021. The value included in the table is therefore £2,208,000 (€2,601,000) and £2,906,000 (€3,412,000) respectively,
based on the share prices on vesting of £7.36 (€8.67) and £7.265 (€8.53), of which £1,050,300 (€1,251,000) and £1,362,400 (€1,612,000) relates to share price appreciation.
6 Benefits include private medical insurance, permanent health insurance, car and life assurance.
119
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Annual report on remuneration continued
Non-executive Directors’ emoluments (in £) (audited)
4,5
FeesAnnual bonus
2
BenefitsPensionTotal emoluments
Director20222021202220212 02220212022202120222021
Brian Mattingley
1
470,0 0027 7,167——————470,0 0027 7,167
Ian Penrose
3
262,000233,219——————262,000233,219
Anna Massion
3
252,000230,719——————252,000230,719
John Krumins
3
252,000230,719——————252,000230,719
Linda Marston-Weston
1
252,00070,000——————252,00070,000
Non-executive Directors’ emoluments (in €) (audited)
4,5
Fees are paid in Sterling and are translated into Euros in the table below:
FeesAnnual bonus
2
BenefitsPensionTotal emoluments
Director20222021202220212 02220212022202120222021
Brian Mattingley
1
545,963326,876——————545,963326,876
Ian Penrose
3
301,726275,111——————301,726275,111
Anna Massion
3
290,041272,108——————290,041272,108
John Krumins
3
290,041272,108——————290,041272,108
Linda Marston-Weston
1
290,04183,126——————290,04183,126
1 Brian Mattingley was appointed as Chairman of the Board on 1 June 2021 and Linda Marston-Weston joined the Board on 1 October 2021.
2 Non-executive Directors are not eligible to receive any variable pay under the Remuneration Policy and thus received no variable pay during 2021 and 2022.
3 It should also be noted that Ian Penrose, Anna Massion and John Krumins each waived 20% of their fees for five months in 2020 to support the business during the COVID-19 outbreak; however,
this was later repaid in February 2021, once the Group’s improved financial performance showed consistent sustainability (the share price had returned to levels last seen in autumn 2018). This is
included within the table above.
4 The Non-executive Directors did not receive an increase in the year, having had their fees amended on 1 October 2021. Ian Penrose was appointed as Senior Independent Director, effective from
1October 2021.
5 The Chairman and Non-executive Directors received additional fees in respect of the significant additional work performed in the year, arising from the intense and lengthy corporate activity and
global regulatory work. It is estimated that each of the Chairman and Non-executive Directors spent at least an additional 32 days working in 2022 over and above their contracted days. As such, it
was determined that an additional fee equating to £132,000 (2021: £120,000) would be payable. This amount was based on the annual fee level for the Senior Independent Director, and then scaled
back so that the amount was no more than 10% above the additional fees paid in respect of 2021, despite the more than 50% increase in additional days’ work/commitment. It is not anticipated that
additional fees will be payable in respect of 2023. The amounts included in the table above in respect of 2021 have been updated to reflect the additional amounts paid in 2022 in respect of additional
work completed during 2021.
Determination of 2021 bonus
In accordance with the Company’s Remuneration Policy, the CEO and CFO had the opportunity to earn a bonus in respect of 2021 of 200%
and 150% of salary respectively. 2021 performance was assessed against a mixture of financial and non-financial targets as set out below.
Thebonus was payable on a sliding scale of 0% for threshold to 100% for maximum performance.
Performance metricWeightingThresholdMaximumActual
CEO payout level
(% of maximum)
CFO payout level
(% of maximum)
Financial (70%)
Adjusted EBITDA (€’m)50%347.0401.5405.650%50%
Cash flow (€’m)20%292.0338.0396.920%20%
Strategic and non-financial (30%)30%See below30%30%
Tot al100%100%100%
As set out in the 2021 Directors’ Remuneration Report, the financial performance targets were divided this year between Adjusted EBITDA and
cash flow, with 50% and 20% weightings respectively. The targets for Adjusted EBITDA and cash flow were set cognisant of analyst consensus
as at January 2022.
Adjusted EBITDA and cash generation are the key financial performance metrics of the Company most closely representing the underlying
trading performance of the business. When setting the EBITDA targets for 2022, the Committee and Board took into consideration both
consensus estimates and internal forecasts.
The financial performance of Playtech was strong in 2022, despite the enormous distractions and challenges faced due to the lengthy takeover
activity and corporate transactions.
At the beginning of the year, the Committee set challenging metrics for the Executive Directors and reviewed the approach to calibrating
performance targets, Following this review, the Committee determined to increase the level of stretch within the targets such that the level
of performance required to achieve maximum payouts under the financial targets was to exceed target by 10%. This was an increase on the
approach taken in 2021 which required a 5% outperformance of target to achieve maximum payout.
Cognisant of consensus forecasts for EBITDA (€331 million), the Committee set target EBITDA (equivalent to a 50% payout under the EBITDA
element) at €365 million (10% above consensus), and maximum payout for delivering 110% of target EBITDA of €401.5 million (21% above
consensus). Similarly, with consensus forecasts for cash generation being €284 million, the target cash generation was set at €307 million, and
maximum payout at €338 million. EBITDA and cash generation was €405.6 million and €396.9 million respectively, which resulted in a maximum
payout under both the EBITDA andcash generation elements of the bonus.
120
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
The non-financial performance targets (representing 30% of the total
bonus potential) were selected to underpin key strategic objectives
of the Group aligned with the business strategy. The Group made
good progress against many of the key strategic and operational
objectives set at the beginning of the year. The CEO was tasked with
completing the disposal of the Finalto business (2.5%), accelerating
the performance and market positioning of the LATAM business
(5%), continuing to drive the digital growth/channel shift in Snaitech
to improve the quality of earnings and therefore value (7.5%), and
accelerating Playtech’s position in the rapidly growing market in
the United States (5%). The former CFO was tasked with improving
the structure and efficiency of the balance sheet (10%), supporting
the CEO on certain strategic initiatives (5%), and to commence the
overview of the business integration and efficiency plan to drive
material cost efficiencies and additional cash generation in 2023
andparticularly 2024 (5%).
In addition, for both the CEO and former CFO, 10% (out of the 30%
potential for non-financial performance measures) was allocated
towards ESG targets. This was a new criteria introduced in 2022, and
is being extended to all members of the senior management team in
2023. These were:
• Safer gambling – continued uptake and development of Playtech
Protect solutions and safer gambling features.
• Environment – continued progress towards our stated emissions
reduction target of 40% scope 1 and 2 emissions target by 2025
(on a 2018 baseline) and supply chain emissions reduction as
compared to a 2020 baseline.
• DEI targets – annual progress towards increasing female leadership
to 35% from a 2021 baseline.
• Reputation, ethics and Compliance – no new material ESG, ethical
or compliance breaches resulting in significant reputational damage
for the Group.
In particular, the Committee took account of the CEO’s exceptional
leadership and social responsibility in facing the ongoing Ukraine
crisis. Playtech has over 700 employees (10%+ of the global
workforce) in Ukraine, and, before and during the invasion, Playtech’s
Crisis Management Group has worked 24/7 to look after our
workforce, provide relocation opportunities to adjacent countries and
provide humanitarian support whilst ensuring the business continues
to operate. The Committee is proud of Playtech’s response to this
awful situation. Finally, it should be noted that the above has been
achieved against the backdrop of continued corporate activity and
takeover approaches which have understandably consumed large
amounts of management time, whilst continuing to deliver record
financial results.
In this context and recognising the significant progress made in
respect of the key strategic, operational and ESG objectives of the
Company, the Committee determined to pay a maximum bonus in
respect of these objectives. When combined with the maximum
payout achieved under the financial targets, the overall bonus payout
for the CEO and former CFO was 100% of maximum.
This amounted to £1.6 million (2021: £1.6m) for the CEO, £613k
(2021:£549k) for the former CFO. As set out in Chair’s statement, the
Remuneration Committee determined to not pro-rate the bonus for
the former CFO in recognition that he was actively employed during
the whole financial year, in reflection of the Board’s request to remain
in the business to support an orderly transition.
No bonus was payable to the new CFO in respect of the one month
ofthe year served as a Director.
In line with the Policy, 33.3% of these payments will be deferred into
shares for two years for the CEO. In light of the exceptional Company
performance and Andrew Smith’s commitment to the Company until
the year end, the Committee determined that the annual bonus would
be paid in cash for the former CFO.
The Committee is satisfied that the annual bonus payments to
Executive Directors are a fair reflection of corporate and individual
performance during the year.
LTIP vesting in the year
The LTIP awards granted in October 2020 will vest subject to an EPS performance condition (measured over a three-year period from 1 January
2020 to 31 December 2022) and relative TSR performance conditions (measured over a three-year period from 26 October 2020 to 25 October
2023). Based on performance to 31 December 2022, the outcome is expected to be as follows:
Adjusted Diluted EPS (Final)25%25%36 Euro cents51.5 Euro cents93.38%
Tot al100%60.85%
1 The bespoke peer group for the 2020 LTIP awards consisted of 888 Holdings plc, Betsson AB (B shares), Entain plc, International Game Technology plc, Gamesys Group plc, Kindred Group plc, Greek
Organization of Football Prognostics S.A. (OPAP S.A.), Flutter Entertainment plc, Rank Group plc, Sportech plc and William Hill plc.
Awards for Mor Weizer and Andrew Smith vested on 1 March 2022 as follows:
DirectorOriginal number of awards grantedNumber of awards vestedTotal value
1
Total value due to share price
appreciation
2
Mor Weizer546,000332,216£1,690,979£474,072
Andrew Smith81,90049,832£253,645£71,110
1 Based on the share price of £5.09 as at 31 December 2022.
2 Calculated as the share price on 31 December 2022 of £5.09 less the share price on the date of grant of £3.663.
The awards are also subject to a two-year retention period post vesting.
121
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Annual report on remuneration continued
LTIP vesting in the year continued
As part of the settlement agreement with Andrew Smith, the Committee determined to settle the in-flight 2022 LTIP award via a cash payment
of £208,857, based on the time pro-ration between the grant date and the end of his notice period. The Committee determined that this was
appropriate as the granting of the award was delayed from the normal timescales as a result of continued corporate activity that resulted in a
close period of over 12 months.
One-off award approved by shareholders in 2019
TrancheNumber of awards grantedShare price targetPerformance period (years)Share price target achievedVesting date
A300,000£6.003Yes26/11/2021
B400,000£7.003Ye s14/12/2021
C500,000£8.003NoLapsed
D700,000£12.005NoN/A
Accordingly, tranche C lapsed during the year as a result of the share price target of £8.00 not being met. Tranche D has until 19 December 2024
to be achieved.
LTIP awards (audited)
On 19 August 2022 the following awards were made to the Executive Directors (including Chris McGinnis prior to his appointment as a Director)
under the LTIP:
DirectorType of awardTotal number of awardsAggregate market value (£)
1
Mor WeizerNil cost option351,7241,632,000
Andrew SmithNil cost option144,041668,350
Chris McGinnisCash-based award—300,000
Awards represented 200% of salary for Mor Weizer and 150% of salary for Andrew Smith based on a share price on grant of 464 pence.
Therehas been no change in the exercise price or date since the awards were granted.
The 2022 LTIP awards for Mor Weizer and Andrew Smith are subject to the following performance conditions:
1 The bespoke peer group for the 2022 LTIP awards consisted of 888 Holdings plc, Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Betsson AB (B shares), DraftKings A, Entain plc, Evolution AB, Flutter Entertainment plc,
International Game Technology plc, Kindred Group plc, Light & Wonder inc, Greek Organization of Football Prognostics S.A. (OPAP S.A.), and Rank Group plc.
For Chris McGinnis, the award is subject to the following performance conditions:
1 As disclosed above, the LTIP award granted in 2020 is based on relative TSR performance until 25 October 2023, and therefore this figure represents the known EPS vesting and an estimate of the
relative TSR vesting as at 31 December 2022.
Percentage change in remuneration of Directors compared with employees
1
The following table sets out the percentage change in the salary/fees, benefits and bonus for each Director from 2020 to 2022 compared with
the average percentage change for employees. All percentages are calculated based on the GBP value of pay, as this reflects how pay is set,
ignoring the impact of exchange rate fluctuations. The increases, as detailed in this Report, reflect the additional time spent on the business
during the intense period of activity during the last two years.
Salary/feesBenefitsBonus
2019 to 20202020 to 20212021 to 20222019 to 20202020 to 20212021 to 20222019 to 20202020 to 20212021 to 2022
Executive Directors
Mor Weizer0%-20.0%+2.0%+31.6%
3
-1.6%+10.5%-63.1%+233.3%+2.0%
Andrew Smith+2.5%+0%-5.1%
4
+75.3% -41.0%-5.2%-64.3%+254.2%+11.6%
Chris McGinnisN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Non-executive Directors
2,5
Brian MattingleyN/AN/A+69.6%
6
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Ian Penrose +2.5%+116.7%+12.3%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Anna Massion+2.5%+114.4%+9.2%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
John Krumins+2.5%+114.4%+9.2%N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Linda Marston-WestonN/AN/A+260.0%
6
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Wider workforce
Average employee – UK based+2.7%+4.5%+11%+6%+0.8%+9.4%+22%-15.6%+83%
1 Playtech plc has no employees. The UK workforce was chosen as a comparator group as the Remuneration Committee looks to benchmark the remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer with
reference mainly to the UK market (albeit that he has a global role and responsibilities, and remuneration packages across the Group vary widely depending on local market practices and conditions).
2 The percentage change figures shown above between 2020 and 2021 for the Non-executive Directors have been updated to reflect additional fees paid during 2022 in respect of additional time
commitment during 2021.
3 The increase in the value of Mor Weizer’s benefits was due to the provision of a fully expensed company car.
4 The decrease in the value of Andrew Smith’s salary was due to him stepping down from the Board during the year.
5 The increase for the Non-executive Directors reflects additional fees paid in respect of the significant additional work performed in the year.
6 The increase in the value of Brian Mattingley and Linda Marston-Weston’s fees was due to their appointment to the Board part way through 2021.
Pay ratio information in relation to the total remuneration of the Director undertaking the role of Chief
Executive Officer
The table below compares the single total figure of remuneration for the Chief Executive Officer with that of the Group employees who are paid
at the 25th percentile (lower quartile), 50th percentile (median) and 75th percentile (upper quartile) of its UK employee population between
2019 and 2022:
YearMethodology25th percentile pay ratioMedian pay ratio75th percentile pay ratio
2022Method A114:175:151:1
2021Method A229:1160:1107:1
2020Method A43:131:121:1
2019Method A73:152:135:1
The employees included are those employed on 31 December 2022 and remuneration figures are determined with reference to the financial
year to 31 December 2022. The CEO is paid in GBP Sterling and the ratios have been calculated using the CEO’s 2022 total single figure of
remuneration expressed in GBP Sterling (£4.28 million).
Option A, as set out under the reporting regulations, was used to calculate remuneration for 2022, in line with the approach taken in 2021,
aswebelieve that that is the most robust methodology for calculating these figures.
The value of each employee’s total pay and benefits was calculated using the single figure methodology consistent with the CEO, with the
exception of annual bonuses, where the amount paid during the year was used (i.e. in respect of the 2021 financial year) as 2022 employee
annual bonuses had not yet been determined at the time this report was produced. No elements of pay have been omitted. Where required,
remuneration was approximately adjusted to be on a full-time and full-year equivalent basis based on the employee’s contracted hours and
theproportion of the year they were employed.
125
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Annual report on remuneration continued
Pay ratio information in relation to the total remuneration of the Director undertaking the role of Chief Executive
Officer continued
The table below sets out the salary and total pay and benefits for the three quartile point employees:
25th percentile50th percentile75th percentile
Salary
Total pay
and benefitsSalary
Total pay
and benefitsSalary
Total pay
and benefits
2022£33,000£37,728£55,000£56,860£75,769£83,813
The Committee considers that the median CEO pay ratio is consistent with the relative roles and responsibilities of the CEO and the identified
employee. Base salaries of all employees, including our Executive Directors, are set with reference to a range of factors including market
practice, experience and performance in role. The CEO’s remuneration package is weighted towards variable pay (including the annual bonus
and LTIP) due to the nature of the role, and this means the ratio is likely to fluctuate depending on the outcomes of incentive plans in each year.
The Committee also recognises that, due to the flexibility permitted within the regulations for identifying and calculating the total pay and benefits
for employees, as well as differences in employment and remuneration models between companies, the ratios reported above may not be
comparable to those reported by other companies.
Relative importance of spend on pay
The following table sets out the amounts paid in share buybacks and dividends, and total remuneration paid to all employees:
Payouts
2022
€’ m
2021
€’ m
Change
%
Dividends——0%
Share buybacks——0%
Total employee remuneration
1
435.0384.6+13.1%
1 Total employee remuneration for continuing and discontinued operations includes wages and salaries, social security costs, share-based payments and pension costs for all employees, including
the Directors.
Directors’ interests in ordinary shares (audited)
Director
Ordinary shares
Share awards and share options
31 December
Total interests at
December 20222022202120222021
Executive Directors
2,3,4,7
Mor Weizer
1,5
332,050277,5502,863,9493,012,2253,195,999
Andrew Smith
5,6
55,14384,875256,113324,550311,256
Chris McGinnis5,0005,00081,900122,96386,900
Non-executive Directors
7
Brian Mattingley—————
Ian Penrose17,50017,500——17,500
Anna Massion32,00032,000——32,000
John Krumins18,00010,000 ——18,000
Linda Marston-Weston—————
1 The CEO’s share ownership is 207% of salary based on the closing share price of 509 pence on 31 December 2022.
2 Share options are granted for nil consideration.
3 These options were granted in accordance with the rules of the Playtech Long Term Incentive Plan 2012 or the Playtech Long Term Incentive Plan 2022 (the “Option Plans”). Options under the Option
Plans are granted as nil cost options and in the case of Executive Directors exclusively, the options vest and become exercisable on the third anniversary of the notional grant date. Unexercised
options expire ten years after the date of grant, unless the relevant employee leaves the Group’s employment, in which case the unvested options lapse and any vested options lapse three months
after the date that the employment ends.
4 No LTIP awards were granted in 2021.
5 Mr Weizer and Mr Smith were each granted an award in 2022 over 351,724 and 144,041 shares respectively. The Adjusted EPS performance condition is based over the financial year ending
31December 2024, whilst the relative TSR performance conditions are based over the period of 19 August 2022 to 18 August 2025 with normal vesting scheduled for 18 August 2025. As set
outonpage 122, the awards granted to Mr Smith lapsed on cessation as part of the settlement agreement.
6 The figures for Mr Smith have been illustrated at the date at which he stepped down from the Board (28 November 2022).
7 There was no movement in share interests between 31 December 2022 and the date of publication.
126
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Role and membership
The Remuneration Committee is currently comprised entirely of three independent Non-executive Directors as defined in the Code. Ian Penrose
chairs the Committee, and the other members are Linda Marston-Weston and Anna Massion.
Details of attendance at the Remuneration Committee meetings are set out on page 101 and their biographies and experience on pages 96 to 97.
The Committee operates within agreed terms of reference detailing its authority and responsibilities. The Committee’s terms of reference are
available for inspection on the Company’s website, www.playtech.com, and include:
• determining and agreeing the Policy for the remuneration of the CEO, the CFO, the Chairman and other members of the senior
management team;
• reviewing the broad Policy framework for remuneration to ensure it remains appropriate and relevant;
• reviewing the design of and determining targets for any performance-related pay and the annual level of payments under such plans;
• reviewing the design of and approving any changes to long-term incentive or option plans; and
• ensuring that contractual terms on termination and payments made are fair to the individual and the Company and that failure is not rewarded.
The Remuneration Committee also considers the terms and conditions of employment and overall remuneration of Executive Directors, the
Company Secretary and members of the senior management team and has regard to the Company’s overall approach to the remuneration of all
employees. Within this context the Committee determines the overall level of salaries, incentive payments and performance-related pay due to
Executive Directors and senior management. The Committee also determines the performance targets and the extent of their achievement for
both annual and long-term incentive awards operated by the Company and affecting the senior management. In order to manage any potential
conflicts of interest, no Director is involved in any decisions as to his/her own remuneration.
The Remuneration Committee takes advice from both inside and outside the Group on a range of matters, including the scale and composition
of the total remuneration package payable to people with similar responsibilities, skills and experience in comparable companies, sectors and
geographies that have extensive operations inside and outside the UK. A benchmarking exercise of the highest paid 20 individuals has recently
been undertaken, to provide assurance that the remuneration levels and structures remain appropriate.
During the year the Remuneration Committee received assistance and advice from the Company Secretary, Brian Moore (who is also secretary
to the Committee).
The Remuneration Committee has a planned schedule of at least three meetings throughout the year, with additional meetings and zoom calls
held when necessary. During 2022, the Committee met ten times, addressing a wide variety of issues, including:
MonthPrincipal activity
January and February
• Review of bonus and other incentivisation arrangements in relation to Executive Directors and
members of senior management
• Review of pay increases for 2022
• Consideration of ongoing corporate takeover activity on staff morale and incentivisation with the
ongoing close period and uncertain future
May, June and July
• Consideration of voting at AGM
August, September
and October
• Discussions to introduce ESG component to senior management team bonuses
• Review of long-term bonus proposals for over 400 members of the team
• Consideration of remuneration package for the incoming CFO, and the terms of the compensation for
loss of office of the former CFO
November and December• Review of long-term financial and bonus targets for Snaitech in Italy
• Consideration of remuneration matters for 2023
External advisers
As a result of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP’s (PwC’s) appointment as reporting accountant in relation to Finalto during 2020, the firm stood
down as independent adviser to the Committee. Following the completion of the sale of Finalto in 2022, later in 2022 PwC were reappointed as
the independent adviser to the Committee. PwC is a member of the Remuneration Consultants Group and, as such, voluntarily operates under
the code of conduct in relation to executive remuneration consulting in the UK. Total fees for advice provided to the Committee were £69,200 on
a time and materials basis.
127
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Annual report on remuneration continued
Engagement with shareholders and shareholder voting
At the 2022 AGM the total votes received in favour of resolution for
the Remuneration Report were 69.67%. Following the AGM and
throughout the year during the takeover period and discussions, the
Group has continued to engage with shareholders. The principal
reason given by those shareholders who were unable to support
the resolutions related to payouts under the one-off equity incentive
scheme approved in 2019. Shareholders were more supportive of the
changes to remuneration implemented since 2021 and therefore the
Committee has not made any changes to how it operates the ongoing
Remuneration Policy during 2022.
The Directors’ Remuneration Policy and the Directors’ Annual Report
on Remuneration were each subject to a shareholder vote at the AGM
held on 26 May 2021 and 30 June 2022 respectively, the results of
which were as follows:
ForAgainstWithheld
Approval of
Remuneration Report
166,001,674
(69.67%)
72,258,663
(30.33%)
107,756
Approval of
Remuneration Policy
177,453,581
(75.47%)
57,668,932
(24.53%)
155,838
Engagement with the wider workforce
With respect to employee engagement, the Board and Chairman of
the Remuneration Committee engages with the COO of B2B, the CEO
of Snaitech and Global Head of Human Resources on strategic and
operational issues affecting and of interest to the workforce, including
remuneration, talent pipeline and diversity and inclusion. The COO
and CEO are standing attendees at the Board meetings. In addition,
the Company has established a Speak Up hotline, which enables
employees to raise concerns confidentially and independently of
management. Any concerns raised are reported into the Head of
Legal and Head of Compliance for discussion and consideration by
the Risk Committee. The Board considers the current mechanisms
appropriate for understanding and factoring in stakeholder concerns
into plc level decision making. However, the Board will assess whether
additional mechanisms can strengthen its understanding and
engagement of stakeholder concerns in the future.
Specifically, wide-ranging discussions were held around
remuneration, reviewing benchmarking data about the
competitiveness of Playtech’s basic pay levels compared to peer
groups and geographies. Bonus targets and quanta were reviewed to
continue to improve the alignment of individual and Group operating
and strategic performance. The Committee also took the opportunity
to consider the list of team members who historically have been
eligible for an LTIP grant, to ensure that this element of aligning
employee and shareholder interests remains appropriate. There
was significant engagement around the wide-ranging implications
of the Takeover Offer by Aristocrat for the Company, the subsequent
corporate activity around other potential acquirers, and also around
the uncertainties created for the business and its employees by the
numerous items of corporate activity that affected the Company
throughout much of 2021 and 2022.
Furthermore, and working in conjunction with the ESG Committee,
several discussions were held reviewing the Company’s approach to
diversity and inclusion, followed by setting the Company goals and
targets in this area.
During 2022, the Board discussed, reviewed and engaged on a
number of stakeholder issues. The material stakeholder topics
discussed by the Board in 2022 included:
• executive compensation and pay;
• environmental, social and governance matters;
• developing the business in markets;
• corporate governance;
• diversity;
• inclusion and gender pay gap and regulatory and compliance
developments;
• safer gambling;
• data protection;
• environment;
• anti-money laundering and anti-bribery and corruption;
• human rights and modern slavery;
• responsible supply chain and procurement; and
• commercial developments with B2B licensees and third parties.
By order of the Board
Ian Penrose
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
23 March 2023
128
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Remuneration Report
Directors’ report
The Directors are pleased to present to shareholders their
report and the audited financial statements for the year ended
31December 2022.
The Directors’ Report should be read in conjunction with the
other sections of this Annual Report: the Strategic Report,
including Responsible Business and Sustainability Report and the
Remuneration Report, all of which are incorporated into this Directors’
Report by reference.
The following also form part of this report:
• the reports on corporate governance set out on pages 94 to 134;
• information relating to financial instruments, as provided in the
notesto the financial statements; and
• related party transactions as set out in Note 36 to the financial
statements.
Annual Report and Accounts
The Directors are aware of their responsibilities in respect of the
Annual Report. The Directors consider that the Annual Report,
taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and understandable and provides
the information necessary for shareholders to assess the Group’s
performance, business model and strategy. The Statement of
Directors’ Responsibilities appears on page 134.
Principal activities and business review
The Group is the gambling industry’s leading technology company
delivering business intelligence-driven gambling software, services,
content and platform technology across the industry’s most popular
product verticals, including casino, live casino, sports betting, virtual
sports, bingo and poker. It is the pioneer of omni-channel gambling
technology through its integrated platform technology. As of June
2018, through the acquisition of Snaitech, the Group directly owns
and operates a leading sports betting and gaming brand in online and
retail in Italy.
Finalto
In September 2021, the Company announced that it had entered into
an agreement with a purchaser, an investment vehicle incorporated
in the Cayman Islands, to dispose of the Group’s Financials Division,
named Finalto (formerly TradeTech Group) business for a total
consideration of $250 million. The resolution to sell the Finalto
business was put to shareholders on 1 December 2021 and was duly
passed. In July 2022, the Company announced the completion of an
all-cash sale of Finalto to Gopher Investments for an enterprise value
of $250 million.
Playtech plc is a public listed company, with a premium listing on the
Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. It is incorporated in the
Isle of Man and domiciled in the UK.
The information that fulfils the requirement for a management report
as required by Rule 4.1.5 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rules applicable to the Group can be found in the Strategic Report
on pages 2 to 92 which also includes an analysis of the development,
performance and position of the Group’s business. A statement of the
key risks and uncertainties facing the business of the Group at the end
of the year is found on pages 85 to 90 of this Annual Report and details
of the policies and the use of financial instruments are set out in Note 5
to the financial statements.
Directors and Directors’ indemnity
The Directors of the Company who held office during 2021 and to
date are:
AppointedResigned
Brian Mattingley01.06.2021—
Mor Weizer02.05.2007—
Andrew Smith10.01.201728.11.2022
Ian Penrose01.09.2018—
Anna Massion02.04.2019—
John Krumins02.04.2019—
Linda Marston—Weston01.10.2021—
Chris McGinnis28.11.2022—
Samy Reeb04.01.2023—
All of the current Directors will stand for election and/or re-election at
the forthcoming Annual General Meeting to be held on 24 May 2023.
Save as set out in Note 36 to the financial statements, no Director
had a material interest in any significant contract, other than a service
contract or contract for services, with the Company or any of its
operating companies at any time during the year.
The Company also purchased and maintained throughout 2022
Directors’ and Officers’ liability insurance in respect of itself and
itsDirectors.
Corporate governance statement
The Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules require certain
information to be included in a corporate governance statement in
the Directors’ Report. Information that fulfils the requirements of the
corporate governance statement can be found in the Governance
Report on pages 94 to 134 and is incorporated into this report by reference.
Disclaimer
The purpose of these financial statements (including this report) is to
provide information to the members of the Company. The financial
statements have been prepared for, and only for, the members of
the Company, as a body, and no other persons. The Company, its
Directors and employees, agents and advisers do not accept or
assume responsibility to any other person to whom this document is
shown or into whose hands it may come and any such responsibility or
liability is expressly disclaimed.
The financial statements contain certain forward-looking statements
with respect to the operations, performance and financial condition of
the Group. By their nature, these statements involve uncertainty since
future events and circumstances can cause results and developments
to differ materially from those anticipated. The forward-looking
statements reflect knowledge and information available at the date
of preparation of these financial statements and the Company
undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Nothing in this document should be construed as a profit forecast.
Results and dividend
The results of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2022 are
set out on pages 144 to 215. The Company is not recommending the
payment of a final dividend for the year ended 31 December 2022.
Thissituation will be reviewed throughout 2023.
129
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Directors’ report continued
Going concern, viability, responsibilities and disclosure
The current activities of the Group and those factors likely to affect its
future development, together with a description of its financial position,
are described in the Strategic Report. Critical accounting estimates
affecting the carrying values of assets and liabilities of the Group are
discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements.
The principal and emerging risks are set out in detail in the Strategic
Report on pages 85 to 90 together with a description of the ongoing
mitigating actions being taken across the Group. The Board carries
out a robust assessment of these risks on an annual basis, with
regular updates being presented at Board and Board Committee
meetings. These meetings receive updates from Finance, Legal,
Tax, Operations, Internal Audit, Regulatory and Compliance, Data
Protection, Human Resources, IT Security and Group Secretariat.
TheGroup maintains a risk register which is monitored and reviewed
on a continuous basis.
During 2022, the Board carried out an assessment of these principal
risks facing the Group, including those factors that would threaten its
future performance, solvency or liquidity. This assessment considered
the current situation around the potential impact of the Ukraine crisis.
This ongoing assessment forms part of the Group’s strategic plan.
After making appropriate enquiries and having regard to the
Group’s cash balances and normal business planning and control
procedures, to include a detailed analysis of various scenarios,
the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Company
and the Group have adequate resources to continue in operational
existence and meet their liabilities for a period of at least 15 months
from the date of approval of the financial statements. In respect of
the viability assessment, the Directors reviewed a five-year forecast
considering the viability status for the period to December 2027 in
accordance with the Group’s five-year plan, which is considered
to be an appropriate period over which the Group can predict its
revenue, cost base and cash flows with a higher degree of certainty,
as opposed to more arbitrary forms of forecasts based solely on
percentage increases. Notwithstanding projected profitability over
the forecast period, the Directors have no reason to believe that the
Group’s viability will be threatened over a period longer than that
covered by the positive confirmation of long-term viability as per the
Viability Statement on pages 91 and 92. Given the above, the Directors
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the accounts.
Significant shareholdings
As of 21 March 2023, the Company had been advised of the following
significant shareholders each holding more than 3% of the Company’s
issued share capital, based on 306,356,693 ordinary shares in issue
(excluding treasury shares of 2,937,550):
Shareholder%No. of ordinary shares
Interactive Brokers (EO)6.2319,081,076
Albula Investment Fund 5.42 16,594,432
Setanta Asset Management4.9915,307,229
TT Bond Partners 4.9715,237,921
Future Capital Group4.9015,000,000
Paul Suen Cho Hung4.6114,115,010
Vanguard Group4.5013,784,973
Blackrock3.8911,925,947
Dr Choi Chiu Fai Stanley3.7511,517,241
Dimensional Fund Advisors3.3810,353,214
The persons set out in the table above have notified the Company
pursuant to Rule 5 of the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rules of their interests in the ordinary share capital of the Company.
The Company has not been notified of any changes to the above
shareholders between 21 March 2023 and the date of this report.
Capital structure
As at 28 February 2023, the Company had 309,294,243 issued
shares of no-par value, of which 2,937,550 are held as treasury shares.
The Company has one class of ordinary share and each share carries
the right to one vote at general meetings of the Company and to
participate in any dividends declared in accordance with the articles
of association. No person has any special rights of control over the
Company’s share capital.
The authorities under the Company’s articles of association granted
at the last Annual General Meeting for the Directors to issue new
shares for cash and purchase its own shares remain valid until
the forthcoming Annual General Meeting when it is intended that
resolutions will be put forward to shareholders to renew the authority
for the Company to issue shares for cash and purchase its own shares.
Articles of association
The articles of association contain provisions similar to those which
are contained within the articles of association of other companies
in the gambling industry, namely to permit the Company to (i) restrict
the voting or distribution rights attaching to ordinary shares or (ii)
compel the sale of ordinary shares if a “Shareholder Regulatory
Event” (as defined in the articles of association) occurs. A Shareholder
Regulatory Event would occur if a holder of legal and/or beneficial
interests in ordinary shares does not satisfactorily comply with a
regulator’s request(s) and/or the Company’s request(s) in response
to regulatory action and/or the regulator considers that such
shareholder may not be suitable (a determination which in all practical
effects is at the sole discretion of such regulator), to be the holder of
legal and/or beneficial interests in ordinary shares. Accordingly, to the
extent a relevant threshold of ownership is passed, or to the extent any
shareholder may be found by any such regulator to be able to exercise
significant and/or relevant financial influence over the Company and
is indicated by a regulator to be unsuitable, a holder of an interest in
ordinary shares may be subject to such restrictions or compelled
to sell its ordinary shares (or have such ordinary shares sold on
its behalf).
Voting rights
Subject to any special rights or restrictions as to voting attached to
any shares by or in accordance with the articles of association, on a
show of hands every member who is present in person or by proxy
and entitled to vote has one vote and on a poll every member who
is present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote has one vote for
every share of which he is the holder.
Restrictions on voting
No member shall, unless the Board otherwise determines, be entitled
to vote at a general meeting or at any separate meeting of the holders
of any class of shares, either in person or by proxy, in respect of any
share held by him or to exercise any right as a member unless all
calls or other sums presently payable by him in respect of that share
have been paid to the Company. In addition, any member who having
been served with a notice by the Company requiring such member to
disclose to the Board in writing, within such reasonable period as may
be specified in such notice, details of any past or present beneficial
interest of any third party in the shares or any other interest of any kind
whatsoever which a third party may have in the shares, and the identity
of the third party having or having had any such interest, fails to do so
may be disenfranchised by service of a notice by the Board.
Transfer
Subject to the articles of association, any member may transfer all or
any of his or her certificated shares by an instrument of transfer in any
usual form or in any other form which the Board may approve. The
Board may, in its absolute discretion, decline to register any instrument
of transfer of a certificated share which is not a fully paid share or on
130
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
which the Company has a lien. The Board may also decline to register
a transfer of a certificated share unless the instrument of transfer is:
(i) delivered for registration to the registered agent, or at such other
place as the Board may decide, for registration; and (ii) accompanied
by the certificate for the shares to be transferred except in the case
of a transfer where a certificate has not been required to be issued
by the certificate for the shares to which it relates and/or such other
evidence as the Board may reasonably require to prove the title of the
transferor and the due execution by him of the transferor, if the transfer
is executed by some other person on his behalf, the authority of that
person to do so, provided that where any such shares are admitted to
AIM, the Official List maintained by the UK Listing Authority or another
recognised investment exchange.
Amendment of the Company’s articles of association
Any amendments to the Company’s articles of association may be
made in accordance with the provisions of the Isle of Man Companies
Act 2006 by way of special resolution.
Appointment and removal of Directors
Unless and until otherwise determined by the Company by ordinary
resolution, the number of Directors (other than any alternate Directors)
shall not be less than two and there shall be no maximum number
ofDirectors.
Powers of Directors
Subject to the provisions of the Isle of Man Companies Act 2006,
the memorandum and the articles of association of the Company
and to any directions given by special resolution, the business of the
Company shall be managed by the Board, which may exercise all the
powers of the Company.
Appointment of Directors
Subject to the articles of association, the Company may, by ordinary
resolution, appoint a person who is willing to act to be a Director, either
to fill a vacancy, or as an addition to the existing Board, and may also
determine the rotation in which any Directors are to retire. Without
prejudice to the power of the Company to appoint any person to be a
Director pursuant to the articles of association, the Board shall have
power at any time to appoint any person who is willing to act as a
Director, either to fill a vacancy or as an addition to the existing Board,
but the total number of Directors shall not exceed any maximum
number fixed in accordance with the articles of association. Any
Director so appointed shall hold office only until the next Annual
General Meeting of the Company following such appointment and
shall then be eligible for re-election but shall not be taken into account
in determining the number of Directors who are to retire by rotation at
that meeting.
Retirement of Directors
At each Annual General Meeting one-third of the Directors (excluding
any Director who has been appointed by the Board since the previous
Annual General Meeting) or, if their number is not an integral multiple of
three, the number nearest to one-third but not exceeding one-third shall
retire from office (but so that if there are fewer than three Directors who
are subject to retirement by rotation under this article one shall retire).
Removal of Directors
The Company may by ordinary resolution passed at a meeting called
for such purpose, or by written resolution consented to by members
holding at least 75% of the voting rights in relation thereto, remove any
Director before the expiration of his period of office notwithstanding
anything in the articles of association or in any agreement between
the Company and such Director and, without prejudice to any claim
for damages which he may have for breach of any contract of service
between him and the Company, may (subject to the articles) by
ordinary resolution, appoint another person who is willing to act as
a Director in his place. A Director may also be removed from office
by the service on him of a notice to that effect signed by all the
otherDirectors.
Significant agreements
There are no agreements or arrangements to which the Company
is a party that are affected by a change in control of the Company
following a takeover bid, and which are considered individually
significant in terms of their impact on the business of the Group
as a whole.
The rules of certain of the Company’s incentive plans include
provisions which apply in the event of a takeover or reconstruction.
Related party transactions
Details of all related party transactions are set out in Note 36 to the
financial statements. Internal controls are in place to ensure that any
related party transactions involving Directors, or their connected
persons are carried out on an arm’s length basis and are disclosed in
the financial statements.
Political and charitable donations
During the year ended 31 December 2022, the Group made charitable
donations of €2.7 million (2021: €6.0 million), primarily to charities that
fund research into, and for the treatment of, problem gambling but also
to a variety of charities operating in countries in which the Company’s
subsidiaries are based. In addition, the Group continues to support
our employees in Ukraine by meeting the costs for assistance during
evacuation and monthly living assistance since then.
The Group made no political donations during this period (2021: €Nil).
Sustainability and employees
Information with respect to the Group’s impact on the environment
and other matters concerning sustainability can be found on pages
46 to 77.
Employee engagement continues to be a top priority across the
Group and, in accordance with principle D of the Code, we are looking
at ways to increase engagement with our workforce and a further
update will be included in next year’s Annual Report. Various initiatives
involving our employees are set out in the Strategic Report on
pages 2 to 92 and in the statement dealing with our relationship with
stakeholders on pages 43 to 45.
Applications for employment by disabled persons are always fully
and fairly considered, bearing in mind the aptitude and ability of
the applicant concerned. The Group places considerable value
on the involvement of its employees and has continued to keep
them informed of matters affecting them as employees and on the
performance of the Group and has run information days for employees
in different locations across the Group during the year. Details of our
engagement with stakeholders are set out on pages 43 to 45. Some
employees are stakeholders in the Company through participation in
share option plans. Information provided by the Company pursuant to
the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules is publicly available
via the regulatory information services and the Company’s website,
www.playtech.com.
Branches
The Company’s subsidiary Playtech Holdings Limited has established
a branch in Argentina. Playtech Software Limited (UK) has established
a branch in Gibraltar. Intelligent Gaming Systems Limited has
established a branch in Argentina. Quickspin AB has established a
branch in Malta. V.B. Video (Cyprus) Limited has established a branch
in Italy. VF 2011 Limited has established a branch in Gibraltar and
Playtech Software Bulgaria Limited has established a branch in Spain.
131
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Directors’ report continued
Regulatory disclosures
The information in the following tables is provided in compliance with the Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rules (DTRs).
The DTRs also require certain information to be included in a corporate governance statement in the Directors’ Report. Information that fulfils
the requirements of the corporate governance statement can be found in the Governance Report on page 142 and is incorporated into this
Directors’ Report by reference.
Disclosure table pursuant to ListingRule 9.8.4C
Listing RuleInformation includedDisclosure
9.8.4(1)Interest capitalised by the GroupNone
9.8.4(2)Unaudited financial informationNone
9.8.4(4)Long-term incentive scheme only involving a DirectorNone
9.8.4(5)Directors’ waivers of emolumentsNone
9.8.4(6)Directors’ waivers of future emolumentsNone
9.8.4(7)Non-pro-rata allotments for cashNone
9.8.4(8)Non-pro-rata allotments for cash by major subsidiariesNone
9.8.4(9)Listed company is a subsidiary of anotherN/A
9.8.4(10)Contracts of significanceNone
9.8.4(11)Contracts of significance involving a controlling shareholderNone
9.8.4(12)Waivers of dividendsNone
9.8.4(12)Waivers of future dividendsNone
9.8.4(14)Agreement with a controlling shareholderNone
Additional information provided pursuant to Listing Rule 9.8.6
Listing RuleInformation includedDisclosure
9.8.6(1)Interests of Directors (and their connected persons) in the
shares of the Company at the year end and not more than one
month prior to the date of the notice of AGM
See page 126
9.8.6(2)Interests in Playtech shares disclosed under DTR5 at the
year end and not more than one month prior to the date of
thenotice of AGM
See page 130
9.8.6(3)The going concern statementSee page 84
9.8.6(4)(a)Amount of the authority to purchase own shares available
atthe year end
30,635,669 ordinary shares which authority will expire at the
AGM and is proposed to be renewed
9.8.6(4)(b)Off-market purchases of own shares during the yearNone
9.8.6(4)(c)Off-market purchases of own shares after the year endNone
9.8.6(4)(d)Non-pro-rata sales of treasury shares during the yearNone
9.8.6(5)Compliance with the principles of the UK Corporate
Governance Code
See the statement on pages 98 and 99
9.8.6(6)Details of non-compliance with the UK Corporate
Governance Code
See the statement on pages 98 and 99
9.8.6(7)Re Directors proposed for re-election, the unexpired term
oftheir service contract and a statement about Directors
without a service contract
The CEO and CFO serve under service contracts described on
page 103. The Chairman and the Non-executive Directors serve
under letters of appointment described on page 104
9.8.6(8)TCFD Recommendations and Recommended Disclosures See pages 67 to 73
9.8.6(9)Statement on board diversitySee pages 60 to 62 and page 94
9.8.6(10)Numerical data on ethnic backgroundSee Responsible Business and Sustainability Addendum to the
Annual Report 2022.
9.8.6(11)Explanation of approach to collecting data for LR9.8.6 R
(9) and (10)
See Responsible Business and Sustainability Addendum to the
Annual Report 2022.
132
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Additional information under Rule 4.1 of the Disclosure and Transparency Rules
DTRRequirementHow fulfilled
4.1.3Publication of Annual Financial Report within four months
of the end of the financial year
This document is dated 23 March 2023, being a date
less than four months after the year end
4.1.5Content of Annual Financial ReportThe audited financial statements are set out on pages
144 to 225
The information that fulfils the requirement for a
management report can be found in the Strategic Report
on pages 2 to 92
The Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities can be
found on page 134
4.1.6Audited financial statementsThe audited financial statements set out on pages
144 to 225 comprise consolidated accounts prepared
in accordance with IFRS and the accounts of the
Company
4.1.7Auditing of financial statementsThe financial statements have been audited by BDO LLP
on pages 136 to 143
4.1.8 & 4.1.9Content of management reportThe Strategic Report on pages 2 to 92 includes an
analysis, using financial key performance indicators,
of the development, performance and position of the
Company’s business and a review of the Company’s
business and on pages 85 to 90 a description of the
principal risks and uncertainties
4.1.11(1)Important events since the year endThe Strategic Report on pages 2 to 92 gives details of
important events since the year end. See Note 40 to the
audited financial statements on page 215
4.1.11(2)Future developmentThe Strategic Report on pages 2 to 92 gives an
indication of the likely future development of the
Company
4.1.11(3)Research and developmentThe Strategic Report on pages 2 to 92 gives an indication
of ongoing research and development activities
4.1.11(4)Purchase of own sharesSee the statement on page 130
4.1.11(5)Branch ocesSee the statement on page 131
4.1.11(6)Use of financial instrumentsSee Note 5 to the audited financial statements on pages
152 to 162
4.1.12 & 13Responsibility statementSee the statement of the Directors on page 134
4.1.14Reporting formatAvailable on www.playtech.com
133
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Directors’ report continued
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities
The Directors have elected to prepare the consolidated financial
statements for the Group in accordance with UK adopted International
Accounting Standards and have elected to prepare the Company
financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally
Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting
Standards and applicable law).
The Directors are responsible under applicable law and regulation
for keeping proper accounting records which disclose with
reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group,
for safeguarding the assets and for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
International Accounting Standard 1 (revised) requires that financial
statements present fairly for each financial year the Group’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. This requires the
faithful representation of the effects of transactions, other events and
conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria
for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the International
Accounting Standards Board’s “Framework for the Preparation and
Presentation of Financial Statements”. In virtually all circumstances,
a fair presentation will be achieved by compliance with all applicable
International Financial Reporting Standards. A fair presentation also
requires the Directors to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• present information, including accounting policies, in a manner that
provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information;
• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable
and prudent;
• state whether they have been prepared in accordance with
International Accounting Standards as adopted by the UK subject
to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial
statements; and
• provide additional disclosures when compliance with the specific
requirements in IFRS is insufficient to enable users to understand
the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on
the entity’s financial position and financial performance.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group’s
transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time
the financial position of the Group. They are also responsible for
safeguarding the assets of the Group and hence for taking reasonable
steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
In addition, the Directors at the date of this report consider that
the financial statements, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and
understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders
to assess the Group’s performance, business model and strategy.
Website publication
Financial statements are published on the Company’s website.
The maintenance and integrity of the Company’s website is
the responsibility of the Directors. The Directors’ responsibility
also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements
contained therein.
Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are listed within
theGovernance section on pages 96 and 97, confirm that, to the best
oftheir knowledge:
• the Group financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with International Accounting Standards adopted by
the UK, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial
position and profit of the Group; and
• the Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and
performance of the business and the financial position of the Group
and the Company, together with a description of the principal risks
and uncertainties that they face.
Annual General Meeting
The Annual General Meeting provides an opportunity for the Directors
to communicate personally the performance and future strategy to
non-institutional shareholders and for those shareholders to meet with
and question the Board. All results of proxy votes are read out, made
available for review at the meeting, recorded in the minutes of the
meeting and communicated to the market and via the Group website.
The Annual General Meeting for 2023 is scheduled for 24 May 2023.
The notice convening the Annual General Meeting for this year, and
an explanation of the items of non-routine business, are set out in the
circular that accompanies the Annual Report.
Auditor
So far as each Director is aware, at the date of the approval of the
financial statements there is no relevant audit information of which
the Company’s auditor is unaware. Each Director has taken all the
steps that they ought to have taken as a Director in order to make
themselves aware of any information needed by the Group’s auditor
for the purposes of its audit and to establish that the auditor is aware of
that information.
A resolution to reappoint BDO LLP as the Company’s auditor will
besubmitted to the shareholders at this year’s AGM.
Approved by the Board and signed on behalf of the Board.
Chris McGinnis
Chief Financial Officer
23 March 2023
134
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Governance Report
Financial
Statements
Financial Statements
136 Independent auditor’s report
144 Consolidated statement of comprehensiveincome
145 Consolidated statement of changes in equity
146 Consolidated balance sheet
148 Consolidated statement of cash flows
150 Notes to the financial statements
216 Company statement of changes in equity
217 Company balance sheet
218 Notes to the Company financial statements
226 Five-year summary
Company information
227Company information
135
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Independent auditor’s report
To the members of Playtech plc
Opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion:
• the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2022
andofthe Group’s profit for the year then ended;
• the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards; and
• the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice.
We have audited the financial statements of Playtech plc (the "Parent Company") and its subsidiaries (the "Group") for the year ended
31December 2022 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated and Company Statements of
Changes in Equity, the Consolidated and Company Balance Sheets, the Consolidated of Cash Flows and notes to the financial statements
andnotes to the Company financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and UK adopted
international accounting standards. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial
statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure
Framework (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under
those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We believe
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is consistent with the
additional report to the Audit Committee.
Independence
We remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit
ofthe financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the
financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group and the Parent Company’s ability to continue to
adopt the going concern basis of accounting for a period of at least 12 months from the date of approval of the financial statements included:
• Evaluating the Directors’ process in making its assessment, including the period covered, including confirming the assessment and underlying
projections were prepared by appropriate individuals with sufficient knowledge of the detailed figures as well as an understanding of the
Group’s markets, strategies and risks;
• Understanding and corroborating the achievability of key Director assumptions in their cash flow forecasts and challenging these against
ourknowledge of the prior year, our knowledge of the business and industry, and other areas of the audit;
• Checking through enquiry with the Directors, review of Board minutes and review of external resources for any key future events that may
have been omitted from cash flow forecasts and assessing the impact these could have on future cash flows and cash reserves;
• Assessing the Directors’ stress test scenarios and challenging whether other reasonably possible scenarios could occur and including
inourassessment where appropriate;
• Assessing the Directors’ reverse stress test to analyse the level of reduction in EBITDA that could be sustained before a covenant breach
orliquidity event would be indicated;
• Confirming the financing facilities, repayment terms and financial covenants to supporting documentation;
• Reviewing the Directors’ assessment of covenant compliance throughout the forecast period to 30 June 2024;
• Considering the impact of inflation including energy costs and other macroeconomic matters;
• Ensuring any large non-routine payments are considered as part of the Directors’ assessment, this included matters such as the repayment
ofthe 2023 bond of €200 million;
• Challenging the Directors as to matters outside of the going concern assessment period, principally relating to the timing and cost of the
Italian license renewals; and
• Considering the adequacy of the disclosures relating to going concern included within the Annual Report against the requirements of the
accounting standards and consistency of the disclosure against the forecasts and going concern assessment.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually or
collectively, may cast significant doubt on the Group and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at least 12
months from when the financial statements are authorised for issue.
136
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Conclusions relating to going concern continued
In relation to the Parent Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to add or
draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether the Directors considered it appropriate to
adoptthe going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of this report.
Overview
Coverage100% (2021: 100%) of Group revenue.
96% (2021: 95%) of Group total assets.
Key audit matters
20222021
Revenue recognition.
Accounting for and valuation of LATAM equity call options.
Valuation and disclosure of Caliplay (Mexico) and Wplay (Columbia) equity call options.
Our key audit matter over LATAM equity call options has been focused in the current year on the Caliplay and Wplay call
options, the prior year KAM included those held over other LATAM based entities which are immaterial in the current year.
MaterialityGroup financial statements as a whole
€12.0 million (2021: €7.9 million) based on 3% (2021: 2.5%) of Adjusted EBITDA.
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including the Group’s systems of internal control,
and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management override of internal
controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of material misstatement.
In determining the scope of our audit we considered the level of work to be performed at each component in order to ensure sufficient assurance
was gained to allow us to express an opinion on the financial statements of the Group as a whole. We tailored the extent of the work to be
performed at each component, either by us, as the Group audit team, or component auditors within the BDO network based on our assessment
of the risk of material misstatement at each component.
We performed full scope audit procedures on ten components, five of these were considered significant with the other five being undertaken
to ensure appropriate audit coverage. Four of the significant components were audited by the Group audit team and the remaining significant
component audited by BDO Italy. For the remaining non-significant components, component auditors within the BDO network or the Group
audit team performed review procedures or specific audit procedures on certain balances based on their relative size, risks in the business
andour knowledge of those entities.
Our involvement with component auditors
For the work performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement needed in order to be able to conclude whether
sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole.
Our involvement with the component auditor of the significant component included attending key meetings as appropriate (including those
withlocal management), directing the scope and approach of the audit, and performing a detailed review of the audit files.
For the component auditors of the non-significant components we provided group instructions, directed the scope of their work and where
considered necessary, performed a detailed review of their working papers.
137
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Independent auditor’s report continued
To the members of Playtech plc
An overview of the scope of our audit continued
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of
the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified,
including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit, and directing the efforts of the
engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion
thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matter (KAM)How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Revenue
recognition.
The Group’s
revenue streams
and the related
accounting
policies applied
during the period
are detailed
in Note5 to
the financial
statements.
Revenue recognition was
considered a KAM due to the
complexity of the IT systems
and the significant level of audit
focus required.
Our key audit matters in respect
of revenue consists of the
following:
Playtech B2B gaming revenue
There is a risk over accuracy
and existence of revenue due
to the nature of the contracts
in place, complexity of the
IT systems and the risk of
manipulation or error in the
underlying source data.
Snaitech B2C streams:
There is a risk in respect of
accuracy and existence of
revenue due to the complexity
of the IT systems and
manipulation or error in the
underlying source data.
We developed an understanding of the key revenue processes from inception to
recognition in the financial statements and assessed the design and implementation
of the controls over the Group’s revenue cycles. This included undertaking test bets
as part of our risk assessment procedures and tracing the underlying transactions to
source data.
In completing this work we utilised our own IT specialists to assess the IT controls in
respect of the key operating systems supporting the above transaction flows. Our IT
specialists also reviewed the work completed by the IT specialists from the BDO Italy
component team.
Our testing approach for revenue was tailored for the different revenue streams and
entities across the Group.
B2B gaming revenue
We examined and assessed the treatment of a sample of new and modified revenue
contracts in the year to check the performance obligations were identified appropriately
and that revenue was recognised in line with the Group’s accounting policies and
relevant accounting standards.
We tested revenue recognised with the support of IT specialists, by completing the
following:
• Tested the operating effectiveness of certain controls within the Groups main
operating system (IMS);
• Performed a full reconciliation of IMS to the billing database (used by management
tocalculate revenue for invoicing);
• For a sample of customers and invoices, we independently recalculated revenue
based on the underlying source data and the contractual terms in place and agreed
the invoices to cash receipt;
• Completed test bets and traced through underlying data to IMS; and
• For a sample of customers, analysed revenue for the year on a monthly basis
toidentify exceptions and tested those identified to underlying source data.
B2C revenue
Our testing approach for B2C revenue recognised by Snaitech included the following:
• With the assistance of our IT specialists, we carried out an end-to-end walkthrough
to understand the IT system, process and controls in place for each of the revenue
streams (betting, amusement with prizes (AWP) and video lottery terminals (VLT));
• With the support of our IT specialists, we tested the operating effectiveness
of ITcontrols, including user access controls, change management and data
processing management;
• For betting, we performed a reconciliation of bets from the operating platform
tothegovernment ADM reports;
• For a sample of bets placed through retail outlets we recalculated the revenue
recognised based on contractual terms in place, and agreed amounts to underlying
contracts and cash receipts;
• In respect of online betting we reconciled player balance liability to the underlying
data and tested a sample of deposits and withdrawals to payment processor
statements; and
• For AWP and VLT machines, we agreed the revenue recognised to the operating
system and to cash for a sample of items, and recalculated.
Key observation
Based on the work performed we did not identify any evidence of manipulation or
errorsin the data and consider that revenue has been appropriately recognised.
138
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Key audit matter (KAM)How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation and
disclosure of
Caliplay (Mexico)
and Wplay
(Columbia) equity
call options
(withreference
to Note 5 –
accounting
policies and
judgements and
estimates Note 6
and Note 20).
This was considered a KAM due to the
level of audit team effort, the complexities,
judgements and estimates required in the
valuation as well as associated disclosures.
Mexico: Caliplay
The valuation requires management
judgement in terms of the inputs and the
methodology applied to calculate the fair
value of €524.0 million. (2021: €506.7 million).
The valuation method for the option has
changed when compared to prior year.
The potential transaction with a special
purpose acquisition company (SPAC) which
was deemed to have a high probability of
completion at 31 December 2021, fell away
in Q1 2022. The valuation methodology has
therefore changed from using the SPAC
transaction price to a discounted cash flow
(DCF) approach as at 31 December 2022.
The DCF approach introduces additional
risk due to the additional estimates and
judgements required.
As the Group announced publicly on 6
February 2023, it is seeking a declaration
from the English Courts to obtain clarification
of a point of disagreement with Caliplay. This
disagreement relates to whether Caliplay still
holds an option which permits it to redeem
the additional B2B services fee element of the
strategic agreement. Should it be declared
that Caliplay still has its redemption option and
Caliplay then exercises said option, this would
cancel the equity option held by the Group.
With the support of our valuation experts, we challenged the key
assumptions used in the discounted cash flow models – this included:
• Challenge of the cash flows used and where possible, comparison
tothird party market data;
• Recalculated the discount rates and challenged as to whether
appropriate risk premiums have been applied;
• Assessed the sensitivity analysis performed to changes in key
assumptions (such as discount rate, EBITDA margin, exit multiples,
exit date and post exit restrictions on realising value of the shares)
andconsidered any additional sensitivities required based on the
auditteam’s assessment of the key inputs and judgements;
• Confirmed to contractual terms the expected share holdings of
theGroup on exercise of the options; and
• Checked the underlying models for mathematical accuracy.
In respect of the valuation of the options, management were supported
by a third-party expert. We assessed the objectivity, expertise and
qualifications of the expert.
In respect of the disagreement with Caliplay, we assessed the Group’s
judgement over the lapse of the option, with reference to third-party
advice received as well as our own review of the contractual terms.
An overview of the scope of our audit continued
Key audit matters continued
139
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Independent auditor’s report continued
To the members of Playtech plc
Key audit matter (KAM)How the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Valuation and
disclosure of
Caliplay (Mexico)
and Wplay
(Columbia) equity
call options
(withreference
to Note 5 –
accounting
policies and
judgements and
estimates Note 6
and Note 20)
continued.
The redemption option is stated as being
exercisable for a period of 45 days following
the approval of the audited accounts of
Caliplay for the year ended 31 December
2021. The Group believes the option has
expired and whilst Caliplay has not sought to
exercise the option to date, Caliplay has made
it clear that it considers the option has not
yet expired.
In arriving at the fair value of the equity call
option derivative, the Group has made a
judgement that the option has expired.
Should the English Courts determine that the
option is exercisable and Caliplay chooses
to exercise, the amount payable by Caliplay
to Playtech upon exercise would either be
agreed between the parties or, failing which,
determined by an independent investment
bank valuing Playtech’s current entitlement to
receive the additional B2B services fee until
31December 2034.
There is a risk therefore that should the option
be exercisable that it may materially impact
the fair value of the equity call option held by
the Company.
Colombia: Wplay
The Group hold an equity call option in
respect of Wplay which is required to be
fair valued.
Management have calculated the fair value of
the option as €93.5 million (2021: €97.2million)
using a discounted cash flow model which
requires estimates and judgement.
Due to the estimates and judgements required
and the complexity of the option arrangement
there is a risk that the fair value of the option
is not appropriate and the valuation is
materiallymisstated.
In respect of both valuations the Company
engaged a third-party expert to support
themin the calculations.
Disclosures
In respect of all options held there is a risk
that the disclosures, sensitivities given and
disclosure of key judgements (including the
exercisability of the Caliplay option) and
estimates are not complete and accurate.
Disclosures
In respect of both options, we reviewed the disclosures to check that they
were complete and accurate based on the accounting approach and the
audit team’s assessment of the valuation work completed, this included
an assessment of the adequacy of the detail included in the critical
judgements and estimates section (see Note 6).
Key observation
Based on the work performed we consider the judgements and estimates
made in the valuation of the Caliplay and Wplay equity options and the
related disclosure to be appropriate.
An overview of the scope of our audit continued
Key audit matters continued
140
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We consider
materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of reasonable users
thatare taken on the basis of the financial statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level,
performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily be
evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their occurrence,
when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole and performance materiality as follows:
Group financial statementsParent Company financial statements
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Materiality12.07.96.04.5
Basis for determining
materiality
3% of Adjusted EBITDA2.5% of Adjusted EBITDA50% of group materiality55% of group materiality
Rationale for the
benchmarkapplied
Although the previous oer
to acquire the company
has expired, Adjusted
EBITDA was the underlying
benchmark used in
determining the oer
price and is a key metric
used by analysts and the
Directors in assessing
the performance of
the business and in
bankingcovenants.
Given the potential corporate
transaction activity,
Adjusted EBITDA (which
was the underlying basis
for the Aristocrat oer) was
considered to be the metric
of greatest interest to users of
the financial statements.
2% of total assets
capped at 50% of Group
materiality. This was
calculated as a percentage
of Group materiality for
Group reporting purposes
given the assessment of
aggregation risk.
2% of total assets capped
at 55% of Group materiality.
This was calculated as
a percentage of Group
materiality for Group
reporting purposes
given the assessment of
aggregationrisk.
Performance materiality7.85.53.93.2
Basis for determining
performance materiality
65% of Group materiality
– this was set by the audit
team with reference to
the level of adjustments
identified in the prior year,
level of sampling work
required and the number
ofcomponents.
70% of Group materiality –
this was set by the audit team
with reference to the level of
adjustments identified in the
prior year, level of sampling
work required and the
number of components.
65% of Parent Company
materiality – this was
set by the audit team
with reference to the
level of adjustments
identified in the prior year,
level of sampling work
required and the number
ofcomponents.
70% of Parent Company
materiality – this was set by
the audit team with reference
to the level of adjustments
identified in the prior year,
level of sampling work
required and the number
ofcomponents.
Component materiality
We set materiality for each component of the Group based on a percentage of between 25% and 60% (2021: 9% and 63%) of Group
materiality dependent on the size and our assessment of the risk of material misstatement of that component. Component materiality ranged
from €3million to €7 million (2021: €0.8 million to €5.0 million). In the audit of each component, we further applied performance materiality
levels of65% (2021: 70%) of the component materiality to our testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding component materiality was
appropriately mitigated.
Reporting threshold
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of €240k (2021: €136k). We also
agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
141
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Independent auditor’s report continued
To the members of Playtech plc
Other information
The Directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report other
than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the other information and,
except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is
to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or
our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies
or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements
themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are
required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Directors’ Remuneration Report
The Parent Company voluntarily prepares a Directors’ Remuneration Report in accordance with the provisions of the UK Companies Act 2006.
The Directors have requested that we audit the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report specified by the Companies Act 2006 to be audited
as if the Company were a UK registered listed company. In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been
properly prepared in accordance with the UK Companies Act 2006.
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the Corporate
Governance Statement relating to the Parent Company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified for
our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance
Statement is materially consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit.
Going concern and
longer-term viability
• The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting
andany material uncertainties identified set out on page 84; and
• The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s prospects, the period this assessment covers
andwhy the period is appropriate set out on page 91.
Other Code
provisions
• Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 134;
• Board’s confirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on page 91;
• The section of the Annual Report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on pages 85 to 90; and
• The section describing the work of the Audit Committee set out on pages 106 to 110.
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors’ Governance report, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for
being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation
of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Directors
either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is
not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements
can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements.
142
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements continued
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting non-compliance with laws and regulations
We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect non-compliance with laws and regulations. The extent to which
our procedures are capable of detecting non-compliance are detailed below:
• We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the Group and the industry in which it operates, through
discussion with management and the Audit Committee and our knowledge of the industry. We focused on significant laws and regulations
that could give rise to a material misstatement in the financial statements, including, but not limited to, the IoM Companies Act 2006, the UK
Listing Rules, certain gaming license requirements, IFRSs as it applies in the UK and tax legislation; and
• We considered compliance with these laws and regulations through discussions with management, in-house legal counsel, head of
compliance, Group tax director and as well as reviewing internal audit reports. Our procedures also included reviewing minutes from Board
meetings of those charges with governance to identify any instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations.
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
We design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including
fraud. The extent to which our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
• We assessed the susceptibility of the Group’s financial statements to material misstatement, including how fraud might occur. In addressing
the risk of fraud including management override of controls and improper revenue recognition, we tested the appropriateness of journal
entries made throughout the year by applying specific criteria;
• We performed a detailed review of the Group’s year end adjusting entries and journals throughout the year, investigated any that appeared
unusual as to nature or amount; assessed whether the judgements made in accounting estimates were indicative of a potential bias and tested
the risk of manipulation of IT systems with regards revenue recognition (see key audit matter above); and
• We also communicated potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and component auditors, and remained alert to any indications
of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that the risk of not
detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate
concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures performed
and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the
less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with section 80C of the Isle of Man Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required to state
to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to
anyone other than the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions
wehave formed.
Oliver Chinneck (Recognised Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London, UK
23 March 2023
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
143
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Note
20222021
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
1
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
1
Continuing operations
Revenue91, 601.81,601.81,205.41,205. 4
Distribution costs before depreciation and amortisation(1, 067 .3)(1,063.3)(794.5)(788.8)
Administrative expenses before depreciation and amortisation(147 .3)(118.2)(127 .4)(98.5)
Impairment of financial assets (14. 7)(14.7)(2.2)(1.0)
EBITDA 10372.5405. 6281.3317 . 1
Depreciation and amortisation (17 0. 1)(128. 1)(169. 1)(134.3)
Impairment of tangible and intangible assets12(38.5)—(21. 6)—
Finance income13A11.611.61 .11 .1
Finance costs13B(73. 0)(69 .9)(67 .7)(6 2.9)
Share of loss from associates20A(3.8)(3.8)(0.6)(0.6)
Unrealised fair value changes of equity investments20B(0.3)—(1. 6)—
Unrealised fair value changes of derivative financial assets20C6 .0—583.2—
Loss on disposal of subsidiary20A(8.8)———
Profit before taxation1095.6215.4605.0120. 4
Income tax (expense)/credit10, 14(55.0)(54.9)81.77. 2
Profit from continuing operations1040.6160.5686.71 2 7. 6
Discontinued operation
Profit/(loss) from discontinued operation, net of tax84 7. 041.2(1 2 .1)(13.8)
Profit for the year – total8 7. 6201.76 74 . 6113.8
Other comprehensive loss:
Items that are or may be classified subsequently to profit or loss:
Exchange loss arising on translation of foreign operations(0.2)(0 .2)(1.4)(1. 4)
Recycling of foreign exchange loss on disposal of foreign
discontinuedoperations23.223.2——
Items that will not be classified to profit or loss:
Gain/(loss) on remeasurement of employee termination indemnities0.90.9(0 .1)(0 .1)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year23.923.9(1.5)(1.5)
Total comprehensive income for the year111.5225. 66 7 3 .1112.3
Profit for the year attributable to the owners of the Company8 7. 6201. 767 4. 6113.8
Total comprehensive income attributable to the owners of
theCompany111.5225. 6673. 1112.3
Earnings per share attributable to the ordinary equity holders
ofthe Company
Profit or loss – total
Basic (cents)152 9.26 7. 2226.338.2
Diluted (cents)1528. 164.7216.236.5
Profit or loss from continuing operations
Basic (cents)1513.553.5230.342.8
Diluted (cents)1513.051.5220. 140. 9
1 Adjusted numbers relate to certain non-cash and one-off items, as well as material reorganisation and acquisition-related costs. The Board of Directors believes that the adjusted results more
closely represent the consistent trading performance of the business. A full reconciliation between the actual and adjusted results is provided in Note 10.
144
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of changes in equity
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Additional
paid in
capital
€’m
Employee
termination
indemnities
€’m
Retained
earnings
€’m
Employee
Benefit
Trust
€’m
Put/call
options
reserve
€’m
Foreign
exchange
reserve
€’m
Total
attributable to
equity holders
of Company
€’m
Non-
controlling
interests
€’m
Total
equity
€’m
Balance at 1 January 2022 606.0(0.5)1,025. 0(23.2)(3.7)(22.7)1,580. 90. 31,581.2
Total comprehensive income for the year
Profit for the year——87.6———87 .6—87 .6
Other comprehensive income for the year—0.9———23.023.9—23. 9
Total comprehensive income for the year—0.98 7. 6——23.0111.5—111.5
Transactions with the owners of the Company
Contributions and distributions
Exercise of options——(6.0)6.0—————
Employee stock option scheme——8.3———8.3—8.3
Total contributions and distributions——2.36 .0——8.3—8.3
Changes in ownership interests
Acquisition of non-controlling interest without change
in control——(3.4)—3.7—0. 3(0 .3)—
Total changes in ownership interests——(3.4)—3 .7—0. 3(0.3)—
Total transactions with owners of the Company——(1. 1)6.03 .7—8 .6(0 .3)8.3
Balance at 31 December 2022606 .00.41, 111.5(17 .2)—0.31,701. 0—1,70 1.0
Balance at 1 January 20215 9 2 .1(0.4)343.7(14.5)(3.7)(21.3)895.90.3896.2
Total comprehensive income for the year
Profit for the year——674 . 6———6 74 . 6—6 74 . 6
Other comprehensive loss for the year—(0 .1)———(1. 4)(1.5)—(1.5)
Total comprehensive income for the year—(0 .1)6 74 . 6——(1.4)673. 1—673. 1
Transactions with the owners of the Company
Contributions and distributions
Exercise of options——(13.9)13.9—————
Employee stock option scheme——11.9———11.9—11.9
Transfer from treasury shares to Employee
BenefitTrust13.9—8.7(22.6)—————
Total contributions and distributions13. 9—6.7(8.7)——11 .9—11.9
Total transactions with owners of the Company13. 9—6 .7(8. 7)——11.9—11.9
Balance at 31 December 2021606.0(0.5)1,025. 0(23.2)(3.7)(22.7)1,580. 90. 31,581.2
145
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Consolidated balance sheet
As at 31 December 2022
Note
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment 17341.43 29.7
Right of use assets1871.673.8
Intangible assets199 80.91,046. 1
Investments in associates20A3 6.65.2
Other investments20B9.28 .1
Derivative financial assets20C636.462 2.2
Trade receivables221 .16 .6
Deferred tax asset32112.510 2.9
Other non-current assets2110 9.6104. 4
Non-current assets 2,299.32,299 . 0
Trade receivables22163.9178.5
Other receivables23107.68 7.1
Inventories5.54.9
Cash and cash equivalents 24426.5575 .4
703.5845.9
Assets classified as held for sale 251 9.6507.4
Current assets723. 11,353.3
TOTAL ASSETS3,022. 43,652.3
EQUITY
Additional paid in capital 606.0606. 0
Employee termination indemnities 0.4(0 .5)
Employee Benefit Trust(17 .2)(23.2)
Put/call options reserve—(3.7)
Foreign exchange reserve0.3(22.7)
Retained earnings 1, 111.51,025.0
Equity attributable to equity holders of the Company 1,7 01.01,580 .9
Non-controlling interests—0. 3
TOTAL EQUITY261,701. 01,581.2
LIABILITIES
Loans and borrowings27—1 6 7 .1
Bonds28348.0875 .0
Lease liability1854.069. 8
Deferred revenues 1.02.9
Deferred tax liability32124.888.9
Contingent consideration and redemption liability302.36.0
Provisions for risks and charges291 0.013.5
Other non-current liabilities 3324.912 .8
Non-current liabilities565.01,236.0
146
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
LIABILITIES continued
Bonds28199. 6—
Trade payables 3161.241.3
Lease liability1831.820.3
Progressive operators’ jackpots and security deposits24114.31 10. 7
Client funds2439.830.4
Income tax payable17 .32 .6
Gaming and other taxes payable 34112.8105.4
Deferred revenues 5.05.2
Contingent consideration and redemption liability300.65.0
Provisions for risks and charges293 .93.2
Other payables 331 6 9 .1166.2
755. 4490.3
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale251.0344.8
Current liabilities756 .4835. 1
TOTAL LIABILITIES1,321.42,0 71. 1
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 3,022. 43,652.3
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board and authorised for issue on 23 March 2023.
Mor Weizer Chris McGinnis
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
147
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Consolidated statement of cash flows
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Note
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Profit for the year8 7. 66 74 . 6
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities (see below)3 3 7.1(41 9.0)
Net taxes paid(13.8)(30. 6)
Net cash from operating activities410 .9225.0
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Loans granted(30. 4)(16.7)
Acquisition of assets under business combinations35(2.9)—
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment(54.0)(49.6)
Acquisition of intangible assets(10. 1)(7. 2)
Capitalised development costs(61.3)(57 . 4)
Acquisition of investment in associates 20A/B(30.2)(8 .1)
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment0.80.7
Disposal of Financial segment/casual and social gaming, net of cash disposed25C/25B(169.8)10.7
Disposal of subsidiary, net of cash disposed20A(0.4)—
Net cash used in investing activities(358.3)(127 .6)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Interest paid on bonds and loans and borrowings(36. 7)(39. 4)
Repayment of loans and borrowings(166 . 1)(15 0.0)
Repayment of bonds28(330.0)—
Payment of contingent consideration and redemption liability (see below)(5.9)(0.7)
Principal paid on lease liability(22.5)(22.7)
Interest paid on lease liability(5.7)(5.6)
Net cash used in financing activities(566.9)(218.4)
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS(5 14.3)(121. 0)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR942. 11, 061.2
Exchange (loss)/gain on cash and cash equivalents(0.9)1.9
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR426.9942. 1
Cash and cash equivalents consists of:
Cash and cash equivalents – continuing operations24426.95 76.0
Cash and cash equivalents treated as held for sale24—366. 1
426.9942. 1
Less: expected credit loss on cash and cash equivalents24(0.4)(0.6)
426.594 1.5
148
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
ADJUSTMENT TO RECONCILE NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Income and expenses not aecting operating cash flows:
Depreciation on property, plant and equipment1741.542 .9
Amortisation of intangible assets19109.8109.3
Amortisation of right of use assets1821.520. 2
Capitalisation of amortisation of right of use assets(1. 9)(2 .1)
Gain on early termination of lease contracts18(0.7)(1.2)
Share of loss from associates20A3.80.6
Impairment of other receivables—1. 2
(Reversal of)/impairment of property, plant and equipment17(0.2)12.5
Impairment of intangible assets1938. 79 .1
Reversal of impairment of asset classified as held for sale25C—(2 .0)
Profit on disposal of financial segment/casual and social gaming25C/25B(15. 1)(7. 6)
Loss on disposal of subsidiary20A8.8—
Changes in fair value of equity investments20B0.31 .6
Changes in fair value of derivative financial assets20C(6.0)(583.2)
Fair value loss on convertible loans3 .0—
Interest on bonds and loans and borrowings36.241 . 2
Interest on lease liability5.75.6
Interest income on loans receivable(1.3)(0 .5)
Income tax expense/(credit)58.5(79.8)
Changes in equity-settled share-based payments8.313.8
Movement in contingent consideration and redemption liability(4.3)6.2
Expected credit loss on cash and cash equivalents(0.2)—
Expected credit loss on loans receivable1.6—
Unrealised exchange (gain)/loss (4. 4)8.7
Other0.20 .4
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Change in trade receivables13.0(5.9)
Change in other receivables3.5(28.0)
Change in inventories(0.6)(0.2)
Change in trade payables20.4(7. 9)
Change in progressive operators, jackpots and security deposits3.610.5
Change in client funds(15.3)21.7
Change in other payables13. 61.8
Change in provisions for risks and charges(2.8)(4.2)
Change in deferred revenues(2. 1)(3.7)
3 3 7.1(41 9.0)
Payment of contingent consideration and redemption liabilities on previous acquisitions
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
A. Acquisition of Eyecon Limited3.6—
B. Acquisition of non-controlling interest of Statscore SP Z.O.O. 1.6—
C. Other acquisitions0.70.7
5.90.7
149
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements
Note 1 – General
Playtech plc (the “Company”) is an Isle of Man company. The registered office is located at St George’s Court, Upper Church Street, Douglas,
Isleof Man IMe of Man IM1 1EE.
These consolidated financial statements comprise the Company and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group”).
Note 2 – Basis of preparation
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the UK adopted International Accounting Standards (IAS).
They were authorised for issue by the Company’s Board of Directors on 23 March 2023.
Details of the Group’s accounting policies are included in Note 5.
Going concern basis
In adopting the going concern basis in the preparation of the financial statements, the Directors have considered the current trading performance,
financial position and liquidity of the Group, the principal and emerging risks and uncertainties together with scenario planning and reverse stress tests.
The Directors have assessed going concern over a 15-month period to 30 June 2024 which aligns with the six-monthly covenant measurement period.
31 December
2022
€’m
31 December
2021
€’m
Cash and cash equivalents 426.5575.4
Cash held on behalf of clients, progressive jackpots and security deposits (154.1)(141.1)
Adjusted gross cash and cash equivalents (excluding assets and liabilities held for sale)272.4434.3
Despite the decline in adjusted gross cash and cash equivalents from €434.3 million at 31 December 2021 to €272.4 million at 31 December
2022, the Group continues to hold a strong liquidity position. The decline from the prior year is explained by the full repayment of the revolving
credit facility (RCF) drawn amounting to €166.1 million, as well as the €330.0 million partial repayment of the 2018 Bond, both offset by the cash
proceeds from disposal of the Financial segment of €223.9 million (refer to Note 25), as well as the Group’s strong performance during the year.
The Directors have reviewed liquidity and covenant forecasts for the Group, which assume that there will be no further lockdowns on a global
scale. The Directors have also considered sensitivities in respect of potential downside scenarios, reverse stress tests and the mitigating actions
available to management.
The modelling of downside scenarios assessed if there was a significant risk to the Group’s liquidity and covenant compliance position.
This includes risks such as not realising budget/forecasts across certain markets and any potential implications of changes in tax and other
regulations, as well as the impact on cash flow should the share buyback scheme and other shareholder return options resume.
The Group’s principal financing arrangements include an RCF up to €277.0 million, the 2018 Bond amounting to €200.0 million post partial
repayment and the 2019 Bond amounting to €350.0 million which are repayable in October 2023 and March 2026 respectively. The RCF has
been restructured during the year reducing the credit line from €317.0 million to €277.0 million and is available until October 2025, with the Group
having the option to extend by 12 months. The remaining €200.0 million balance of the 2018 Bond will be due upon expiration in October 2023, with
the current plan assuming this will be paid through cash reserves, rather than refinanced.
The RCF is subject to certain financial covenants which are tested every six months on a rolling 12-month basis, as set out in Notes 27 and 28.
Asat 31 DeAs at 31 December 2022, the Group comfortably met its covenants which were as follows:
• Leverage: Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA to be less than 3.5:1 for the 12 months ended 31 December 2022 (12 months ended 31 December 2021: 3:1).
• Interest cover: Adjusted EBITDA/Interest to be over 4:1 for the 12 months ended 31 December 2022 (12 months ended 31 December 2021: 4:1).
The Bonds only have one financial covenant, being the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (same as the Interest cover ratio for the RCF), which should
equal or be greater than 2:1.
If the Group’s results are in line with its base case projections as approved by the Board it would not be in breach of the financial covenants for a period
of no less than 15 months from approval of these financial statements (the “relevant going concern period”). This period covers the bank reporting
requirements for June 2023, December 2023 and June 2024 and is the main reason why the Directors selected a 15-month period of assessment.
Stress test
The stress test assumes a worst-case scenario for the entire Group which includes additional sensitivities around Italy, the Americas and Asia,
but with mitigations similar to the ones taken in 2020 and 2021 (including salary and capital expenditure reductions). It also considers the impact
of cash flow should the share buyback scheme commence again, as well as other shareholder return options. Under this scenario Adjusted
EBITDA would fall on average by 7% per month compared to the base case over the relevant going concern period, but the Group would not
breach its covenants.
Reverse stress test
The reverse stress test was used to identify the reduction in Adjusted EBITDA required that could result in either a liquidity event or breach of the
RCF and bond covenants.
As a result of completing this assessment, without considering further mitigating actions, management considered the likelihood of the reverse
stress test scenario arising to be remote. In reaching this conclusion management considered the following:
150
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 2 – Basis of preparation continued
Going concern basis continued
Reverse stress test continued
• current trading is performing above the base case;
• Adjusted EBITDA would have to fall by 87% in the year ending 31 December 2023 and 88% in the 12 months to June 2024 compared to the
base case, to cause a breach of covenants; and
• in the event that revenues decline to this point to drive the decrease in Adjusted EBITDA, additional mitigating actions are available tomanble to management
which have not been factored into the reverse stress test scenario.
As such, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group will have adequate financial resources to continue in operational existence
over the relevant going concern period and have therefore considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of preparation in the
financial statements.
Note 3 – Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated financial statements are presented in Euro, which is the Company’s functional currency. The functional currency
for subsidiaries includes Euro, United States Dollar and British Pound. All amounts have been rounded to the nearest million, unless
otherwiseindica indicated.
Note 4 – New standards, interpretations and amendments adopted by the Group
New standards, interpretations and amendments adopted from 1 January 2022
The Group applied for the first time certain standards and amendments, which are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2022,
but do not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group.
New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective
There a number of standards, amendments to standards, and interpretations which have been issued by the IASB that are effective in future
accounting periods that the Group has decided not to adopt early.
The amendments are applied retrospectively for annual periods on or after 1 January 2023:
• Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IFRS Practice Statement 2 Disclosure of Accounting Policies.
The amendments change the requirements in IAS 1 with regard to disclosure of accounting policies. The amendments replace all instances
of the term “significant accounting policies” with “material accounting policy information”. Accounting policy information is material if, when
considered together with other information included in an entity’s financial statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence decisions that
the primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements.
The supporting paragraphs in IAS 1 are also amended to clarify that accounting policy information that relates to immaterial transactions, other
events or conditions is immaterial and need not be disclosed. Accounting policy information may be material because of the nature of the related
transactions, other events or conditions, even if the amounts are immaterial. However, not all accounting policy information relating to material
transactions, other events or conditions is itself material.
The amendments to IAS 1 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, with earlier application permitted, and are
applied prospectively. The amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 do not contain an effective date or transition requirements.
• Amendments to IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors: Definition of Accounting Estimates.
The amendments replace the definition of a change in accounting estimates with a definition of accounting estimates. Under the new definition,
accounting estimates are “monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to measurement uncertainty”.
The definition of a change in accounting estimates was deleted. However, the Board retained the concept of changes in accounting estimates in
the standard with the following clarifications:
• A change in accounting estimate that results from new information or new developments is not the correction of an error.
• The effects of a change in an input or a measurement technique used to develop an accounting estimate are changes in accounting estimates
if they do not result from the correction of prior period errors.
The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023 to changes in accounting policies and changes in
accounting estimates that occur on or after the beginning of that period, with earlier application permitted.
The Group does not expect any other standards issued by the IASB, but not yet effective, to have a material impact on the Group.
The following amendments are effective for the period beginning 1 January 2024:
• Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements: Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current and Classification of
Liabilities as Current or Non-current – deferral of effective date.
The amendments affect only the presentation of liabilities as current or non-current in the statement of financial position and not the amount of
timing of recognition of any asset, income or expenses, or the information disclosed about those items.
The amendments clarify that the classification of liabilities as current or non-current is based on the rights that are in existence at the end of the
reporting period, specify that the classification is unaffected by expectations about whether an entity will exercise its right to defer settlement
of a liability, explain the rights that are in existence if covenants are complied with at the end of the reporting period, and introduce a definition
of“settleof “settlement” to make clear that settlement refers to the transfer to the counterparty of cash, equity instruments, other assets or services.
151
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies
The Group has consistently applied the following accounting policies to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements, except if
mentioned otherwise.
A. Basis of consolidation
(i) Business combinations
The Group accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method when the acquired set of activities and assets meets the definition
of a business and control is transferred to the Group. In determining whether a particular set of activities and assets is a business, the Group
assesses whether the set of assets and activities acquired includes, at a minimum, an input and substantive process and whether the acquired
set has the ability to produce outputs.
The consideration transferred in the acquisition is generally measured at fair value, as are the identifiable net assets acquired. Any goodwill
arising is tested semi-annually for impairment. Any gain on a bargain purchase is recognised in the profit or loss immediately. Transaction costs
are expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.
Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the date of acquisition. If an obligation to pay contingent consideration that meets the
definition of a financial instrument is classified as equity, then it is not remeasured, and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise,
other contingent consideration is remeasured at fair value at each reporting date and subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent
consideration are recognised in the profit or loss. A contingent consideration in which the contingent payments are forfeited if employment is
terminated is compensation for the post-combination services and is not included in the calculation of the consideration and recognised as
employee-related costs.
Cash payments arising from settlement of contingent consideration and redemption liability are disclosed in financing activities in the
consolidated statement of cash flows.
When a business combination is achieved in stages, the Group’s previously held interests in the acquired entity are remeasured to its acquisition-
date fair value and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is recognised in the profit or loss. Amounts arising from interests in the acquiree prior to the
acquisition date that have previously been recognised in other comprehensive income are reclassified to the profit or loss, where such treatment
would be appropriate if that interest were disposed of.
(ii) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. Control is achieved when the Group:
• has the power over the entity;
• is exposed, or has rights, to variable return from its involvement with the entity; and
• has the ability to use its power over the entity to affect its returns.
The Group reassesses whether or not it controls an entity if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three
elements of control listed above.
When the Group has less than a majority of the voting rights of an investee, it considers that it has power over the investee when the voting rights
are sufficient to give it the practical ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee unilaterally. The Group considers all relevant facts and
circumstances in assessing whether or not the Company’s voting rights in an investee are sufficient to give it power, including:
• the size of the Group’s holding of voting rights relative to the size and dispersion of holdings of the other vote holders;
• potential voting rights held by the Company, other vote holders or other parties;
• rights arising from other contractual arrangements; and
• any additional facts and circumstances that indicate that the Group has, or does not have, the current ability to direct the relevant activities
atthe time that the time that decisions need to be made, including voting patterns at previous shareholders’ meetings.
Where the Group holds a currently exercisable call option, the rights arising as a result of the exercise of the call option are included in the
assessment above of whether the Group has control.
The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences
untilthe duntil the date on which control ceases.
(iii) Non-controlling interests (NCI)
NCI are measured initially at their proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets at the date of acquisition.
Changes in the Group’s interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a change of control are accounted for as equity transactions. The difference
between the consideration and the carrying value of the NCI is recognised as profit/loss in the retained earnings.
(iv) Loss of control
When the Group loses control over a subsidiary it derecognises the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary and any related NCI and other
components of equity. Any resulting gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss.
(v) Investments in associates and equity call options
An associate is an entity over which the Group has significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture.
Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control
over those policies.
The considerations made in determining significant influence or joint control are similar to those necessary to determine control over subsidiaries.
In the consolidated financial statements, the Group’s investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method ofaccethod of accounting.
152
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
A. Basis of consolidation continued
(v) Investments in associates and equity call options continued
Under the equity method, the investment in an associate or a joint venture is carried in the consolidated balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition
changes in the Group’s share of the net assets of the associate. The Group’s share of the results of the associate is included in the profit or loss.
Losses of the associate or joint venture in excess of the Group’s cost of the investment are recognised as a liability only when the Group has
incurred obligations on behalf of the associate.
On acquisition of the investment, any difference between the cost of the investment and share of the associate’s identifiable assets and liabilities
is accounted for as follows:
• Any premium paid is capitalised and included in the carrying amount of the associate.
• Any excess of the share of the net fair value of the associate’s identifiable assets and liabilities over the cost of the investment is included as
income in the determination of the share of the associate’s profit or loss in the period in which the investment is acquired.
Any intangibles identified and included as part of the investment are amortised over their assumed useful economic life. Where there is objective
evidence that the investment in an associate may be impaired the carrying amount of the investment is tested for impairment in the same way as
other non-financial assets.
The aggregate of the Group’s share of profit or loss of an associate is shown on the face of the profit or loss outside operating profit and
represents profit or loss before tax. The associated tax charge is disclosed in income tax.
The Group recognises its share of any changes in the equity of the associate through the consolidated statement of changes in equity. Profits
and losses resulting from transactions between the Group and the associate are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the associate.
The Group applies equity accounting only up to the date an investment in associate meets the criteria for classification as held for sale. From
then onwards, the investment is measured at the lower of its carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
When potential voting rights or other derivatives containing potential voting rights exist, the Group’s interest in an associate is determined solely
on the basis of existing ownership interests and does not reflect the possible exercise or conversion of potential voting rights and other derivative
instruments unless there is an existing ownership interest as a result of a transaction that currently gives it access to the returns associated with
an ownership interest. In such circumstances, the proportion allocated to the entity is determined by taking into account the eventual exercise
of those potential voting rights and other derivative instruments that currently give the entity access to the returns. When instruments containing
potential voting rights in substance currently give access to the returns associated with an ownership interest in an associate or a joint venture,
the instruments are not subject to IFRS 9 and equity accounting is applied. In all other cases, instruments containing potential voting rights in an
associate or a joint venture are accounted for in accordance with IFRS 9.
A derivative financial asset is measured under fair value under IFRS 9. In the case where there is significant influence, but the option is not
currently exercisable, there is still an investment in associate but as there is no current access to profits the option is fair valued instead.
Derivatives are recorded at fair value and classified as assets when their fair value is positive and as liabilities when their fair value is negative.
Subsequently, derivatives are measured at fair value.
(vi) Equity investments held at fair value
All equity investments in scope of IFRS 9 are measured at fair value in the balance sheet. Fair value changes are recognised in the profit or loss.
Fair value is based on quoted market prices (Level 1). Where this is not possible, fair value is assessed based on alternative methods (Level 3).
(vii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and transactions are eliminated. Unrealised gains arising from transactions with equity-accounted investees are eliminated
against the investment to the extent of the Group’s interest in the investee. Unrealised losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains,
but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
B. Foreign currency
(i) Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the respective functional currencies of Group companies at the exchange rates at the
dates of thetransdates of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate
when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency are translated at the exchange
rate at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency differences are generally recognised in the profit or loss and presented within finance costs.
(ii) Foreign operations
On consolidation, the assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition, are
translated into Euro at the exchange rates at the reporting date and their statements of profit or loss are translated into Euro at the end of each
month at the average exchange rate for the month which approximates the exchange rates at the date of the transactions.
The exchange differences arising on the translation for consolidation are recognised in other comprehensive income (OCI) and accumulated in
the foreign exchange reserve.
When a foreign operation is disposed of in its entirety or partially such that control, significant influence or joint control is lost, the cumulative
amount in the foreign exchange reserve relating to the foreign operation is reclassified to the profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal.
153
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
C. Discontinued operation
A discontinued operation is a component of the Group’s business, the operations and cash flows of which can be clearly distinguished
fromtherest of the Gfrom the rest of the Group and which:
• represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations;
• is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations; or
• is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.
Classification as a discontinued operation occurs at the earlier of disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as
held for sale.
When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of comprehensive income is re-presented as if
theopthe operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.
D. Revenue recognition
The majority of the Group’s revenue is derived from selling services with revenue recognised when services have been delivered to the
customer. Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the supply of services in the ordinary course of
the Group’s activities. Revenue is recognised when economic benefits are expected to flow to the Group. Specific criteria and performance
obligations are described below for each of the Group’s material revenue streams.
Type of income Nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant payment terms
B2B licensee feeLicensee fee is the standard operator income of the Group which relates to licensed technology and the provision of
certain services provided via various distribution channels (online, mobile or land-based interfaces).
Licensee fee is based on the underlying gaming revenue earned by our licensees calculated using the contractual terms
in place. Revenue is recognised when performance obligation is met which is when the gaming transaction occurs.
ThepThe payment terms of the B2B licensee fee is on average 30 days from the invoice date.
B2B fixed-fee incomeFixed-fee income is the standard operator income of the Group which includes revenue derived from the provision
ofcerof certain services and licensed technology for which charges are based on a fixed fee and/or stepped according to
themothe monthly usage ofthe seage of the service/technology. The usage measurement is typically reset on a monthly basis.
The performance obligation is met and revenue is recognised once the obligations under the contracts have been met
which is when the services have been provided.
Services provided and fees for:
a. minimum revenue guarantee: the additional balance billed by the Group on a monthly basis for the difference in the
minimum guarantee per licensee contract and actual performance; and
b. other: hosting, live, set-up, content delivery network and maintenance fees. The fees charge to licensees for these
services are fixed per month.
The amounts for the above are recognised over the life of the contracts and are typically charged on a fixed percentage
and stepped according to the monthly usage of the service depending on the type of service. Set-up fees are recognised
over the whole period of the contract, with an average period of 36 months. The revenue is recognised monthly over the
period ofthe ciod of the contract and the payment terms of the B2B fixed fee income is on average 30 days from the invoice date.
B2B cost-based revenueCost-based revenue is the standard operator income of the Group which is made of the total revenue charged to the
licensee based on the development costs needed to satisfy the contract with the licensee.
The largest type of service included in cost-based revenue is the dedicated team costs. Dedicated team employees are
charged back to the client based on time spent on each product.
Cost-based revenues are recognised on a monthly basis based on the contract in place of licensee with Playtech and any
additional services needed on development are charged to the licensee upon delivery of the service. The payment terms
ofthe B2B cof the B2B cost-based revenue is on average 30 days from the invoice date.
B2B revenue received from
thesale of harthe sale of hardware
Revenue received from the sale of hardware is the total revenue charged to customers upon the sale of each hardware
product. The performance obligation is met and revenue is recognised on delivery of the hardware and acceptance
bythecustomby the customer.
Revenue received from future sale of hardware is recognised as deferred revenue. Once the obligation for the future
sale is met, revenue is then recognised in profit or loss. The payment terms of the B2B revenue received from thesale e sale
ofhardware is oof hardware is on average 30 days from the invoice date.
Additional B2B servicesfAdditional B2B services feeThis income is calculated based on the profit and/or net revenues generated by the customer in return for the additional
services provided to them by the Group. This is typically charged on a monthly basis and is measured using a predetermined
percentage set in each licensee arrangement. The revenue is only recognised when the customer’s activities go live and
the revenue from the additional B2B services is recognised only once the Group is unconditionally contractually entitled
to it. The Directors have determined that this is when the customer starts generating profits which is later than when the
customer goes live with its B2C operations. The Directors' rationale is that there is uncertainty that the Group will collect the
consideration to which it is entitled before the customer starts generating profits and therefore, the revenue is wholly variable.
The payment terms of the additional B2B services fees is on average 30 days from the invoice date.
154
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Type of income Nature, timing of satisfaction of performance obligations and significant payment terms
B2C revenueIn respect of B2C Snaitech revenues, the Group acts as principal with the end customer, with specific revenue policies
as follows:
• The revenues from land-based gaming machines are recognised net of the winnings, jackpots and certain flat-rate
gaming tax.
• The revenue from online gaming (games of skill/casino/bingo) are recognised net of the winnings, jackpots, bonuses
and certain flat-rate gaming tax. In respect of Casino and Bingo, revenue is recognised at the conclusion of the bet.
Revenue from games of skill is recognised at the conclusion of the bet.
• The revenues related to the acceptance of fixed odds bets are considered financial instruments under IFRS 9 and
arerecogare recognised net of certain flat-rate gaming tax, winnings, bonuses and the fair value of open bets.
• Revenues related to fixed odds bets are recognised at the conclusion of the event.
• Poker revenues in the form of commission (i.e. rake) is recognised at the conclusion of each poker hand.
ThepThe performance obligation is the provision of the poker games to the players.
• All the revenues from gaming machines are recorded net of players’ winnings and certain gaming taxes while the
concession fees payable to the regulator and the compensation of operators, franchisees and platform providers are
accounted as expenses. Revenue is recognised at the time of the bet.
Where the gaming tax incurred is directly measured by reference to the individual customer transaction and related to
thestake (descthe stake (described as “flat-rate tax” above), this is deducted from revenue.
Where the tax incurred is measured by reference to the Group’s net result from betting and gaming activity, this is not
deducted from revenue and is recognised as an expense.
In respect of Sun Bingo and B2C Sport revenue, the Group acts as principal with the end customer, with revenue being
recognised at the conclusion of the event, net of winnings, jackpots and bonuses.
Financial trading income
(discontinued operations)
Financial trading income represents gains (including commission) and losses arising on client trading activity, primarily
incoin contracts for difference on shares, indexes, commodities and foreign exchange.
Open client positions are carried at fair market value and gains and losses arising on this valuation are recognised in
revenue as well as gains and losses realised on positions that have closed.
The performance obligation is met in the accounting periods in which the trading transaction occurs and is concluded.
Based on the services provided by the Group, excluding certain rebates provided to customers in the Financial division, no return, refund and
other similar obligations exist. Moreover, no warranties and related obligations exist.
E. Share-based payments
Certain employees participate in the Group’s share option plans. Following the 2012 LTIP employees are granted cash-settled options and
equity-settled options. The Remuneration Committee has the option to determine if the option will be settled in cash or equity, a decision
that is made at grant date. The fair value of the equity-settled options granted is charged to the profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the
vesting period and the credit is taken to equity, based on the Group’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest. Fair value is determined
by the Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo or binomial valuation model, as appropriate. The cash-settled options are presented as a liability. The
liability is remeasured at each reporting date and settlement date so that the ultimate liability equals the cash payment on settlement date.
Remeasurements of the fair value of the liability are recognised in profit or loss.
The Group has also granted awards to be distributed from the Group’s Employee Benefit Trust. The fair value of these awards is based on
the market price at the date of the grant; some of the grants have performance conditions. The performance conditions are for the Executive
Management and include targets based on growth in earnings per share and total shareholder return over a specific period compared to other
competitors. The fair value of the awards with market performance conditions is factored into the overall fair value and determined using a
MonteCaMonte Carlo method. Where these options lapse due to not meeting market performance conditions the share option charge is not reversed.
F. Income tax
The income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.
(i) Current tax
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in profit or loss because
it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are never taxable or
deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of
therepothe reporting period.
A provision is recognised for those matters for which the tax determination is uncertain, but it is considered probable that there will be a
future outflow of funds to a tax authority. The provisions are measured at the best estimate of the amount expected to become payable.
TheaThe assessment is based on the judgement of tax professionals within the Company supported by previous experience in respect of
suchactivitieh activities and in certain cases based on specialist tax advice.
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
D. Revenue recognition continued
155
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
F. Income tax continued
(ii) Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying
amounts for financial reporting purposes at the reporting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for all taxable temporary differences, except:
• when the deferred tax liability arises from the initial recognition of goodwill or an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business
combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss; and
• in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, when the
timing of the reversal of the temporary differences can be controlled and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the
foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses.
Deferred tax assets are recognised in the period in which the deductible temporary differences arise when there are sufficient taxable temporary
differences relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity which are expected to reverse, or where it is probable that taxable
profit will be available against which a deductible temporary difference can be utilised.
Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary
differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilised, except:
• when the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a
transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither the accounting profit nor taxable profit
or loss; and
• in respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and interests in joint ventures, deferred
tax assets are recognised only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable
profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that
sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are
reassessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the
deferredtadeferred tax asset to be recovered.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realised or the liability
issettlis settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax relating to items recognised outside the profit or loss is recognised outside the profit or loss. Deferred tax items are recognised
incoin correlation to the underlying transaction either in OCI or directly in equity.
Tax benefits acquired as part of a business combination, but not satisfying the criteria for separate recognition at that date, are recognised
subsequently, if new information about facts and circumstances change. The adjustment is either treated as a reduction in goodwill (as long
asitdoas it does not exceed goodwill) if it was recognised during the measurement period or is otherwise recognised in profit or loss.
The Group offsets deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities if and only if it has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets and
current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either
the same taxable entity or different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realise the
assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred tax liabilities or assets are expected
to be settled or recovered.
The tax base of assets and liabilities is assessed at each reporting date, and changes in the tax base that result from internal reorganisations,
changes in the expected manner of recovery or changes in tax law are reflected in the calculation of deductible and taxable temporary differences.
G. Finance expense
Finance expense arising on interest-bearing financial instruments carried at amortised cost are recognised in the profit or loss using the effective
interest rate method. Finance expense includes the amortisation of fees that are an integral part of the effective finance cost of a financial
instrument, including issue costs, and the amortisation of any other differences between the amount initially recognised and the redemption price.
All finance expenses are recognised over the availability period.
Interest expense arising on the above during the period is disclosed under the financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
H. Inventories
Inventories are initially recognised at cost, and subsequently at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises all costs of purchase,
costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.
156
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
I. Property, plant and equipment
(i) Recognition and measurement
Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
If significant parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items
(majorc(major components) of property, plant and equipment.
Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised in profit or loss.
(ii) Subsequent expenditure
Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only if it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the expenditure will flow to the Group.
(iii) Depreciation
Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of property, plant and equipment less their estimated residual values using the straight-
line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognised in profit or loss. Land is not depreciated.
The estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment for current and comparative periods are as follows:
%
Computers and gaming machines20–33
Oce furniture and equipmenOffice furniture and equipment7–33
Freehold and leasehold buildings and improvements3–20, or over the length of the lease
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.
J. Intangible assets and goodwill
(i) Recognition and measurement
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of a business combination over the Group’s interest in the fair value of identifiable assets, liabilities
and contingent liabilities acquired. Cost comprises the fair value of assets given, liabilities assumed and equity instruments issued, plus the
amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree plus, if the business combination is achieved in stages, the fair value of the existing equity
interest in the acquiree. Contingent consideration is included in cost at its acquisition date fair value and, in the case of contingent consideration
classified as a financial liability, remeasured subsequently through profit or loss. Direct costs of acquisition are recognised immediately as an
expense. Goodwill is capitalised as an intangible asset with any impairment in carrying value being charged to the profit or loss. Where the fair
value of identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceed the fair value of consideration paid, the excess is credited in full to the profit
or loss on the acquisition date as a gain on bargain purchase.
Externally acquired intangible assets
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Group and have finite useful lives are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and any
accumulated impairment losses.
Business combinations
Intangible assets are recognised on business combinations if they are separable from the acquired entity or give rise to other contractual/legal
rights. Thea. The amounts ascribed to such intangibles are arrived at by using appropriate valuation techniques.
Development costs that are directly attributable to the design and testing of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the Group
are recognised as intangible assets where the following criteria are met:
• it is technically feasible to complete the software so that it will be available for use;
• management intends to complete the software and use or sell it;
• there is an ability to use or sell the software;
• it can be demonstrated how the software will generate probable future economic benefits;
• adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the software are available; and
• the expenditure attributable to the software during its development can be reliably measured.
The amount initially recognised for internally generated intangible assets is the sum of the expenditure incurred from the date when the
intangible asset first meets the recognition criteria listed above. Expenditure includes salaries, wages and other employee-related costs
directly engaged in generating the assets and any other expenditure that is directly attributable to generating the assets (i.e. certifications
andaand amortisation of right of use assets). Where no internally generated intangible asset can be recognised, development expenditure is
recognised in profit or loss in the period in which it is incurred.
(ii) Subsequent expenditure
Subsequent expenditure is capitalised only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates.
AllotheAll other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill and brands, is recognised in the profit or loss as incurred.
(iii) Amortisation
Amortisation is calculated to write off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over
theirestimated usr estimated useful lives and is generally recognised in the profit or loss. Goodwill is not amortised.
157
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
J. Intangible assets and goodwill continued
(iii) Amortisation continued
The estimated useful lives for current and comparative periods are as follows:
%
Domain namesNil
Internally generated capitalised development costs20–33
Technology IP13–33
Customer lists In line with projected cash flows or 7–20
AliaAffiliate contracts5–12.5
Patents and licences10–33 or over the period of the licence
Amortisation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.
K. Assets held for sale
Non-current assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, are classified as held for sale if it is highly probable that they will be
recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use.
The criteria for held for sale classification is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable, and the asset or disposal group is available for
immediate sale in its present condition. Actions required to complete the sale should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the sale
will be made or that the decision to sell will be withdrawn. Management must be committed to the plan to sell the asset and the sale expected to
be completed within one year from the date of the classification.
Such assets, or disposal groups, are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. Any impairment loss on a
disposal group is allocated first to goodwill, and then to the remaining assets on a pro rata basis, except that no loss is allocated to inventories,
financial assets or deferred tax assets, which continue to be measured in accordance with the Group’s other accounting policies. Impairment
losses on initial classification as held for sale or held for distribution and subsequent gains and losses on remeasurement are recognised in the
profit or loss.
Once classified as held for sale, intangible assets and property, plant and equipment are no longer amortised or depreciated.
L. Financial instruments
Initial recognition and subsequent measurement
A financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to a financial asset of one entity and a financial liability or equity instrument of another entity.
(i) Financial assets
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial assets are classified, at initial recognition, as subsequently measured at amortised cost, fair value through other comprehensive
income and fair value through profit or loss.
The classification of financial assets at initial recognition depends on the financial asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics and the Group’s
business model for managing them. With the exception of trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component or for which
the Group has applied the practical expedient, the Group initially measures a financial asset at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset
not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs. Trade receivables that do not contain a significant financing component or for which
the Group has applied the practical expedient are measured at the transaction price. In order for a financial asset to be classified and measured
at amortised cost or fair value through OCI, it needs to give rise to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest (SPPI) on the
principal amount outstanding. This assessment is referred to as the SPPI test and is performed at an instrument level. Financial assets with cash
flows that are not SPPI are classified and measured at fair value through profit or loss, irrespective of the business model.
Subsequent measurement
For purposes of subsequent measurement, financial assets are classified in four categories:
• financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments);
• financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income with recycling of cumulative gains and losses (debt instruments);
• financial assets designated at fair value through other comprehensive income with no recycling of cumulative gains and losses upon
derecognition (equity instruments); and
• financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial assets at amortised cost (debt instruments)
Financial assets at amortised cost are subsequently measured using the effective interest (EIR) method and are subject to impairment. Gains
and losses are recognised in the profit or loss when the asset is derecognised, modified or impaired. The Group’s financial assets at amortised
cost include trade receivables, loans receivable and cash and cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash at bank and in hand, short-term deposits with an original maturity of less than three months and
customer balances.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are carried in the balance sheet at fair value with net changes in fair value recognised in the
profit or loss. This category includes listed equity investments which the Group had not irrevocably elected to classify at fair value through OCI.
158
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
L. Financial instruments continued
(i) Financial assets continued
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss continued
The Group recognises a debt financial instrument with an embedded conversion option, such as a loan convertible into ordinary shares of an
entity, as a financial asset in the balance sheet. On initial recognition, the convertible loan is measured at fair value with any gain or loss arising on
subsequent measurement until conversion recognised in profit or loss. On conversion of a convertible instrument, the Group derecognises the
financial asset component and recognises it as an investment (equity interest, associate, joint venture or subsidiary) depending on the results of
the assessment performed under the relevant standards.
At every reporting date, the Group evaluates whether the debt instrument is considered to have low credit risk using all reasonable and
supportable information that is available without undue cost or effort. In making that evaluation, the Group reassesses the internal credit
rating of the debt instrument. In addition, the Group considers whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk depending on the
characteristics of each debt instrument.
Derecognition
A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is primarily derecognised
(i.e.r removed from the Group’s consolidated balance sheet) when:
• the rights to receive cash flows from the asset have expired; or
• the Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full
without material delay to a third party under a “pass-through” arrangement, and either (a) the Group has transferred substantially all the risks
and rewards of the asset; or (b) the Group has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has
transferred control of the asset.
When the Group has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from an asset or has entered into a passthrough arrangement, it evaluates if, and
to what extent, it has retained the risks and rewards of ownership. When it has neither: transferred nor retained substantially all of the risks and
rewards of the asset, nor transferred control of the asset, the Group continues to recognise the transferred asset to the extent of its continuing
involvement. In that case, the Group also recognises an associated liability. The transferred asset and the associated liability are measured on
abasa basis that reflects the rights and obligations that the Group has retained.
Continuing involvement that takes the form of a guarantee over the transferred asset is measured at the lower of the original carrying amount
ofthe asof the asset and the maximum amount of consideration that the Group could be required to repay.
Impairment
The Group recognises an allowance for expected credit losses (ECLs) for all debt instruments not held at fair value through profit or loss. ECLs
are based on the difference between the contractual cash flows due in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the Group
expects to receive, discounted at an approximation of the original effective interest rate. The expected cash flows will include cash flows from
the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are integral to the contractual terms.
ECLs are recognised in two stages. For credit exposures for which there has not been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition,
ECLs are provided for credit losses that result from default events that are possible within the next 12 months (a 12-month ECL). For those credit
exposures for which there has been a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, a loss allowance is required for credit losses
expected over the remaining life of the exposure, irrespective of the timing of the default (a lifetime ECL).
For trade receivables, the Group applies a simplified approach in calculating ECLs. Therefore, the Group does not track changes in credit risk,
but instead recognises a loss allowance based on lifetime ECLs at each reporting date. The Group has established a provision matrix that is
based on its historical credit loss experience, adjusted for forward-looking factors specific to the debtors and the economic environment.
(ii) Financial liabilities
Initial recognition and measurement
Financial liabilities are classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, loans and borrowings, payables,
or; derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value
and, in the case of loans and borrowings and payables, net of directly attributable transaction costs. The Group’s financial liabilities include trade
and other payables, loans and borrowings including bank overdrafts, and derivative financial instruments.
Subsequent measurement
For purposes of subsequent measurement, financial liabilities are classified in two categories:
• financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss; and
• financial liabilities at amortised cost (loans and borrowings and bonds).
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss include financial liabilities held for trading and financial liabilities designated upon initial
recognition as at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities at amortised cost
This is the category most relevant to the Group. After initial recognition, interest-bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured
at amortised cost using the effective interest rate (EIR) method. Gains and losses are recognised in the profit or loss when the liabilities are
derecognised as well as through the EIR amortisation process. Amortised cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium
onacqon acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is included as finance costs in the profit or loss.
159
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
L. Financial instruments continued
(ii) Financial liabilities continued
Derecognition
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires. When an existing financial liability
is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such
an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the
respective carrying amounts is recognised in the profit or loss.
(iii) Offsetting
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet if there is a currentlyenforcere is a currently enforceable legal right
to offset the recognised amounts and there is an intention to settle on a net basis, to realise the assets and settle theliabe the liabilities simultaneously.
M. Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity and are stated at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs.
N. Share buyback
Consideration paid for the share buyback is recognised against the additional paid in capital. Any excess of the consideration paid over the
weighted average price of shares in issue is debited to the retained earnings.
O. Employee Benefit Trust
Consideration paid/received for the purchase/sale of shares subsequently put in the Employee Benefit Trust, which is controlled by the
Company, is recognised directly in equity. The cost of shares held is presented as a separate reserve (the “Employee Benefit Trust reserve”).
Any excess of the consideration received on the sale of treasury shares over the weighted average cost of the shares sold is credited to
retained earnings.
P. Dividends
Dividends are recognised when they become legally due. In the case of interim dividends to equity shareholders, this is when paid by the
Directors. In the case of final dividends, this is when they are declared and approved by the shareholders at the AGM.
Q. Impairment of non-financial assets
At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its non-financial assets (other than inventories and deferred tax assets)
todetermine wto determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the asset’s recoverable amount is estimated.
Goodwill is tested semi-annually for impairment.
For impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are
largely independent of the cash inflows of other assets or CGUs. Goodwill arising from a business combination is allocated to CGUs that are
expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
The recoverable amount of an asset or CGU is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs of disposal. Value in use is based on the
estimated future cash flows, discounted to their present value using a post-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the
timevaltime value of money and the risks specific to the asset or CGU.
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount.
Impairment losses are recognised in the profit or loss. They are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the
CGU, and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the CGU on a pro rata basis.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the asset’s
carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment
loss had beenrecoeen recognised.
R. Provisions
Provisions for legal claims are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable
that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions are not recognised for
future operating losses.
Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined by considering the
class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outflow with respect to any one item included in the same
class of obligations may be minimum.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the
end of the reporting period. The discount rate used to determine the present value is a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of
the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.
160
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
S. Leases
At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease. A contract is, or contains, a lease if the contract
conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
Group as a lessee
The Group applies a single recognition and measurement approach for all leases, except for short-term leases and leases of low-value assets.
The Group recognises lease liabilities to make lease payments and right of use assets representing the right to use the underlying assets.
(i) Right of use assets
The Group recognises right of use assets at the commencement date of the lease (i.e. the date the underlying asset is available for use).
Right-of-use assets are measured at cost, less any accumulated amortisation and impairment losses and adjusted for any remeasurement of
lease liabilities. The cost of right of use assets includes the amount of lease liabilities recognised, initial direct costs incurred, and lease payments
made at or before the commencement date less any lease incentives received. Right of use assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful lives of the assets.
(ii) Lease liabilities
At the commencement date of the lease, the Group recognises lease liabilities measured at the present value of lease payments to be made
over the lease term. The lease payments include fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments) less any lease incentives receivable,
variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, and amounts expected to be paid under residual value guarantees. The lease
payments also include the exercise price of a purchase option reasonably certain to be exercised by the Group and payments of penalties
forterminfor terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the Group exercising the option to terminate.
Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate are recognised as expenses in the period in which the event or condition that
triggers the payment occurs.
In calculating the present value of lease payments, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate at the lease commencement date because the
interest rate implicit in the lease is not readily determinable. After the commencement date, the amount of lease liabilities is increased to reflect
the accretion of interest and reduced for the lease payments made.
In addition, the carrying amount of lease liabilities is remeasured if there is a modification, a change in the lease term, a change in the lease
payments (e.g. changes to future payments resulting from a change in an index or rate used to determine such lease payments) or a change in
the assessment of an option to purchase the underlying asset. When the lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is
made to the carrying amount of the right of use asset or is recorded in the profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right of use asset has been
reduced to zero.
The cash payments made in relation to long-term leases is split between principal and interest paid on lease liability and disclosed within
financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
(iii) Short-term leases and leases of low-value assets
The Group applies the short-term lease recognition exemption to its short-term leases (i.e. those leases that have a lease term of 12 months or
less from the commencement date and do not contain a purchase option). It also applies the lease of low-value assets recognition exemption to
leases that are considered to be low value. Lease payments on short-term leases and leases of low-value assets are recognised as expense on
a straight-line basis over the lease term and included within financing activities in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
T. Fair value measurement
“Fair value” is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability
takes place either: (a) in the principal market for the asset or liability; or (b) in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market
for the asset orliaset or liability.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability,
assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.
The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available to measure fair value,
maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy,
described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
• Level 1 – quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
• Level 2 – valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable.
• Level 3 – valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.
161
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
U. Adjusted results
The Group discloses EBITDA, being the profit before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. EBITDA is a measure of the Group’s overall
financial performance and profitability which the Directors consider useful to reflect the underlying performance of the business.
The Board of Directors believes that in order to best represent the trading performance and results of the Group, the reported numbers should
exclude certain non-cash items, one-off items and the impact of substantial reorganisations and acquisition-related items.
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Profit/Loss after making these exclusions are therefore presented alongside the reported EBITDA and reported
Profit/loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
The Directors use the Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Profit/Loss to understand, manage and evaluate the business and make operating
decisions. These adjusted measures are among the primary factors management uses in planning for and forecasting future periods.
Furthermore, compensation of the executives is based in part on the performance of the business based on Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted results exclude the following items:
• Material non-cash items: these items are excluded to better analyse the underlying cash transactions of the business as the management
regularly monitors the operating cash conversion to Adjusted EBITDA.
• Material one-off items: there items are excluded to get normalised results that are distorted by unusual or infrequent items unusual or
infrequent items that are excluded to get normalised results that were previously distorted by these items. Unusual items include highly
abnormal, one-off and only incidentally relating to the ordinary activities of the Group. Infrequent items are those which are not reasonably
expected to recur in the foreseeable future given the environment in which the Group operates.
• Material reorganisations and acquisition-related items: these items are excluded as they are not considered related to the ordinary activities
ofthe buof the business and are not considered to be ongoing costs of the operations of the business.
In addition, management presents underlying adjusted results and constant currency adjusted results to the Board of Directors.
Underlying adjusted results are presented as an alternative performance measure to exclude the impact of acquisitions made in the period or
inthe cin the comparable period in order to present a more accurate “like-for-like” comparison over the comparable period.
Constant currency adjusted results are presented in order to try and present measures that exclude the effect of currency fluctuations. In view
of the fact that the Group has transactions in foreign currencies and may be affected from the fluctuations of the currencies, all transactions in
foreign currencies are converted to Euro using the exchange rate of the comparable period.
As these are non-GAAP measures, they should not be considered as replacements for IFRS measures. The Group’s definition of these non-GAAP
measures may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures reported by other companies. A full reconciliation of adjustments is included
in Note 10.
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions
In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management has made judgements and estimates that affect the application of the
Group’s accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual events may differ from these estimates.
Judgements
In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies management has made the following judgements, which have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue from contracts with customers
The Group applies judgement in determining whether it is acting as a principal or an agent specifically on the revenue earned under the B2B
licensee fee stream. This income falls within the scope of IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In making these judgements, the
Group considers, by examining each contract with its customers, which party has the primary responsibility for providing the services and is
exposed to the majority of the risks and rewards associated with providing the services, as well as if it has latitude in establishing prices, either
directly or indirectly. The business model of this division is predominantly a revenue share model which is based on royalties earned from B2C
business partners’ revenue.
IFRS 15, paragraph B37 describes indicators that an entity controls the specified good or service before it is transferred to a customer and
therefore acts as the principal. Based on this assessment it was concluded that Playtech is acting as an agent under the B2B licensee fee stream
due to the three indicators under B37 which are not satisfied as follows:
• Playtech is responsible in fulfilling the contract to the operator, principally in respect of the software solutions, and not to the end customer
which is the responsibility of the operator;
• there is no inventory risk as Playtech does not have the ability to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from
thegothe good or service before it is transferred to the end customer; and
• Playtech does not have any discretion in establishing prices set by the operator to third parties.
Based on the above it was determined that the Group was acting as agent and revenue is recognised as the net amount of B2B licensee fees
received. The majority of this B2B revenue is recognised when the gaming or betting activity used as the basis for the revenue share calculation
takes place, and furthermore is only recognised when collection is virtually certain with a legally enforceable right to collect.
162
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Judgements continued
Internally generated intangible assets
The Group capitalises costs for product development projects. Expenditure on internally developed products is capitalised when it meets
thefollowithe following criteria:
• adequate resources are available to complete and sell the product;
• the Group is able to sell the product;
• sale of the product will generate future economic benefits; and
• expenditure on the project can be measured reliably.
Initial capitalisation of cost is based on the management’s judgement that the technological and economic feasibility is confirmed, usually when
product development has reached a defined milestone and future economic benefits are expected to be realised according to an established
project management model. Following capitalisation, an assessment is performed in regard to project recoverability which is based on the
actual return of the project. During the year, the Group capitalised €57.5 million (2021: €51.3 million) and the carrying amount of capitalised
development costs as at31Dosts as at 31 December 2022 was €123.2 million (2021: €122.3 million).
Adjusted performance measures
As noted in Note 5, paragraph U, the Group presents adjusted performance measures which differ from statutory measures due to exclusion
of certain non-cash and one-off items and material reorganisation and acquisition-related items from the actual results. The determination
of whether non-cash and one-off items and material reorganisation and acquisition-related items should form part of the adjusted results
is a matter of judgement and is based on whether the inclusion/exclusion from the results represent more closely the consistent trading
performance of the business. The items excluded from the adjusted measures are described in further detail in Note 10.
Provision for risks and charges and potential liabilities
The Group operates in a number of regulated markets and is subject to lawsuits and potential lawsuits regarding complex legal matters, which
are subject to a different degree of uncertainty in different jurisdictions and under different laws. For all material ongoing and potential legal
and regulatory claims against the Group, an assessment is performed to consider whether an obligation or possible obligation exists and
to determine the probability of any potential outflow to determine whether a claim results in the recognition of a provision or disclosure of a
contingent liability. The timing of payment of provisions is subject to uncertainty and may have an effect on the presentation of the provisions
as current and non-current liabilities in the balance sheet. Expected timing of payment and classification of provision is determined by the
management based on the latest information available at the reporting date. See Note 29 for further details.
Classification of equity call options
Background
In addition to the provision of software-related solutions as a B2B product, the Group also offers certain customers a form of offering (which
includes software and related services) which is termed a “structured agreement”. Structured agreements are customarily with customers which
have a gaming licence and are retail/land based operators that are looking to establish their online B2C businesses – these customers require
initial support beyond the provision of the Group’s standard B2B software technology. With this product offering, Playtech offers additional
services to support the customer’s B2C activities over and above the B2B software solution products.
Playtech generates revenues from the structured agreements as follows:
• the standard operator revenue (B2B licensee fee income as per Note 5D); and
• revenue based on predefined revenue generated by each customer under the structured agreement which is typically capped at a percentage
of the profit (also defined in each agreement) generated by the customer, which compensates Playtech for the additional services provided
(additional B2B services fee as per Note 5D).
Under these agreements, Playtech typically has a call option to acquire equity in the operating entities. If the call option is exercised by Playtech,
the Group would no longer provide certain services (which generally include technical and general strategic support services) and would no
longer receive the related additional B2B services fee. This mechanism is not designed as a control feature but mainly to protect Playtech’s
position should the customer be subject to an exit transaction. Playtech is therefore able to benefit from any value appreciation in the operation
and could also potentially cease to provide the additional B2B services should it choose to do so dependent on the nature of the exit transaction.
163
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Judgements continued
Classification of equity call options continued
Judgement applied
In respect of each of the structured agreements where the Group holds equity call options, management applies judgement to assess whether
the Group has control or significant influence. For each of the Group’s structured agreements an assessment was completed in Note 20 using
the below guidance.
The existence of control by an entity is evidenced if all of the below are met in accordance with IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements,
paragraph 7:
• power over the investee;
• exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
• the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s returns.
In the cases where the Group assessed that it exercises control over these arrangements, then the company is consolidated in the Group’s
annual results in accordance with IFRS 10.
The existence of significant influence by an entity is usually evidenced in one or more of the following ways in accordance with IAS 28 Investment
in Associates and Joint Ventures, paragraph 6:
• representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee;
• participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends or other distributions;
• material transactions between the entity and its investee;
• interchange of managerial personnel; or
• provision of essential technical information.
If the conclusion is that the Group has significant influence, the next consideration made is whether there is current access to net profits and
losses of the underlying associate. This is determined by the exercise conditions of each relevant equity call option and in particular whether
theoptiothe options are exercisable at the end of each reporting period.
If the option is exercisable then the investment is accounted for using the equity accounting method. However, in the cases where the company
over which the Group has a current exercisable option generates profits, management made a judgement and concluded that Playtech’s share
of profits (were the option to be exercised) should not be recognised as it is unlikely that the profits will be realised as the existing shareholder
has the right, and is entitled, to extract distributable profits. As such management did not consider it appropriate to recognise any share of these
profits. However, in the cases where the associate has generated losses, the Group’s percentage share is recognised and deducted from the
carrying value of the investment inanvestment in associate.
Management has made a further judgement that if the equity call option is not exercisable at the end of the reporting period, then the option
isrecois recorded at fair value as per IAS 28, paragraph 14 and recognised as a derivative financial asset as per IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.
Furthermore, under some of these arrangements the Group has provided loan advances. In such instances a judgement was made as to
whether these amounts form part of the Group’s investment in the associate as per IAS 28, paragraph 38, with a key consideration being
whether the Group expects settlement to occur in the foreseeable future. In the case where this is not expected and there is no set repayment
term, then it is concluded that in substance these loans are extensions of the entity’s investment in the associate and therefore would form part
of the cost of the investment.
Finally, the Group has certain agreements in relation to the provision of services by service providers in connection with certain of the Group’s
obligations under their various structured agreements. Under these arrangements, the service providers have certain rights to equity. In order for
these rights to crystallise, the Group must first exercise the relevant option. A judgement was therefore made that no current liability exists under
IAS 32, until the point when Playtech exercises the option.
Estimates and assumptions
The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date, which have a significant
risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are described below. The
Group based its assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the consolidated financial statements were prepared. Existing
circumstances and assumptions about future developments may change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the
control of the Group. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.
Impairment of non-financial assets
Impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair
value less costs of disposal and its value in use. The value in use calculation is based on a discounted cash flow model (DCF). The cash flows
are derived from the budget for the next five years and do not include restructuring activities that the Group is not yet committed to or significant
future investments that may enhance the performance of the assets of the CGU being tested. The recoverable amount is sensitive to the
discount rate used for the DCF model as well as the expected future cash inflows and the growth rate used for extrapolation purposes. These
estimates are most relevant to goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite useful lives recognised by the Group. The key assumptions used to
determine the recoverable amount of the different CGUs, are disclosed and further explained in Note 19, including a sensitivity analysis for the
CGUs with lower headroom.
164
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Estimates and assumptions continued
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income tax in several jurisdictions and significant judgement is required in determining the provision for income taxes.
During the ordinary course of business, there are transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As a result,
the Group recognises tax liabilities based on estimates of whether additional taxes and interest will be due. These tax liabilities are recognised
when, despite the Group’s belief that its tax return positions are supportable, the Group believes it is more likely than not that a taxation authority
would not accept its filing position. In these cases, the Group records its tax balances based on either the most likely amount or the expected
value, which weights multiple potential scenarios. The Group believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open audit years
based on its assessment of many factors including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates and
assumptions and may involve a series of complex judgements about future events. To the extent that the final taxoutcomx outcome of these matters
is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will impact income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.
Where management conclude that it is not probable that the taxation authority will accept an uncertain tax treatment, they calculate the effect
of uncertainty in determining the related taxable profit (tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax, credits or tax rates. The effect of
uncertainty for each uncertain tax treatment is reflected by using the expected value – the sum of the probabilities and the weighted amounts in
a range of possible outcomes. More details are included in Note 14.
Deferred tax asset
In evaluating the Group’s ability to recover our deferred tax assets in the jurisdiction from which they arise, management considers all available
positive and negative evidence, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies and results of recent operations. Deferred tax asset
is recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilised.
Judgement is required in determining the initial recognition and the subsequent carrying value of the deferred tax assets. Deferred tax asset is
only able to be recognised to the extent that utilisation is considered probable. It is possible that a change in profit forecasts or risk factors could
result in a material change to the income tax expense and deferred tax asset in future periods.
Deferred tax asset in the UK
As a result of the Group’s internal restructuring in January 2021, the Group is entitled to UK tax deductions in respect of certain goodwill and
intangible assets. A deferred tax asset was recognised as the tax base of the goodwill and intangible assets is in excess of the book value
base of those assets. At the beginning of the period, the net recognised deferred tax asset amounted to €63.6 million. As at 31 December
2022, an additional deferred tax asset of €5.2 million was recognised. This additional deferred tax asset has been recognised as the Group’s
management has concluded that it is probable for the UK entities to continue to generate taxable profits in the future against which the Group
can utilise the tax deductions for goodwill and intangible assets giving a tax benefit of €68.8 million. This represents the benefit of the deductions
against forecast profits for the next five years. During the year, €12.0 million has been utilised and the net recognised deferred tax asset as
at 31 December 2022 amounts to €56.8 million. In addition, a total of €37.0 million of deferred tax asset has not been recognised in respect
of the benefit of future tax deductions expected to arise after the next five years for the remaining useful economic life of the goodwill and
intangible assets.
The Group reviewed the latest forecasts for the UK companies for the next five years, including their ability to continue to generate income
beyond the forecast period under the tax laws substantively enacted at the reporting date. Based on this, the Group’s management concludes
that it is probable that the UK companies will continue to generate taxable income in the future. Any future changes in the tax law orthe strux law or the structure
of the Group could have a significant effect on the use of the tax deductions, including the period over which the deductions can be utilised.
The Group has recognised a deferred tax asset of €60.4 million in respect of tax losses and excess interest in the UK which are available to
offset against the future profits of the UK Group companies. Based on the current forecasts, these losses will be fully utilised over the next
five years.
Deferred tax assets in Italy
The Group has recognised a deferred tax asset of €23.1 million in respect of tax losses in Italy which are available to offset against the future
profits of the Italian Group companies. Based on the current forecasts, these losses will be fully utilised within the next five years.
The Group reviewed the latest forecasts for the Italian companies for the next five years, including their ability to continue to generate income
beyond the forecast period under the tax laws substantively enacted at the reporting date. Based on this, the Group management concludes
that it is probable that the Italian Group companies will continue to generate taxable income in the future against which the losses can be utilised.
Any future changes in the tax law or the structure of the Group could have a significant effect on the use of the tax deductions, including the
period over which the deductions can be utilised.
165
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Estimates and assumptions continued
Impairment of financial assets
The Group undertook a review of trade receivables and other financial assets, as applicable, and their expected credit losses (ECLs). The review
considered the macroeconomic outlook, customer credit quality, exposure at default, and effect of payment deferral options as at the reporting date.
TheECL mThe ECL methodology and definition of default remained consistent with prior periods. The model inputs, including forward-looking information,
scenarios and associated weightings, together with the determination of the staging of exposures, were revised. The Group’s financial assets
consist of trade and loans receivables and cash and cash equivalents. ECL on cash balances was considered and calculated by reference
to Moody’s credit rating for each financial institution, while ECL on trade and loans receivables was based on past default experience and an
assessment of the future economic environment. More details are included in Note 38.
In respect of the Group’s Asian licensees’ business model an additional ECL risk was identified due to increase in collection days and uncertainty
over timing of receipt of funds. This resulted in an additional provision for bad debts of €15.4 million (2021: €7.5 million) recognised in the profit or
loss in H1 2022 with nothing further recognised in H2 2022.
Sun Bingo agreement
Background
The News UK contract commenced in 2016 and was originally set for a five-year period to June 2021. Both parties have obligations under
the contract, which include News UK providing access to brand and related materials as well as other services. Playtech has the primary
responsibility for the operation of the arrangement, but both parties have contractual responsibilities.
The related brands are used in Playtech’s B2C service, where the Group acts as the principal, meaning that in the Group’s consolidated
statement of comprehensive income:
• revenue from B2C customers is recognised as income; and
• the fees paid to News UK for use of the brands are an expense as they are effectively a supplier.
In the original contract, the fees payable were subject to a predetermined annual minimum guarantee (MG) which Playtech had to pay
to News UK.
During the period from 2016 to 2018, performance was not in line with expectations, and as such, the MG made this operation significantly loss
making for the Group. This opened the negotiations with News UK for certain amendments to the contract, which were agreed and signed in
February 2019 as follows:
• the MG was still payable up until the end of the original contract period, being June 2021, with no MG payable after that; and
• the contract term was extended to permit Playtech access to News UK’s brands and other related materials and other services, for a longer
period, to allow Playtech to recover its MG payments and to make a commercial return as was always envisaged. The term of the contract was
extended to end at the earlier of: a) five years from the date when Playtech had fully recovered all MG payments made; or b) 15 years from the
renegotiation (i.e. June 2036).
Judgements made on recognition and measurement
The annual MG paid to News UK was recognised in Playtech’s profit or loss up until February 2019, essentially being expensed over the original
term of the contract. However, from the point at which the amended contract became effective, the timing of the MG paid (being based on the
original terms) no longer reflected the period over which Playtech was consuming the use of the News UK brands and other related services
from them. As such, a prepayment was recorded to reflect the amount that had been paid, as at each period end, which related to the future use
of the brands and services. IFRS do not have a specific standard that deals with accounting for prepayments; however, the asset recognised as
aprepayma prepayment is in accordance with IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements.
At the commencement of the agreement and on renegotiation of the contract, the Directors considered whether the nature of the arrangement
gave rise to any intangible assets. At contract inception the Directors concluded that there were no such assets to recognise as both parties
had contractual obligations under the agreement to deliver services, as explained above. Post the contract renegotiation, the amounts to be
paid in the remainder of the initial period were considered to be advanced payments in respect of amounts to be earned by News UK over the
remainder of the extended contract period. Consequently, the Directors did not believe that there was a fundamental change in the nature of
thearrathe arrangements and it was considered most appropriate to categorise the amounts paid as operating expense prepayments.
As noted above, the term of this renegotiated contract is dependent on the future profitability of the contract, and it was expected that the future
profitability would mean the contract would finish before the end of the fixed term period. For this reason, it was considered appropriate that the
prepayment recognised should be released to the profit or loss in line with this expected profitability, rather than on astraigan on a straight-line basis.
The amounts held in non-current and current assets of €63.4 million and €3.6 million in Notes 21 and 23, respectively, are the difference between
the MG actually paid to News UK from February 2019 to June 2021 and the amounts recognised in the Group’s profit or loss from February 2019
to December 2022.
166
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 6 – Significant accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Estimates and assumptions continued
Sun Bingo agreement continued
Judgements made on recognition and measurement continued
There is always a risk with any budgeting process that the plan may not be realised. This risk increases the longer the period for which the budget
covers and in this instance the period is potentially up to 15 years. When producing the budget management applies reasonable assumptions
based on known factors, but sometimes and outside of management’s control, these factors may vary. However, management also reviews these
forecasts at each reporting period and more regularly internally and adjusts the expense released accordingly. Based on the most recent forecasts
and current profitability and the fact that the Group had been running the operation since 2016 and therefore has significant experience of the level
of profitability that can be derived from the operation, it is confident that the performance of the business will allow the full recovery of this asset,
before the contract ends.
Calculation of legal provisions
The Group ascertains a liability in the presence of legal disputes or ongoing lawsuits when it believes it is probable that a financial outlay will take
place and when the amount of the losses can be reasonably estimated. The Group is subject to lawsuits regarding complex legal problems,
which are subject to a differing degree of uncertainty (also due to a complex legislative framework), including the facts and the circumstances
inherent to each case, the jurisdiction and the different laws applicable. Given the uncertainties inherent to these problems, it is difficult to predict
with certainty the outlay which will derive from these disputes and it is therefore possible that the value of the provisions for legal proceedings
and disputes may vary depending on future developments in the proceedings underway. The Group monitors the status of the disputes
underway and consults with its legal advisers and experts on legal and tax-related matters. More details are included in Note 29.
Measurement of fair values of equity investments and equity call options
The Group’s equity investments and, where applicable (based on the judgements applied above), equity call options held by the Group, are measured
at fair value for financial reporting purposes. The Group has an established control framework with respect to the measurement of fair value.
In estimating the fair value of an asset and liability, the Group uses market-observable data to the extent it is available. Where Level 1 inputs are
not available, the Group engages third-party qualified valuers to perform the valuation. The Group works closely with the qualified valuers to
establish the appropriate valuation techniques and inputs to the model.
As mentioned in Note 20, the Group has:
• investments in listed securities where the fair values of these equity shares are determined by reference to published price quotations in an
active market;
• equity investments in entities that are not listed, accounted at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9; and
• derivative financial assets (call options in instruments containing potential voting rights), which are accounted at fair value through profit or loss
under IFRS 9.
The fair value of the equity investments that are not listed and of the derivative financial assets, rely on non-observable inputs that require a
higher level of management judgement to calculate a fair value than those based wholly on observable inputs. Valuation techniques are used
to calculate fair values include comparisons with similar financial instruments for which market observable prices exist, discounted cash flow
analysis and other valuation techniques commonly used by market participants. Upon the use of DCF method, the Group assumes that the
expected cash flows are based on the EBITDA.
The Group only uses models with unobservable inputs for the valuation of certain unquoted equity investments. In these cases, estimates are
made to reflect uncertainties in fair values resulting from a lack of market data inputs, for example, as a result of illiquidity in the market. Inputs
into valuations based on unobservable data are inherently uncertain because there is little or no current market data available from which to
determine the level at which an arm’s length transaction would occur under normal business conditions. Unobservable inputs are determined
based on the best information available. Further details on the fair value of assets are disclosed in Note 20, which includes a significant
judgement relating to the public announcement made by the Group on 6 February 2023 where Playtech plc is seeking a declaration from the
English Courts to obtain clarification on a point of disagreement between the Group and Caliplay.
The following table shows the carrying amount and fair value of non-current assets, as disclosed in Note 20, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy.
Carrying amountFair value
2022
€’m
Level 1
€’m
Level 2
€’m
Level 3
€’m
Non-current assets
Other investments (Note 20B)9.21.4—7.8
Derivative financial assets (Note 20C)636.4——636.4
645.61.4—644.2
Carrying amountFair value
2021
€’m
Level 1
€’m
Level 2
€’m
Level 3
€’m
Non-current assets
Other investments (Note 20B)8.11.6—6.5
Derivative financial assets (Note 20C)622.2——622.2
630.31.6—628.7
167
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 7 – Segment information
The Group’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services.
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker. The chief
operating decision maker has been identified as the management team including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.
The operating segments identified are:
• B2B: including Casino, Services, Sport, Bingo, Poker and Other;
• B2C: including Snaitech, Sun Bingo and Other B2C and HAPPYBET; and
• Financial: including B2C and B2B CFD (discontinued operations).
The Group-wide profit measures are Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Profit (see Note 10).
oftheCompanof the Company45.983.210.3(11.8)—81.7—127.6(13.8)113.8
Total assets1,911.11,154.792.96.2—1,253.8—3,164.9487.43,652.3
Total liabilities842.7867.311.45.9—884.6—1,727.3343.82,071.1
168
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 7 – Segment information continued
Geographical analysis of non-current assets
The Group’s information about its non-current assets by location is detailed below:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Italy746.1755.5
UK328.4332.6
Austria131.5132.8
Alderney75.9100.0
Sweden59.970.2
Gibraltar27.937.7
Cyprus22.025.6
Latvia15.515.9
Australia18.815.1
Ukraine8.811.3
Estonia7.89.4
British Virgin Islands8.28.0
Rest of World59.727.5
1,510.51,541.6
Note 8 – Discontinued operation
The results of the discontinued operations for the year are presented below:
20222021
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Revenue74.574.546.646.6
Distribution costs before depreciation and amortisation(34.9)(34.8)(56.9)(56.4)
Administrative expenses before depreciation and amortisation(13.3)(4.0)(15.9)(8.5)
Impairment of financial assets(1.9)(1.9)(4.7)(4.7)
EBITDA 24.433.8(30.9)(23.0)
Reversal of impairment of asset held for sale——2.0—
Finance income11.611.612.012.0
Finance costs(0.5)(0.5)(0.9)(0.9)
Profit on disposal of discontinued operations (Note 25C/25B)15.1—7.6—
Profit/(loss) before taxation50.644.9(10.2)(11.9)
Tax expense(3.6)(3.7)(1.9)(1.9)
Profit/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax 47.041.2(12.1 )(13.8)
169
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 8 – Discontinued operation continued
All of the profit from discontinued operations, net of tax in the year ended 31 December 2022 relates to the Financial segment, which was
disposed during the current year (refer to Note 25C). Included in the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, in the prior year is a profit
ondion disposal of €7.6 million relating to the “YoYo” business, which was part of the Group’s Casual and Social Gaming business, all fully disposed
during 2021. The remainder of the 2021 results included in the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, all relate to the Financials segment.
The following tables provide a full reconciliation between adjusted and actual results from discontinued operations:
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Revenue
€’m
EBITDA
€’m
Profit from
discontinued
operations
attributable to
the owners of
the Company
€’m
Reported as actual74.524.447.0
Employee stock option expenses—0.30.2
Professional fees
1
—9.19.1
Profit on disposal of discontinued operations (Note 25C)——(15.1)
Adjusted measure74.533.841.2
1 On the completion of the transaction the break fee of US$8.8 million to the Consortium that had previously agreed to acquire the Financial segment, as announced in May 2021 was triggered and
therefore paid. This is included in professional fees.
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Revenue
€’m
EBITDA
€’m
Loss from
discontinued
operations
attributable to
the owners of
the Company
€’m
Reported as actual46.6(30.9)(12.1)
Employee stock option expenses—0.80.8
Professional fees—7.17.1
Reversal of impairment of asset held for sale (Note 25C)——(2.0)
Profit on disposal of discontinued operations (Note 25B)——(7.6)
Adjusted measure46.6(23.0)(13.8)
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
20222021
ActualAdjustedActualAdjusted
Basic (cents)15.713.7(4.0)(4.6)
Diluted (cents)15.113.2(4.0)(4.6)
The net cash flows incurred by the Financial segment in the period are as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Operating 28.2(2.6)
Investing(3.8)(6.9)
Financing(1.1)(2.2)
Net cash inflow/(outflow)23.3(11.7)
The above net cash inflow/(outflow) does not include the disposal proceeds.
170
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 9 – Revenue from contracts with customers
The Group has disaggregated revenue into various categories in the following table which is intended to:
• depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by recognition date; and
• enable users to understand the relationship with revenue segment information provided in the segmental information note.
Set out below is the disaggregation of the Group’s revenue:
Revenue analysis by geographical location of licensee, product type, timing of transfer of performance obligations and regulated vs
unregulated by geographical major markets
The revenues from B2B (consisting of licensee fee, fixed-fee income, revenue received from the sale of hardware, cost-based revenue and
additional B2B services fee), B2Ca, B2C and Financials are described in Note 5D.
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Primary geographic markets
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Total
€’m
Italy35.1897.7(10.0)922.81.3924.1
UK127.065.2(3.7)188.534.1222.6
Mexico123.7——123.70.3124.0
Malta55.7——55.70.155.8
Philippines51.2——51.2—51.2
Spain27.7——27.71.028.7
Gibraltar24.9——24.9—24.9
Poland21.9——21.90.122.0
Netherlands20.2——20.21.021.2
Greece20.5——20.50.320.8
Curacao20.2——20.2—20.2
Germany0.816.8—17.61.018.6
British Virgin Islands————16.016.0
Ireland10.0——10.00.310.3
Colombia9.1——9.10.49.5
Rest of World84.43.4—87.818.6106.4
632.4983.1(13.7)1,601.874.51,676.3
Product type
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Total
€’m
B2B licensee fee451.7——451.7—451.7
B2B fixed-fee income42.1——42.1—42.1
B2B cost-based revenue59.9——59.9—59.9
B2B revenue received from the sale of hardware13.2——13.2—13.2
Additional B2B services fee65.5——65.5—65.5
Total B2B632.4——632.4—632.4
Snaitech—899.8—899.8—899.8
Sun Bingo and Other B2C—65.3—65.3—65.3
HAPPYBET —20.1—20.1—20.1
Intercompany—(2.1)—(2.1)—(2.1)
Total B2C—983.1—983.1—983.1
Intercompany——(13.7)(13.7)—(13.7)
Total intercompany——(13.7)(13.7)—(13.7)
Financial————74.574.5
632.4983.1(13.7)1,601.874.51,676.3
171
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 9 – Revenue from contracts with customers continued
Revenue analysis by geographical location of licensee, product type, timing of transfer of performance obligations and regulated vs
unregulated by geographical major markets continued
For the year ended 31 December 2022 continued
Timing of transfer of performance obligations
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
1
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Total
€’m
Recognised over time619.228.4(13.7)633.974.5708.4
Recognised at the point in time13.2954.7—967.9—967.9
632.4983.1(13.7)1,601.874.51,676.3
1 B2C revenue recognised at the point in time is recorded under IFRS 9.
2022
€’m
Regulated – Americas144.7
Regulated – Europe (excluding UK)184.6
Regulated – UK126.7
Regulated – Rest of World5.6
Total regulated B2B revenue461.6
Unregulated excluding Asia103.6
Total core B2B revenue565.2
Asia 67.2
Total B2B Gambling revenue632.4
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Primary geographic markets
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Italy30.7583.6(7.6)606.71.2607.9
UK132.261.9(4.1)190.014.1204.1
Mexico90.3——90.30.390.6
Philippines67.6——67.6—67.6
Malta52.3——52.30.552.8
Gibraltar27.9——27.9—27.9
Spain21.7——21.71.723.4
Germany1.216.4(0.8)16.82.319.1
Greece16.8——16.81.518.3
Poland14.4——14.40.114.5
Curacao12.2——12.20.112.3
Netherlands7.2——7.23.210.4
Colombia8.5——8.5(0.2)8.3
Romania5.7——5.70.25.9
Norway5.4——5.40.35.7
Rest of World60.21.8(0.1)61.921.383.2
554.3663.7(12.6)1,205.446.61,252.0
172
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 9 – Revenue from contracts with customers continued
Revenue analysis by geographical location of licensee, product type, timing of transfer of performance obligations and regulated vs
unregulated by geographical major markets continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021 continued
Product type
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Tot al
€’m
B2B licensee fee404.0——404.0—404.0
B2B fixed-fee income48.5——48.5—48.5
B2B cost-based revenue45.3——45.3—45.3
B2B revenue received from the sale of hardware7.1——7.1—7.1
Additional B2B services fee49.4——49.4—49.4
Total B2B554.3——554.3—554.3
Snaitech—584.7—584.7—584.7
Sun Bingo and Other B2C—61.9—61.9—61.9
HAPPYBET —18.2—18.2—18.2
Intercompany—(1.1)—(1.1)—(1.1)
Total B2C—663.7—663.7—663.7
Intercompany——(12.6)(12.6)—(12.6)
Total intercompany——(12.6)(12.6)—(12.6)
Financial————46.646.6
554.3663.7(12.6)1,205.446.61,252.0
Timing of transfer of performance obligations
B2B
€’m
B2C
€’m
1
Intercompany
€’m
Total Gaming
– continuing
operations
€’m
Financial
– discontinued
operations
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Recognised over time547.222.2(12.6)556.846.6603.4
Recognised at the point in time7.1641.5—648.6—648.6
554.3663.7(12.6)1,205.446.61,252.0
1 B2C revenue recognised at the point in time is recorded under IFRS 9.
2021
€’m
Regulated – Americas101.3
Regulated – Europe (excluding UK)141.4
Regulated – UK132.1
Regulated – Rest of World3.9
Total regulated B2B revenue378.7
Unregulated excluding Asia93.7
Total core B2B revenue472.4
Asia 81.9
Total B2B Gambling revenue554.3
173
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 9 – Revenue from contracts with customers continued
Revenue analysis by geographical location of licensee, product type, timing of transfer of performance obligations and regulated vs
unregulated by geographical major markets continued
There were no changes in the Group’s revenue measurement policies and procedures in 2021 and 2022. The vast majority of the Group’s B2B
contracts are for the delivery of services within the next 12 months. Furthermore, no individual licensee in 2022 and 2021 accounted for more
than 10% of the total gaming revenue and the total revenue of the Group.
The Group’s contract liabilities, in other words deferred income, primarily include advance payment for hardware and services and also
includeclude certain fixed fees paid by the licensee in the beginning of the contract. Deferred income as at 31 December 2022 was €6.0 million
(2021:€8: €8.1 million).
The movement in contract liabilities during the year was the following:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Balance at 1 January8.111.8
Recognised during the year8.47.0
Realised in the profit or loss(10.5)(10.7)
Balance at 31 December6.08.1
174
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 10 – Adjusted items
Management regularly uses adjusted financial measures internally to understand, manage and evaluate the business and make operating
decisions. These adjusted measures are among the primary factors management uses in planning for and forecasting future periods. The
primary adjusted financial measures are Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Profit, which management considers are relevant in understanding
theGrouthe Group’s financial performance. Thedefi. The definitions of adjusted items and underlying adjusted results are disclosed in Note 5.
As these are not a defined performance measure under IFRS, the Group’s definition of adjusted items may not be comparable with similarly
titledperfled performance measures or disclosures by other entities.
The following tables provide a full reconciliation between adjusted and actual results from continuing operations:
For the year ended 31 December 2022
Revenue
€’m
EBITDA –
B2B
€’m
EBITDA –
B2C
€’m
EBITDA
€’m
(Loss)/
Profit –
B2B
€’m
Profit–
B2C
€’m
Profit
from
continuing
operations
attributable
to the
owners
of the
Company
€’m
Profit
before
tax from
continuing
operations
€’m
Reported as actual1,601.8138.4234.1372.5(42.8)83.440.695.6
Employee stock option expenses
1
—7.10.98.07.10.98.08.0
Professional fees
2
—15.7—15.715.7—15.715.7
Fair value change and finance cost on contingent consideration
Underlying adjusted result on constant currency basis1,582.0——387.7——133.4—
1 Employee stock option expenses relate to non-cash expenses of the Group and differ from year to year based on share price and the number of options granted.
2 The vast majority of the professional fees relate to the potential sale of the Group. These expenses are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore are excluded.
3 Fair value change and finance costs on redemption liability related to the acquisition of Statscore. These expenses are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore are excluded.
4 Financial support provided to the employees based in Ukraine. These expenses are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore are excluded.
5 One off payment to terminate an onerous contract with a former service provider made in H1 2022. This expense is not considered an ongoing cost of operations and therefore is excluded.
6 Fair value change of equity instruments and derivative financial assets. These are excluded from the results as they relate to unrealised profit/loss.
7 Fair value loss on convertible loans relates to Gameco. This write off is not considered an ongoing cost of operations and is excluded. Refer to Note 20B.
8 Amortisation and deferred tax on intangible assets acquired through business combinations. Costs directly related to acquisitions are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore
areexclare excluded.
9 Impairment of tangible and intangible assets mainly relates to the impairment of Eyecon €13.6 million, Quickspin €7.0 million, Bingo VF €12.5 million and IGS €5.6 million. Refer to Note 19.
10 Loss arising on the disposal of Statscore, previously a subsidiary of the Group. Even though, Statscore was a separate CGU which was tested for impairment biannually up to the date of disposal,
itdiit didn’t meet the criteria of IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations of being a separate major line of business for the Group. As such it was not presented separately
asdias discontinued operations as at 31 December 2022. This loss is not considered an ongoing cost of operations and therefore is excluded. Refer to Note 20A.
11 Change in estimates related to uncertain overseas tax positions in respect of prior years.
175
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
For the year ended 31 December 2021
Revenue
€’m
EBITDA –
B2B
€’m
EBITDA –
B2C
€’m
EBITDA
€’m
Profit –
B2B
€’m
Profit–
B2C
€’m
Profit
from
continuing
operations
attributable
to the
owners
of the
Company
€’m
Profit
before
tax from
continuing
operations
€’m
Reported as actual1,205.4105.5175.8281.3629.257.5686.7605.0
Employee stock option expenses
1
—11.51.613.111.51.613.113.1
Professional fees
2
—13.90.514.413.90.514.414.4
Fair value change and finance cost on redemption liability
3
—1.3—1.31.4—1.41.4
Charitable donation
4
—3.5—3.53.5—3.53.5
Provision for other receivables
5
—1.2—1.21.2—1.21.2
Settlement of legal matter
6
—2.3—2.32.3—2.32.3
Fair value change and finance cost on contingent consideration
Underlying adjusted result on constant currency basis1,205.4——317.1——128.1—
1 Employee stock option expenses relate to non-cash expenses of the Group and differ from year to year based on share price and the number of options granted.
2 The majority of the professional fees equally relate to: (a) work completed in relation to the potential exercise of Playtech M&A Call Option (Note 20A); and (b) the potential sale of the Group.
Theseexese expenses are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore are excluded.
3 Fair value change and finance costs on redemption liability and contingent consideration related to the acquisition of Statscore, Eyecon and Wplay. These expenses are not considered ongoing
costs of operations.
4 In 2020, the Board of Directors approved a £3.0 million COVID-19 Recovery and Resilience Fund which was paid in the year ended 31 December 2021. This is a one-off payment and therefore
isexclis excluded.
5 Provision against loan receivables that do not relate to the ordinary operations of the Group.
6 Settlement of legal matter which is not considered a recurring cost and therefore is excluded.
7 Fair value change of equity instruments and derivative financial assets. These are excluded from the results as they relate to unrealised profit/loss.
8 Amortisation and deferred tax on intangible assets acquired through business combinations. Costs directly related to acquisitions are not considered ongoing costs of operations and therefore
areexclare excluded.
9 Impairment of tangible and intangible assets mainly relates to the impairment of land before the classification as held for sale (Refer to Note 25A) and impairment of Bingo VF and several
capitalisation costs (Refer to Note 12).
10 Deferred tax recognised in respect of the assets classified as held for sale during the year. Please refer to Note 25A for further details.
11 The recognition of €63.6 million of deferred tax asset relates to the special project the Group completed on 1 January 2021 to move the tax residency of a number of companies from the Isle of Man
tothe Uto the UK.
The following table provides a full reconciliation between adjusted and actual tax from continuing operations:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Tax on profit or loss for the year55.0(81.7)
Adjusted for:
Deferred tax on intangible assets on acquisitions8.39.1
Deferred tax (refer to footnote 11 above)—63.6
Tax on disposal of asset held for sale —1.8
Tax related to uncertain positions(8.4)—
Adjusted tax54.9(7.2)
Note 10 – Adjusted items continued
176
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 11 – Auditor’s remuneration
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Group audit and Parent Company (BDO)2.31.5
Audit of subsidiaries (BDO)1.41.4
Audit of subsidiaries (non-BDO)0.30.3
Total audit fees4.03.2
Non-audit services provided by Parent Company auditor and its international member firms
Other non-audit services0.90.5
Total non-audit fees0.90.5
Note 12 – Impairment of tangible and intangible assets
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
(Reversal of)/impairment of property, plant and equipment (Note 17)(0.2)12.5
Impairment of intangible assets (Note 19)38.79.1
38.521.6
Impairment of intangibles assets for 2022 relates to the impairment of Eyecon €13.6 million, Quickspin €7.0 million, Bingo VF €12.5 million
andIand IGS €5.6 million. Refer to Note 19.
Of the total impairment of property, plant and equipment of €12.5 million in 2021, an amount of €12.3 million relates to land classified as held
forsalfor sale. Refer to Note 25A.
Out of the total of €9.1 million in 2021, an amount of €6.4 million relates to the impairment of Bingo VF. The remaining relates to the impairment
ofcapof capitalised development costs. Based on the assessment performed at the reporting date, several projects will not be recoverable.
Note 13 – Finance income and costs
A. Finance income
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Interest income2.41.1
Net foreign exchange gain9.2—
11.61.1
B. Finance costs
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Net foreign exchange loss—(0.5)
Interest on bonds(35.7)(36.7)
Interest on lease liability(5.5)(5.3)
Interest on loans and borrowings and other(6.0)(5.6)
Bank facility fees(7.0)(1.8)
Bank charges(14.1)(13.0)
Movement in contingent consideration and redemption liability(0.1)(4.8)
Fair value loss on convertible loans(3.0)—
Expected credit loss on loans receivable(1.6)—
(73.0)(67.7)
Net finance costs(61.4)(66.6)
177
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 14 – Tax expense/(credit)
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Current tax expense
Income tax expense for the current year19.310.8
Income tax relating to prior years9.13.4
Withholding tax0.30.4
Total current tax expense28.714.6
Deferred tax
Origination and reversal of temporary dierary differences23.5(78.8)
Deferred tax movements relating to prior years8.1—
Impact of changes in tax rates(5.3)(17.5)
Total deferred tax expense/(credit)26.3(96.3)
Total tax expense/(credit) from continuing operations55.0(81.7)
A reconciliation of the reported income tax charge of €55.0 million (2021: tax credit of €81.7 million) applicable to profit before tax of €95.6 million
(2021: profit before tax of €605.0 million) at the UK statutory income tax rate of 19% is as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Profit for the year40.6686.7
Income tax expense/(credit)55.0(81.7)
Profit before income tax95.6605.0
Tax using the Company’s domestic tax rate (19% in 2021 and 2022)18.2115.0
Tax eax effect of:
Non-taxable fair value movements on call options(1.1)(110.9)
Tax exempt income(4.3)(7.5)
Non-deductible expenses19.82.3
Deferred tax asset recognised on Group restructuring(5.4)(75.2)
DierDifference in tax rates applied in overseas jurisdictions13.8(3.6)
Impact of changes in tax rates(5.3)(5.5)
Increase in unrecognised tax losses2.12.3
Adjustment in respect of previous years:
– Deferred tax asset 8.0(2.0)
– Tax asset not provided9.23.4
Total tax expense/(credit)55.0(81.7)
Reported tax charge/(credit)
A reported tax charge of €55.0 million from continuing operations arises on a profit before income tax of €95.6 million compared to an expected
charge of €18.2m.2 million (2021: a tax credit of €81.7 million on profit before income tax of €605.0 million). The reported tax expense includes
adjustments in respect of prior years relating to current tax and deferred tax. The prior year adjustment in respect of current tax of €9.2 million
includes an additional provision of €8.4 million relating to uncertain overseas tax positions in respect of prior years. The prior year adjustment
relating to deferred tax of €8.1 million relates to the overprovision of deferred tax assets and an underprovision for deferred tax liabilities in
respect of goodwill.
The Group’s effective tax rate for the current period is 39.5%. The key reasons for the differences are:
• Profits of subsidiaries located in territories where the tax rate is higher than the UK statutory tax rate, this includes Snaitech profits in Italy.
• Expenses not deductible for tax purposes including professional fees, impairment of intangible assets and loss on disposal of subsidiaries.
Changes in tax rates and factors affecting the future tax charge
The most significant elements of the Group’s income arise in the UK where the tax rate for the current period is 19%. It should be noted that
the UK tax rate is set to increase to 25% from 1 April 2023. As such, theUh, the UK statutory headline rate of corporation tax is the basis on which the
applicable tax rate is computed.
In December 2022, European Union (EU) Member States unanimously adopted the Minimum Tax Directive via written procedure ensuring a
global minimum level of taxation (set at 15%) for multinational enterprise groups. GLoBE Model rules were released in March 2022 and broadly
EU Member States have until 31 December 2023 to transpose the Directive into national legislation with the rules to be applicable for fiscal years
starting on or after 31 December 2023. None of the countries in which the Group operates has enacted or substantively enacted Pillar Two
Model Rules as part of their national laws as of 31 December 2022. Whilst consultation on a number of areas remains ongoing, the Group will
continue to closely monitor developments.
178
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 14 – Tax expense/(credit) continued
Deferred tax
The deferred tax asset and liability are measured at the enacted or substantively enacted tax rates of the respective territories which are
expected to apply to the year in which the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or
substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. The deferred tax balances within the financial statements reflect the increase in the UK’s main
corporation tax rate from 19% to 25% from 1 April 2023.
Note 15 – Earnings per share
The calculation of basic earnings per share (EPS) has been based on the following profit attributable to ordinary shareholders and weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding.
20222021
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Profit attributable to owners of the Company87.6201.7674.6113.8
Basic (cents)29.267.2226.338.2
Diluted (cents)28.164.7216.236.5
20222021
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Actual
€’m
Adjusted
€’m
Profit attributable to the owners of the Company from continuing operations40.6160.5686.7127.6
Basic (cents)13.553.5230.342.8
Diluted (cents)13.051.5220.140.9
20222021
Actual
Number
Adjusted
Number
Actual
Number
Adjusted
Number
Denominator – basic
Weighted average number of equity shares300,059,994300,059,994298,229,795298,229,795
Denominator – diluted
Weighted average number of equity shares300,059,994300,059,994298,229,795298,229,795
Weighted average number of option shares11,792,38511,792,38513,882,77413,882,774
Weighted average number of shares311,852,379311,852,379312,112,569312,112,569
The calculation of diluted EPS has been based on the above profit attributable to ordinary shareholders and weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding after adjustment for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. The effects of the anti-dilutive potential
ordinary shares are ignored in calculating diluted EPS.
EPS for discontinued operations is disclosed in Note 8.
Note 16 – Employee benefits
Total staff costs comprise the following:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Salaries and personnel-related costs427.0367.4
Cash-settled share-based payments(0.3)3.4
Equity-settled share-based payments 8.313.8
435.0384.6
Average number of personnel:
Distribution 6,2696,259
General and administration538650
6,8076,909
The Group has the following employee share option plans (ESOP) for the granting of non-transferable options to certain employees:
• the GTS 2010 Company Share Option Plan (CSOP). Options granted under these plan vest on the first day on which they become exercisable
which is three years after grant date;
• the Long Term Incentive Plan 2012 (LTIP). Awards (options, conditional awards, cash-settled awards, or a forfeitable share award) granted
under this plan vest on the first day on which they become exercisable which is typically between 18 and 36 months after grant date; and
• the Long Term Incentive Plan 2022 (LTIP22). Awards (options, conditional Share awards, Restricted shares, cash-settled awards) granted
under this plan vest on the first day on which they become exercisable which is typically after 36 months.
179
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 16 – Employee benefits continued
The overall term of the ESOP is ten years. These options are settled in equity or cash once exercised. Option prices are denominated in GBP.
During 2022 the Group granted the following under its LTIP22:
• 492,765 nil cost awards subject to EPS growth, relative total shareholder return (TSR) against constituents of the FTSE 250 but excluding
the investment trusts index, and relative TSR against a sector comparator group of peer companies. The fair value per share according to
theMothe Monte Carlo simulation model is between £2.71 and £4.58. Inputs used were as follows:
Expected life (years)
Share price at
grant date
Dividend
yield
Risk
free rate
Projection
period
(years)Volatility
3£4.582Nil2.34%341%-49%
There were no grants during 2021.
At 31 December 2022 and 2021 the following options were outstanding:
2022
Number
2021
Number
Shares vested on 1 March 2018 at nil cost72,596102,844
Shares vested between 1 September 2016 and 1 March 2018 at nil cost20,89023,112
Shares vested on 1 March 2019 at nil cost21,82031,972
Shares vested between 1 September 2017 and 1 March 2019 at nil cost39,02150,742
Shares vested on 21 December 2019 at nil cost9,77912,870
Shares vested between 1 September 2017 and 1 April 2019 at nil cost—21,187
Shares vested on 1 March 2020 at nil cost98,444112,369
Shares vested on 1 March 2021 at nil cost1,047,7821,347,475
Shares vested between 1 March 2022 and 1 August 2022 at nil cost2,218,7353,499,954
Shares will vest by 19 December 2024 at nil cost1,900,0001,900,000
Shares will vest between 1 March 2023 and 26 October 2023 at nil cost6,392,0736,780,249
Shares will vest by August 18 2025 at nil cost351,724—
12,172,86413,882,774
The total number of shares exercisable as of 31 December 2022 is 4,729,067 (2021: 2,402,571).
The total number of outstanding shares that will be cash settled is 561,385 (2021: 630,923). The total liability outstanding for the cash-settled
options is €3.1 million (2021: €3.8 million).
The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices of share options for the ESOP.
2022
Number
of options
2021
Number
of options
2022
Weighted average
exercise price
2021
Weighted average
exercise price
Outstanding at the beginning of the year13,882,77416,886,778—£0.03
Granted492,765———
Forfeited(408,237)(1,130,697)——
Exercised(1,794,438)(1,873,307)—£0.05
Outstanding at the end of the year 12,172,86413,882,774——
Included in the number of options exercised during the year are 50,448 options (2021: 232,796) which were cash settled.
The weighted average share price at the date of exercise of options was £5.302 (2021: £6.506).
Share options outstanding at the end of the year have the following exercise prices:
Expiry dateExercise price
2022
Number
2021
Number
21 December 2025Nil93,486125,956
Between 21 December 2026 and 31 December 2026Nil70,620116,771
Between 1 March 2027 and 28 June 2027Nil98,444112,369
23 July 2028Nil1,044,7711,344,464
Between 27 February 2029 and 19 December 2029Nil4,121,7465,402,965
Between 17 July 2030 and 26 October 2030Nil6,392,0736,780,249
18 August 2032Nil351,724—
12,172,86413,882,774
180
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 17 – Property, plant and equipment
Computer
software
and hardware
€’m
Gaming
machines
€’m
Oce furniture Office furniture
and equipment
€’m
Buildings,
leasehold
buildings and
improvements
€’m
Total
€’m
Cost
At 1 January 2022132.196.241.1270.1539.5
Additions19.815.88.89.253.6
Disposals(6.3)(2.3)(2.0)(3.8)(14.4)
Reclassifications(0.3)——0.3—
At 31 December 2022145.3109.747.9275.8578.7
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses
At 1 January 202295.361.424.528.6209.8
Charge16.014.55.45.641.5
Impairment loss——(0.2)—(0.2)
Disposals(6.1)(2.0)(1.9)(3.8)(13.8)
At 31 December 2022105.273.927.830.4237.3
Net book value
At 31 December 202240.135.820.1245.4341.4
At 1 January 202236.834.816.6241.5329.7
Computer
software
and hardware
€’m
Gaming
machines
€’m
Oce furniture Office furniture
and equipment
€’m
Buildings,
leasehold
buildings and
improvements
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Cost
At 1 January 2021115.186.634.7302.8539.2
Additions24.210.77.86.048.7
Disposals(7.2)(1.1)(1.4)(2.9)(12.6)
Transfer to held for sale———(35.8)(35.8)
At 31 December 2021132.196.241.1270.1539.5
Accumulated depreciation and impairment losses
At 1 January 202187.544.421.029.2182.1
Charge14.817.74.85.642.9
Impairment loss———12.512.5
Disposals(7.0)(0.7)(1.3)(2.9)(11.9)
Transfer to held for sale———(15.8)(15.8)
At 31 December 202195.361.424.528.6209.8
Net book value
At 31 December 202136.834.816.6241.5329.7
At 1 January 202127.642.213.7273.6357.1
181
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 18 – Leases
Set out below are the carrying amounts of right of use assets recognised and the movements during the year:
Oce leasesOffice leases
€’m
Hosting
€’m
Tot al
€’m
At 1 January 202267.86.073.8
Additions/modifications7.412.119.5
Disposal of subsidiary(0.2)—(0.2)
Amortisation charge (14.5)(7.0)(21.5)
At 31 December 202260.511.171.6
Oce leasesOffice leases
€’m
Hosting
€’m
Tot al
€’m
At 1 January 202160.16.666.7
Additions/modifications22.54.827.3
Amortisation charge (14.8)(5.4)(20.2)
At 31 December 202167.86.073.8
Set out below are the carrying amounts of lease liabilities and the movements during the year:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
At 1 January90.182.5
Additions/modifications18.826.1
Disposal of subsidiary(0.2)—
Accretion of interest5.55.3
Payments(27.1)(26.2)
EEffect of movement in exchange rates(1.3)2.4
At 31 December85.890.1
Current31.820.3
Non-current54.069.8
85.890.1
The maturity analysis of lease liabilities is disclosed in Note 38B.
The following are the amounts recognised in the profit or loss:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Amortisation expense of right of use assets21.520.2
Interest expense on lease liabilities5.55.3
Impact of early termination of lease contracts(0.7)(1.2)
Variable lease payments (included in distribution costs)0.11.0
26.425.3
Rent concessions have been provided to the Group companies as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Group elected to account for
qualifying rent concessions in the same way as they would if they were not lease modifications, resulting in accounting for the concession as a
variable lease payment. The amount recognised in the profit or loss to reflect changes in lease payments that arose from rent concessions to
which the Group has applied the practical expedient is €0.1 million (2021: €1.0 million).
182
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 19 – Intangible assets
Patents, domain
names and licence
€’m
Technology IP
€’m
Development
costs
€’m
Customer
list and aliateslist and affiliates
€’m
Goodwill
€’m
Total
€’m
Cost
At 1 January 2022191.486.5363.6526.9773.61,942.0
Additions32.2—59.4——91.6
Assets acquired through business combinations—2.9——5.48.3
Disposal of subsidiary—(3.0)(1.4)(0.5)(12.4)(17.3)
Write ose offs—(1.8)(4.3)——(6.1)
At 31 December 2022223.684.6417.3526.4766.62,018.5
Accumulated amortisation and impairment
losses
At 1 January 2022110.672.7241.3346.2125.1895.9
Charge24.32.949.732.9—109.8
Impairment loss——7.0—31.738.7
Disposal of subsidiary—(0.9)—(0.2)—(1.1)
Write ose offs—(1.8)(3.9)——(5.7)
At 31 December 2022134.972.9294.1378.9156.81,037.6
Net book value
At 31 December 202288.711.7123.2147.5609.8980.9
At 1 January 202280.813.8122.3180.7648.51,046.1
Patents, domain
names and licence
€’m
Technology IP
€’m
Development
costs
€’m
Customer
list and aliatlist and affiliates
€’m
Goodwill
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Cost
At 1 January 2021185.784.9316.8526.9773.61,887.9
Additions5.71.653.4——60.7
Write ose offs——(6.6)——(6.6)
At 31 December 2021191.486.5363.6526.9773.61,942.0
Accumulated amortisation and impairment
losses
At 1 January 202191.665.5198.3310.1118.3783.8
Charge19.07.247.036.1—109.3
Impairment loss——2.3—6.89.1
Write ose offs——(6.3)——(6.3)
At 31 December 2021110.672.7241.3346.2125.1895.9
Net book value
At 31 December 202180.813.8122.3180.7648.51,046.1
At 1 January 202194.119.4118.5216.8655.31,104.1
183
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 19 – Intangible assets continued
During the year, the research and development costs net of capitalised development costs were €88.3 million (2021: €80.1 million). The internal
capitalisation for the year was €57.5 million (2021: €51.3 million).
Out of the total amortisation charge of €109.8 million (2021: €109.3 million), an amount of €42.0 million (2021: €34.8 million) relates to the
intangible assets acquired through business combinations.
In accordance with IAS 36, the Group regularly monitors the carrying value of its intangible assets, including goodwill. Goodwill is allocated
tothirteeto thirteen cash-generating units (CGUs) (2021: fifteen out of which two CGUs were under held for sale).
The allocation of the goodwill in CGUs (excluding CGUs held for sale) is as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Snai259.7258.7
Sports B2B132.5132.5
Services109.9109.9
Casino50.850.8
Quickspin19.826.8
Eyecon3.016.6
Poker15.615.6
Statscore—12.4
Bingo retail9.59.5
Bingo VF—7.4
VB retail4.64.6
IGS—3.7
AUS GMTC4.4—
609.8648.5
Management reviews CGUs for impairment bi-annually, or on the occurrence of an impairment indicator. The recoverable amount of each CGU
has been determined from value in use calculations based on cash flow projections covering five years plus a terminal value which have been
adjusted to take into account each CGU’s major events as expected in future periods.
Management has considered the ongoing economic uncertainty caused by the Russian invasion in Ukraine and the overall global recessionary
pressures, with a higher level of judgement and uncertainty implemented in the forecasts. A potential risk for future impairment exists should
there be a significant change in the economic outlook, versus those trends management anticipates in its forecasts due to the occurrence of
these events.
With the exception of CGUs which have been fully impaired to date and CGUs deemed sensitive to impairment from a reasonably possible
change in key assumptions as reviewed in further detail below, management has calculated the growth estimates for years one to five by
applying an average annual growth rate for revenue based on the underlying economic environment in which the CGU operates and the
expected performance over that period. Beyond this period, management has applied an annual growth rate of 2%. Management has included
appropriate capital expenditure requirements to support the forecast growth and assumed the maintenance of the current level of licences.
Management has also applied post-tax discount rates to the cash flow projections as summarised below.
2022 CGUs not sensitive to changes in assumptions:
Average revenue
growth rate
2023-2027
Discount
rate applied
Snai9.4%17.3%
Services22.2%16.2%
Casino5.5%13.9%
Poker6.2%17.4%
VB retail 10.0%12.4%
2021 CGUs not sensitive to changes in assumptions:
Average revenue
growth rate
2022-2026
Discount
rate applied
Snai9.9%15.0%
Sports B2B23.7%13.9%
Services10.3%14.2%
Casino6.0%12.9%
Poker2.2%14.7%
IGS24.0%12.9%
VB retail18.0%11.2%
184
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 19 – Intangible assets continued
In relation to the Bingo VF, Eyecon, Quickspin and IGS CGUs, following impairment tests completed as at 31 December 2022, partial
impairments have been recognised as disclosed below. Certain other CGUs, which are specifically referred to below but not impaired,
areconare considered sensitive to changes in assumptions used for the calculation of value in use.
Bingo VF CGU
The recoverable amount of the Bingo VF CGU of €4.8 million, with carrying value of €21.1 million, has been determined using a cash flow forecast
that includes annual revenue growth rates between negative 1% and 10% over the one to five-year forecast period, a 2% long-term growth rate
and a post-tax discount rate of 15.8%. Following the contract termination of a significant licensee, the CGU is currently making considerable
efforts to recover through new geographical expansion and organic growth. However, growth is slower than expected, with new business
planned in new territories being delayed given the overall recessionary pressures worldwide. The impairment recognised in the current year
was€12.was €12.5 million which impairs the assets down to the recoverable amount.
Eyecon CGU
The recoverable amount of the Eyecon CGU showed signs of underperformance during H1 2022, mainly due to the fact that its operations are
highly concentrated in the UK online market which has seen a slowdown due to uncertain regulatory climate and as a result the recoverable
amount did not cover the carrying value, with an impairment loss of €13.6 million recognised in the profit or loss for the period ended 30 June 2022.
No further impairment has been recognised in the year. The recoverable amount of this CGU of €16.9 million, with a carrying value equal to
€16.1millio.1 million at 31 December 2022, was determined using a cash flow forecast that includes annual revenue growth rates between 0% to 10.0%
over the 1-5 year forecast period, 2% long-term growth rate and a post-tax discount rate of 15.6%. The recoverable amount would equal the
carrying value of the CGU if:
• the discount rate applied was higher by 4.8%, i.e. reaching a post-tax discount rate of 15.6%; or
• the revenue growth was lower by 0.2% when compared to the forecasted average five-year growth.
Quickspin CGU
The recoverable amount of the Quickspin CGU was impaired during H1 2022, given the risk the CGU bore from the proportion of revenues being
generated from Group’s B2B customers choosing to operate in areas with geopolitical tension, and the resulting 1% increase on the post-tax discount
rate of the CGU to mitigate for that factor. As a result of the above and also the decrease in the CGU performance which went through organisational
updates, an impairment loss of €7.0 million was recognised in the profit or loss for the period ended 30 June 2022. No further impairment was
recognised in the year. The recoverable amount of this CGU of €56.2 million, with a carrying value of €46.2 million at 31 December 2022, has been
determined using a cash flow forecast that includes annual revenue growth rates between 5.0% to 15.1% over the 1–5 year forecast period, 2% long-
term growth rate and a post-tax discount rate of 12.1%. The recoverable amount would equal the carrying value of the CGU if:
• the discount rate applied was higher by 18.3%, i.e., reaching a post-tax discount rate of 14.3%; or
• the revenue growth was lower by 2% when compared to the forecasted average five-year growth.
IGS CGU
The recoverable amount of the IGS CGU of €1.1 million, with carrying value of €6.7 million, has been determined using a cash flow forecast that
includes annual revenue growth rates between 10.0% and 77.0% over the one to five-year forecast period, a 2% long-term growth rate and a
post-tax discount rate of 22.0%. The unit was severely affected by COVID-19 and until recently it had not managed to bring revenue up to pre-COVID
levels with the business suffering from cancelled or postponed projects. As a result, the recoverable amount does not cover the carrying value,
with an impairment loss of €5.6 million recognised in the profit or loss.
If the revenue growth rate per annum is lower by 1%, then an additional impairment of €1.1 million would be recognised. Similarly, if the discount
rate increases by 1% to a post-tax discount rate of 23.0%, this would result in a further impairment of €0.4 million.
Bingo retail CGU
The recoverable amount of the Bingo retail CGU, with carrying value of €24.9 million, which has not been impaired, has been determined using a
cash flow forecast that includes annual revenue growth rates of 2% over the one to five-year forecast period, a 2% long-term growth rate and a
post-tax discount rate of 14.4%. The recoverable amount would equal the carrying value of the CGU if:
• the discount rate applied was higher by 8.1%, i.e. reaching a post-tax discount rate of 15.6%; or
• the revenue growth was lower by 1.0% when compared to the forecasted average five-year growth.
Sports B2B CGU
The recoverable amount of the Sports B2B CGU, with carrying value of €232.9 million, which has not been impaired, has been determined using
a cash flow forecast that includes annual revenue growth rates of 9.2% over the one to five-year forecast period, a 2% long-term growth rate and
a post-tax discount rate of 14.9%. The recoverable amount would equal the carrying value of the CGU if:
• the discount rate applied was higher by 7.6%, i.e. reaching a post-tax discount rate of 16.0%; or
• the revenue growth was lower by 0.5% when compared to the forecasted average five-year growth.
185
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets
Introduction
Below is a breakdown of the relevant assets at 31 December 2022 and 2021 per the consolidated balance sheet:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
A. Investments in associates36.6 5.2
B. Other investments9.2 8.1
C. Derivative financial assets636.4 622.2
682.2 635.5
The following are the amounts recognised in the statement of comprehensive income:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Profit or Loss
A. Share of loss from associates(3.8) (0.6)
B. Unrealised fair value changes of equity investments(0.3) (1.6)
C. Unrealised fair value changes of derivative financial assets6.0 583.2
Other comprehensive income
Foreign exchange movement from the derivative call options held in non-Euro functional currency subsidiaries 6.8—
8.7 581.0
Where the underlying derivative call option is held in a non-Euro functional currency entity, the foreign exchange movement is recorded through
other comprehensive income. As at 31 December 2022, the foreign exchange movement of the derivative call option held in Caliplay (Note 20C)
is recorded in the profit or loss as the derivative call option is held in a Euro functional currency entity. The foreign exchange movement of the
derivative call option held in Wplay, Onjoc and Tenbet are recorded through other comprehensive income as the derivative call option is held in
aUSa USD functional currency entity.
The recognition and valuation methodologies for each category are explained in each of the relevant sections below, including key judgements
made under each arrangement as described in Note 6.
186
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
A. Investments in associates
Balance sheet
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Caliplay——
ALFEA SPA1.71.6
Galera—3.6
LSports34.9—
Total investment in equity accounted associates36.65.2
Profit and loss impact
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Share of profit in ALFEA SPA0.1—
Share of loss in Galera(3.6)(0.6)
Share of loss in LSports(0.3)—
Total profit and loss impact(3.8) (0.6)
Caliplay
Background
During 2014 the Group entered into an agreement with Turística Akalli, S. A. de C.V, which has since changed its name to Corporacion Caliente
SAPI (“Caliente”), the majority owner of Tecnologia en Entretenimiento Caliplay, S. de R.L. de C.V (“Caliplay”), which is a leading betting and
gaming operator in Mexico which operates the “Caliente” brand in Mexico.
The Group made a €16.8 million loan to September Holdings B.V (previously the 49% shareholder of Caliplay), a company which is 100% owned
by Caliente, in return for a call option that would grant the Group the right to acquire 49% of the economic interest of Caliplay for a nominal
amount (the “Playtech Call Option”).
During 2021 Caliplay redeemed its share at par from September Holdings, which resulted in Caliente becoming the sole shareholder in Caliplay.
The terms of the existing structured agreement were varied, with the following key changes:
• A new additional option (in addition to the Playtech Call Option) was granted to the Group which allowed the Group to take up to a 49%
equity interest in a new acquisition vehicle should Caliplay be subject to a corporate transaction – this additional option is only exercisable in
connection with a corporate transaction and therefore was not exercisable at 31 December 2021 or 31 December 2022 (the “Playtech M&A
Call Option”).
• Caliente received a put option which would require Playtech to acquire September Holding Company B.V. for a nominal amount (the
“September Put Option”). This option has been exercised and the parties are in the process of transferring legal ownership of September
Holding Company B.V. to the Group.
The Group has no equity holding in Caliplay or Caliente and is currently providing services to Caliplay including technical and general strategic
support services for which it receives income (including an additional B2B services fee as described in Note 5). If the Playtech Call Option or
the Playtech M&A Call Option are exercised, the Group would no longer be entitled to receive the additional B2B services fee (and will cease to
provide the related services) which for the year ended 31 December 2022 was €66.3 million (2021: €49.4 million). In addition, for 45 days after
the finalisation of Caliplay’s 2021 accounts, Caliplay also had an option to redeem the Group’s additional B2B services fee or (if the Playtech
Call Option had been exercised at that time) Caliente would have the option to acquire Playtech’s 49% stake in Caliplay (together the “Caliente
Call Option”).
As per the public announcement made by the Group on 6 February 2023, Playtech plc is seeking a declaration from the English Courts to obtain
clarification on a point of disagreement between the parties in relation to the Caliente Call Option. The Group believes the Caliente Call Option
has expired and referred to its expiry having taken place in its interim report for the six-month period ended 30 June 2022, which was published
on 22 September 2022. If the Caliente Call Option was declared as being exercisable and was exercised, this would extinguish the Playtech Call
Option and the Playtech M&A Call Option.
In addition to the above, from 1 January 2025, if there is a change of control of Caliplay or any member of the Caliente group which holds a
regulatory permit under which Caliplay operates, each of the Group and Caliente shall be entitled (but not obligated), within 60 days of the time
of such change of control, to require that the Caliente group redeems the Group’s additional B2B services fee or (if the Playtech Call Option had
been exercised at that time) acquires Playtech’s 49% stake in Caliplay. If such change of control were to take place and the right to redeem/
acquire were to occur, this would extinguish the Playtech Call Option (to the extent not exercised prior thereto) and the Playtech M&A Call
Option. In respect of this change of control arrangement the Group has made a judgement that as at 31 December 2022 this has no impact on
the fair value calculation of the Playtech M&A Call Option.
187
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
A. Investments in associates continued
Caliplay continued
Assessment of control and significant influence
As at 31 December 2022 and 2021 it was assessed that the Group did not have control over Caliplay, because it does not meet the criteria
ofIFRof IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, paragraph 7 due to the following:
• Despite the Group previously having a nominated director on the Caliplay board in 2020 and having consent rights on certain decisions
(ineac(in each case, removed in 2021), there was no ability to control the relevant activities.
• Whilst they are not members of the board, the Group has the ability to appoint and change both the Chief Operating Officer (COO) and Chief
Marketing Officer (CMO) who form part of the management team. The COO and the CMO form part of the wider management team but not
the board and therefore are unable to control the relevant activities of Caliplay.
• The Playtech Call Option or the Playtech M&A Call Option, if exercised, would result in Playtech having up to 49% of the voting rights and
would not result in Playtech having control.
• Whilst the Group does receive variable returns from its structured agreement, it does not have the power to direct relevant activities so any
variation cannot arise from such a power.
As at 31 December 2022 and 2021, the Group has significant influence over Caliplay because it meets one or more of the criteria under IAS 28,
paragraph 6 as follows:
• It has the ability to appoint key members of the Caliplay management team.
• The standard operator revenue by itself is not considered to give rise to significant influence; however, when combined with the additional B2B
services fee, this is an indicator of significant influence.
• The material transaction of the historical loan funding is also an indicator of significant influence.
Accounting for each of the options
The Playtech Call Option was exercisable at 31 December 2022 and 31 December 2021, although it still has not been exercised. As the Group
has significant influence and the option is exercisable, the investment is recognised as an investment in associate using the equity accounting
method which includes having current access to profits and losses. The cost of the investment was previously deemed to be the loan given
through September Holdings of €16.8 million, which at the time was assessed under IAS 28, paragraph 38 as not recoverable for the foreseeable
future and part of the overall investment in the entity.
In 2021, with the introduction of the September Put Option, the investment in associate relating to the original Playtech Call Option was reduced
to zero and the €16.8 million original loan amount was determined by management to be the cost of the new Playtech M&A Call option and therefore
fully offset the balance of €16.8 million against the overall fair value movement of the Playtech M&A Call Option (refer to part C of this note).
The Playtech M&A Call Option is not currently exercisable and therefore in accordance with IAS 28, paragraph 14 has been recognised as
derivative financial asset, and disclosed separately under part C of this note.
As per the judgement in Note 6, the Group did not consider it appropriate to equity account for the share of profits as the current 100%
shareholder is entitled to any undistributed profits.
Below is the financial information of Caliplay:
2022
1
€’m
2021
1
€’m
Current assets96.7 62.9
Non-current assets30.3 20.2
Current liabilities(78.1) (67.5)
Non-current liabilities——
Equity48.9 15.6
Revenue532.1 372.3
Profit from continuing operations30.4 23.3
Other comprehensive income /(loss), net of tax2.5 (1.0)
Total comprehensive income32.9 22.3
1 The 2021 balances above have been extracted from Caliplay’s audited 2021 financial statements whereas the 2022 balances have been extracted from the draft unaudited Caliplay financial statements.
Investment in ALFEA SPA
The Group has held 30.7% equity shares in ALFEA SPA since June 2018. At 31 December 2022 the Group’s value of the investment in ALFEA
SPA was €1.7milli.7 million (2021: €1.6 million). A share of profit of €0.1 million was recognised in the profit or loss for the year ended 31Dec1 December 2022
(2021: €Nil).
188
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
A. Investments in associates continued
Investment in Galera
In June 2021, the Group entered into an agreement with Ocean 88 Holdings Ltd which is the sole holder of Galera Gaming Group (together
“Galera”), a company registered in Brazil. Galera offers and operates online and mobile sports betting and gaming (poker, casino, etc.) in Brazil.
They will continue to do so under the local regulatory license, when this becomes available, and will expand to other gaming and gambling
products based on the local license conditions.
The Group’s total consideration paid for the investment in Galera was $5.0 million (€4.2 million) in the year ended 31 December 2021, which
wasthe cowas the consideration for the option to subscribe and purchase from Galera an amount of shares equal to 40% in Galera at nominal price.
In addition to the investment amount paid, Playtech made available to Galera a line of credit up to $20.0 million. In 2022, an amendment was
signed to the original framework agreement to increase the credit line to $45.0 million. As at 31 December 2022, an amount of €26.9 million,
which is included in loans receivable under other non-current assets (refer to Note 36) has been drawn down (2021: €8.1 million). An amount
of €18.0 million has been loaned in the year ended 31 December 2022. The loan is required to be repaid to Playtech prior to any dividend
distribution to the current shareholders of Galera. The Group recognised an allowance for expected credit losses for the loan to Galera of
€1.1m1 million as at 31 December 2022 (2021: €Nil).
In respect of the loan receivable from Galera even though the framework agreement does not state a set repayment term, management has
assessed that this should still be recognised as a loan as opposed to part of the overall investment in associate in line with IAS 28. The Directors
have made a judgement that the loan will be settled from operational cash flows as opposed to being settled as part of an overall transaction. If
the Group had determined that the loan was part of the overall investment in associate an additional €3.6 million share of loss of associate would
have been recorded in the profit and loss. The €3.6 million has not been recognised as the investment in associate has been reduced to €Nil
(see below).
Playtech has assessed whether it holds power to control the investee and it was concluded that this is not the case. Even if the option is
exercised, it would only result in a 40% voting right over the operating entity and therefore no control.
Under the agreement in place:
• the standard operator income to be generated from services provided to Galera when combined with the additional B2B services fee,
thelothe loanand can and certain other contractual rights, are all indicators of significant influence; and
• the Group provides standard B2B services (similar to services provided to other B2B customers) as well as additional services to Galera
thatGalthat Galera requires to assist it in successfully running its operations, which could be considered essential technical information.
Considering the above factors, the Group has significant influence under IAS 28, paragraph 6 over Galera.
As the option is currently exercisable and gives Playtech access to the returns associated with the ownership interest, the investment is treated
as an investment in associate. Playtech’s interest in Galera is accounted for using the equity method in the consolidated financial statements.
Galera is still considered a start-up and therefore is currently loss making. If the call option is exercised by Playtech the Group will no longer
provide certain services and as such will no longer be entitled to the additional B2B service fee. The additional B2B services fee was €Nil in
theyear ethe year ended 31 December 2022 (2021: €Nil).
The cost of the investment was deemed to be the price paid for the option of $5.0 million (€4.2 million). A share of the loss of €3.6 million
was recognised in the profit or loss in the year ended 31 December 2022 (2021: €0.6 million) making the resulting value of the investment at
31 December 2022 €Nil (2021: €3.6 million). The total share of loss from Galera was €7.2 million as at 31 December 2022 but is capped at
€3.6m.6 million to bring the cost of the investment to €Nil.
Investment in LSports
Background
In November 2022, the Group entered into the following transactions:
• acquisition of 15% of Statscore for a total consideration of €1.8 million. As a result of this transaction Statscore became a 100% subsidiary
ofthe Grouof the Group;
• disposal of 100% of Statscore to LSports Data Ltd (“LSports”) for a total consideration of €7.5 million (settled through the acquisition of
LSports in shares) less a novated inter-company loan of €1.6 million, therefore a non-cash net consideration of €5.9 million; and
• acquisition of 30.89% of LSports for a total consideration of €36.7 million, which also included an option to acquire further shares (up to 18.11%)
in LSports. Of the total consideration, €29.2 million was paid in cash with the balance offset against the disposal proceeds of Statscore as per
the above.
As a result of the disposal of 100% of Statscore, the Group realised a loss of €8.8 million which has been recognised in the profit or loss for the
year ended 31 December 2022 and is made up as follows:
2022
€’m
Net asset position as at the date of the disposal (including goodwill of €12.4 million)14.7
Net consideration(5.9)
Loss on disposal8.8
189
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
A. Investments in associates continued
Investment in LSports continued
Background continued
Furthermore, the Group has an option to acquire up to 49% (so an additional 18.11%) of the equity of LSports (“LSports Option”). The LSports
Option is exercisable under the following conditions:
• within 90 days from the date of receipt of the LSports audited financial statements for each of the years ending 31 December 2024, 2025
and 2026; or
• at any time until 31 December 2026 subject and immediately prior to the consummation of an Initial Public Offering or Merger & Acquisition
event of LSports.
The fair value of the option acquired was €1.4 million which was part of the total consideration €36.7 million. Refer to part of Note 20C; there is no
movement on the fair value between acquisition and year end.
LSports is a company whose principal activity is to empower sportsbooks and media companies with the highest quality sports data on a
wide range of events, so they can build the best product possible for their business. The company is based in Israel. The principal reason of
theacqthe acquisition is the attractive opportunity considered by Playtech to increase its footprint in the growing sports data market segment.
Assessment of control and significant influence
As at date of acquisition and 31 December 2022 it was assessed that the Group did not have control over LSports, because it does not meet
thecriterithe criteria of IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements, paragraph 7 due to the following:
• despite Playtech having the right to appoint a director on the LSports board, as at 31 December 2022, one had not yet been appointed.
Moreover, once Playtech appoints a director, there is still no ability to control the relevant activities, as the total number of directors including
potentially one Playtech appointed director will be five;
• Playtech has neither the ability to change any members of the board or of the management of LSports; and
• as at 31 December 2022 the option is not exercisable and therefore can be disregarded in the assessment of power.
Per the above assessment Playtech does not hold power over the investee and as such does not have control.
As at 31 December 2022, the Group has significant influence over LSports because it meets one or more of the criteria under IAS 28, paragraph
6, the main one being Playtech having the ability to appoint a member on the board of LSports enabling it to therefore participate in policy-
making processes, including decisions about dividends and/or other distributions. As a result of this assessment LSports has been recognised
as an investment in associate.
The LSports option, which is not currently exercisable, is fair valued as per paragraph 14 of IAS 28 and shown as a derivative financial asset in
accordance with IFRS 9 and disclosed separately under part C of this note.
Purchase Price Allocation (PPA)
The Group has prepared a PPA following the acquisition of the investment, where any difference between the cost of the investment and
Playtech’s share of the net fair value of the LSports’ identifiable assets and liabilities results in goodwill.
Details of the provisional fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, investment consideration and goodwill are as follows:
Playtech’s share
of net fair value
of the identifiable
assets and
liabilities acquired
2022
€’m
Net book value of liabilities acquired(1.3)
Fair value of customer contracts and relationships7.8
Fair value of technology – internally developed11.5
Fair value of brand1.6
Deferred tax arising on acquisition (2.3)
Total net assets17.3
Total consideration35.3
Goodwill18.0
A total of €0.4 million and €0.1 million was recognised in relation to the amortisation of intangibles and the release of the deferred tax liability
respectively, arising on acquisition in the profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2022, with a corresponding entry against the investment
in associate. The net effect of €0.3 million is recognised in share of loss in profit or loss as at 31 December 2022. No share of profit was recognised
as this amount is negligible.
190
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
A. Investments in associates continued
Other investment in associates that are fair valued under IAS 28, paragraph 14
The following are also investments in associates where the Group has significant influence but where the option is not currently exercisable.
AstheAs there is no current access to profits, the relevant option is fair valued under IFRS 9, and disclosed as derivative financial assets under part C
ofthis note: of this note:
• Wplay;
• Tenbet (Costa Rica); and
• Onjoc (Panama).
The financial information required for investments in associates, other than Caliplay, have not been included here as from a Group perspective
the Directors do not consider them to have a material impact jointly or separately.
B. Other investments
Balance sheet
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Listed investment – PhilWeb1.10.8
Listed investment – Torque Esports Corp0.30.8
Investment in Tenlot Guatemala 4.4 4.4
Investment in Tentech Costa Rica2.1 2.1
Investment in Gameco1.3—
Total other investments9.2 8.1
Profit and loss impact
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Change of fair value of listed securities – PhilWeb0.2 (0.4)
Change in fair value of listed securities – Torque Esports Corp(0.5) (1.2)
Total profit and loss impact(0.3) (1.6)
Listed investments
The Group has shares in listed securities in PhilWeb and Torque Esports Corp. The fair values of these equity shares are determined by reference
to published price quotations in an active market. For the year ended 31 December 2022, the fair value of PhilWeb increased by €0.2 million
(2021: decrease of €0.4 million). For the year ended 31 December 2022, the fair value of Torque Esports Corp decreased by €0.5 million
(2021:dec: decrease of €1.2 million).
Investment in Tenlot Guatemala
In 2020, the Group entered into an agreement with Tenlot Guatemala, a member of the Tenlot Group. Tenlot Guatemala commenced its activity
in 2018 and it is currently growing its lottery business in Guatemala, expanding its distribution network and game offering.
The Group has acquired a 10% equity holding in Tenlot Guatemala for a total consideration of $5.0 million (€4.4 million) in 2020, which has been
accounted at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9.
The fair value of the equity holding as at 31 December 2022 is $5.0 million (€4.4 million) with no movement in fair value from the prior year.
In addition, the Group was granted a 10% equity holding in Super Sports S.A. at no additional cost. The Group also has an option to acquire an
additional 80% equity holding in Super Sports S.A. If the option is exercised, the Group would no longer provide certain services and, as such,
would no longer be entitled to the additional B2B services fee. The additional B2B services fee was €Nil for the year ended 31 December 2022
(2021: €Nil). There are no conditions attached to the exercise of the option.
The right of exercising the call option at any time and the acquisition of the additional 80% in Super Sports S.A. give Playtech:
• power over the investee;
• exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee; and
• the ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of the investor’s returns.
It therefore satisfies all the criteria of control under IFRS 10, paragraph 7 and, as such, at 31 December 2022 Super Sports S.A. has been
consolidated in the consolidated financial statements of the Group, noting that this is not material from a Group perspective.
Investment in Tentech Costa Rica
In 2020, the Group entered into an agreement in Costa Rica with the Tenlot Group. The Group acquired a 6% equity holding in Tentech CR S.A.,
a member of the Tenlot Group, for a total consideration of $2.5 million (€2.1 million). Tentech CR S.A. sells printed bingo cards in accordance with
article 29 of the Law of Raffles and Lotteries of Costa Rica (CRC – Costa Rican Red Cross Association).
The 6% equity holding in Tentech CR S.A. is accounted at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9.
The fair value of the equity holding as at 31 December 2022 is $2.5 million (€2.1 million) with no movement in fair value from the prior year.
191
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
B. Other investments continued
Investment in Gameco
In 2021, the Group entered into a convertible loan agreement with GameCo LLC (“GameCo”), where it provided $4.0 million in the form of a debt
security with 8% interest (2021: €3.8 million). As at 31 December 2021 the receivable was included in loans receivable in Note 21. In December
2022, Gameco acquired Green Jade Games and subsequently, the Playtech debt was converted into equity shares, representing a 7.1% into the
newly formed group. Immediately prior to the conversion, the loan was impaired by €3.0 million and this has been recognised in the profit or loss
in the current year.
The 7.1% equity holding in the newly formed group is accounted at fair value through profit or loss under IFRS 9. The fair value of the equity
holding as at 31 December 2022 is €1.3 million.
C. Derivative financial assets
Balance sheet
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Playtech M&A Call Option (Caliplay)524.0 506.7
Wplay93.5 97.2
Onjoc8.6 6.9
Tenbet8.9 11.4
LSports (Note 20A)1.4—
Total derivative financial assets636.4 622.2
Statement of comprehensive income impact
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Caliplay
Fair value change of Playtech M&A Call Option(13.3) 506.7
Playtech Call Option—(16.6)
Foreign exchange movement to profit or loss30.6—
Wplay
Fair value change in Wplay(9.4) 74.8
Foreign exchange movement recognised in other comprehensive income5.7—
Onjoc
Fair value change in Onjoc1.3 6.9
Foreign exchange movement recognised in other comprehensive income0.4—
Tenbet
Fair value change in Tenbet(3.2) 11.4
Foreign exchange movement recognised in other comprehensive income0.7—
Total comprehensive income impact12.8 583.2
Caliplay
As already disclosed in section A of this note, the Playtech M&A Call Option is not currently exercisable and therefore in accordance with IAS 28,
paragraph 14 has been recognised as a derivative financial asset and fair valued under IFRS 9.
As at 31 December 2021, Caliplay was actively negotiating a merger with a US listed special purpose acquisition corporation (SPAC), which in
turn was expected to enter into a long-term commercial agreement with a leading media partner. As part of the transaction, the media partner
and certain of its shareholders were expected to invest a cash amount in the SPAC in exchange for shares and warrants issued by the SPAC,
which was expected to result in them together holding a material minority equity interest.
Further attempts were made to complete the SPAC transaction during the year, however as per the announcement made on 29 July 2022,
with capital market conditions having deteriorated significantly since the transaction was initially contemplated, the transaction was no longer
being pursued.
For this reason, a decision was taken to change the valuation methodology used as at 31 December 2022 for the Playtech M&A Call Option to
that of a DCF approach with a market exit multiple assumption, as opposed to 31 December 2021, where the Group has assessed the fair value
of the Playtech M&A Call Option based on the proposed term of the expected merger with the SPAC, including the transaction value.
As already mentioned in part A of Note 20 the Group is seeking a declaration from the English Courts to obtain clarification on a point of
disagreement between the parties in relation to the Caliente Call Option and in particular, whether Caliplay still holds this option which permits
it to redeem the additional B2B services fee element. Should it be declared that Caliplay still has the Caliente Call Option and Caliplay then
exercises said option, this would cancel both the Playtech M&A Call Option and the Playtech Call Option.
The Group believes the Caliente Call Option has expired and whilst Caliplay has not sought to exercise the option to date, Caliplay has made it
clear that it considers the option has not yet expired.
192
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
C. Derivative financial assets continued
Caliplay continued
In arriving at the fair value of the Playtech M&A Call Option, the Group has made a judgement that the Caliente Call Option has expired and
therefore no probability weighted scenarios have been modelled that include an assumption that the Caliente Call Option is exercisable. Should
the English Courts determine that the option is exercisable and Caliplay chooses to exercise the option, the amount payable by Caliplay to the
Group upon exercise would either be agreed between the parties or, failing which, determined by an independent investment bank valuing the
Group’s remaining entitlement to receive the additional B2B services fee until 31 December 2034. There is therefore the potential that, should the
Caliente Call Option be exercisable and then subsequently exercised, the proceeds received by the Group may be materially different (positive
or adverse) to the fair value of the Playtech M&A Call Option recorded as at 31 December 2022.
Valuation
The Group has assessed the fair value of the Playtech M&A Option of the derivative financial asset as at 31 December 2022 using a discounted
cash flow (DCF) approach with a market exit multiple assumption. The Group used a discount rate of 16% reflecting the cash flow risks given the
high growth rates in place, as well as a discount for illiquidity and control until the expected Group exit date. The Group also made assumptions
on the probability of a possible transaction that may be completed on a number of exit date scenarios over a four-year period, until December
2026. The Group used a compound annual growth rate of 17.2% over the forecasted cash flow period, an average Adjusted EBITDA margin of
26.3% and an exit multiple of 9.6x. Due to the uncertainty as to how the exercise of the Playtech M&A Call Option may occur and the potential
for the shares held to not be immediately realisable, the Group included an additional discount for lack of marketability (DLOM) for two years
of 13.8%. Furthermore, Playtech’s share in Caliplay was adjusted to reflect the rights to Caliplay shares that a service provider has under its
services agreement with the Group.
As at 31 December 2022, the fair value of the Playtech M&A Call Option was $560.6 million (2021: $574.7 million) which converted to €524.0 million
(2021: €506.7 million). The year-on-year movement of €17.3 million recognised in the profit or loss is attributable to the favourable movement in
the USD to EUR foreign exchange rate of €30.6 million, offset by €13.3 million unfavourable movement in the fair value arising from the change
in a number of variables including exit dates and loss of transaction synergies which impacted cash flows that were only partly offset by the
increase in the shareholding as discussed below.
As at 31 December 2021 the fair value of the option in Caliplay was determined using a potential transaction price where, due to incoming
shareholders, Playtech’s share in Caliplay was being diluted down to 36%. As at 31 December 2022, a discounted cash flow valuation method
is used with a dilution in shareholding down only to 45.8% reflecting the expected rights to Caliplay shares to be allocated to a service provider
under its services agreement with the Group. These rights were reduced following the exercise of a redemption option post year end as disclosed
in Note 40, noting that the Group had assumed this option would be exercised for the purposes of the valuation performed at 31Deed at 31 December 2022.
Despite the change in valuation approach, the Group considers it reasonable that the value of the Playtech M&A Call Option is broadly
unchanged given the continued strong operational results of Caliplay for 2022.
Sensitivity analysis
The assumptions and judgements made in the valuation of the derivative financial asset as at 31 December 2022 include the following
sensitivities, noting that factors and circumstances may arise that are outside the Group’s control which could impact the option value:
• A different discount rate within the range of 14% to 18% will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset in the range of €484.2 million –
€568.3 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €494.5 million –
€553.3 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €464.6 million –
€583.3 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €487.0 million –
€561.8 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €450.5 million –
€601.0 million.
• A 1.0 fluctuation on the market exit multiple will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €473.9 million –
€573.9 million.
• If the 13.8% DLOM applied for two-year period post exercise of the Playtech M&A option was removed (i.e. in the event that an M&A transaction
included the acquisition of Playtech’s shares immediately post exercise) the fair value of the derivative financial asset would increase to €607.6 million.
Conversely, if we double the applied DLOM to 27.6% the fair value of the derivative financial asset would decrease to €440.2 million.
Wplay
In August 2019, Playtech entered into a structured agreement with Aquila Global Group SAS (“Wplay”), which has a license to operate online
gaming activities in Colombia. Under the agreement the Group provides Wplay its technology products, where it receives standard operator
revenue and additional B2B services fee as per Note 5. The Group has no shareholding in Wplay.
Playtech has a call option to acquire a 49.9% equity holding in the Wplay business. As at 31 December 2021 this option was exercisable in August
2022, however during 2022, the parties agreed to defer the Group’s ability to exercise this option to August 2023. If the call option is exercised
by Playtech, the Group would no longer provide certain services and as such will no longer be entitled to the additional B2B services fee.
TheadThe additional B2B services fee was €Nil for the year ended 31 December 2022 (2021: €Nil).
The payment of €22.4 million made to Wplay in 2019 and 2020 was considered to be the payment made for the option in Wplay. The Group
hadchad contingent commitments totalling $6.0 million, of which $5.0 million was paid in June 2021 and $1.0 million was paid in October 2022.
193
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
C. Derivative financial assets continued
Wplay continued
Assessment of control and significant influence
The Group assessed whether it holds power over the investee (in accordance with IFRS 10, paragraph 7) with the following considerations:
• Playtech does not have the ability to direct Wplay’s activities as it has no voting representation on the executive committee or members of
thee executive committee.
• Whilst they are not members of the executive committee, Playtech has the ability to appoint and change both the COO and CMO who form
part of the management team (albeit this right has never been exercised). The COO and the CMO are part of the wider management team
butwoubut would not be able to control the relevant activities of Wplay.
• If the option is exercised it would result in Playtech acquiring 49.9% of the voting rights of the operating entity and therefore would not
result in having control. Furthermore, as at 31 December 2022 the option is not exercisable and therefore can be disregarded in the
assessment of power.
Per the above assessment Playtech does not hold power over the investee and as such does not have control.
With regards to the assessment of significant influence, the following facts were considered:
• Playtech has the right to appoint and remove the COO and CMO which is a potential indicator of significant influence given their relative
positions andinvolvemnd involvement in the day-to-day operations of Wplay.
• The standard operator revenue is not considered to give rise to significant influence. However, when combined with the additional B2B
services fee, this is an indicator of significant influence.
• The Group provides additional services to Wplay which Wplay requires to assist it in successfully running its operations, which could be
considered essential technical information.
The Group therefore has significant influence under IAS 28, paragraph 6 over Wplay. However, as the option is not currently exercisable, we have
an investment in associate but with no access to profits. As such the option is fair valued as per paragraph 14 of IAS 28 and shown as a derivative
financial asset in accordance with IFRS 9.
The Group has given an interest-bearing loan of $1.7 million (€1.6 million) to Wplay, which is due for repayment in December 2023 and is included
in loans receivable from related parties (refer to Note 36).
Valuation
The fair value of the option at 31 December 2022 has been estimated using a DCF approach with a market exit multiple assumption. The Group
used a discount rate of 25% (2021: 23%) reflecting the cash flow risks given the high growth rates in place and the relative early stages of the
business, as well as a discount for illiquidity and control until the expected Playtech exit date of December 2026 (2021: expected exit date of
December 2026). The Group used a compound annual growth rate of 24.7% (2021: 27.2%) over the forecasted cash flow period, an average
Adjusted EBITDA margin of 20.6% (2021: 17.5%) and an exit multiple of 9.6x (2021: 9.8x). As part of the agreement, there is a lock-in mechanism
that contractually might prevent Playtech from selling the resulting shares, however an assumption was made that if the exit date assumed in the
model is earlier, then both parties would be in agreement to this earlier exit point, therefore no further discounts were applied post transaction.
Furthermore, Playtech’s share in Wplay was adjusted to reflect the rights to shares that a service provider has under its services agreement with
the Group.
As at 31 December 2022, the fair value of the Wplay derivative financial asset is €93.5 million. The difference of €3.7 million between the fair
value at 31 December 2021 of €97.2 million and the fair value at 31 December 2022 has been recognised as follows:
a. €9.4 million derived from the fair value decrease of the derivative call option calculated using the DCF model in the profit or loss for the year
ended 31 December 2022.
b. €5.7 million derived from the fair value increase due to the exchange rate fluctuation of USD to EUR (as the derivative call option is under a
foreign subsidiary of the Group whose functional currency is USD) in other comprehensive income for the year ended 31Deed 31 December 2022.
194
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
C. Derivative financial assets continued
Wplay continued
Sensitivity analysis
The assumptions and judgements made in the valuation of the derivative financial asset as at 31 December 2022 include the following
sensitivities, noting that factors and circumstances may arise that are outside the Group’s control which could impact the option value:
• A different discount rate within the range of 20% to 30% will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset in the range of €79.5 million –
€111.0 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €89.0 million –
€98.1 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €84.4 million –
€102.6 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €90.1 million –
€97.1 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €86.7 million –
€100.8 million.
• A 1.0 fluctuation on the market exit multiple will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €85.8 million –
€101.2 million.
• If the expected Playtech exit date fluctuates by one year later or earlier, the fair value of the derivative financial asset will change to
€87.8milli8 million and €99.5 million respectively.
Onjoc
In June 2020, Playtech entered into a framework agreement with ONJOC CORP. (“Onjoc”), which holds a license to operate online sports
betting, gaming and gambling activities in Panama. The Group has no equity holding in Onjoc but has an option to acquire 50%. Under the
agreement the Group provides Onjoc its technology products, where it receives standard operator revenue and additional B2B services fee
as per Note 5. If the option is exercised, the Group would no longer provide certain services and, as such, would no longer be entitled to the
additional B2B services fee. The additional B2B services fee was €Nil in the year ended 31 December 2022 (2021: €Nil). The option can be
exercised any time subject to Onjoc having $15.0 million of Gross Gaming Revenue (GGR) over a consecutive 12-month period.
Assessment of control and significant influence
The Group performed an analysis for Onjoc to assess whether it holds power over Onjoc (in accordance with IFRS 10, paragraph 7)
withthefollwith the following considerations:
• Playtech can propose an independent member to the board of directors, who has to be independent to both Playtech and Onjoc,
andaand assuchds such does not have the ability to direct Onjoc’s activities as it has no voting representation on the board;
• Playtech has the right to appoint and remove the COO, CTO and CMO, which although would form part of the wider management team,
wouldnwould not be able to control the relevant activities of Onjoc by themselves; and
• if the option is exercised it would result in Playtech acquiring 50% of the voting rights of the operating entity and therefore would not
result in having control. Furthermore, as at 31 December 2022 the option is not exercisable and therefore can be disregarded in the
assessment of power.
Per the above assessment Playtech does not hold power over the investee and as such does not have control.
With regards to the assessment of significant influence, the following facts were considered:
• Playtech can propose an independent member to the board of directors and has the right to appoint and remove the COO, CTO and CMO
which are potential indicators of significant influence given their relative positions and the involvement in day-to-day operations of Onjoc;
• the standard operator revenue is not considered to give rise to significant influence. However, when combined with the additional B2B
services fee, this is an indicator of significant influence; and
• the Group provides additional services to Onjoc which Onjoc requires to assist it in successfully running its operations which could be
considered essential technical information.
The Group therefore has significant influence under IAS 28, paragraph 6 over Onjoc. However, as the option is not currently exercisable, we have
an investment in associate but with no access to profits. As such the option is fair valued as per paragraph 14 of IAS 28 and shown as a derivative
financial asset in accordance with IFRS 9.
The Group has given an interest-bearing loan to Onjoc of €1.8 million (2021: €1.1 million) which is due for repayment in October 2025 and is
included in loans receivable from related parties (refer to Note 36).
195
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
C. Derivative financial assets continued
Onjoc continued
Valuation
The fair value of the option at 31 December 2022 has been estimated using a DCF approach with a market exit multiple assumption. The Group
used a discount rate of 33% (2021: 31%) reflecting the cash flow risk given the high growth rates in place and the early stages of the business, as
well as a discount for illiquidity and control until the expected Playtech exit date of December 2027 (2021: expected exit date of December 2027).
The Group used a compound annual growth rate of 60.1% (2021: 89.3%) over the forecasted cash flow period and an average Adjusted EBITDA
margin of 20.4% (2021: 3.7%). As part of the agreement, there is a lock-in mechanism that contractually might prevent Playtech from selling the
resulting shares, however an assumption was made that if the exit date assumed in the model is earlier, then both parties would be in agreement
to this earlier exit point, therefore no further discounts applied post transaction. Furthermore, Playtech’s share in Onjoc was adjusted to reflect
the rights to shares that a service provider has under its services agreement with the Group.
As at 31 December 2022, the fair value of the Onjoc derivative financial asset is €8.6 million. The difference of €1.7 million between the fair value
at 31 December 2021 of €6.9 million and the fair value at 31 December 2022 has been recognised as follows:
a. €1.3 million derived from the fair value increase of the derivative call option calculated using the DCF model in the profit or loss in the year
ended 31 December 2022.
b. €0.4 million derived from the fair value increase from the exchange rate fluctuation of USD to EUR (as the derivative call option is under a
foreign subsidiary of the Group whose functional currency is USD) in other comprehensive income in the year ended 31 December 2022.
Sensitivity analysis
The assumptions and judgements made in the valuation of the derivative financial asset as at 31 December 2022 include the following
sensitivities, noting that factors and circumstances may arise that are outside the Group’s control which could impact the option value:
• A different discount rate within the range of 28% to 38% will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset in the range of €7.1 million – €10.5 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €8.1 million – €9.1 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.7 million – €9.5 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.9 million – €9.3 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.3 million – €10.1 million.
• A 1.0 fluctuation on the market exit multiple will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.6 million – €9.7 million.
Tenbet Costa Rica
In addition to the 6% equity holding in Tentech CR S.A as per section B of this note, the Group has an option to acquire 81% equity holding in
Tenbet. Tenbet which is another member of the Tenlot Group, operates online bingo games and casino side games. Playtech provides certain
services to Tenbet in return for its additional B2B services fee. The Group has no equity holding in Tenbet but has an option to acquire 81% equity.
If the option is exercised, the Group would no longer provide certain services to Tenbet and, as such, would no longer be entitled to the additional
B2B services fee. The additional B2B services fee was €Nil in the year ended 31 December 2022 (2021: €Nil). In H1 2022, the Group signed
an amendment to the Tenbet agreement in which the option can be exercised at any time from the end of 35 months (previously 18months) of y 18 months) of
Tenbet going live. The call option to acquire 81% equity holding in Tenbet is exercisable from July 2023 (previously February 2022).
Under the existing agreements, the Group has provided Tenbet with a credit facility of €2.7 million out of which €2.1 million had been drawn down
as at 31 December 2022 (2021: €1.1 million).
Assessment of control and significant influence
The Group assessed whether it holds power over Tenbet (in accordance with IFRS 10, paragraph 7) with the following considerations:
• Playtech does not have the ability to direct Tenbet’s activities as it has no voting representation on the Board of Directors (or equivalent)
orpeor people in managerial positions;
• Playtech has neither the ability to appoint, or change any members of the Board of Tenbet; and
• as at 31 December 2022 the option is not exercisable and therefore can be disregarded in the assessment of power.
Per the above assessment, Playtech does not hold power over the investee and as such does not have control.
With regards to the assessment of significant influence, the standard operator revenue alone is not considered to give rise to significant
influence. However, when combined with the additional B2B services fee, this is an indicator of significant influence. Furthermore, the Group
provides additional services to Tenbet which Tenbet requires to assist it in successfully running its operations that could be considered essential
technical information. Playtech therefore has significant influence under IAS 28, paragraph 6 over Tenbet. However, as the option is not currently
exercisable, we have an investment in associate but with no access to profits. As such the option is fair valued as per paragraph 14 of IAS 28 and
shown as a derivative financial asset in accordance with IFRS 9.
196
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 20 – Investments and derivative financial assets continued
C. Derivative financial assets continued
Tenbet Costa Rica continued
Valuation
The fair value of the option at 31 December 2022 has been estimated using a DCF approach with a market exit multiple assumption. The Group
used a discount rate of 35% (2021: 33%) reflecting the cash flow risk given the high growth rates in place and the early stages of the business, as
well as a discount for illiquidity and control until the expected Playtech exit date of December 2027 (2021: expected exit date of December 2027).
The Group used a compound annual growth rate of 135% (2021: 64.2%) over the forecasted cash flow period and an average Adjusted EBITDA
margin within the range of – 335% to 31% in years 1-5 with an average of -59.8% (2021: average of -10.1%). As part of the agreement, there is a
lock-in mechanism that contractually might prevent Playtech from selling the resulting shares, however an assumption was made that if the exit
date assumed in the model is earlier, then both parties would be in agreement to this earlier exit point. Furthermore, Playtech’s share in Tenbet
was adjusted to reflect the rights to shares that a service provider has under its services agreement with the Group.
As at 31 December 2022, the fair value of the Tenbet derivative financial asset is €8.9 million. The difference of €2.5 million between the fair value
at 31 December 2021 of €11.4 million and the fair value at 31 December 2022 has been recognised as follows:
a. €3.2 million derived from the fair value decrease of the derivative call option calculated using the DCF model in the profit or loss in the year
ended 31 December 2022.
b. €0.7 million derived from the fair value increase from the exchange rate fluctuation of USD to EUR (as the derivative call option is under a
foreign subsidiary of the Group whose functional currency is USD) in other comprehensive income in the year ended 31 December 2022.
Sensitivity analysis
The assumptions and judgements made in the valuation of the derivative financial asset as at 31 December 2022 include the following
sensitivities, noting that factors and circumstances may arise that are outside the Group’s control which could impact the option value:
• A different discount rate within the range of 30% to 40% will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset in the range of €7.2 million – €11.0 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €8.5 million – €9.3 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the Adjusted EBITDA margin will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €8.0 million – €9.8 million.
• A 5% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.9 million – €10.0 million.
• A 10% fluctuation in the revenue growth rate will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €6.9 million – €11.2 million.
• A 1.0 fluctuation on the market exit multiple will result in a fair value of the derivative financial asset within the range of €7.7 million – €10.2 million.
Note 21 – Other non-current assets
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Security deposits3.33.3
Guarantee for gaming licences2.22.6
Prepaid costs relating to Sun Bingo contract63.471.7
Loans receivable (Net of ECL)1.78.1
Loans receivable from related parties (Net of ECL) (Note 36)27.99.5
Other receivables11.19.2
109.6104.4
Note 22 – Trade receivables
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Trade receivables144.5168.6
Related parties (Note 36)20.516.5
Trade receivables – net165.0185.1
Split to:
Non-current assets1.16.6
Current assets163.9178.5
165.0185.1
197
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 23 – Other receivables
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Prepaid expenses23.425.9
VAT and other taxes13.614.1
Security deposits for regulators24.213.1
Prepaid costs relating to Sun Bingo contract3.64.3
Receivable for legal proceedings and disputes
1
16.416.4
Loans receivable
2
(Net of ECL)13.02.1
Loans receivable from related parties (Net of ECL) (Note 36)3.32.4
Other receivables10.18.8
107.687.1
1 Receivable for legal proceedings and disputes relates to funds held in escrow, in relation to a historical and ongoing legal matter. The corresponding liability is included under gaming and other taxes.
The funds will be released when the case is finally settled, in accordance with the escrow agreement.
2 Included in loans receivable above, is a convertible debenture of C$12.25 million (€8.3 million net of ECL) issued to NorthStar Gaming Inc in December 2022 that will convert into equity and warrants
in connection with NorthStar’s proposed reverse takeover (the “RTO”) of Baden Resources Inc. The fair value of the convertible debenture was assessed as being materially in line with its face value
at 31 December 2022.Re2. Refer to Note 40.
Note 24 – Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the statement of cash flows comprises:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Continuing operations
Cash at bank426.8572.4
Deposits0.13.6
426.9576.0
Less: expected credit loss (Note 38A) (0.4)(0.6)
426.5575.4
Treated as held for sale
Cash at bank—71.2
Cash at brokers—293.4
Deposits—1.5
—366.1
Cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows426.9942.1
Less: expected credit loss (Note 38A)(0.4)(0.6)
426.5941.5
Out of the total cash at bank, an amount of €6.8 million were held by payment processors as at 31 December 2022 (2021: €6.9 million).
The Group holds cash balances on behalf of operators in respect of their jackpot games and poker and casino operations, as well as client funds
with respect to B2C. Furthermore, and up to the point of the Financial segment disposal, the Group held CFD and client deposits in relation to
liquidity and clearing activities. All of these are included in current liabilities.
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Continuing operations
Funds attributed to jackpots84.782.2
Security deposits29.628.5
Players’ balances 39.830.4
154.1141.1
Included in liabilities held for sale
Client deposits—138.5
Client funds —170.3
—308.8
198
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 25 – Assets held for sale
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Assets
A. Property, plant and equipment19.620.0
B. Casual CGU——
C. Financials CGU—487.4
D. Investment in associates——
19.6507.4
A. During 2021, the Group entered into a binding agreement for the disposal of a real estate area in Milan for a total consideration of €20.0 million.
Accordingly, the real estate was classified as held for sale.
Of the total consideration, €1.0 million was received during the year ended 31 December 2021. The advance received was classified as part
of the liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale.
At the date of the transfer to assets held for sale, an impairment review was performed, where the carrying amount was compared to the fair
value less expected disposal costs. The carrying value of the land was higher than the fair value less expected selling costs and therefore an
impairment of €12.3 million was recognised in the profit or loss in the year ended 31 December 2021. In addition, €1.8 million of deferred tax
liability relating to the land was recognised in the profit or loss in the prior year. It was the Group’s decision to sell the asset, and subsequently
the prospective buyer was only interested inthe laly interested in the land and not the buildings, which led to this impairment.
The sale has been finalised but the disposal is expected to complete in 2024 with the movement of the trot track from La Maura area to
SanSSan Siro (previously it was expected that the sale would complete during 2022).
B. Following the decision made by the Group in 2019 to dispose the Casual and Social Gaming businesses, the value of the divisions were
classified asheed as held for sale and the results were included in discontinued operations.
On 11 January 2021, the Group entered into an agreement for the disposal of “YoYo”, also included in this division, for a total consideration of
$9.5 million. As a result of this transaction, the Group realised a profit of €7.6 million in the profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2021,
included within the total profit from discontinued operations (refer to Note 8).
The Social and Casual Gaming CGU is now fully disposed.
C. Following the decision made by the Board of Directors in 2020 to dispose of the Financial segment, the division was classified as held for
sale and its results included in discontinued operations.
In September 2021, the Group entered into an agreement to sell this division for a cash consideration of $250.0 million, with the final
consideration being subject to a completion accounts adjustment of up to $25.0 million in either direction, to be determined by the financial
performance of the Financial segment from 1 January 2021 to the completion date.
The disposal was completed in July 2022, with cash consideration after this adjustment of $228.1 million (€223.9 million).
At 31 December 2020 an impairment charge of €221.2 million was recognised against this CGU as a result of comparing its carrying value to
expected proceeds from the disposal, less expected costs to sell. Following a review of the net assets of the unit at 31 December 2021, when
compared to the expected proceeds, €2.0 million of the previously recognised impairment was reversed. The impairment loss allocated
against goodwill cannot be reversed.
199
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 25 – Assets held for sale continued
The profit on disposal of Financial segment was determined as follows:
€’m
Cash consideration received223.9
Transaction costs paid(1.6)
Cash disposed oCash disposed off(392.1)
Net cash outflow on disposal of Financial segment(169.8)
Net assets disposed (other than cash):
Property, plant and equipment(4.3)
Right of use assets(6.3)
Intangible assets(98.0)
Trade and other receivables(13.9)
Deferred tax liability7.0
Trade payables and other payables24.8
Client deposits144.5
Client funds147.1
Income tax payable2.7
Lease liability4.5
Net liability position on disposal of Financial segment208.1
Net cash outflow(169.8)
Net liability position disposed208.1
Recycling of foreign exchange reserve related to the foreign discontinued operations(23.2)
Profit on disposal 15.1
D. In 2020, the Board of Directors made a decision to dispose of its shareholding in two associates and as such their value of €2.2 million
was transferred to assets held for sale. During 2021, the Group entered into an agreement for the disposal of these associates for a total
consideration of €2.2 million.
Note 26 – Shareholders’ equity
A. Share capital
Share capital is comprised of no par value shares as follows:
2022
Number
of shares
2021
Number
of shares
Authorised
1
N/AN/A
Issued and paid up309,294,243309,294,243
1 The Company has no authorised share capital, but it is authorised to issue up to 1,000,000,000 shares of no par value.
The table below shows the movement of the shares:
Shares in issue/
circulation
Number of sharesTreasury shares
Shares held by
2014 EBT
Shares held by
2021 EBTTot al
At 1 January 2021297,603,8159,965,8891,724,539—309,294,243
Transfer to EBT—(7,028,339)—7,028,339—
Exercise of options1,640,511—(1,640,511)——
At 31 December 2021/1 January 2022299,244,3262,937,55084,0287,028,339309,294,243
Exercise of options1,743,990—(84,028)(1,659,962)—
At 31 December 2022300,988,3162,937,550—5,368,377309,294,243
200
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 26 – Shareholders’ equity continued
B. Employee Benefit Trust
2014 EBT
In 2014, the Group established an Employee Benefit Trust (2014 EBT) by acquiring 5,517,241 shares for a total of €48.5 million. During the year
ended 31 December 2022, 84,028 shares (2021: 1,640,511 shares) were issued at a cost of €0.6 million (2021: €13.9 million).
2021 EBT
In 2021 the Company transferred 7,028,339 shares held by the Company in treasury to the Employee Benefit Trust (2021 EBT) for a total
of €22.6 million. During the year ended 31 December 2022, 1,659,962 shares (2021: Nil) were issued at a cost of €5.4 million (2021: €Nil).
Asat 31 DeAs at 31 December 2022, a balance of 5,368,377 shares (2021: 7,028,339 shares) remains in the 2021 EBT with a cost of €17.2 million
(2021:(2021: €22.6 million).
C. Share options exercised
During the year 1,794,438 (2021: 1,873,307) share options were exercised, of which 50,448 were cash settled (2021: 232,796).
D. Distribution of dividends
During 2022 the Group did not pay any dividends.
E. Reserves
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within owners’ equity:
ReserveDescription and purpose
Additional paid in capitalShare premium (i.e. amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value)
Employee Benefit TrustCost of own shares held in treasury by the trust
Put/call options reserveFair value of put/call options as part of business acquisition
Foreign exchange reserveGains/losses arising on retranslating the net assets of overseas operations
Employee termination indemnitiesGains/losses arising from the actuarial remeasurement of the employee termination indemnities
Non-controlling interestThe portion of equity ownership in a subsidiary not attributable to the owners of the Company
Retained earningsCumulative net gains and losses recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income
Note 27 – Loans and borrowings
The credit facility of the Group is a revolving credit facility (RCF) which has been restructured during the year. The facility has been reduced
from€317from €317.0 million to €277.0 million and is available until October 2025, with an option to extend by 12 months. Interest payable on the loan
isbais based on SONIA rates (replacing Euro Libor and Libor rates) based on the currency of each withdrawal. Following the announcement of
the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as to the future cessation or loss of representativeness of the 35 Libor benchmark, effective from
1Jan1 January 2022, Libor rates were replaced with the SONIA daily rate (Sterling overnight index average). As at the reporting date the credit facility
drawn amounted to €Nil (2021: €167.1 million).
Under the RCF, the covenants are monitored on a regular basis by the finance department, including modelling future projected cash flows
under a number of scenarios to stress-test any risk of covenant breaches, the results of which are reported to management and the Board of
Directors. The covenants are as follows:
• Leverage: Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA 3.5:1 (2021: 3:1)
As at 31 December 2022 and 2021 the Group met these financial covenants.
201
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 28 – Bonds
2018 Bond
€’m
2019 Bond
€’m
Tot al
€’m
At 1 January 2021526.3346.8873.1
Release of capitalised expenses1.30.61.9
At 31 December 2021/1 January 2022527.6347.4875.0
Repayment of bonds(330.0)—(330.0)
Release of capitalised expenses2.00.62.6
At 31 December 2022199.6348.0547.6
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Split to:
Non-current348.0875.0
Current199.6—
547.6875.0
Bonds
(a) 2018 Bond
On 12 October 2018, the Group issued €530 million of senior secured notes (the “2018 Bond”) maturing in October 2023. During the year, the
Group partially repaid the 2018 Bond by €330 million. The net proceeds of issuing the 2018 Bond after deducting commissions and other
direct costs of issue totalled €523.4 million. Commissions and other direct costs of issue have been offset against the principal balance and are
amortised over the period of the 2018 Bond.
The issue price was 100% of its principal amount and bears interest from 12 October 2018 at the rate of 3.75% per annum payable semi-annually,
in arrears, on 12 April and 12 October commencing on 12 April 2019.
The fair value of the Bond as Level 1 at 31 December 2022 was €198.8 million (2021: €536.1 million).
(b) 2019 Bond
On 7 March 2019, the Group issued €350 million of senior secured notes (the “2019 Bond”) maturing in March 2026. The net proceeds of issuing
the 2019 Bond after deducting commissions and other direct costs of issue totalled €345.7 million. Commissions and other direct costs of issue
have been offset against the principal balance and are amortised over the period of the 2019 Bond.
The issue price is 100% of its principal amount and bears interest from 7 March 2019 at a rate of 4.25% per annum payable semi-annually,
inarreain arrears, on7Septembn 7 September and 7 March commencing on 7 September 2019.
The fair value of the Bond as Level 1 at 31 December 2022 was €331.6 million (2021: €358.3 million).
As at 31 December 2022 and 2021 the Group met the required interest cover financial covenant of 2:1 Adjusted EBITDA/interest ratio,
forthecofor the combined 2018 and 2019 Bonds.
Note 29 – Provisions for risks and charges, litigation and contingent liabilities
The Group is involved in proceedings before civil and administrative courts, and other legal or potential legal actions related to its business,
including certain matters related to previous acquisitions. Based on the information currently available, and taking into consideration the existing
provisions for risks, the Group currently considers that such proceedings and potential actions will not result in an adverse effect upon the
financial statements; however, where this is not considered to be remote, they have been disclosed as contingent liabilities.
All the matters were subject to a review and estimate by the Board of Directors based on the information available at the date of preparation of
these financial statements and, where appropriate, supported by updated legal opinions from independent professionals. These provisions are
classified based on the Directors’ assessment of the progress and probabilities of success of each case at each reporting date.
Movements of the provisions outstanding as at 31 December 2022 are shown below:
Legal and
regulatory
€’m
Contractual
€’m
Other
€’m
Total
€’m
Balance at 1 January 20226.96.73.116.7
Provisions made during the year1.0—0.91.9
Provisions used during the year(0.1 )(0.5)(0.4)(1.0)
Provisions reversed during the year(0.5)(2.0)(1.2)(3.7)
Balance at 31 December 20227.34.22.413.9
202
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 29 – Provisions for risks and charges, litigation and contingent liabilities continued
Legal and
regulatory
€’m
Contractual
€’m
Other
€’m
Total
€’m
2021
Non-current6.93.53.113.5
Current—3.2—3.2
6.96.73.116.7
2022
Non-current7.30.32.410.0
Current—3.9—3.9
7.34.22.413.9
Provision for legal and regulatory issues
The Group is subject to proceedings and potential claims regarding complex legal matters (including those related to previous acquisitions),
which are subject to a different degree of uncertainty. Provisions are held for various legal and regulatory issues that relate to matters arising in
the normal course of business, including in particular various disputes that arose in relation to the operation of the various licenses held by the
Group’s subsidiary Snaitech. The uncertainty is due to complex legislative and licensing frameworks in the various territories in which the Group
operates. The Group also operates in certain jurisdictions where legal and regulatory matters can take considerable time for the required local
processes to be completed and the matters to be resolved.
Contractual claims
The Group is subject to historic claims relating to contractual matters that arise with customers in the normal course of business. The Group
believes they have a robust defence to the claims raised and has provided for the likely settlement where an outflow of funds is probable. The
uncertainty relates to complex contractual dealings with a wide range of customers in various jurisdictions, and because as noted above, the
Group operates in certain jurisdictions where contractual disputes can take considerable time to be resolved in the local legal system.
Given the uncertainties inherent, it is difficult to predict with certainty the outlay (or the timing thereof) which will derive from these matters. It is
therefore possible that the value of the provisions may vary further to future developments. The Group monitors the status of these matters and
consults with its advisers and experts on legal and tax-related matters in arriving at the provisions recorded. The provisions included represent
the Directors’ best estimate of the potential outlay and none of the matters provided for are individually material to the financial statements.
Accounting for uncertain tax positions
The Group is subject to various forms of tax in a number of jurisdictions. Given the nature of the industry and the jurisdictions within which the
Group operates, the tax, legal and regulatory regimes are continuously changing and subject to differing interpretations. As such, the Group
is exposed to a small number of uncertain tax positions and open audits/enquiries. Judgement is applied in order to adequately provide for
uncertain tax positions where it is believed that it is more likely than not that an economic outflow will arise. The Group has provided for uncertain
tax positions which meet the recognition threshold and these positions are included within tax liabilities. There is a risk that additional liabilities
could arise. Given the uncertainty and the complexity of application of international tax in the sector, it is not feasible to accurately quantify any
possible range of liability or exposure, and this has therefore not been disclosed.
Note 30 – Contingent consideration and redemption liability
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Non-current contingent consideration and redemption liability consists of:
Non-current redemption liability
Acquisition of Statscore SP Z.O.O.—6.0
Non-current contingent consideration
Acquisition of Aus GMTC PTY Ltd2.1—
Others0.2—
Total non-current contingent consideration and redemption liability2.36.0
Current contingent consideration consists of:
Acquisition of Eyecon Limited—3.6
Amount payable to Aquila Global Group SAS (“Wplay”) (Note 20)—0.8
Other acquisitions 0.60.6
Total current contingent consideration0.65.0
Total contingent consideration and redemption liability2.911.0
203
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 30 – Contingent consideration and redemption liability continued
The maximum contingent consideration and redemption liability payable is as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Acquisition of Eyecon Limited—3.6
Acquisition of HPYBET Austria GmbH—15.0
Interest in Aquila Global Group SAS (“Wplay”)—0.9
Acquisition of Statscore SP Z.O.O.—15.0
Acquisition of Aus GMTC PTY Ltd46.7—
Other acquisitions0.86.8
47.541.3
Note 31 – Trade payables
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Suppliers47.033.5
Customer liabilities14.27.8
61.241.3
Note 32 – Deferred tax
The movement on the deferred tax is as shown below:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Balance at 1 January14.0(82.5)
Charge to profit or loss (Note 14)(26.3)96.3
Exchange dierchange differences—0.2
At 31 December(12.3)14.0
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Split as:
Deferred tax liability (124.8)(88.9)
Deferred tax asset112.5102.9
(12.3)14.0
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there is a legally enforceable right of offset, in accordance with IAS 12.
As at 31 December 2022, the Directors continued to recognise deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences and tax losses carried
forward, with the latter only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses can be
utilised. Please refer to Note 14 for the assessment performed on the recognition of deferred tax in the period.
Details of the deferred tax outstanding as at 31 December 2022 and 2021 are as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Deferred tax recognised on Group restructuring56.863.6
Tax losses75.974.1
Other temporary and deductible dierary and deductible differences(145.0)(123.7)
Total (12.3)14.0
Details of the deferred tax, amounts recognised in profit or loss are as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Accelerated capital allowances(1.3)76.8
Employee pension liabilities(0.3)0.1
Other temporary and deductible dierary and deductible differences(26.6)(15.5)
Leases(0.1)—
Tax losses2.034.9
Total (26.3)96.3
204
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 33 – Other payables
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Non-current liabilities
Payroll and related expenses23.910.8
Other 1.02.0
24.912.8
Current liabilities
Payroll and related expenses96.581.7
Accrued expenses48.267.4
VAT payable3.03.8
Interest payable7.410.4
Other payables14.02.9
169.1166.2
Note 34 – Gaming and other taxes payable
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Gaming tax 112.5105.3
Other 0.30.1
112.8105.4
Note 35 – Acquisitions during the year
On 30 August 2022, the Group acquired 100% of the share capital of Aus GMTC PTY Ltd (“Aus GMTC”) which creates content and
online games.
The Group paid a total cash consideration of €2.9 million (US$3.0 million), with an additional consideration (capped at US$50.0 million) in
cash payable in 2025 based on a pre-defined EBITDA calculation resulting from the performance of the developed games active during the
year ending 30 September 2025. The consideration is calculated based on four times the pre-defined EBITDA for that year, less the cash
consideration already paid, plus the €1.8 million loan provided to the acquired company pre-acquisition.
Details of the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, purchase consideration and goodwill, are as follows:
Fair value of the
identifiable assets,
liabilities and
goodwill acquired
€’m
Net book value of liabilities acquired(0.5)
Fair value of IP Technology acquired2.9
Total net assets acquired2.4
Fair value of consideration6.8
Goodwill arising on acquisition 4.4
Fair value of
consideration paid
and payable
€’m
Cash consideration2.9
Non-current contingent consideration3.9
Fair value of consideration 6.8
Adjustments to fair value include the following:
Amount
€’m
Amortisation
%
IP Technology2.933.3
The main factor leading to the recognition of goodwill is the future games to be developed by the studio and the assembled work force who have
significant experience in the field of game design and development. The resulting goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. The acquisition
represents its own CGU and in accordance with IAS 36 the Group will regularly monitor the carrying value of this.
205
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 35 – Acquisitions during the year continued
Management has used the replacement cost methodology in determining the fair value of the IP Technology acquired.
The future consideration is €3.9 million, discounted at 35% based on Damodaran’s Target Rates of Return – Stage in Life Cycle, and is calculated
based on the estimated future EBITDA of the studio. The €1.8 million loan provided to the company pre-acquisition has been deducted against
the future consideration in Note 30.
Management has not disclosed Aus GMTC’s contribution to the Group profit since the acquisition nor the impact the acquisition would have
hadohad on the Group’s revenue and profits if it had occurred on 1 January 2022, because the amounts are negligible.
Note 36 – Related parties
Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party’s
making of financial or operational decisions, or if both parties are controlled by the same third party. Also, a party is considered to be related if
amema member of the key management personnel has the ability to control the other party.
During the year, Group companies entered into the following transactions with related parties which are not members of the Group:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Revenue
Investments in associates132.795.0
Interest income
Investments in associates0.80.1
The revenue from investments in associates includes income from Caliplay, Galera, Wplay, Onjoc and Tenbet. The interest income relates to the
same companies except Caliplay.
The following amounts were outstanding at the reporting date:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Trade receivables (Note 22)
Associates 20.516.5
Loans and interest receivable – current (Note 23)
Associates 3.42.4
Loans and interest receivable – non-current (Note 21)
Associates 29.09.5
The loans and interest receivables above do not include the expected credit losses. For the year ended 31 December 2022, the Group
recognised a provision for expected credit losses of €0.1 million relating to amounts owed by related parties in less than one year (2021: €Nil)
and€and €1.1 million for more than one year.
The loans due from related parties are further disclosed in Note 20.
Key management personnel compensation which includes the Board members (Executive and Non-executive Directors) and senior
management personnel comprised the following:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Short-term employee benefits13.614.2
Post-employment benefits0.10.1
Termination benefits1.20.1
Share-based payments2.24.3
17.118.7
The Group is aware that a partnership in which a member of key management personnel (who is not a Board member) has a non-controlling
interest provides certain advisory and consulting services to third-party service providers of the Group in connection with certain of the Group’s
structured and other commercial agreements. The partnership contracts with and is compensated by the third-party service providers, and the
Group has no direct arrangement with the partnership. The total paid to this partnership by the third-party service providers was €5.9 million
(2021: €3.0 million).
206
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 37– Subsidiaries
Details of the Group’s principal subsidiaries as at the end of the year are set out below:
NameCountry of incorporation
Proportion of voting
rights and ordinary
share capital heldNature of business
Playtech Holdings LimitedIsle of Man100%Main trading company of the Group up to December 2020, owns the
intellectual property rights and licenses the software to customers.
From January 2021 onwards, the principal activity is the holding of
investment in subsidiaries
Playtech Software LimitedUnited Kingdom100%Main trading company from 2021 onwards, owns the intellectual
property rights and licenses the software to customers
Video B Holding LimitedBritish Virgin Islands100%Trading company for the Videobet software, owns the intellectual
property rights of Videobet and licenses it to customers. From
January 2021 onwards, the principal activity is the holding of
investment in subsidiaries
Playtech Services (Cyprus) LimitedCyprus100%Activates the iPoker Network in regulated markets. Owns the
intellectual property of the GTS, Ash and Geneity businesses
VB (Video) Cyprus LimitedCyprus100%Trading company for the Videobet product to Romanian companies
Virtue Fusion (Alderney) LimitedAlderney100%Online bingo and casino software provider
Intelligent Gaming Systems LimitedUnited Kingdom100%Casino management systems to land-based businesses
VF 2011 LimitedAlderney100%Holds licence in Alderney for online gaming and Bingo B2C operations
PT Turnkey Services LimitedIsle of Man100%Holding company of the Turnkey Services group
PT Entertenimiento Online EADBulgaria100%Poker and Bingo network for Spain
CSMS LimitedBulgaria100%Consulting and online technical support, data mining processing
andadvertising services to Grand advertising services to Group companies
207
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
NameCountry of incorporation
Proportion of voting
rights and ordinary
share capital heldNature of business
Mobenga AB LimitedSweden100%Mobile sportsbook betting platform developer
PokerStrategy LtdGibraltar100%Operates poker community business
Snai Rete Italia S.r.l.Italy100%Italian retail betting market
PT Services UA LTDUkraine100%Designs, develops and manufactures software
Trinity Bet Operations LtdMalta100%Retail and Digital Sports Betting
Euro live Technologies SIALatvia100%Global broadcaster providing innovative video stream services
forusers wfor users worldwide
Gaming Technology Solutions LimitedUnited Kingdom100%Provision of B2B services within Bingo, Virtual Sports, Sports Betting
and Games Development
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management
The Group has exposure to the following risks arising from financial instruments:
• Credit risk;
• Liquidity risk; and
• Market risk.
There have been no substantive changes in the Group’s exposure to financial instrument risks, its objectives, policies and processes for
managing those risks or the methods used to measure them from previous periods unless otherwise stated in this note.
The principal financial instruments of the Group, from which financial instrument risks arises, are as follows:
• Trade receivables;
• Loans receivable;
• Convertible loans;
• Cash and cash equivalents;
• Investments in equity securities;
• Derivative financial assets;
• Trade payables;
• Bonds;
• Loans and borrowings; and
• Contingent consideration and redemption liability.
Note 37– Subsidiaries continued
208
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management continued
Financial instrument by category
The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy.
Carrying amountFair value
Note
Measurement
category
2022
€’m
Level 1
€’m
Level 2
€’m
Level 3
€’m
31 December 2022
Continuing operations
Non-current financial assets
Equity investments20BFVTPL9.21.4—7.8
Derivative financial assets20CFVTPL636.4——636.4
Trade receivables22Amortised cost1.1———
Loans receivable21Amortised cost29.6———
Current financial assets
Trade receivables22Amortised cost163.9———
Convertible loans23FVTPL8.3——8.3
Loans receivables23Amortised cost8.0———
Cash and cash equivalents24Amortised cost426.5———
Non-current liabilities
Bonds28Amortised cost348.0———
Lease liability18Amortised cost54.0———
Contingent consideration and redemption liability30FVTPL2.3——2.3
Current liabilities
Bonds28Amortised cost199.6———
Trade payables31Amortised cost61.2———
Lease liability18Amortised cost31.8———
Progressive operators’ jackpots and security deposits24Amortised cost114.3———
Client funds24Amortised cost39.8———
Contingent consideration and redemption liability30FVTPL0.6——0.6
Interest payable33Amortised cost7.4———
209
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management continued
Financial instrument by category continued
Note
Measurement
category
Carrying amountFair value
2021
€’m
Level 1
€’m
Level 2
€’m
Level 3
€’m
31 December 2021
Continuing operations
Non-current financial assets
Equity investments20BFVTPL8.11.6—6.5
Derivative financial assets20CFVTPL622.2——622.2
Trade receivables22Amortised cost6.6———
Convertible loans21FVTPL3.7——3.7
Loans receivable21Amortised cost13.9———
Current financial assets
Trade receivables22Amortised cost178.5———
Loans receivables21Amortised cost4.5———
Cash and cash equivalents24Amortised cost575.4———
Non-current liabilities
Bonds28Amortised cost875.0———
Loans and borrowings27Amortised cost167.1———
Lease liability18Amortised cost69.8———
Contingent consideration and redemption liability30FVTPL6.0——6.0
Current liabilities
Trade payables31Amortised cost41.3———
Lease liability18Amortised cost20.3———
Progressive operators’ jackpots and security deposits24Amortised cost110.7———
Client funds24Amortised cost30.4———
Contingent consideration and redemption liability30FVTPL5.0——5.0
Interest payable33 Amortised cost10.4———
Treated as held for sale
Current financial assets
Cash and cash equivalentsAmortised cost366.1———
Current liabilities
Trade payablesAmortised cost0.4———
Lease liabilityAmortised cost5.2———
Client depositsAmortised cost138.5———
Client fundsAmortised cost170.3———
The fair value of the contingent consideration and redemption liability is calculated by discounting the estimated cash flows. The valuation model
considers the present value of the expected future payments, discounted using a risk adjusted discount rate.
For details of the fair value hierarchy, valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs relating to determining the fair value of derivative
financial assets, which are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, refer to Note 20C.
The carrying amount does not materially differ from the fair value of the financial assets and liabilities.
The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of the Group’s risk management objectives and policies and, whilst retaining ultimate
responsibility for them, it has delegated the authority for designing and operating processes that ensure the effective implementation of the
objectives and policies to the Group’s Finance function. The overall objective of the Board is to set policies that seek to reduce risk as far as
possible without unduly affecting the Group’s competitiveness and flexibility.
Further details regarding these policies are set out below:
210
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management continued
A. Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a counterparty will not meet its obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract, leading to a financial loss.
The Group is exposed to credit risk from its operating activities (primarily trade receivables), its investing activities through loans made and from
its financing activities, including deposits with banks and financial institutions. After the impairment analysis performed at the reporting date,
theexpethe expected credit losses (ECLs) are €4.9 million (2021: €7.4 million).
Cash and cash equivalents
The Group held cash and cash equivalents (before ECL) of €426.9 million as at 31 December 2022 (2021: €576.0 million). The cash and cash
equivalents are held with bank and financial institution counterparties, which are rated from Caa- to AA+, based on Moody’s ratings.
Impairment on cash and cash equivalents has been measured on a 12-month expected credit loss basis and reflects the short maturities
of the exposures. The Group considers that its cash and cash equivalents have low credit risk based on the external credit ratings of the
counterparties. The Group uses a similar approach for assessment of ECLs for cash and cash equivalents to those used for trade receivables.
The ECL on cash balances as at 31 December 2022 is €0.4 million (2021: €0.6 million).
A reasonable movement in the inputs of the ECL calculation of cash and cash equivalents does not materially change the ECL to be recognised.
Tot al
€’m
Financial institutions
with A- and
above rating
€’m
Financial institutions
with below A- rating
and no rating
€’m
Continuing operations
At 31 December 2022426.9214.2212.7
At 31 December 2021576.0291.7284.3
Treated as held for sale
At 31 December 2022———
At 31 December 2021366.1291.974.2
Trade receivables
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. However, management also
considers the factors that may influence the credit risk of its customer base, including the default risk associated with the industry and country
inwhiin which customers operate.
As at 31 December 2022, the Group has trade receivables of €165.0 million (2021: €185.1 million) which is net of an allowance for ECL
of€4of €4.5m.5 million (2021: €6.8 million).
The Group applies the IFRS 9 simplified approach to measuring expected credit losses which uses a lifetime expected loss allowance for all
trade receivables. To measure the ECL, trade receivables have been grouped based on shared credit risk characteristics and the days past due.
The expected loss rates are calculated based on past default experience and an assessment of the future economic environment. The ECL is
calculated with reference to the ageing and risk profile of the balances.
The carrying amounts of financial assets represent the maximum credit exposure.
Set out below is the movement in the allowance for expected credit losses of trade receivables:
31 December 2022
Total
€’m
Not past due
€’m
1–2 months
overdue
€’m
More than
2 months
past due
€’m
Expected credit loss rate2.7%3.0%1.1%2.9%
Gross carrying amount169.5124.927.217.5
Expected credit loss(4.5)(3.7)(0.3)(0.5)
Trade receivables – net165.0121.226.917.0
31 December 2021
Tot al
€’m
Not past due
€’m
1–2 months
overdue
€’m
More than
2 months
past due
€’m
Expected credit loss rate3.5%4.2%1.6%1.9%
Gross carrying amount191.9139.632.619.7
Expected credit loss(6.8)(5.9)(0.5)(0.4)
Trade receivables – net185.1133.732.119.3
A reasonable movement in the inputs of the ECL calculation of trade receivables does not materially change the ECL to be recognised.
Impairment losses on trade receivables and contract assets are presented as net impairment losses within the impairment of financial assets.
Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the same line item.
211
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management continued
A. Credit risk continued
Trade receivables continued
The movement in the ECL in respect of trade receivables during the year was as follows:
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Balance at 1 January6.821.7
Charged to profit or loss(2.3)(14.9)
Balance at 31 December4.56.8
Loans receivable
The Group recognised an allowance for expected credit losses for all debt instruments given to third parties based on past default experience
and assessment of the future economic environment. For the year ended 31 December 2022, the Group recognised provision for expected
credit losses of €1.6 million in the profit or loss relating to loans receivable (2021: €Nil).
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Balance at 1 January——
Charged to profit or loss1.6—
Balance at 31 December1.6—
Furthermore, €3.0 million of an existing loan to Gameco was impaired as at 31 December 2022 (refer to Note 20B). At 31 December 2021,
therewas a lothere was a loan impairment of €1.2 million relating to BGO.
B. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting the obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by
delivering cash or another financial asset. The Group’s objective when managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will have sufficient
liquidity to meet its liabilities when they are due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking
damage to the Group’s reputation.
The following are the remaining contractual maturities of financial liabilities at the reporting date. The amounts are gross and undiscounted and
include contractual interest payments. Balances due within one year equal their carrying balances as the impact of discounting is not significant.
Contractual cash flows
2022
Carrying amount
€’m
Total
€’m
Within 1 year
€’m
1–5 years
€’m
More than 5 years
€’m
Bonds547.6604.6221.1383.5—
Lease liability85.8110.234.143.133.0
Contingent consideration and redemption liability2.97.90.27.7—
Trade payables61.261.261.2——
Progressive and other operators’ jackpots114.3114.3114.3——
Client funds39.839.839.8——
Interest payable7.47.47.4——
Provisions for risks and charges13.913.93.910.0—
872.9959.3482.0444.333.0
2021
Loans and borrowings167.1173.83.3170.5—
Bonds875.0979.734.8944.9—
Lease liability90.1107.122.359.725.1
Contingent consideration and redemption liability11.011.65.16.5—
Trade payables41.341.341.3——
Progressive and other operators’ jackpots110.7110.7110.7——
Client funds30.430.430.4——
Interest payable10.410.410.4——
Provisions for risks and charges16.716.73.213.5—
1,352.71,481.7261.51,195.125.1
212
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 38 – Financial instruments and risk management continued
C. Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices, will affect the Group’s
income or the value of its holding of financial instruments.
The objective of market risk management is to manage and control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters while optimising
the return.
Currency risk
Currency risk is the risk that the value of financial instruments will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates.
Foreign exchange risk arises because the Group has operations located in various parts of the world. However, the functional currency of those
operations is the same as the Group’s primary currency (Euro) and the Group is not substantially exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates in
respect of assets held overseas.
Foreign exchange risk also arises when the Group operations enters into foreign transactions, and when the Group holds cash balances,
incuin currencies denominated in a currency other than the functional currency.
31 December 2022
In EUR
€’m
In USD
€’m
In GBP
€’m
In other
currencies
€’m
Total
€’m
Continuing operations
Cash and cash equivalents338.55.860.222.4426.9
Progressive operators’ jackpots and security deposits(139.0)(0.2)(14.9)—(154.1)
Cash and cash equivalents less client funds199.55.645.322.4272.8
31 December 2021
In EUR
€’m
In USD
€’m
In GBP
€’m
In other
currencies
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Continuing operations
Cash and cash equivalents477.434.941.522.2576.0
Progressive operators’ jackpots and security deposits(126.6)(0.1 )(14.4)—(141.1)
Cash and cash equivalents less client funds350.834.827.122.2434.9
31 December 2021
In EUR
€’m
In USD
€’m
In GBP
€’m
In other
currencies
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Treated as held for sale
Cash and cash equivalents85.1211.144.425.5366.1
Client funds and client deposits(63.7)(208.6)(12.1 )(24.4)(308.8)
Cash and cash equivalents less client funds21.42.532.31.157.3
The Group’s policy is not to enter into any currency hedging transactions.
Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market interest rates.
The Group’s exposure to the risk of changes in market interest rates relates primarily to the Group’s long-term debt obligations with floating
interest rates. The Group manages its interest rate risk by having a balanced portfolio of fixed and variable rate bonds and loans and borrowings.
At 31 December 2022, none of the Group’s borrowings are at a variable rate of interest (2021: 16%).
Any reasonably possible change to the interest rate would have an immaterial effect on the interest payable.
Equity price risk
The Group is exposed to market risk by way of holding some investments in other companies on a short-term basis. Variations in market value
over the life of these investments will have an immaterial impact on the balance sheet and the statement of comprehensive income.
213
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the financial statements continued
Note 39 – Reconciliation of movement of liabilities to cash flows arising from financing activities
Liabilities
Loans and
borrowings
€’m
Bonds
€’m
Interest on
loans and
borrowings
and bonds
€’m
Contingent
consideration
and redemption
liability
€’m
Lease
liabilities
€’m
Tot al
€’m
Balance at 1 January 2022167.1875.010.411.095.31,158.8
Changes from financing cash flows
Interest payable on bonds and loans and borrowings——(36.7)——(36.7)
Repayment of loans and borrowings(166.1)————(166.1)
Repayment of bonds—(330.0)———(330.0)
Payment of contingent consideration
andredempand redemption liability———(5.9)—(5.9)
Principal paid on lease liability————(22.5)(22.5)
Interest paid on lease liability————(5.7)(5.7)
Total changes from financing cash flows(166.1)(330.0)(36.7)(5.9)(28.2)(566.9)
Other changes
Liability related
New leases————19.019.0
Interest on bonds, bank borrowings and
otherborrother borrowings—2.633.6——36.2
Interest on lease liability————5.75.7
Movement in deferred and contingent
consideration and redemption liability———(4.3)—(4.3)
Payment of contingent consideration related
toinvto investments———(1.0)—(1.0)
Additional contingent consideration———2.9—2.9
Disposal of subsidiary/discontinued operations————(4.7)(4.7)
Note 4 – New standards, interpretations and amendments adopted by the Group
New standards, interpretations and amendments adopted from 1 January 2022
The Company applied for the first time certain standards and amendments, which are effective for annual periods beginning on or after
1January 2022, but do not have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective
There a number of standards, amendments to standards, and interpretations which have been issued by the IASB that are effective in future
accounting periods that the Company has decided not to adopt early.
The amendments are applied retrospectively for annual periods on or after 1 January 2023:
• Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements and IFRS Practice Statement 2 Disclosure of Accounting Policies.
The amendments change the requirements in IAS 1 with regard to disclosure of accounting policies. The amendments replace all instances
of the term “significant accounting policies” with “material accounting policy information”. Accounting policy information is material if, when
considered together with other information included in an entity’s financial statements, it can reasonably be expected to influence decisions
thatthe primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the basis of those financial statements.
The supporting paragraphs in IAS 1 are also amended to clarify that accounting policy information that relates to immaterial transactions, other
events or conditions is immaterial and need not be disclosed. Accounting policy information may be material because of the nature of the related
transactions, other events or conditions, even if the amounts are immaterial. However, not all accounting policy information relating to material
transactions, other events or conditions is itself material.
The amendments to IAS 1 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023, with earlier application permitted, and are
applied prospectively. The amendments to IFRS Practice Statement 2 do not contain an effective date or transition requirements.
• Amendments to IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors: Definition of Accounting Estimates.
The amendments replace the definition of a change in accounting estimates with a definition of accounting estimates. Under the new definition,
accounting estimates are “monetary amounts in financial statements that are subject to measurement uncertainty”.
The definition of a change in accounting estimates was deleted. However, the Board retained the concept of changes in accounting estimates
inthe standard with the following clarifications:
• A change in accounting estimate that results from new information or new developments is not the correction of an error.
• The effects of a change in an input or a measurement technique used to develop an accounting estimate are changes in accounting estimates
if they do not result from the correction of prior period errors.
The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023 to changes in accounting policies and changes in
accounting estimates that occur on or after the beginning of that period, with earlier application permitted.
The Company does not expect any other standards issued by the IASB, but not yet effective, to have a material impact on the Company.
218
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 4 – New standards, interpretations and amendments adopted by the Group continued
New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective continued
The following amendments are effective for the period beginning 1 January 2024:
• Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements: Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current and Classification
ofLiabilities as Current or Non-current – deferral of effective date.
The amendments affect only the presentation of liabilities as current or non-current in the statement of financial position and not the amount
oftiming of recognition of any asset, income or expenses, or the information disclosed about those items.
The amendments clarify that the classification of liabilities as current or non-current is based on the rights that are in existence at the end of the
reporting period, specify that the classification is unaffected by expectations about whether an entity will exercise its right to defer settlement
of a liability, explain the rights that are in existence if covenants are complied with at the end of the reporting period, and introduce a definition
of“settlement” to make clear that settlement refers to the transfer to the counterparty of cash, equity instruments, other assets or services.
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below. The Company has consistently
applied the following accounting policies to all relevant periods, except if mentioned otherwise.
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. The Company “controls” an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns
from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
Investments in subsidiary companies are stated at cost less provision for impairment in value, which is recognised as an expense in the period
inwhich the impairment is identified. Subsequent changes in value include employee share option additions and subsidiary capital contributions
in the form of debt settlement.
Associates
An associate is an entity over which the Company has significant influence and is neither a subsidiary nor an interest in a joint venture. Significant
influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies.
The existence of significant influence by an entity is usually evidenced in one or more of the following ways in accordance with IAS 28 Investment
in Associates and Joint Ventures, paragraph 6:
• representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee;
• participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends or other distributions;
• material transactions between the entity and its investee;
• interchange of managerial personnel; or
• provision of essential technical information.
The results and assets and liabilities of associates are incorporated in these financial statements using the equity method of accounting.
Under the equity method, an investment in associate is initially recognised in the balance sheet at cost and adjusted thereafter to recognise
theCompany’s share of the profit or loss and other comprehensive income of the associate.
Interest income
Interest income is recognised over time, on a time-proportion basis, using the effective interest method.
Interest expense
Interest expense is charged to profit or loss over the time the relevant interest relates to.
Foreign currencies
The financial statements are presented in the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates, the Euro (€)
(itsfunctional currency).
In preparing the financial statements, transactions in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency (foreign currencies) are recorded at
the rates of exchange prevailing on the dates of the transactions. At each reporting date, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rates prevailing on the reporting date. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are denominated in foreign currencies are
retranslated at the rates prevailing on the date when the fair value was determined. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical
cost in a foreign currency are notretranslated.
Exchange differences arising on the settlements of monetary items and on the retranslation of monetary items are included in profit or loss for
the period. Exchange differences arising on the retranslation of non-monetary items, carried at fair value, are included in profit or loss for the
period except for differences arising on the retranslation of non-monetary items in respect of which gains and losses are recognised in other
comprehensive income and then equity.
Dividends
Dividend distribution to the Company’s shareholders is recognised in the Company’s financial statements in the year in which they are approved
by the Company’s shareholders.
219
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
Financial instruments
(i) Recognition
Trade receivables and debt securities issued are initially recognised when they are originated. All other financial assets and liabilities are initially
recognised when the Company becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instruments.
Financial assets
(ii) Classification
The Company classifies its financial assets at amortised cost.
The classification depends on the Company’s business model for managing the financial assets and the contractual terms of the cash flows.
Financial assets are not reclassified subsequent to their initial recognition unless the Company changes its business model for managing
financial assets, in which case all affected financial assets are classified on the first day of the first reporting period following the change in
business model.
(iii) Measurement
The classification of financial assets at initial recognition depends on the financial asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics and the
Company’s business model for managing them. Financial assets are measured at amortised cost and arise principally through intercompany
balances being amounts from other Group companies in the ordinary course of business, but also incorporate other types of contractual
monetary assets. They are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs. The Company holds the intercompany receivables with the
objective to collect the contractual cash flows and therefore measures them subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest rate
method, less provision for impairment.
ECL on intercompany receivables is based on past default experience and an assessment of the future economic environment. ECL and
specific provisions are considered and calculated with reference to the ageing and risk profile of the balances. The Company uses judgement
in making these assumptions and selecting the inputs to the impairment calculations based on the Company’s past history, existing market
conditions as well as forward-looking estimates at the end of each reporting period. Based on past experience and how the Group operates
in relation to intercompany positions, the ECL is negligible because these balances are usually cleared, either through repayment or capital
contribution.
Other receivables consist of amounts generally arising from transactions outside the usual operating activities of the Company such as the
proceeds from disposal of investment. Due to the short-term nature of the other current receivables, their carrying amount is considered
to be the same as their fair value. For the majority of the non-current receivables, the fair values are also not significantly different to their
carrying amounts.
(iv) Derecognition
The Company derecognises a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire, or it transfers the
rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset
are transferred or in which the Company neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and it does not retain
control of the financial asset.
The Company enters into transactions whereby it transfers assets recognised in its balance sheet but retains either all or substantially all of the
risks and rewards of the transferred assets. In these cases, the transferred assets are not derecognised.
(v) Impairment
The Company has assessed all types of financial assets that are subject to the expected credit loss model:
• intercompany receivables; and
• cash and cash equivalents.
For intercompany receivables and cash and cash equivalents, the Company applies the general approach for calculating the expected credit
losses. Due to the short-term nature of these assets (i.e less than 12 months), the Company recognises expected credit losses over the lifetime
ofthe assets.
For cash and cash equivalents, ECL was considered and calculated by reference to Moody’s credit ratings for each financial institution. The
cash and cash equivalents held with banks are all rated with A, based on Moody’s ratings. As a result, the probability of default of each institution
is considered insignificant.
Financial liabilities
(vi) Classification and measurement
Financial liabilities are classified as measured at amortised cost or FVTPL. A financial liability is classified as at FVTPL if it is classified as held for
trading, it is a derivative or it is designated as such on initial recognition. Financial liabilities at FVTPL are measured at fair value and net gains and
losses, including any interest expense, are recognised in profit or loss. Other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortised cost
using the effective interest method. Interest expense and foreign exchange gains and losses are recognised in profit or loss. Any gain or loss on
derecognition is also recognised in profit or loss.
(vii) Derecognition
The Company derecognises a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expired. The Company also derecognises
a financial liability when its terms are modified and the cash flows of the modified liability are substantially different, in which case a new financial
liability based on the modified terms is recognised at fair value.
On derecognition of a financial liability, the difference between the carrying amount extinguished and the consideration paid (including any non-
cash assets transferred or liabilities assumed) is recognised in profit or loss.
220
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 5 – Significant accounting policies continued
Financial liabilities continued
(viii) Offsetting
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the balance sheet when, and only when, the Company
currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the amounts and it intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realise the asset and
settlethe liability simultaneously.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in banks and demand deposits and are carried at amortised cost because: (i) they are held
forcollection of contractual cash flows and those cash flows represent SPP; and (ii) they are not designated at FVTPL.
Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are obligations to pay for goods and services that have been acquired in the ordinary course of business from
suppliers. Trade and other payables are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within one year or less. If not, they are presented
asnon-current liabilities.
Trade and other payables are recognised at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Share capital
Ordinary shares are classified as equity and are stated at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs.
Share buyback
Consideration paid for the share buyback is recognised against the additional paid in capital. Any excess of the consideration paid over
theweighted average price of shares in issue is debited to the retained earnings.
Employee Benefit Trust
Consideration paid/received for the purchase/sale of shares subsequently put in the Employee Benefit Trust, which is controlled by the
Company, is recognised directly in equity. The cost of shares held is presented as a separate reserve (the “Employee Benefit Trust reserve”).
Any excess of the consideration received on the sale of treasury shares over the weighted average cost of the shares sold is credited to
retained earnings.
Note 6 – Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The Company makes certain estimates and assumptions regarding the future. Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated based on
historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. In
the future, actual experience may differ from these estimates and assumptions. The areas requiring the use of estimates and critical judgements
that may potentially have a significant impact on the Company’s earnings and financial position are detailed below.
Estimates and assumptions
Impairment of investment in subsidiary companies
The Company is required to test if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of its investments may not be recoverable.
In making this assessment there were no indicators of impairment evident and as such no impairment of investments in subsidiary companies
has been recognised during the year. Please refer to Note 7 for the breakdown of the impairment to investments.
The assessment considered the following key points on the material investments the Company holds:
• investment in Playtech Holdings Limited and its relevant subsidiaries of €905.3 million includes the Snaitech operations which comfortably
cover the investment value; and
• investment in Playtech Software Limited of €261.9 million; this company holds a significant number of key IP and major activities of the Group
which is the reason why there are no factors indicating there is an impairment.
Impairment of financial assets
Loss allowances for financial assets are based on assumptions about risk of default and expected loss rates. The Company’s financial assets
consist of intercompany receivables and cash and cash equivalents. ECL on cash balances was considered and calculated by reference to
Moody’s credit rating for each financial institution.
Note 7 – Investments in subsidiaries
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Investment in subsidiaries at 1 January 1,201.41,144.2
Additional capital contribution
1
—49.1
Employee stock options 8.113.9
Disposals
3
(0.8)—
Impairments
2
—(5.8)
Investment in subsidiaries at 31 December1,208.71,201.4
1 During 2021 the Group agreed to forgive certain outstanding debt due from subsidiaries with a book value of €49.1 million which has accordingly been treated as additional capital contribution.
2 Impairment for the year ended 31 December 2021 relates to €1.2 million impairment of Playtech Holding Sweden AB Limited and €4.6 million of PTVB Management Limited.
3 In July 2022, the Company completed the disposal of its investment in Finalto Group Limited (formerly known as TradeTech Holdings Limited) realising a profit on disposal of €49.0 million. Out of the
€0.8 million disposals, the €0.4 million relates to PT Gaming Limited which was dissolved during 2022.
221
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
Note 7 – Investments in subsidiaries continued
The details of the investments are as follow:
NameCountry of incorporation
Proportion of voting rights and
ordinary share capital heldNature of business
Playtech Holding Limited (ex. Playtech
Software Limited)
Isle of Man100%Holding company, transferred its activities in 2021 to
PlaytechSoftware Ltd
Video B Holding LimitedBritish Virgin Islands100%Trading company for the Videobet software, owns the
intellectual property rights of Videobet and licenses it
tocustomers
PTVB Management LimitedIsle of Man100%Management company
Technology Trading IOM LimitedIsle of Man100%Holding company, transferred its activities in 2021 to
PlaytechSoftware Ltd
PT Turnkey Services LimitedIsle of Man100%Holding company of the Turnkey Services Group
Playtech Holding Sweden AB LimitedSweden100%Holding company of Mobenga AB
Roxwell Investments LimitedIsle of Man100%Holds the Employee Benefit Trust (2014 EBT)
Factime Investments LtdIsle of Man100%Holding company of Juego Online EAD
VS Technology LimitedUnited Kingdom100%Licensing online gaming software and games to customers in
South America
Playtech Software LimitedUnited Kingdom100%Main trading company from 2021, owns the intellectual
property rights and licenses the software to customers
Playtech Retail LimitedBritish Virgin Islands100%Dormant company
Note 8 – Investment in associate and derivative financial asset
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Investment in associate at 1 January ——
Acquisitions in the year35.3—
Share of loss from associate(0.3)—
Investment in associate at 31 December35.0—
The details of the investment are as follow:
NameCountry of incorporation
Proportion of voting rights
and ordinary share capital heldNature of business
LSports Data Limited Israel30.89%Partners with sportsbooks to create engaging customer oerings by
utilising the most accurate real-time data on a broad range of events
In November 2022, the Company acquired 30.89% of LSports for a total consideration of €36.7 million. A total of €0.3 million was recognised
in relation to the amortisation of intangibles and the release of the deferred tax liability arising on acquisition in the statement of comprehensive
income for the year ended 31 December 2022, with a corresponding entry against the investment in associate. No share of profit was recognised
in the profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2022, as the amount was assessed as insignificant.
Furthermore, the Company has an option to acquire up to 49% (so an additional 18.11%) of the equity of LSports (“LSports Option”). The LSport
Option is exercisable under the following conditions:
• within 90 days from the date of receipt of the LSports audited financial statements for each of the years ending 31 December 2024, 2025
and 2026; or
• at any time until 31 December 2026 subject and immediately prior to the consummation of an Initial Public Offering or Merger & Acquisition
event of LSports.
The fair value of the option at acquisition date was €1.4 million with no change in fair value as at 31 December 2022.
222
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Note 9 – Trade and other receivables
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings770.5895.8
Total non-current770.5895.8
Other receivables9.82.5
Amounts due from subsidiary undertakings5.0205.4
Total current14.8207.9
Management has assessed its receivables from Group companies using a forward-looking expected credit loss model (ECL). During
2022, the Company impaired €2.4 million of receivable from PT Investments GC Inc. given that the latter company also impaired a part of its
externalreceivables.
Included in other receivables above, is a convertible debenture of C$12.25 million (€8.4 million) issued to NorthStar Gaming Inc in December
2022 that will convert into equity and warrants in connection with NorthStar’s proposed reverse takeover (the “RTO”) of Baden Resources Inc.
The fair value of the convertible debenture was assessed as being materially in line with its face value at 31 December 2022. The RTO completed
in March 2023 (refer to Note 15).
Note 10 – Cash and cash equivalents
2022
€’m
2021
€’m
Cash at bank2.537.5
Deposits—0.2
2.537.7
Note 11 – Shareholders’ equity
A. Share capital
Share capital is comprised of no par value shares as follows:
2022
Number of shares
2021
Number of shares
Authorised
1
N/AN/A
Issued and paid up309,294,243309,294,243
1 The Company has no authorised share capital, but it is authorised to issue up to 1,000,000,000 shares of no par value.
The table below shows the movement of the shares:
Shares in issue/
circulation
Number of shares
Treasury shares
Number of shares
Shares held by
2014 EBT
Number of shares
Shares held by
2021 EBT
Number of shares
Tot al
Number of shares
At 1 January 2021297,603,8159,965,8891,724,539—309,294,243
Transfer to EBT—(7,028,339)—7,028,339—
Exercise of options1,640,511—(1,640,511)——
At 31 December 2021/1 January 2022299,244,3262,937,55084,0287,028,339309,294,243
Exercise of options1,743,990—(84,028)(1,659,962)—
At 31 December 2022300,988,3162,937,550—5,368,377309,294,243
B. Employee Benefit Trust
In 2014, the Group established an Employee Benefit Trust (2014 EBT) by acquiring 5,517,241 shares for a total of €48.5 million.
Up to May 2019, the Group could not hold treasury shares under the Company’s memorandum and articles of association and therefore a Group
company, Roxwell Investments Limited, purchased the shares for the Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) through an intercompany loan. Any exercise
of options released shares from the EBT to the outstanding shares of the Company and offset these with the intercompany loan. Following
the change in the memorandum and articles of association, the Company is entitled to hold treasury shares and the EBT is recognised in the
statement of changes in equity of the Company as a separate reserve (the “Employee Benefit Trust”). As noted in the table above, in 2021 the
Company transferred 7,028,339 shares held by the Company in treasury to the Employee Benefit Trust (2021 EBT) for a total of €22.6 million.
223
Playtech plc Annual Report and Financial Statements 2022
Financial Statements
Notes to the Company financial statements continued
Note 11 – Shareholders’ equity continued
B. Employee Benefit Trust continued
2021 EBT
During the year ended 31 December 2022, 1,659,962 shares (2021: Nil) were issued at a cost of €5.4 million (2021: €Nil). As at 31 December 2022,
a balance of 5,368,377 shares (2021: 7,028,339 shares) remains in the 2021 EBT with a cost of €17.2 million (2021: €22.6 million).
2014 EBT
During the year ended 31 December 2022, 84,028 shares (2021: 1,640,511 shares) were issued at a cost of €0.6 million (2021: €13.9 million).
C. Share options exercised
During the year 1,794,438 (2021:1,873,307) share options were exercised, of which 50,448 were cash settled (2021: 232,796).
D. Distribution of dividend
The Company did not pay any dividends during the current year.
E. Reserves
The following describes the nature and purpose of each reserve within owners’ equity:
ReserveDescription and purpose
Additional paid in capitalShare premium (i.e. amount subscribed for share capital in excess of nominal value)
Employee Benefit TrustCost of own shares held in treasury by the trust
Retained earningsCumulative net gains and losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income
Note 12 – Loans and borrowings
The credit facility of the Company is a revolving credit facility (RCF) which has been restructured during the year. The facility has been reduced
from €317.0 million to €277.0 million and is available until October 2025, with an option to extend by 12 months. Interest payable on the loan is
based on SONIA rates (replacing Euro Libor and Libor rates) based on the currency of each withdrawal. Following the announcement of the UK
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) as to the future cessation or loss of representativeness of the 35 Libor benchmark, effective from 1 January
2022, Libor rates were replaced with the SONIA daily rate (Sterling Overnight Index Average). As at the reporting date the credit facility drawn
amounted to €Nil (2021: €167.1 million).
Under the RCF, the covenants are monitored on a regular basis by the finance department, including modelling future projected cash flows under
a number of scenarios to stress-test any risk of covenant breaches, the results of which are reported to management and the Board of Directors.
The covenants are as follows:
• Leverage: Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA 3.5:1 (2021: 3:1)